| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
The driver uses ieee80211_iterate_active_interfaces_atomic()
and ieee80211_iterate_stations_atomic() in several places and does
register accesses in the iterators. This doesn't cope with upcoming
USB support as registers can only be accessed non-atomically.
Split these into a two stage process: First use the atomic iterator
functions to collect all active interfaces or stations on a list, then
iterate over the list non-atomically and call the iterator on each
entry.
Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
Suggested-by: Ping-Ke shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221202081224.2779981-7-s.hauer@pengutronix.de
|
|
Since chip_info has became const table, we must access them via const
pointer to avoid invalid writing.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727065232.28510-1-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
reported by smatch
phy.c:854 rtw_phy_linear_2_db() error: buffer overflow 'db_invert_table[i]'
8 <= 8 (assuming for loop doesn't break)
However, it seems to be a false alarm because we prevent it originally via
if (linear >= db_invert_table[11][7])
return 96; /* maximum 96 dB */
Still, we adjust the code to be more readable and avoid smatch warning.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220727065003.28340-5-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Adding this allows us to get notification when bitrate configuration
of the station changes. Update according parameters to firmware so
the rate control algorithm can work properly.
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220407095858.46807-2-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Register cfg80211_sar_capa with type NL80211_SAR_TYPE_POWER and four
frequency ranges for configurations in unit of 0.25 dBm. And handle
callback set_sar_specs.
Originally, TX power has three main parameters, i.e. power base,
power by rate, and power limit. The formula can be simply considered
as TX power = power base + min(power by rate, power limit). With the
support of SAR which can be treated as another power limit, there is
one more parameter for TX power. And the formula will evolve into
TX power = power base + min(power by rate, power limit, power sar).
Besides, debugfs tx_pwr_tbl is also refined to show SAR information.
The following is an example for the difference.
Before supporting SAR,
-----------------------------------
...
path rate pwr base (byr lmt ) rem
A CCK_1M 66(0x42) 78 -12 ( 12 -12) 0
A CCK_2M 66(0x42) 78 -12 ( 8 -12) 0
...
-----------------------------------
After supporting SAR and making some configurations,
-----------------------------------
...
path rate pwr base (byr lmt sar ) rem
A CCK_1M 62(0x3e) 78 -16 ( 12 -12 -16) 0
A CCK_2M 62(0x3e) 78 -16 ( 8 -12 -16) 0
...
-----------------------------------
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211220093656.65312-1-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Current adaptivity mechanism is achieved in driver, by periodically
referencing the IGI value and then updating related registers.
But we find that this way may halt TX activity too long if huge
and temporary energy is detected frequently. So we move the mechanism
to firmware for immediately reacting this case to recover TX rapidly.
Signed-off-by: Chin-Yen Lee <timlee@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210830072014.12250-5-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Add Energy Detected CCA (EDCCA) mechanism to detect energy on the channel.
And EDCCA support adaptivity mode now. From MIC Ordinance Regulating Radio
Equipment article 49.20, ETSI EN-300-328 and EN-301-893, the device should
be able to dynamically pause TX activity when energy detected on the air.
According to ETSI/JP DFS region, driver will set corresponding threshold
and stop TX activity if the detected energy exceeds the threshold. For now,
we support it on 8822b and 8822c first.
By default, EDCCA mechanism is turned on. For ETSI/JP DFS region, it will
turn to adaptivity mode. However, with adaptivity, if environment is too
noisy, TX may often be halted. So, a debugfs for EDCCA is added. It can
show what EDCCA mode is used currently. And EDCCA mechanism can be turned
on/off through the debugfs while debugging.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210830072014.12250-4-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Mapping table from country code to rtw_regulatory, which manages tx power
limit according to countries, is updated. And mapping architecture is also
upgraded. For more precise control on tx power limit, it allows different
rtw_regulatory for different bands logically. Besides, a helper function
to query rtw_regulatory for current band under current country is provided.
For older chips, some newly added rtw_regulatory may not be configured.
To avoid that those chips have no limit on some countries mapping to a
newer rtw_regulatory after table update, a backward selection mechanism
of rtw_regulatory is introduced. It can help chips use a rtw_regulatory
which has been configured as an alternative of a newer one which is not
configured.
In addition, rtw88 actually doesn't manage channel plans by itself.
Instead, it follows them from stack. So, correct some naming about
chplan with regd, and remove the unnecessary channel control for now.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210830072014.12250-2-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
This feature chooses to transmit with antenna that has better signal
strength periodically under 1ss rate.
It can benefit connection quality in the following cases:
1. User is far away from the AP.
2. The far-field pattern of the antenna showed significant signal
strength difference.
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210426013252.5665-2-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Add CFO tracking, which stands for central frequency offset tracking, to
adjust oscillator to align central frequency of connected AP. Then, it can
yield better performance.
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210416030901.7099-1-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Using a kernel with the Undefined Behaviour Sanity Checker (UBSAN) enabled, the
following array overrun is logged:
================================================================================
UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in /home/finger/wireless-drivers-next/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1789:34
index 5 is out of range for type 'u8 [5]'
CPU: 2 PID: 84 Comm: kworker/u16:3 Tainted: G O 5.12.0-rc5-00086-gd88bba47038e-dirty #651
Hardware name: TOSHIBA TECRA A50-A/TECRA A50-A, BIOS Version 4.50 09/29/2014
Workqueue: phy0 ieee80211_scan_work [mac80211]
Call Trace:
dump_stack+0x64/0x7c
ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
__ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds.cold+0x43/0x48
rtw_get_tx_power_params+0x83a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/0xad0 [rtw_core]
? rtw_pci_read16+0x20/0x20 [rtw_pci]
? check_hw_ready+0x50/0x90 [rtw_core]
rtw_phy_get_tx_power_index+0x4d/0xd0 [rtw_core]
rtw_phy_set_tx_power_level+0xee/0x1b0 [rtw_core]
rtw_set_channel+0xab/0x110 [rtw_core]
rtw_ops_config+0x87/0xc0 [rtw_core]
ieee80211_hw_config+0x9d/0x130 [mac80211]
ieee80211_scan_state_set_channel+0x81/0x170 [mac80211]
ieee80211_scan_work+0x19f/0x2a0 [mac80211]
process_one_work+0x1dd/0x3a0
worker_thread+0x49/0x330
? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0
kthread+0x134/0x150
? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70
ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
================================================================================
The statement where an array is being overrun is shown in the following snippet:
if (rate <= DESC_RATE11M)
tx_power = pwr_idx_2g->cck_base[group];
else
====> tx_power = pwr_idx_2g->bw40_base[group];
The associated arrays are defined in main.h as follows:
struct rtw_2g_txpwr_idx {
u8 cck_base[6];
u8 bw40_base[5];
struct rtw_2g_1s_pwr_idx_diff ht_1s_diff;
struct rtw_2g_ns_pwr_idx_diff ht_2s_diff;
struct rtw_2g_ns_pwr_idx_diff ht_3s_diff;
struct rtw_2g_ns_pwr_idx_diff ht_4s_diff;
};
The problem arises because the value of group is 5 for channel 14. The trivial
increase in the dimension of bw40_base fails as this struct must match the layout of
efuse. The fix is to add the rate as an argument to rtw_get_channel_group() and set
the group for channel 14 to 4 if rate <= DESC_RATE11M.
This patch fixes commit fa6dfe6bff24 ("rtw88: resolve order of tx power setting routines")
Fixes: fa6dfe6bff24 ("rtw88: resolve order of tx power setting routines")
Reported-by: Богдан Пилипенко <bogdan.pylypenko107@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210401192717.28927-1-Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net
|
|
Since firmware can't have proper statistics, driver update the statistics
periodically to firmware to assist in tuning performance.
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326092147.30252-1-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Fix power tracking issue by replacing unnecessary IQ calibration
with LC calibration.
When thermal difference exceeds limitation, let RF circuit adjsut
its characteristic to fit in current environment.
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319054218.3319-6-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
DIG min is expected to be set according to chip. And actually we assigned
it under each chip information. However, we didn't use the setting when we
did DIG process. It is unexpected, so we fix it.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210319054218.3319-4-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
Register rrsr determines the response rate we send.
In field tests, using rate higher than current tx rate could lead
to difficulty for the receiving end to receive management/control
frames. Calculate current modulation level by tx rate then cross out
rate higher than those.
Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210209070755.23019-2-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
In order to help debugging in field, we add some log messages.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201109090123.9254-2-pkshih@realtek.com
|
|
I'm not a standards expert, but this really looks to be undefined
behavior, when chip->dig_cck may be NULL. (And, we're trying to do a
NULL check a few lines down, because some chip variants will use NULL.)
Fixes: fc637a860a82 ("rtw88: 8723d: Set IG register for CCK rate")
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200821211716.1631556-1-briannorris@chromium.org
|
|
Replace the existing /* fall through */ comments and its variants with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough[1].
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v5.7/process/deprecated.html?highlight=fallthrough#implicit-switch-case-fall-through
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200821064959.GA23693@embeddedor
|
|
In the current design, various chip functions and tables
are built into rtw88 core. That causes kernel to load its
functionalities even if a chip isn't currently used. We
plan to make each chip's functionalities a separate
kernel module to reduce rtw88 core. And kernel will be
able to load the necessary.
Before extracting chip functionalities, we export symbols
inside rtw88 core which will be used in chip modules.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200515052327.31874-2-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
When chip's temperature is changed, RF characters are changed. To keep the
characters to be consistent, 8723d uses thermal meter to assist in
calibrating LCK, IQK, crystal and TX power.
A base thermal value is programmed in efuse, all calibration data in
MP process is based on this thermal value. So we calucate the delta of
thermal value between the base value, and use this delta to reference XTAL
and TX power offset tables to know how much we need to adjust.
For IQK and LCK, driver checks if delta of thermal value is over 8, then
they are triggered.
For crystal adjustment, when delta of thermal value is changed, we check
XTAL tables to get offset of XTAL value. If thermal value is larger than
base value, positive table (_p as suffix) is used. Otherwise, we use
negative table (_n as suffix). Then, we add offset to XTAL default value
programmed in efuse, and write sum value to register.
To compensate TX power, there are two hierarchical tables. First level use
delta of thermal value to access eight tables to yield delta of TX power
index. Then, plus base TX power index to get index of BB swing table
(second level tables) where register value is induced.
BB swing table can't deal with all cases, if index of BB swing table is
over the size of the table. In this case, TX AGC is used to compensate the
remnant part. Assume 'upper' is the upper bound of BB swing table, and
'target' is the desired index. Then, we can illustrate them as
compensation method BB swing TX AGC
------------------- -------- --------------
target > upper upper target - upper
target < 0 0 target
otherwise target 0
For debug purpose, add a column 'rem' to tx_pwr_tbl entry, and it looks
like
path rate pwr base (byr lmt ) rem
A CCK_1M 32(0x20) 34 -2 ( 0 -2) 0
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512102621.5148-4-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
IQ calibration is used to calibrate RF characteristic to yield expected
performance. Basically, we do calibration twice and compare the similarity
to determine calibration is good or not, if not we do the third
calibration, and then compare with the results of first and second
calibration. If it still not similar, IQK is failed.
Before doing calibration, we need to backup registers that will be
modified in calibration procedure, and restore these registers after
calibration is done.
A calibration procedure can divided into four sub-procedures that are
S1-TX, S1-RX, S0-TX and S0-RX. Where, S1 and S0 represent to path A and B
respectively. Each sub-procedure configure proper registers, and then
rigger one-shot calibration and poll until completion. For RX calibration,
it needs to do twice one-shot calibration, first one is to yield parameter
used by second one.
The result of TX part is stored for TX power tracking that adjusts TX AGC
to output expected power.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200512102621.5148-3-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
DIG sets only one IG register for most chips, but 8723D need to set
additional register for CCK rate.
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200504105010.10780-8-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
8723D use SIPI to indirectly read RF register instead of directly read,
so introduce a new struct rtw_rf_sipi_addr and new function
rtw_phy_read_rf_sipi(). Since other chips don't use the new function,
only 8723D needs to fill struct rtw_rf_sipi_addr in rtw_chip_info.
Because there are two kinds of functions for reading RF registers now,
change rtw_phy_read_rf() to chip->ops->read_rf() in
rtw_phy_write_rf_reg_sipi() so that we can switch tp proper RF read
functions depends on the type of the chip.
Though 8723D is an 1x1 chip, it has two RF PHY and we can switch to
one of them, and that should be configured properly. Hence, add a
fix_rf_phy_num to struct rtw_chip_info to allow driver to set one of
the PHY's registers for 8723D, even it is only 1x1. Another variable
rf_phy_num is introduced to keep the constraint number of RF path we
can access, and its value is:
rf_phy_num = (fix_rf_phy_num ? fix_rf_phy_num : rf_path_num)
Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200420055054.14592-5-yhchuang@realtek.com
|
|
According to some experiments, the original RF register protection
setting of 8822c cannot perfectly make sure that there is no hardware
PI write (direct) during direct write. Modify the setting so that the
hardware block of PI would be turned off via rtw8822c_rstb_3wire()
during the direct write, to avoid RF register racing.
Note that 8822b uses SIPI write (indirect), so 8822b does not
have such problem.
Signed-off-by: Chien-Hsun Liao <ben.liao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Fixes coccicheck warning:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1437:1-24: WARNING: Assignment of 0/1 to bool variable
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhengbin <zhengbin13@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The checks to see if swing_table->n or swing_table->p are null are
redundant since n and p are arrays and can never be null if
swing_table is non-null. I believe these are redundant checks
and can be safely removed, especially the checks implies that these
are not arrays which can lead to confusion.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Array compared against 0")
Fixes: c97ee3e0bea2 ("rtw88: add power tracking support")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The level of cckpd is from 0 to 4, and it is the index of
array pd_lvl[] and cs_lvl[]. However, the length of both arrays
are 4, which is smaller than the possible maximum input index.
Enumerate cck level to make sure the max level will not be wrong
if new level is added in future.
Fixes: 479c4ee931a6 ("rtw88: add dynamic cck pd mechanism")
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Use proper struct for BB PG tables.
TODO: we need to find a way to store the tables that have
condition values.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
This commit adds several Tx/Rx physical information to phy_info
debugfs for 8822B/8822C. By this debugfs, we can know physical
information, such as Tx/Rx rate, RSSI, EVM,SNR, etc. The
information is gotten from the packets of Tx/Rx path. It has
no impact for the performance of 8822B/8822C.
In the fields, we may meet different kinds of problems, but
we may have no professional instrument to check them. At
this moment, this debugfs is a good tool, and it may provide
useful information for debug.
Signed-off-by: Tsang-Shian Lin <thlin@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The temperature of the chip can affect the output power
of the RF components. Hence driver requires to compensate
the power by adjusting the power index recorded in the
power swing table.
And if the difference of current thermal value to the
default thermal value exceeds a threshold, the RF IQK
should be triggered to re-calibrate the characteristics
of the RF components, to keep the output IQ vectors of
the RF components orthogonal enough.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Chiu <chiu@endlessm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Add macros to see which band we are, based on the current channel.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
These helper functions seems useless. And in some cases
we want to use test_and_[set/clear]_bit, these helpers
will make the code more complicated. So remove them.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
This mechanism reduces the numbers of false alram in cck rate by
dynamically adjusting the value of power threshold and cs_ratio.
We determine the new value by three factors, which are rssi, false alarm
count and igi. Based on these factors, we define the current condition
into five levels. Compared to the previous level, if the level is changed,
we set the new values for power threshold and cs_ratio.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Power amplifiers are not linear components, and require DPK to
reduce its nonlinearity. DPK is called Digital Pre-distortion
Calibration, can be used to compensate the output of power.
DPK tracking is in charge of tracking the thermal changes. And
it then shifts the power curve accordingly, which makes the
power output remains linear even if the PA works in different
temperature.
To perform DPK, the parameter table should also be updated.
And the table will be applied when device is powered on.
Then DPK will reference the values to calibrate.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
We're just trusting that these tables are of the right dimensions, when
we could do better by just using the struct directly. Let's expose the
struct txpwr_lmt_cfg_pair instead.
The table changes were made by using some Vim macros, so that should
help prevent any translation mistakes along the way.
Remaining work: get the 'void *data' out of the generic struct
rtw_table; all of these tables really deserve to be their own data
structure, with proper type fields.
Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Add a structure for power parameters including base,
offset, limit and a function to get tx power parameters.
Then, refine flow to get tx power index through the
function.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Since this macro definition has different values in different chipset,
the current defined macro value is for 8822b. This will cause the
settings of 8822c be incorrect.
Remove RTW_MAX_POWER_INDEX and use max_power_index in struct rtw_chip_info
to make sure the value of different chipset is right.
Signed-off-by: Tzu-En Huang <tehuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
If phy rate is decreased, sub bandwidth may be chosen by RA.
We consider possible power limits and apply the min one;
otherwise, the tx power index may be larger than spec.
And we cross-reference power limits of vht and ht with
20/40M bandwidth in 5G to avoid values are not assigned.
Signed-off-by: Zong-Zhe Yang <kevin_yang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
When we are loading tx power limit from the power limit table, compare
the world-wide limit with the current limit and choose the lowest power
limit for the world-wide power settings.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Tx power limit is stored separately by 2G and 5G.
But driver did not get tx power limit from 5G and causes incorrect tx
power. Check if the channel is beyond 2G and get the corresponding tx
power limit.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The orig variable is taken but not used, remove it
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Rename the function names to make them have the same prefix "rtw_phy"
for the tx power setting routines. Only the function names and
corresponding identation are modified.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The type change from (void *) to (struct rtw_dev *) is redundant.
Just pass the right type and compiler can check that for us.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Some functions that should be static are unnecessarily exposed, remove
their declaration in header file phy.h.
After resolving their declaration order, they can be declared as static.
So this commit changes nothing except the order and marking them static.
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next
Kalle Valu says:
====================
wireless-drivers-next patches for 5.3
First set of patches for 5.3, but not that many patches this time.
This pull request fails to compile with the tip tree due to
ktime_get_boot_ns() API changes there. It should be easy for Linus to
fix it in p54 driver once he pulls this, an example resolution here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625160432.533aa140@canb.auug.org.au
Major changes:
airo
* switch to use skcipher interface
p54
* support boottime in scan results
rtw88
* add fast xmit support
* add random mac address on scan support
rt2x00
* add software watchdog to detect hangs, it's disabled by default
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
|
Collision of writing rf registers could occur if the driver writes
rf registers by direct write while the hardware is writing other rf
registers by pi write simultaneously.
Hardware pi write can be triggered by rf calibrations sometimes, so
the driver can not always write rf registers by direct write
protection. Direct write protection can make sure that there is no
hardware pi write during the direct write.
According to some experiments, if we add direct write protection
when switching channel, the performance of rf calibration will not
be affected.
Signed-off-by: Chien-Hsun Liao <ben.liao@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
Fix sparse warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:851:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_cck_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:852:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ofdm_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:853:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:854:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_ht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:855:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_1s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:856:4: warning: symbol 'rtw_vht_2s_size' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:11:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_c2h_cmd_handle_ext' was not declared. Should it be static?
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/fw.c:50:6: warning: symbol 'rtw_fw_send_h2c_command' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
The new rssi_level should be stored in si, otherwise the rssi_level will
never be updated and get a wrong RA mask, which is calculated by the
rssi level
If a wrong RA mask is chosen, the firmware will pick some *bad rates*.
The most hurtful scene will be in *noisy environment*, such as office or
public area with many APs and users.
The latency would be high and the overall throughput would be only half
or less.
Tested in 2.4G in office area, with this patch the throughput increased
from such as "1x Mbps -> 4x Mbps".
Signed-off-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
My compiler complains about:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_phy_rf_power_2_rssi’:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:430:26: warning: array subscript is above array bounds [-Warray-bounds]
linear = db_invert_table[i][j];
According to comment power_db should be in range 1 ~ 96 .
To fix add check for boundaries before access the array.
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Yan-Hsuan Chuang <yhchuang@realtek.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
|
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch
cases where we are expecting to fall through.
This patch fixes the following warnings:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘rtw_get_channel_group’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:907:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
WARN_ON(1);
^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:908:2: note: here
case 1:
^~~~
In file included from ./include/linux/bcd.h:5,
from drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:5:
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c: In function ‘phy_get_2g_tx_power_index’:
./include/linux/compiler.h:77:22: warning: this statement may fall through [-Wimplicit-fallthrough=]
# define unlikely(x) __builtin_expect(!!(x), 0)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
./include/asm-generic/bug.h:125:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘unlikely’
unlikely(__ret_warn_on); \
^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1021:3: note: in expansion of macro ‘WARN_ON’
WARN_ON(1);
^~~~~~~
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw88/phy.c:1022:2: note: here
case RTW_CHANNEL_WIDTH_20:
^~~~
Warning level 3 was used: -Wimplicit-fallthrough=3
This patch is part of the ongoing efforts to enable
-Wimplicit-fallthrough.
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
|
