summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/damon/vaddr-test.h
blob: bce37c4875402d439895430cc4b35b1b75778f89 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
/*
 * Data Access Monitor Unit Tests
 *
 * Copyright 2019 Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.  All rights reserved.
 *
 * Author: SeongJae Park <sjpark@amazon.de>
 */

#ifdef CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST

#ifndef _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H
#define _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H

#include <kunit/test.h>

static void __link_vmas(struct maple_tree *mt, struct vm_area_struct *vmas,
			ssize_t nr_vmas)
{
	int i;
	MA_STATE(mas, mt, 0, 0);

	if (!nr_vmas)
		return;

	mas_lock(&mas);
	for (i = 0; i < nr_vmas; i++)
		vma_mas_store(&vmas[i], &mas);
	mas_unlock(&mas);
}

/*
 * Test __damon_va_three_regions() function
 *
 * In case of virtual memory address spaces monitoring, DAMON converts the
 * complex and dynamic memory mappings of each target task to three
 * discontiguous regions which cover every mapped areas.  However, the three
 * regions should not include the two biggest unmapped areas in the original
 * mapping, because the two biggest areas are normally the areas between 1)
 * heap and the mmap()-ed regions, and 2) the mmap()-ed regions and stack.
 * Because these two unmapped areas are very huge but obviously never accessed,
 * covering the region is just a waste.
 *
 * '__damon_va_three_regions() receives an address space of a process.  It
 * first identifies the start of mappings, end of mappings, and the two biggest
 * unmapped areas.  After that, based on the information, it constructs the
 * three regions and returns.  For more detail, refer to the comment of
 * 'damon_init_regions_of()' function definition in 'mm/damon.c' file.
 *
 * For example, suppose virtual address ranges of 10-20, 20-25, 200-210,
 * 210-220, 300-305, and 307-330 (Other comments represent this mappings in
 * more short form: 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330) of a process are
 * mapped.  To cover every mappings, the three regions should start with 10,
 * and end with 305.  The process also has three unmapped areas, 25-200,
 * 220-300, and 305-307.  Among those, 25-200 and 220-300 are the biggest two
 * unmapped areas, and thus it should be converted to three regions of 10-25,
 * 200-220, and 300-330.
 */
static void damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas(struct kunit *test)
{
	static struct mm_struct mm;
	struct damon_addr_range regions[3] = {0,};
	/* 10-20-25, 200-210-220, 300-305, 307-330 */
	struct vm_area_struct vmas[] = {
		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 10, .vm_end = 20},
		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 20, .vm_end = 25},
		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 200, .vm_end = 210},
		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 210, .vm_end = 220},
		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 300, .vm_end = 305},
		(struct vm_area_struct) {.vm_start = 307, .vm_end = 330},
	};

	mt_init_flags(&mm.mm_mt, MM_MT_FLAGS);
	__link_vmas(&mm.mm_mt, vmas, ARRAY_SIZE(vmas));

	__damon_va_three_regions(&mm, regions);

	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 10ul, regions[0].start);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 25ul, regions[0].end);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 200ul, regions[1].start);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 220ul, regions[1].end);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 300ul, regions[2].start);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 330ul, regions[2].end);
}

static struct damon_region *__nth_region_of(struct damon_target *t, int idx)
{
	struct damon_region *r;
	unsigned int i = 0;

	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
		if (i++ == idx)
			return r;
	}

	return NULL;
}

/*
 * Test 'damon_set_regions()'
 *
 * test			kunit object
 * regions		an array containing start/end addresses of current
 *			monitoring target regions
 * nr_regions		the number of the addresses in 'regions'
 * three_regions	The three regions that need to be applied now
 * expected		start/end addresses of monitoring target regions that
 *			'three_regions' are applied
 * nr_expected		the number of addresses in 'expected'
 *
 * The memory mapping of the target processes changes dynamically.  To follow
 * the change, DAMON periodically reads the mappings, simplifies it to the
 * three regions, and updates the monitoring target regions to fit in the three
 * regions.  The update of current target regions is the role of
 * 'damon_set_regions()'.
 *
 * This test passes the given target regions and the new three regions that
 * need to be applied to the function and check whether it updates the regions
 * as expected.
 */
static void damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(struct kunit *test,
				unsigned long *regions, int nr_regions,
				struct damon_addr_range *three_regions,
				unsigned long *expected, int nr_expected)
{
	struct damon_target *t;
	struct damon_region *r;
	int i;

	t = damon_new_target();
	for (i = 0; i < nr_regions / 2; i++) {
		r = damon_new_region(regions[i * 2], regions[i * 2 + 1]);
		damon_add_region(r, t);
	}

	damon_set_regions(t, three_regions, 3);

	for (i = 0; i < nr_expected / 2; i++) {
		r = __nth_region_of(t, i);
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, expected[i * 2]);
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, expected[i * 2 + 1]);
	}
}

/*
 * This function test most common case where the three big regions are only
 * slightly changed.  Target regions should adjust their boundary (10-20-30,
 * 50-55, 70-80, 90-100) to fit with the new big regions or remove target
 * regions (57-79) that now out of the three regions.
 */
static void damon_test_apply_three_regions1(struct kunit *test)
{
	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
	/* 5-27, 45-55, 73-104 */
	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 45, .end = 55},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 73, .end = 104} };
	/* 5-20-27, 45-55, 73-80-90-104 */
	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 45, 55,
				73, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};

	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
}

/*
 * Test slightly bigger change.  Similar to above, but the second big region
 * now require two target regions (50-55, 57-59) to be removed.
 */
static void damon_test_apply_three_regions2(struct kunit *test)
{
	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
	/* 5-27, 56-57, 65-104 */
	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 56, .end = 57},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
	/* 5-20-27, 56-57, 65-80-90-104 */
	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 56, 57,
				65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};

	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
}

/*
 * Test a big change.  The second big region has totally freed and mapped to
 * different area (50-59 -> 61-63).  The target regions which were in the old
 * second big region (50-55-57-59) should be removed and new target region
 * covering the second big region (61-63) should be created.
 */
static void damon_test_apply_three_regions3(struct kunit *test)
{
	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
	/* 5-27, 61-63, 65-104 */
	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 27},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 61, .end = 63},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 104} };
	/* 5-20-27, 61-63, 65-80-90-104 */
	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 20, 20, 27, 61, 63,
				65, 80, 80, 90, 90, 104};

	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
}

/*
 * Test another big change.  Both of the second and third big regions (50-59
 * and 70-100) has totally freed and mapped to different area (30-32 and
 * 65-68).  The target regions which were in the old second and third big
 * regions should now be removed and new target regions covering the new second
 * and third big regions should be created.
 */
static void damon_test_apply_three_regions4(struct kunit *test)
{
	/* 10-20-30, 50-55-57-59, 70-80-90-100 */
	unsigned long regions[] = {10, 20, 20, 30, 50, 55, 55, 57, 57, 59,
				70, 80, 80, 90, 90, 100};
	/* 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */
	struct damon_addr_range new_three_regions[3] = {
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 5, .end = 7},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 30, .end = 32},
		(struct damon_addr_range){.start = 65, .end = 68} };
	/* expect 5-7, 30-32, 65-68 */
	unsigned long expected[] = {5, 7, 30, 32, 65, 68};

	damon_do_test_apply_three_regions(test, regions, ARRAY_SIZE(regions),
			new_three_regions, expected, ARRAY_SIZE(expected));
}

static void damon_test_split_evenly_fail(struct kunit *test,
		unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
{
	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target();
	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);

	damon_add_region(r, t);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), -EINVAL);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), 1u);

	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.start, start);
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
	}

	damon_free_target(t);
}

static void damon_test_split_evenly_succ(struct kunit *test,
	unsigned long start, unsigned long end, unsigned int nr_pieces)
{
	struct damon_target *t = damon_new_target();
	struct damon_region *r = damon_new_region(start, end);
	unsigned long expected_width = (end - start) / nr_pieces;
	unsigned long i = 0;

	damon_add_region(r, t);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
			damon_va_evenly_split_region(t, r, nr_pieces), 0);
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_nr_regions(t), nr_pieces);

	damon_for_each_region(r, t) {
		if (i == nr_pieces - 1) {
			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
				r->ar.start, start + i * expected_width);
			KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, end);
			break;
		}
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test,
				r->ar.start, start + i++ * expected_width);
		KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, r->ar.end, start + i * expected_width);
	}
	damon_free_target(t);
}

static void damon_test_split_evenly(struct kunit *test)
{
	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, damon_va_evenly_split_region(NULL, NULL, 5),
			-EINVAL);

	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 0, 100, 0);
	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 0, 100, 10);
	damon_test_split_evenly_succ(test, 5, 59, 5);
	damon_test_split_evenly_fail(test, 5, 6, 2);
}

static struct kunit_case damon_test_cases[] = {
	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_three_regions_in_vmas),
	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions1),
	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions2),
	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions3),
	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_apply_three_regions4),
	KUNIT_CASE(damon_test_split_evenly),
	{},
};

static struct kunit_suite damon_test_suite = {
	.name = "damon-operations",
	.test_cases = damon_test_cases,
};
kunit_test_suite(damon_test_suite);

#endif /* _DAMON_VADDR_TEST_H */

#endif	/* CONFIG_DAMON_VADDR_KUNIT_TEST */