| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
reclaim_period_ms used to be positive only but the commit 0001725d0f9b
("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input
validation") incorrectly changed it to non-negative validation.
Change validation to allow only positive input.
Fixes: 0001725d0f9b ("KVM: selftests: Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() for input validation")
Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Reported-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Message-Id: <20230111183408.104491-1-vipinsh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Many KVM selftests take command line arguments which are supposed to be
positive (>0) or non-negative (>=0). Some tests do these validation and
some missed adding the check.
Add atoi_positive() and atoi_non_negative() to validate inputs in
selftests before proceeding to use those values.
Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191719.1559407-7-vipinsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
|
|
atoi() doesn't detect errors. There is no way to know that a 0 return
is correct conversion or due to an error.
Introduce atoi_paranoid() to detect errors and provide correct
conversion. Replace all atoi() calls with atoi_paranoid().
Signed-off-by: Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>
Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103191719.1559407-4-vipinsh@google.com
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
|
|
KVM x86 updates for 6.1, batch #2:
- Misc PMU fixes and cleanups.
- Fixes for Hyper-V hypercall selftest
|
|
Map the test's huge page region with 2MiB virtual mappings when TDP is
disabled so that KVM can shadow the region with huge pages. This fixes
nx_huge_pages_test on hosts where TDP hardware support is disabled.
Purposely do not skip this test on TDP-disabled hosts. While we don't
care about NX Huge Pages on TDP-disabled hosts from a security
perspective, KVM does support it, and so we should test it.
For TDP-enabled hosts, continue mapping the region with 4KiB pages to
ensure that KVM can map it with huge pages irrespective of the guest
mappings.
Fixes: 8448ec5993be ("KVM: selftests: Add NX huge pages test")
Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220929181207.2281449-4-dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Require KVM_CAP_VM_DISABLE_NX_HUGE_PAGES for the entire NX hugepage test
instead of skipping the "disable" subtest if the capability isn't
supported by the host kernel. While the "enable" subtest does provide
value when the capability isn't supported, silently providing only half
the promised coveraged is undesirable, i.e. it's better to skip the test
so that the user knows something.
Alternatively, the test could print something to alert the user instead
of silently skipping the subtest, but that would encourage other tests
to follow suit, and it's not clear that it's desirable to take selftests
in that direction. And if selftests do head down the path of skipping
subtests, such behavior needs first-class support in the framework.
Opportunistically convert other test preconditions to TEST_REQUIRE().
Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220812175301.3915004-1-oliver.upton@linux.dev
[sean: rewrote changelog to capture discussion about skipping the test]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Add an argument to the NX huge pages test to test disabling the feature
on a VM using the new capability.
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220613212523.3436117-10-bgardon@google.com>
[Handle failure of sudo or setcap more gracefully. - Paolo]
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
There's currently no test coverage of NX hugepages in KVM selftests, so
add a basic test to ensure that the feature works as intended.
The test creates a VM with a data slot backed with huge pages. The
memory in the data slot is filled with op-codes for the return
instruction. The guest then executes a series of accesses on the memory,
some reads, some instruction fetches. After each operation, the guest
exits and the test performs some checks on the backing page counts to
ensure that NX page splitting an reclaim work as expected.
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Message-Id: <20220613212523.3436117-7-bgardon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
