summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/asm-generic/access_ok.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-02-25uaccess: remove CONFIG_SET_FSArnd Bergmann1-13/+1
There are no remaining callers of set_fs(), so CONFIG_SET_FS can be removed globally, along with the thread_info field and any references to it. This turns access_ok() into a cheaper check against TASK_SIZE_MAX. As CONFIG_SET_FS is now gone, drop all remaining references to set_fs()/get_fs(), mm_segment_t, user_addr_max() and uaccess_kernel(). Acked-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> # for sparc32 changes Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Tested-by: Sergey Matyukevich <sergey.matyukevich@synopsys.com> # for arc changes Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> # [openrisc, asm-generic] Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
2022-02-25uaccess: generalize access_ok()Arnd Bergmann1-0/+60
There are many different ways that access_ok() is defined across architectures, but in the end, they all just compare against the user_addr_max() value or they accept anything. Provide one definition that works for most architectures, checking against TASK_SIZE_MAX for user processes or skipping the check inside of uaccess_kernel() sections. For architectures without CONFIG_SET_FS(), this should be the fastest check, as it comes down to a single comparison of a pointer against a compile-time constant, while the architecture specific versions tend to do something more complex for historic reasons or get something wrong. Type checking for __user annotations is handled inconsistently across architectures, but this is easily simplified as well by using an inline function that takes a 'const void __user *' argument. A handful of callers need an extra __user annotation for this. Some architectures had trick to use 33-bit or 65-bit arithmetic on the addresses to calculate the overflow, however this simpler version uses fewer registers, which means it can produce better object code in the end despite needing a second (statically predicted) branch. Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> [arm64, asm-generic] Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> Acked-by: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com> Acked-by: Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>