summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/riscv/errata
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-10-27drivers/perf: riscv_pmu_sbi: add support for PMU variant on T-Head C9xx coresHeiko Stuebner1-0/+19
With the T-HEAD C9XX cores being designed before or during the ratification to the SSCOFPMF extension, it implements functionality very similar but not equal to it. It implements overflow handling and also some privilege-mode filtering. While SSCOFPMF supports this for all modes, the C9XX only implements the filtering for M-mode and S-mode but not user-mode. So add some adaptions to allow the C9XX to still handle its PMU through the regular SBI PMU interface instead of defining new interfaces or drivers. To work properly, this requires a matching change in SBI, though the actual interface between kernel and SBI does not change. The main differences are a the overflow CSR and irq number. As the reading of the overflow-csr is in the hot-path during irq handling, use an errata and alternatives to not introduce new conditionals there. Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221011231841.2951264-2-heiko@sntech.de/ Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-10-13Merge patch series "Some style cleanups for recent extension additions"Palmer Dabbelt1-6/+8
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> says: As noted by some people, some parts of the recently added extensions (svpbmt, zicbom) + t-head errata could use some styling upgrades. So this series provides these. changes in v2: - add patch also converting cpufeature probe to BIT() - update commit message in patch1 (Conor) Heiko Stuebner (5): riscv: cleanup svpbmt cpufeature probing riscv: drop some idefs from CMO initialization riscv: use BIT() macros in t-head errata init riscv: use BIT() marco for cpufeature probing riscv: check for kernel config option in t-head memory types errata arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 14 ++++++----- arch/riscv/include/asm/cacheflush.h | 2 ++ arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 39 ++++++++++++----------------- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-1-heiko@sntech.de * b4-shazam-merge: riscv: check for kernel config option in t-head memory types errata riscv: use BIT() marco for cpufeature probing riscv: use BIT() macros in t-head errata init riscv: drop some idefs from CMO initialization riscv: cleanup svpbmt cpufeature probing Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-10-13riscv: check for kernel config option in t-head memory types errataHeiko Stuebner1-0/+3
The t-head variant of page-based memory types should also check first for the enabled kernel config option. Fixes: a35707c3d850 ("riscv: add memory-type errata for T-Head") Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-6-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-10-13riscv: use BIT() macros in t-head errata initHeiko Stuebner1-2/+2
Using the appropriate BIT macro makes the code better readable. Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-4-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-10-13riscv: drop some idefs from CMO initializationHeiko Stuebner1-4/+3
Wrapping things in #ifdefs makes the code harder to read while we also have IS_ENABLED() macros to do this in regular code and the extension detection is not _that_ runtime critical. So define a stub for riscv_noncoherent_supported() in the non-CONFIG_RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT case and move the code to us IS_ENABLED. Suggested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-3-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-09-13RISC-V: Clean up the Zicbom block size probingPalmer Dabbelt1-0/+1
This fixes two issues: I truncated the warning's hart ID when porting to the 64-bit hart ID code, and the original code's warning handling could fire on an uninitialized hart ID. The biggest change here is that riscv_cbom_block_size is no longer initialized, as IMO the default isn't sane: there's nothing in the ISA that mandates any specific cache block size, so falling back to one will just silently produce the wrong answer on some systems. This also changes the probing order so the cache block size is known before enabling Zicbom support. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org CC: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> CC: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> CC: Atish Patra <atishp@rivosinc.com> Fixes: 3aefb2ee5bdd ("riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variant") Fixes: 1631ba1259d6 ("riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Reported-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com> [Conor: fixed the redefinition errors] Tested-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220912224800.998121-1-mail@conchuod.ie Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-08-10riscv: implement Zicbom-based CMO instructions + the t-head variantPalmer Dabbelt1-0/+20
This series is based on the alternatives changes done in my svpbmt series and thus also depends on Atish's isa-extension parsing series. It implements using the cache-management instructions from the Zicbom- extension to handle cache flush, etc actions on platforms needing them. SoCs using cpu cores from T-Head like the Allwinne D1 implement a different set of cache instructions. But while they are different, instructions they provide the same functionality, so a variant can easly hook into the existing alternatives mechanism on those. [Palmer: Some minor fixups, including a RISCV_ISA_ZICBOM dependency on MMU that's probably not strictly necessary. The Zicbom support will trip up sparse for users that have new toolchains, I just sent a patch.] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220706231536.2041855-1-heiko@sntech.de/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sparse/20220811033138.20676-1-palmer@rivosinc.com/T/#u * palmer/riscv-zicbom: riscv: implement cache-management errata for T-Head SoCs riscv: Add support for non-coherent devices using zicbom extension dt-bindings: riscv: document cbom-block-size of: also handle dma-noncoherent in of_dma_is_coherent()
2022-08-06Merge tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.20-mw0' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-26/+12
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux Pull RISC-V updates from Palmer Dabbelt: - Enabling the FPU is now a static_key - Improvements to the Svpbmt support - CPU topology bindings for a handful of systems - Support for systems with 64-bit hart IDs - Many settings have been enabled in the defconfig, including both support for the StarFive systems and many of the Docker requirements There are also a handful of cleanups and improvements, as usual. * tag 'riscv-for-linus-5.20-mw0' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/riscv/linux: (28 commits) riscv: enable Docker requirements in defconfig riscv: convert the t-head pbmt errata to use the __nops macro riscv: introduce nops and __nops macros for NOP sequences RISC-V: Add fast call path of crash_kexec() riscv: mmap with PROT_WRITE but no PROT_READ is invalid riscv/efi_stub: Add 64bit boot-hartid support on RV64 riscv: cpu: Add 64bit hartid support on RV64 riscv: smp: Add 64bit hartid support on RV64 riscv: spinwait: Fix hartid variable type riscv: cpu_ops_sbi: Add 64bit hartid support on RV64 riscv: dts: sifive: "fix" pmic watchdog node name riscv: dts: canaan: Add k210 topology information riscv: dts: sifive: Add fu740 topology information riscv: dts: sifive: Add fu540 topology information riscv: dts: starfive: Add JH7100 CPU topology RISC-V: Add CONFIG_{NON,}PORTABLE riscv: config: enable SOC_STARFIVE in defconfig riscv: dts: microchip: Add mpfs' topology information riscv: Kconfig.socs: Add comments riscv: Kconfig.erratas: Add comments ...
2022-08-03riscv: implement cache-management errata for T-Head SoCsHeiko Stuebner1-0/+20
The T-Head C906 and C910 implement a scheme for handling cache operations different from the generic Zicbom extension. Add an errata for it next to the generic dma coherency ops. Reviewed-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220706231536.2041855-5-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-07-07riscv: don't warn for sifive erratas in modulesHeiko Stuebner1-1/+2
The SiFive errata code contains code checking applicable erratas vs. actually applied erratas to suggest missing erratas to the user when their Kconfig options are not enabled. In the main kernel image one can be quite sure that all available erratas appear at least once, so that check will succeed. On the other hand modules can very well not use any errata-relevant code, so the newly added module-alternative support may also patch the module code, but not touch SiFive-specific erratas at all. So to restore the original behaviour don't warn when patching modules. This will keep the warning if necessary for the main kernel image but prevent spurious warnings for modules. Of course having such a vendor-specific warning may not be needed at all, as CONFIG_ERRATA_SIFIVE is selected by CONFIG_SOC_SIFIVE and the individual erratas are default-y so disabling them requires deliberate action anyway. But for now just restore the old behaviour. Fixes: a8e910168bba ("riscv: implement module alternatives") Reported-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220608120849.1695191-1-heiko@sntech.de Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-06-16riscv: remove usage of function-pointers from cpufeatures and t-head errataHeiko Stuebner1-26/+12
Having a list of alternatives to check with a per-entry function pointer to a check function is nice style-wise. But in case of early-alternatives it can clash with the non-relocated kernel and the function pointer in the list pointing to a completely wrong location. This isn't an issue with one or two list entries, as in that case the compiler seems to unroll the loop and even usage of the list structure and then only does relative jumps into the check functions based on this. When adding a third entry to either list though, the issue that was hiding there from the beginning is triggered resulting a jump to a memory address that isn't part of the kernel at all. The list of features/erratas only contained an unused name and the pointer to the check function, so an easy solution for the problem is to just unroll the loop in code, dismantle the whole list structure and just call the relevant check functions one by one ourself. For the T-Head errata this includes moving the stage-check inside the check functions. The issue is only relevant for things that might be called for early- alternatives (T-Head and possible future main extensions), so the SiFive erratas were not affected from the beginning, as they got an early return for early-alternatives in the original patchset. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220526205646.258337-6-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-05-11riscv: add memory-type errata for T-HeadHeiko Stuebner4-1/+100
Some current cpus based on T-Head cores implement memory-types way different than described in the svpbmt spec even going so far as using PTE bits marked as reserved. Add the T-Head vendor-id and necessary errata code to replace the affected instructions. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Tested-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511192921.2223629-13-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-05-11riscv: implement module alternativesHeiko Stuebner1-5/+9
This allows alternatives to also be applied when loading modules and follows the implementation of other architectures (e.g. arm64). Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511192921.2223629-4-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-05-11riscv: allow different stages with alternativesHeiko Stuebner1-1/+2
Future features may need to be applied at a different time during boot, so allow defining stages for alternatives and handling them differently depending on the stage. Also make the alternatives-location more flexible so that future stages may provide their own location. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511192921.2223629-3-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-05-11riscv: integrate alternatives better into the main architectureHeiko Stuebner2-76/+0
Right now the alternatives need to be explicitly enabled and erratas are limited to SiFive ones. We want to use alternatives not only for patching soc erratas, but in the future also for handling different behaviour depending on the existence of future extensions. So move the core alternatives over to the kernel subdirectory and move the CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE to be a hidden symbol which we expect relevant erratas and extensions to just select if needed. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Philipp Tomsich <philipp.tomsich@vrull.eu> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511192921.2223629-2-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2022-01-09riscv: errata: alternative: mark vendor_patch_func __initdataJisheng Zhang1-1/+2
The function pointer vendor_patch_func is only used during init, so mark it as __initdata. Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
2021-06-01riscv: skip errata_cip_453.o if CONFIG_ERRATA_SIFIVE_CIP_453 is disabledVincent1-1/+1
The errata_cip_453.o should be built only when the Kconfig CONFIG_ERRATA_SIFIVE_CIP_453 is enabled. Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vincent <vincent.chen@sifive.com> Fixes: 0e0d4992517f ("riscv: enable SiFive errata CIP-453 and CIP-1200 Kconfig only if CONFIG_64BIT=y") Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
2021-04-26riscv: sifive: Apply errata "cip-1200" patchVincent Chen1-0/+18
For certain SiFive CPUs, "sfence.vma addr" cannot exactly flush addr from TLB in the particular cases. The details could be found here: https://sifive.cdn.prismic.io/sifive/167a1a56-03f4-4615-a79e-b2a86153148f_FU740_errata_20210205.pdf In order to ensure the functionality, this patch uses the Alternative scheme to replace all "sfence.vma addr" with "sfence.vma" at runtime. Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
2021-04-26riscv: sifive: Apply errata "cip-453" patchVincent Chen3-0/+59
Add sign extension to the $badaddr before addressing the instruction page fault and instruction access fault to workaround the issue "cip-453". To avoid affecting the existing code sequence, this patch will creates two trampolines to add sign extension to the $badaddr. By the "alternative" mechanism, these two trampolines will replace the original exception handler of instruction page fault and instruction access fault in the excp_vect_table. In this case, only the specific SiFive CPU core jumps to the do_page_fault and do_trap_insn_fault through these two trampolines. Other CPUs are not affected. Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
2021-04-26riscv: sifive: Add SiFive alternative portsVincent Chen4-0/+75
Add required ports of the Alternative scheme for SiFive. Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
2021-04-26riscv: Introduce alternative mechanism to apply errata solutionVincent Chen2-0/+70
Introduce the "alternative" mechanism from ARM64 and x86 to apply the CPU vendors' errata solution at runtime. The main purpose of this patch is to provide a framework. Therefore, the implementation is quite basic for now so that some scenarios could not use this schemei, such as patching code to a module, relocating the patching code and heterogeneous CPU topology. Users could use the macro ALTERNATIVE to apply an errata to the existing code flow. In the macro ALTERNATIVE, users need to specify the manufacturer information(vendorid, archid, and impid) for this errata. Therefore, kernel will know this errata is suitable for which CPU core. During the booting procedure, kernel will select the errata required by the CPU core and then patch it. It means that the kernel only applies the errata to the specified CPU core. In this case, the vendor's errata does not affect each other at runtime. The above patching procedure only occurs during the booting phase, so we only take the overhead of the "alternative" mechanism once. This "alternative" mechanism is enabled by default to ensure that all required errata will be applied. However, users can disable this feature by the Kconfig "CONFIG_RISCV_ERRATA_ALTERNATIVE". Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen <vincent.chen@sifive.com> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>