diff options
author | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-12-16 11:30:10 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2020-12-16 11:30:10 -0800 |
commit | e994cc240a3b75744c33ca9b8d74f71f0fcd8852 (patch) | |
tree | 10809f00d4cbb97bff138301b21edfacf8b129af /tools | |
parent | ba1d41a55e4d07c7b27ee2f6e7cf5b5348849261 (diff) | |
parent | 2c07343abd8932200a45ff7b10950e71081e9e77 (diff) | |
download | linux-e994cc240a3b75744c33ca9b8d74f71f0fcd8852.tar.bz2 |
Merge tag 'seccomp-v5.11-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux
Pull seccomp updates from Kees Cook:
"The major change here is finally gaining seccomp constant-action
bitmaps, which internally reduces the seccomp overhead for many
real-world syscall filters to O(1), as discussed at Plumbers this
year.
- Improve seccomp performance via constant-action bitmaps (YiFei Zhu
& Kees Cook)
- Fix bogus __user annotations (Jann Horn)
- Add missed CONFIG for improved selftest coverage (Mickaël Salaün)"
* tag 'seccomp-v5.11-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux:
selftests/seccomp: Update kernel config
seccomp: Remove bogus __user annotations
seccomp/cache: Report cache data through /proc/pid/seccomp_cache
xtensa: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
sh: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
s390: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
riscv: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
powerpc: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
parisc: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
csky: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
arm: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
arm64: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
selftests/seccomp: Compare bitmap vs filter overhead
x86: Enable seccomp architecture tracking
seccomp/cache: Add "emulator" to check if filter is constant allow
seccomp/cache: Lookup syscall allowlist bitmap for fast path
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/config | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c | 151 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings | 2 |
3 files changed, 131 insertions, 23 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/config b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/config index 64c19d8eba79..ad431a5178fb 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/config +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/config @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@ +CONFIG_PID_NS=y CONFIG_SECCOMP=y CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER=y CONFIG_USER_NS=y diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c index 91f5a89cadac..fcc806585266 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/seccomp_benchmark.c @@ -4,12 +4,16 @@ */ #define _GNU_SOURCE #include <assert.h> +#include <limits.h> +#include <stdbool.h> +#include <stddef.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <time.h> #include <unistd.h> #include <linux/filter.h> #include <linux/seccomp.h> +#include <sys/param.h> #include <sys/prctl.h> #include <sys/syscall.h> #include <sys/types.h> @@ -70,18 +74,74 @@ unsigned long long calibrate(void) return samples * seconds; } +bool approx(int i_one, int i_two) +{ + double one = i_one, one_bump = one * 0.01; + double two = i_two, two_bump = two * 0.01; + + one_bump = one + MAX(one_bump, 2.0); + two_bump = two + MAX(two_bump, 2.0); + + /* Equal to, or within 1% or 2 digits */ + if (one == two || + (one > two && one <= two_bump) || + (two > one && two <= one_bump)) + return true; + return false; +} + +bool le(int i_one, int i_two) +{ + if (i_one <= i_two) + return true; + return false; +} + +long compare(const char *name_one, const char *name_eval, const char *name_two, + unsigned long long one, bool (*eval)(int, int), unsigned long long two) +{ + bool good; + + printf("\t%s %s %s (%lld %s %lld): ", name_one, name_eval, name_two, + (long long)one, name_eval, (long long)two); + if (one > INT_MAX) { + printf("Miscalculation! Measurement went negative: %lld\n", (long long)one); + return 1; + } + if (two > INT_MAX) { + printf("Miscalculation! Measurement went negative: %lld\n", (long long)two); + return 1; + } + + good = eval(one, two); + printf("%s\n", good ? "✔️" : "❌"); + + return good ? 0 : 1; +} + int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { + struct sock_filter bitmap_filter[] = { + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, nr)), + BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), + }; + struct sock_fprog bitmap_prog = { + .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(bitmap_filter), + .filter = bitmap_filter, + }; struct sock_filter filter[] = { + BPF_STMT(BPF_LD|BPF_W|BPF_ABS, offsetof(struct seccomp_data, args[0])), BPF_STMT(BPF_RET|BPF_K, SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW), }; struct sock_fprog prog = { .len = (unsigned short)ARRAY_SIZE(filter), .filter = filter, }; - long ret; - unsigned long long samples; - unsigned long long native, filter1, filter2; + + long ret, bits; + unsigned long long samples, calc; + unsigned long long native, filter1, filter2, bitmap1, bitmap2; + unsigned long long entry, per_filter1, per_filter2; printf("Current BPF sysctl settings:\n"); system("sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable"); @@ -101,35 +161,82 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) ret = prctl(PR_SET_NO_NEW_PRIVS, 1, 0, 0, 0); assert(ret == 0); - /* One filter */ - ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &prog); + /* One filter resulting in a bitmap */ + ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &bitmap_prog); assert(ret == 0); - filter1 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; - printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter: %llu ns\n", filter1); + bitmap1 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 1 filter (bitmap): %llu ns\n", bitmap1); + + /* Second filter resulting in a bitmap */ + ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &bitmap_prog); + assert(ret == 0); - if (filter1 == native) - printf("No overhead measured!? Try running again with more samples.\n"); + bitmap2 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters (bitmap): %llu ns\n", bitmap2); - /* Two filters */ + /* Third filter, can no longer be converted to bitmap */ ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &prog); assert(ret == 0); - filter2 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; - printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 2 filters: %llu ns\n", filter2); - - /* Calculations */ - printf("Estimated total seccomp overhead for 1 filter: %llu ns\n", - filter1 - native); + filter1 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 3 filters (full): %llu ns\n", filter1); - printf("Estimated total seccomp overhead for 2 filters: %llu ns\n", - filter2 - native); + /* Fourth filter, can not be converted to bitmap because of filter 3 */ + ret = prctl(PR_SET_SECCOMP, SECCOMP_MODE_FILTER, &bitmap_prog); + assert(ret == 0); - printf("Estimated seccomp per-filter overhead: %llu ns\n", - filter2 - filter1); + filter2 = timing(CLOCK_PROCESS_CPUTIME_ID, samples) / samples; + printf("getpid RET_ALLOW 4 filters (full): %llu ns\n", filter2); + + /* Estimations */ +#define ESTIMATE(fmt, var, what) do { \ + var = (what); \ + printf("Estimated " fmt ": %llu ns\n", var); \ + if (var > INT_MAX) \ + goto more_samples; \ + } while (0) + + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 1 bitmapped filter", calc, + bitmap1 - native); + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 2 bitmapped filters", calc, + bitmap2 - native); + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 3 full filters", calc, + filter1 - native); + ESTIMATE("total seccomp overhead for 4 full filters", calc, + filter2 - native); + ESTIMATE("seccomp entry overhead", entry, + bitmap1 - native - (bitmap2 - bitmap1)); + ESTIMATE("seccomp per-filter overhead (last 2 diff)", per_filter1, + filter2 - filter1); + ESTIMATE("seccomp per-filter overhead (filters / 4)", per_filter2, + (filter2 - native - entry) / 4); + + printf("Expectations:\n"); + ret |= compare("native", "≤", "1 bitmap", native, le, bitmap1); + bits = compare("native", "≤", "1 filter", native, le, filter1); + if (bits) + goto more_samples; + + ret |= compare("per-filter (last 2 diff)", "≈", "per-filter (filters / 4)", + per_filter1, approx, per_filter2); + + bits = compare("1 bitmapped", "≈", "2 bitmapped", + bitmap1 - native, approx, bitmap2 - native); + if (bits) { + printf("Skipping constant action bitmap expectations: they appear unsupported.\n"); + goto out; + } - printf("Estimated seccomp entry overhead: %llu ns\n", - filter1 - native - (filter2 - filter1)); + ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "1 bitmapped", entry, approx, bitmap1 - native); + ret |= compare("entry", "≈", "2 bitmapped", entry, approx, bitmap2 - native); + ret |= compare("native + entry + (per filter * 4)", "≈", "4 filters total", + entry + (per_filter1 * 4) + native, approx, filter2); + if (ret == 0) + goto out; +more_samples: + printf("Saw unexpected benchmark result. Try running again with more samples?\n"); +out: return 0; } diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings index ba4d85f74cd6..6091b45d226b 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/seccomp/settings @@ -1 +1 @@ -timeout=90 +timeout=120 |