diff options
| author | Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> | 2017-02-24 14:56:02 -0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> | 2017-02-24 17:46:54 -0800 |
| commit | d811914d87576c562e849c00d9f9beff45038801 (patch) | |
| tree | 7f31dbf8e5febb2396b7428d3c821792e5ce9787 /tools | |
| parent | 0262d9c845ec349edf93f69688a5129c36cc2232 (diff) | |
| download | linux-d811914d87576c562e849c00d9f9beff45038801.tar.bz2 | |
userfaultfd: non-cooperative: rename *EVENT_MADVDONTNEED to *EVENT_REMOVE
Patch series "userfaultfd: non-cooperative: add madvise() event for
MADV_REMOVE request".
These patches add notification of madvise(MADV_REMOVE) event to
non-cooperative userfaultfd monitor.
The first pacth renames EVENT_MADVDONTNEED to EVENT_REMOVE along with
relevant functions and structures. Using _REMOVE instead of
_MADVDONTNEED describes the event semantics more clearly and I hope it's
not too late for such change in the ABI.
This patch (of 3):
The UFFD_EVENT_MADVDONTNEED purpose is to notify uffd monitor about
removal of certain range from address space tracked by userfaultfd.
Hence, UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE seems to better reflect the operation
semantics. Respectively, 'madv_dn' field of uffd_msg is renamed to
'remove' and the madvise_userfault_dontneed callback is renamed to
userfaultfd_remove.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1484814154-1557-2-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hillf.zj@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c | 16 |
1 files changed, 8 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c index 5a840a605a16..9eb77df568f7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/userfaultfd.c @@ -398,12 +398,12 @@ static void *uffd_poll_thread(void *arg) uffd = msg.arg.fork.ufd; pollfd[0].fd = uffd; break; - case UFFD_EVENT_MADVDONTNEED: - uffd_reg.range.start = msg.arg.madv_dn.start; - uffd_reg.range.len = msg.arg.madv_dn.end - - msg.arg.madv_dn.start; + case UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE: + uffd_reg.range.start = msg.arg.remove.start; + uffd_reg.range.len = msg.arg.remove.end - + msg.arg.remove.start; if (ioctl(uffd, UFFDIO_UNREGISTER, &uffd_reg.range)) - fprintf(stderr, "madv_dn failure\n"), exit(1); + fprintf(stderr, "remove failure\n"), exit(1); break; case UFFD_EVENT_REMAP: area_dst = (char *)(unsigned long)msg.arg.remap.to; @@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_open(int features) * mremap, the entire monitored area is accessed in a single pass for * HUGETLB_TEST. * The release of the pages currently generates event only for - * anonymous memory (UFFD_EVENT_MADVDONTNEED), hence it is not checked + * anonymous memory (UFFD_EVENT_REMOVE), hence it is not checked * for hugetlb and shmem. */ static int faulting_process(void) @@ -715,14 +715,14 @@ static int userfaultfd_events_test(void) pid_t pid; char c; - printf("testing events (fork, remap, madv_dn): "); + printf("testing events (fork, remap, remove): "); fflush(stdout); if (release_pages(area_dst)) return 1; features = UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_FORK | UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMAP | - UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_MADVDONTNEED; + UFFD_FEATURE_EVENT_REMOVE; if (userfaultfd_open(features) < 0) return 1; fcntl(uffd, F_SETFL, uffd_flags | O_NONBLOCK); |