diff options
author | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2018-12-04 08:18:14 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> | 2018-12-04 08:18:14 -0800 |
commit | 2a95471c3397734ba6869ca3fa084490fb35b40b (patch) | |
tree | 416ce2a6672f6c97c074df80912ec09e2ff0c29c /tools | |
parent | d59dd69d5576d699d7d3f5da0b4738c3a36d0133 (diff) | |
parent | df47fc376df8338fdc9b27a5c9162a08f6e6157c (diff) | |
download | linux-2a95471c3397734ba6869ca3fa084490fb35b40b.tar.bz2 |
Merge branch 'prog_test_run-improvement'
Lorenz Bauer says:
====================
Right now, there is no safe way to use BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN with data_out.
This is because bpf_test_finish copies the output buffer to user space
without checking its size. This can lead to the kernel overwriting
data in user space after the buffer if xdp_adjust_head and friends are
in play.
Thanks to everyone for their advice and patience with this patch set!
Changes in v5:
* Fix up libbpf.map
Changes in v4:
* Document bpf_prog_test_run and bpf_prog_test_run_xattr
* Use struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr for return values
Changes in v3:
* Introduce bpf_prog_test_run_xattr instead of modifying the existing
function
Changes in v2:
* Make the syscall return ENOSPC if data_size_out is too small
* Make bpf_prog_test_run return EINVAL if size_out is missing
* Document the new behaviour of data_size_out
====================
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 7 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 23 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h | 19 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 1 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c | 55 |
5 files changed, 102 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h index 0183b8e70a9e..64262890feb2 100644 --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h @@ -374,8 +374,11 @@ union bpf_attr { struct { /* anonymous struct used by BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN command */ __u32 prog_fd; __u32 retval; - __u32 data_size_in; - __u32 data_size_out; + __u32 data_size_in; /* input: len of data_in */ + __u32 data_size_out; /* input/output: len of data_out + * returns ENOSPC if data_out + * is too small. + */ __aligned_u64 data_in; __aligned_u64 data_out; __u32 repeat; diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c index c19226cccf39..5c3be06bf0dd 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c @@ -463,6 +463,29 @@ int bpf_prog_test_run(int prog_fd, int repeat, void *data, __u32 size, return ret; } +int bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr *test_attr) +{ + union bpf_attr attr; + int ret; + + if (!test_attr->data_out && test_attr->data_size_out > 0) + return -EINVAL; + + bzero(&attr, sizeof(attr)); + attr.test.prog_fd = test_attr->prog_fd; + attr.test.data_in = ptr_to_u64(test_attr->data_in); + attr.test.data_out = ptr_to_u64(test_attr->data_out); + attr.test.data_size_in = test_attr->data_size_in; + attr.test.data_size_out = test_attr->data_size_out; + attr.test.repeat = test_attr->repeat; + + ret = sys_bpf(BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN, &attr, sizeof(attr)); + test_attr->data_size_out = attr.test.data_size_out; + test_attr->retval = attr.test.retval; + test_attr->duration = attr.test.duration; + return ret; +} + int bpf_prog_get_next_id(__u32 start_id, __u32 *next_id) { union bpf_attr attr; diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h index 60392b70587c..098e6f793b76 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.h @@ -118,6 +118,25 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_prog_attach(int prog_fd, int attachable_fd, LIBBPF_API int bpf_prog_detach(int attachable_fd, enum bpf_attach_type type); LIBBPF_API int bpf_prog_detach2(int prog_fd, int attachable_fd, enum bpf_attach_type type); + +struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr { + int prog_fd; + int repeat; + const void *data_in; + __u32 data_size_in; + void *data_out; /* optional */ + __u32 data_size_out; /* in: max length of data_out + * out: length of data_out */ + __u32 retval; /* out: return code of the BPF program */ + __u32 duration; /* out: average per repetition in ns */ +}; + +LIBBPF_API int bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr *test_attr); + +/* + * bpf_prog_test_run does not check that data_out is large enough. Consider + * using bpf_prog_test_run_xattr instead. + */ LIBBPF_API int bpf_prog_test_run(int prog_fd, int repeat, void *data, __u32 size, void *data_out, __u32 *size_out, __u32 *retval, __u32 *duration); diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map index 4fb29f6d7a80..8deff22d61bb 100644 --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.1 { bpf_prog_load_xattr; bpf_prog_query; bpf_prog_test_run; + bpf_prog_test_run_xattr; bpf_program__fd; bpf_program__is_kprobe; bpf_program__is_perf_event; diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c index 1c57abbe0945..26f1fdf3e2bf 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_progs.c @@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ static struct { .tcp.urg_ptr = 123, }; -#define CHECK(condition, tag, format...) ({ \ +#define _CHECK(condition, tag, duration, format...) ({ \ int __ret = !!(condition); \ if (__ret) { \ error_cnt++; \ @@ -83,6 +83,11 @@ static struct { __ret; \ }) +#define CHECK(condition, tag, format...) \ + _CHECK(condition, tag, duration, format) +#define CHECK_ATTR(condition, tag, format...) \ + _CHECK(condition, tag, tattr.duration, format) + static int bpf_find_map(const char *test, struct bpf_object *obj, const char *name) { @@ -124,6 +129,53 @@ static void test_pkt_access(void) bpf_object__close(obj); } +static void test_prog_run_xattr(void) +{ + const char *file = "./test_pkt_access.o"; + struct bpf_object *obj; + char buf[10]; + int err; + struct bpf_prog_test_run_attr tattr = { + .repeat = 1, + .data_in = &pkt_v4, + .data_size_in = sizeof(pkt_v4), + .data_out = buf, + .data_size_out = 5, + }; + + err = bpf_prog_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, &obj, + &tattr.prog_fd); + if (CHECK_ATTR(err, "load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno)) + return; + + memset(buf, 0, sizeof(buf)); + + err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr); + CHECK_ATTR(err != -1 || errno != ENOSPC || tattr.retval, "run", + "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", err, errno, tattr.retval); + + CHECK_ATTR(tattr.data_size_out != sizeof(pkt_v4), "data_size_out", + "incorrect output size, want %lu have %u\n", + sizeof(pkt_v4), tattr.data_size_out); + + CHECK_ATTR(buf[5] != 0, "overflow", + "BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN ignored size hint\n"); + + tattr.data_out = NULL; + tattr.data_size_out = 0; + errno = 0; + + err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr); + CHECK_ATTR(err || errno || tattr.retval, "run_no_output", + "err %d errno %d retval %d\n", err, errno, tattr.retval); + + tattr.data_size_out = 1; + err = bpf_prog_test_run_xattr(&tattr); + CHECK_ATTR(err != -EINVAL, "run_wrong_size_out", "err %d\n", err); + + bpf_object__close(obj); +} + static void test_xdp(void) { struct vip key4 = {.protocol = 6, .family = AF_INET}; @@ -1837,6 +1889,7 @@ int main(void) jit_enabled = is_jit_enabled(); test_pkt_access(); + test_prog_run_xattr(); test_xdp(); test_xdp_adjust_tail(); test_l4lb_all(); |