diff options
author | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-06-05 12:42:19 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2018-06-05 12:42:19 -0400 |
commit | fd129f8941cf2309def29b5c8a23b62faff0c9d0 (patch) | |
tree | 6ad8afbb59eaf14cfa9f0c4bad498254e6ff1e66 /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | |
parent | a6fa9087fc280bba8a045d11d9b5d86cbf9a3a83 (diff) | |
parent | 9fa06104a235f64d6a2bf3012cc9966e8e4be5eb (diff) | |
download | linux-fd129f8941cf2309def29b5c8a23b62faff0c9d0.tar.bz2 |
Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2018-06-05
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) Add a new BPF hook for sendmsg similar to existing hooks for bind and
connect: "This allows to override source IP (including the case when it's
set via cmsg(3)) and destination IP:port for unconnected UDP (slow path).
TCP and connected UDP (fast path) are not affected. This makes UDP support
complete, that is, connected UDP is handled by connect hooks, unconnected
by sendmsg ones.", from Andrey.
2) Rework of the AF_XDP API to allow extending it in future for type writer
model if necessary. In this mode a memory window is passed to hardware
and multiple frames might be filled into that window instead of just one
that is the case in the current fixed frame-size model. With the new
changes made this can be supported without having to add a new descriptor
format. Also, core bits for the zero-copy support for AF_XDP have been
merged as agreed upon, where i40e bits will be routed via Jeff later on.
Various improvements to documentation and sample programs included as
well, all from Björn and Magnus.
3) Given BPF's flexibility, a new program type has been added to implement
infrared decoders. Quote: "The kernel IR decoders support the most
widely used IR protocols, but there are many protocols which are not
supported. [...] There is a 'long tail' of unsupported IR protocols,
for which lircd is need to decode the IR. IR encoding is done in such
a way that some simple circuit can decode it; therefore, BPF is ideal.
[...] user-space can define a decoder in BPF, attach it to the rc
device through the lirc chardev.", from Sean.
4) Several improvements and fixes to BPF core, among others, dumping map
and prog IDs into fdinfo which is a straight forward way to correlate
BPF objects used by applications, removing an indirect call and therefore
retpoline in all map lookup/update/delete calls by invoking the callback
directly for 64 bit archs, adding a new bpf_skb_cgroup_id() BPF helper
for tc BPF programs to have an efficient way of looking up cgroup v2 id
for policy or other use cases. Fixes to make sure we zero tunnel/xfrm
state that hasn't been filled, to allow context access wrt pt_regs in
32 bit archs for tracing, and last but not least various test cases
for fixes that landed in bpf earlier, from Daniel.
5) Get rid of the ndo_xdp_flush API and extend the ndo_xdp_xmit with
a XDP_XMIT_FLUSH flag instead which allows to avoid one indirect
call as flushing is now merged directly into ndo_xdp_xmit(), from Jesper.
6) Add a new bpf_get_current_cgroup_id() helper that can be used in
tracing to retrieve the cgroup id from the current process in order
to allow for e.g. aggregation of container-level events, from Yonghong.
7) Two follow-up fixes for BTF to reject invalid input values and
related to that also two test cases for BPF kselftests, from Martin.
8) Various API improvements to the bpf_fib_lookup() helper, that is,
dropping MPLS bits which are not fully hashed out yet, rejecting
invalid helper flags, returning error for unsupported address
families as well as renaming flowlabel to flowinfo, from David.
9) Various fixes and improvements to sockmap BPF kselftests in particular
in proper error detection and data verification, from Prashant.
10) Two arm32 BPF JIT improvements. One is to fix imm range check with
regards to whether immediate fits into 24 bits, and a naming cleanup
to get functions related to rsh handling consistent to those handling
lsh, from Wang.
11) Two compile warning fixes in BPF, one for BTF and a false positive
to silent gcc in stack_map_get_build_id_offset(), from Arnd.
12) Add missing seg6.h header into tools include infrastructure in order
to fix compilation of BPF kselftests, from Mathieu.
13) Several formatting cleanups in the BPF UAPI helper description that
also fix an error during rst2man compilation, from Quentin.
14) Hide an unused variable in sk_msg_convert_ctx_access() when IPv6 is
not built into the kernel, from Yue.
15) Remove a useless double assignment in dev_map_enqueue(), from Colin.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 185 |
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 27 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c index 4b4f015be217..7cb1d74057ce 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ #define MAX_INSNS BPF_MAXINSNS #define MAX_FIXUPS 8 -#define MAX_NR_MAPS 4 +#define MAX_NR_MAPS 7 #define POINTER_VALUE 0xcafe4all #define TEST_DATA_LEN 64 @@ -66,7 +66,9 @@ struct bpf_test { int fixup_map1[MAX_FIXUPS]; int fixup_map2[MAX_FIXUPS]; int fixup_map3[MAX_FIXUPS]; - int fixup_prog[MAX_FIXUPS]; + int fixup_map4[MAX_FIXUPS]; + int fixup_prog1[MAX_FIXUPS]; + int fixup_prog2[MAX_FIXUPS]; int fixup_map_in_map[MAX_FIXUPS]; const char *errstr; const char *errstr_unpriv; @@ -2769,7 +2771,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .fixup_prog = { 1 }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, .errstr_unpriv = "R3 leaks addr into helper", .result_unpriv = REJECT, .result = ACCEPT, @@ -2856,7 +2858,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .fixup_prog = { 1 }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 42, }, @@ -2870,7 +2872,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .fixup_prog = { 1 }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 41, }, @@ -2884,7 +2886,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .fixup_prog = { 1 }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 1, }, @@ -2898,7 +2900,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .fixup_prog = { 1 }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -2912,7 +2914,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .fixup_prog = { 1 }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 1 }, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 2, }, @@ -2926,7 +2928,7 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 2), BPF_EXIT_INSN(), }, - .fixup_prog = { 2 }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 2 }, .result = ACCEPT, .retval = 42, }, @@ -11682,6 +11684,112 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP, }, { + "calls: two calls returning different map pointers for lookup (hash, array)", + .insns = { + /* main prog */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), + BPF_CALL_REL(11), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_CALL_REL(12), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, + offsetof(struct test_val, foo)), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* subprog 1 */ + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* subprog 2 */ + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .fixup_map2 = { 13 }, + .fixup_map4 = { 16 }, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 1, + }, + { + "calls: two calls returning different map pointers for lookup (hash, map in map)", + .insns = { + /* main prog */ + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 2), + BPF_CALL_REL(11), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1), + BPF_CALL_REL(12), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_10, -8, 0), + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), + BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -8), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 2), + BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_DW, BPF_REG_0, 0, + offsetof(struct test_val, foo)), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* subprog 1 */ + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + /* subprog 2 */ + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_0, 0), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, + .fixup_map_in_map = { 16 }, + .fixup_map4 = { 13 }, + .result = REJECT, + .errstr = "R0 invalid mem access 'map_ptr'", + }, + { + "cond: two branches returning different map pointers for lookup (tail, tail)", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_6, 0, 3), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 7), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog1 = { 5 }, + .fixup_prog2 = { 2 }, + .result_unpriv = REJECT, + .errstr_unpriv = "tail_call abusing map_ptr", + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, + }, + { + "cond: two branches returning same map pointers for lookup (tail, tail)", + .insns = { + BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1, + offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 3), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 2), + BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_2, 0), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 7), + BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, + BPF_FUNC_tail_call), + BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1), + BPF_EXIT_INSN(), + }, + .fixup_prog2 = { 2, 5 }, + .result_unpriv = ACCEPT, + .result = ACCEPT, + .retval = 42, + }, + { "search pruning: all branches should be verified (nop operation)", .insns = { BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10), @@ -12162,12 +12270,13 @@ static int probe_filter_length(const struct bpf_insn *fp) return len + 1; } -static int create_map(uint32_t size_value, uint32_t max_elem) +static int create_map(uint32_t type, uint32_t size_key, + uint32_t size_value, uint32_t max_elem) { int fd; - fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long), - size_value, max_elem, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC); + fd = bpf_create_map(type, size_key, size_value, max_elem, + type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH ? BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC : 0); if (fd < 0) printf("Failed to create hash map '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); @@ -12200,13 +12309,13 @@ static int create_prog_dummy2(int mfd, int idx) ARRAY_SIZE(prog), "GPL", 0, NULL, 0); } -static int create_prog_array(void) +static int create_prog_array(uint32_t max_elem, int p1key) { - int p1key = 0, p2key = 1; + int p2key = 1; int mfd, p1fd, p2fd; mfd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY, sizeof(int), - sizeof(int), 4, 0); + sizeof(int), max_elem, 0); if (mfd < 0) { printf("Failed to create prog array '%s'!\n", strerror(errno)); return -1; @@ -12261,7 +12370,9 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog, int *fixup_map1 = test->fixup_map1; int *fixup_map2 = test->fixup_map2; int *fixup_map3 = test->fixup_map3; - int *fixup_prog = test->fixup_prog; + int *fixup_map4 = test->fixup_map4; + int *fixup_prog1 = test->fixup_prog1; + int *fixup_prog2 = test->fixup_prog2; int *fixup_map_in_map = test->fixup_map_in_map; if (test->fill_helper) @@ -12272,7 +12383,8 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog, * that really matters is value size in this case. */ if (*fixup_map1) { - map_fds[0] = create_map(sizeof(long long), 1); + map_fds[0] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long), + sizeof(long long), 1); do { prog[*fixup_map1].imm = map_fds[0]; fixup_map1++; @@ -12280,7 +12392,8 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog, } if (*fixup_map2) { - map_fds[1] = create_map(sizeof(struct test_val), 1); + map_fds[1] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long), + sizeof(struct test_val), 1); do { prog[*fixup_map2].imm = map_fds[1]; fixup_map2++; @@ -12288,25 +12401,43 @@ static void do_test_fixup(struct bpf_test *test, struct bpf_insn *prog, } if (*fixup_map3) { - map_fds[1] = create_map(sizeof(struct other_val), 1); + map_fds[2] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_HASH, sizeof(long long), + sizeof(struct other_val), 1); do { - prog[*fixup_map3].imm = map_fds[1]; + prog[*fixup_map3].imm = map_fds[2]; fixup_map3++; } while (*fixup_map3); } - if (*fixup_prog) { - map_fds[2] = create_prog_array(); + if (*fixup_map4) { + map_fds[3] = create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY, sizeof(int), + sizeof(struct test_val), 1); + do { + prog[*fixup_map4].imm = map_fds[3]; + fixup_map4++; + } while (*fixup_map4); + } + + if (*fixup_prog1) { + map_fds[4] = create_prog_array(4, 0); + do { + prog[*fixup_prog1].imm = map_fds[4]; + fixup_prog1++; + } while (*fixup_prog1); + } + + if (*fixup_prog2) { + map_fds[5] = create_prog_array(8, 7); do { - prog[*fixup_prog].imm = map_fds[2]; - fixup_prog++; - } while (*fixup_prog); + prog[*fixup_prog2].imm = map_fds[5]; + fixup_prog2++; + } while (*fixup_prog2); } if (*fixup_map_in_map) { - map_fds[3] = create_map_in_map(); + map_fds[6] = create_map_in_map(); do { - prog[*fixup_map_in_map].imm = map_fds[3]; + prog[*fixup_map_in_map].imm = map_fds[6]; fixup_map_in_map++; } while (*fixup_map_in_map); } |