summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>2018-01-18 09:32:15 +1000
committerDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>2018-01-18 09:32:15 +1000
commit4a6cc7a44e98a0460bd094b68c75f0705fdc450a (patch)
treeb8c86a1e0342b1166ab52c4d79e404eede57abec /tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
parent8563188e37b000979ab66521f4337df9a3453223 (diff)
parenta8750ddca918032d6349adbf9a4b6555e7db20da (diff)
downloadlinux-4a6cc7a44e98a0460bd094b68c75f0705fdc450a.tar.bz2
BackMerge tag 'v4.15-rc8' into drm-next
Linux 4.15-rc8 Daniel requested this for so the intel CI won't fall over on drm-next so often.
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c')
-rw-r--r--tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c22
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
index 8591c89c0828..471bbbdb94db 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c
@@ -474,27 +474,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = {
.result = REJECT,
.matches = {
{4, "R5=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"},
- /* ptr & 0x40 == either 0 or 0x40 */
- {5, "R5=inv(id=0,umax_value=64,var_off=(0x0; 0x40))"},
- /* ptr << 2 == unknown, (4n) */
- {7, "R5=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"},
- /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because
- * the add could overflow.
- */
- {8, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"},
- /* Checked s>=0 */
- {10, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
- /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */
- {12, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
- {14, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
- /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine.
- * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able
- * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the
- * upper half of the address space.
- * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access
- * attempt will fail.
- */
- {16, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"},
+ /* R5 bitwise operator &= on pointer prohibited */
}
},
{