Merge v5.6-rc5 into drm-next

Requested my mripard for some misc patches that need this as a base.

Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 9c5b2a91baad..a5f28708e0e7 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -451,6 +451,12 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
 		if (vsk->transport == new_transport)
 			return 0;
 
+		/* transport->release() must be called with sock lock acquired.
+		 * This path can only be taken during vsock_stream_connect(),
+		 * where we have already held the sock lock.
+		 * In the other cases, this function is called on a new socket
+		 * which is not assigned to any transport.
+		 */
 		vsk->transport->release(vsk);
 		vsock_deassign_transport(vsk);
 	}
@@ -753,20 +759,18 @@ static void __vsock_release(struct sock *sk, int level)
 		vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
 		pending = NULL;	/* Compiler warning. */
 
-		/* The release call is supposed to use lock_sock_nested()
-		 * rather than lock_sock(), if a sock lock should be acquired.
-		 */
-		if (vsk->transport)
-			vsk->transport->release(vsk);
-		else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
-			vsock_remove_sock(vsk);
-
 		/* When "level" is SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING, use the nested
 		 * version to avoid the warning "possible recursive locking
 		 * detected". When "level" is 0, lock_sock_nested(sk, level)
 		 * is the same as lock_sock(sk).
 		 */
 		lock_sock_nested(sk, level);
+
+		if (vsk->transport)
+			vsk->transport->release(vsk);
+		else if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_STREAM)
+			vsock_remove_sock(vsk);
+
 		sock_orphan(sk);
 		sk->sk_shutdown = SHUTDOWN_MASK;