summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>2022-10-21 19:49:12 +0800
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-10-21 19:17:38 -0700
commit3d05818707bb2cf133ccdcd29f2d5585b5bc1298 (patch)
tree4910b9634209c04374ddaf0f627dd382648e3077 /kernel
parentdbe69b29988465b011f198f2797b1c2b6980b50e (diff)
downloadlinux-3d05818707bb2cf133ccdcd29f2d5585b5bc1298.tar.bz2
bpf: Wait for busy refill_work when destroying bpf memory allocator
A busy irq work is an unfinished irq work and it can be either in the pending state or in the running state. When destroying bpf memory allocator, refill_work may be busy for PREEMPT_RT kernel in which irq work is invoked in a per-CPU RT-kthread. It is also possible for kernel with arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() being false (e.g. 1-cpu arm32 host or mips) and irq work is inovked in timer interrupt. The busy refill_work leads to various issues. The obvious one is that there will be concurrent operations on free_by_rcu and free_list between irq work and memory draining. Another one is call_rcu_in_progress will not be reliable for the checking of pending RCU callback because do_call_rcu() may have not been invoked by irq work yet. The other is there will be use-after-free if irq work is freed before the callback of irq work is invoked as shown below: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor instruction fetch in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0010) - not-present page PGD 12ab94067 P4D 12ab94067 PUD 1796b4067 PMD 0 Oops: 0010 [#1] PREEMPT_RT SMP CPU: 5 PID: 64 Comm: irq_work/5 Not tainted 6.0.0-rt11+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996) RIP: 0010:0x0 Code: Unable to access opcode bytes at 0xffffffffffffffd6. RSP: 0018:ffffadc080293e78 EFLAGS: 00010286 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffcdc07fb6a388 RCX: ffffa05000a2e000 RDX: ffffa05000a2e000 RSI: ffffffff96cc9827 RDI: ffffcdc07fb6a388 ...... Call Trace: <TASK> irq_work_single+0x24/0x60 irq_work_run_list+0x24/0x30 run_irq_workd+0x23/0x30 smpboot_thread_fn+0x203/0x300 kthread+0x126/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 </TASK> Considering the ease of concurrency handling, no overhead for irq_work_sync() under non-PREEMPT_RT kernel and has-irq-work-interrupt kernel and the short wait time used for irq_work_sync() under PREEMPT_RT (When running two test_maps on PREEMPT_RT kernel and 72-cpus host, the max wait time is about 8ms and the 99th percentile is 10us), just using irq_work_sync() to wait for busy refill_work to complete before memory draining and memory freeing. Fixes: 7c8199e24fa0 ("bpf: Introduce any context BPF specific memory allocator.") Acked-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221021114913.60508-2-houtao@huaweicloud.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/memalloc.c11
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
index 5f83be1d2018..1cb24323826f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/memalloc.c
@@ -493,6 +493,16 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma)
rcu_in_progress = 0;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
c = per_cpu_ptr(ma->cache, cpu);
+ /*
+ * refill_work may be unfinished for PREEMPT_RT kernel
+ * in which irq work is invoked in a per-CPU RT thread.
+ * It is also possible for kernel with
+ * arch_irq_work_has_interrupt() being false and irq
+ * work is invoked in timer interrupt. So waiting for
+ * the completion of irq work to ease the handling of
+ * concurrency.
+ */
+ irq_work_sync(&c->refill_work);
drain_mem_cache(c);
rcu_in_progress += atomic_read(&c->call_rcu_in_progress);
}
@@ -507,6 +517,7 @@ void bpf_mem_alloc_destroy(struct bpf_mem_alloc *ma)
cc = per_cpu_ptr(ma->caches, cpu);
for (i = 0; i < NUM_CACHES; i++) {
c = &cc->cache[i];
+ irq_work_sync(&c->refill_work);
drain_mem_cache(c);
rcu_in_progress += atomic_read(&c->call_rcu_in_progress);
}