summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com>2022-09-08 16:07:16 -0700
committerAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>2022-09-10 18:14:50 -0700
commit1bfe26fb082724be453e4d7fd9bb358e3ba669b2 (patch)
tree9be8bce26275c1cc62d3f683cc64f2e247da96a2 /kernel
parentf7c946f288e32fd8b5fd69825683420d473672bd (diff)
downloadlinux-1bfe26fb082724be453e4d7fd9bb358e3ba669b2.tar.bz2
bpf: Add verifier support for custom callback return range
Verifier logic to confirm that a callback function returns 0 or 1 was added in commit 69c087ba6225b ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper"). At the time, callback return value was only used to continue or stop iteration. In order to support callbacks with a broader return value range, such as those added in rbtree series[0] and others, add a callback_ret_range to bpf_func_state. Verifier's helpers which set in_callback_fn will also set the new field, which the verifier will later use to check return value bounds. Default to tnum_range(0, 0) instead of using tnum_unknown as a sentinel value as the latter would prevent the valid range (0, U64_MAX) being used. Previous global default tnum_range(0, 1) is explicitly set for extant callback helpers. The change to global default was made after discussion around this patch in rbtree series [1], goal here is to make it more obvious that callback_ret_range should be explicitly set. [0]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/ [1]: lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220830172759.4069786-2-davemarchevsky@fb.com/ Signed-off-by: Dave Marchevsky <davemarchevsky@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220908230716.2751723-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel')
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c7
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 9109e07b759a..c259d734f863 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1750,6 +1750,7 @@ static void init_func_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
state->callsite = callsite;
state->frameno = frameno;
state->subprogno = subprogno;
+ state->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 0);
init_reg_state(env, state);
mark_verifier_state_scratched(env);
}
@@ -6790,6 +6791,7 @@ static int set_map_elem_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return err;
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6811,6 +6813,7 @@ static int set_loop_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6840,6 +6843,7 @@ static int set_timer_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_async_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6867,6 +6871,7 @@ static int set_find_vma_callback_state(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_4]);
__mark_reg_not_init(env, &callee->regs[BPF_REG_5]);
callee->in_callback_fn = true;
+ callee->callback_ret_range = tnum_range(0, 1);
return 0;
}
@@ -6894,7 +6899,7 @@ static int prepare_func_exit(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int *insn_idx)
caller = state->frame[state->curframe];
if (callee->in_callback_fn) {
/* enforce R0 return value range [0, 1]. */
- struct tnum range = tnum_range(0, 1);
+ struct tnum range = callee->callback_ret_range;
if (r0->type != SCALAR_VALUE) {
verbose(env, "R0 not a scalar value\n");