diff options
| author | Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com> | 2022-08-04 15:36:03 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> | 2022-10-27 11:01:18 +0200 |
| commit | 244226035a1f9b2b6c326e55ae5188fab4f428cb (patch) | |
| tree | 54019e47494836ed44cee16a4b8bd86dc41a6379 /kernel/sched/core.c | |
| parent | b48e16a69792b5dc4a09d6807369d11b2970cc36 (diff) | |
| download | linux-244226035a1f9b2b6c326e55ae5188fab4f428cb.tar.bz2 | |
sched/uclamp: Fix fits_capacity() check in feec()
As reported by Yun Hsiang [1], if a task has its uclamp_min >= 0.8 * 1024,
it'll always pick the previous CPU because fits_capacity() will always
return false in this case.
The new util_fits_cpu() logic should handle this correctly for us beside
more corner cases where similar failures could occur, like when using
UCLAMP_MAX.
We open code uclamp_rq_util_with() except for the clamp() part,
util_fits_cpu() needs the 'raw' values to be passed to it.
Also introduce uclamp_rq_{set, get}() shorthand accessors to get uclamp
value for the rq. Makes the code more readable and ensures the right
rules (use READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE) are respected transparently.
[1] https://lists.linaro.org/pipermail/eas-dev/2020-July/001488.html
Fixes: 1d42509e475c ("sched/fair: Make EAS wakeup placement consider uclamp restrictions")
Reported-by: Yun Hsiang <hsiang023167@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220804143609.515789-4-qais.yousef@arm.com
Diffstat (limited to 'kernel/sched/core.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | kernel/sched/core.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c index cb2aa2b54c7a..069da4a7ab72 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/core.c +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c @@ -1392,7 +1392,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_idle_reset(struct rq *rq, enum uclamp_id clamp_id, if (!(rq->uclamp_flags & UCLAMP_FLAG_IDLE)) return; - WRITE_ONCE(rq->uclamp[clamp_id].value, clamp_value); + uclamp_rq_set(rq, clamp_id, clamp_value); } static inline @@ -1543,8 +1543,8 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_inc_id(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, if (bucket->tasks == 1 || uc_se->value > bucket->value) bucket->value = uc_se->value; - if (uc_se->value > READ_ONCE(uc_rq->value)) - WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, uc_se->value); + if (uc_se->value > uclamp_rq_get(rq, clamp_id)) + uclamp_rq_set(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value); } /* @@ -1610,7 +1610,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, if (likely(bucket->tasks)) return; - rq_clamp = READ_ONCE(uc_rq->value); + rq_clamp = uclamp_rq_get(rq, clamp_id); /* * Defensive programming: this should never happen. If it happens, * e.g. due to future modification, warn and fixup the expected value. @@ -1618,7 +1618,7 @@ static inline void uclamp_rq_dec_id(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, SCHED_WARN_ON(bucket->value > rq_clamp); if (bucket->value >= rq_clamp) { bkt_clamp = uclamp_rq_max_value(rq, clamp_id, uc_se->value); - WRITE_ONCE(uc_rq->value, bkt_clamp); + uclamp_rq_set(rq, clamp_id, bkt_clamp); } } |