tty: Remove tty_wait_until_sent_from_close()

tty_wait_until_sent_from_close() drops the tty lock while waiting
for the tty driver to finish sending previously accepted data (ie.,
data remaining in its write buffer and transmit fifo).

tty_wait_until_sent_from_close() was added by commit a57a7bf3fc7e
("TTY: define tty_wait_until_sent_from_close") to prevent the entire
tty subsystem from being unable to open new ttys while waiting for
one tty to close while output drained.

However, since commit 0911261d4cb6 ("tty: Don't take tty_mutex for tty
count changes"), holding a tty lock while closing does not prevent other
ttys from being opened/closed/hung up, but only prevents lifetime event
changes for the tty under lock.

Holding the tty lock while waiting for output to drain does prevent
parallel non-blocking opens (O_NONBLOCK) from advancing or returning
while the tty lock is held. However, all parallel opens _already_
block even if the tty lock is dropped while closing and the parallel
open advances. Blocking in open has been in mainline since at least 2.6.29
(see tty_port_block_til_ready(); note the test for O_NONBLOCK is _after_
the wait while ASYNC_CLOSING).

IOW, before this patch a non-blocking open will sleep anyway for the
_entire_ duration of a parallel hardware shutdown, and when it wakes, the
error return will cause a release of its tty, and it will restart with
a fresh attempt to open. Similarly with a blocking open that is already
waiting; when it's woken, the hardware shutdown has already completed
to ASYNC_INITIALIZED is not set, which forces a release and restart as
well.

So, holding the tty lock across the _entire_ close (which is what this
patch does), even while waiting for output to drain, is equivalent to
the current outcome wrt parallel opens.

Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de>
CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Signed-off-by: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 18 deletions

diff --git a/include/linux/tty.h b/include/linux/tty.h
index d072ded41678..614c8224c32f 100644
--- a/include/linux/tty.h
+++ b/include/linux/tty.h
@@ -657,24 +657,6 @@ extern void __lockfunc tty_lock_slave(struct tty_struct *tty);
 extern void __lockfunc tty_unlock_slave(struct tty_struct *tty);
 extern void tty_set_lock_subclass(struct tty_struct *tty);
 /*
- * this shall be called only from where BTM is held (like close)
- *
- * We need this to ensure nobody waits for us to finish while we are waiting.
- * Without this we were encountering system stalls.
- *
- * This should be indeed removed with BTM removal later.
- *
- * Locking: BTM required. Nobody is allowed to hold port->mutex.
- */
-static inline void tty_wait_until_sent_from_close(struct tty_struct *tty,
-		long timeout)
-{
-	tty_unlock(tty); /* tty->ops->close holds the BTM, drop it while waiting */
-	tty_wait_until_sent(tty, timeout);
-	tty_lock(tty);
-}
-
-/*
  * wait_event_interruptible_tty -- wait for a condition with the tty lock held
  *
  * The condition we are waiting for might take a long time to