summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/sound
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>2020-01-10 11:36:13 +0900
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2020-01-10 13:33:08 +0000
commit76c39e867cba338d8982f6372b2c4e3189f6439b (patch)
tree064be2e67cd78d3f9da1d687833ae579d99d218b /include/sound
parentd7a8cb4931652256a01383bb3ea10fab316e72a1 (diff)
downloadlinux-76c39e867cba338d8982f6372b2c4e3189f6439b.tar.bz2
ASoC: soc-core: do pinctrl_pm_select_xxx() as component
ALSA SoC need to care pinctrl_pm_select_xxx(). It is called at soc-core and soc-pcm. soc-pcm is controlling it for activate DAI. soc-core is controlling it for whole system (= suspend/resume/probe/poweroff). If we focus to soc-core side, it need to care about BIAS level. Then, snd_soc_suspend() only is controlling it by Component base (a). Other functions are DAI base (b). (a) pinctrl_pm_select_xxx(component->dev, xxx); (b) pinctrl_pm_select_xxx(dai->dev, xxx); Because of these unbalance, the code is confusable. Here, dai->dev and component->dev are same pointer. Thus, we can replace it component base. One note here is that it cared DAI (= CPU/Codec) pin before this patch, after this patch, it cares Component (= CPU/Codec/Platform) pin. Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Reviewed-By: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/874kx4t4v6.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/sound')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions