summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/exfat
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorYuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com>2022-04-04 11:58:06 +0900
committerNamjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>2022-05-23 11:17:29 +0900
commitd8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3 (patch)
tree959e0e1475aeb1f137861b3a152278fa0d4fea46 /fs/exfat
parent4b0986a3613c92f4ec1bdc7f60ec66fea135991f (diff)
downloadlinux-d8dad2588addd1d861ce19e7df3b702330f0c7e3.tar.bz2
exfat: fix referencing wrong parent directory information after renaming
During renaming, the parent directory information maybe updated. But the file/directory still references to the old parent directory information. This bug will cause 2 problems. (1) The renamed file can not be written. [10768.175172] exFAT-fs (sda1): error, failed to bmap (inode : 7afd50e4 iblock : 0, err : -5) [10768.184285] exFAT-fs (sda1): Filesystem has been set read-only ash: write error: Input/output error (2) Some dentries of the renamed file/directory are not set to deleted after removing the file/directory. exfat_update_parent_info() is a workaround for the wrong parent directory information being used after renaming. Now that bug is fixed, this is no longer needed, so remove it. Fixes: 5f2aa075070c ("exfat: add inode operations") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.7+ Signed-off-by: Yuezhang Mo <Yuezhang.Mo@sony.com> Reviewed-by: Andy Wu <Andy.Wu@sony.com> Reviewed-by: Aoyama Wataru <wataru.aoyama@sony.com> Reviewed-by: Daniel Palmer <daniel.palmer@sony.com> Reviewed-by: Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'fs/exfat')
-rw-r--r--fs/exfat/namei.c27
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 26 deletions
diff --git a/fs/exfat/namei.c b/fs/exfat/namei.c
index a02a04a993bf..76acc3721951 100644
--- a/fs/exfat/namei.c
+++ b/fs/exfat/namei.c
@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ static int exfat_rename_file(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_chain *p_dir,
exfat_remove_entries(inode, p_dir, oldentry, 0,
num_old_entries);
+ ei->dir = *p_dir;
ei->entry = newentry;
} else {
if (exfat_get_entry_type(epold) == TYPE_FILE) {
@@ -1167,28 +1168,6 @@ static int exfat_move_file(struct inode *inode, struct exfat_chain *p_olddir,
return 0;
}
-static void exfat_update_parent_info(struct exfat_inode_info *ei,
- struct inode *parent_inode)
-{
- struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(parent_inode->i_sb);
- struct exfat_inode_info *parent_ei = EXFAT_I(parent_inode);
- loff_t parent_isize = i_size_read(parent_inode);
-
- /*
- * the problem that struct exfat_inode_info caches wrong parent info.
- *
- * because of flag-mismatch of ei->dir,
- * there is abnormal traversing cluster chain.
- */
- if (unlikely(parent_ei->flags != ei->dir.flags ||
- parent_isize != EXFAT_CLU_TO_B(ei->dir.size, sbi) ||
- parent_ei->start_clu != ei->dir.dir)) {
- exfat_chain_set(&ei->dir, parent_ei->start_clu,
- EXFAT_B_TO_CLU_ROUND_UP(parent_isize, sbi),
- parent_ei->flags);
- }
-}
-
/* rename or move a old file into a new file */
static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *old_parent_inode,
struct exfat_inode_info *ei, struct inode *new_parent_inode,
@@ -1219,8 +1198,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *old_parent_inode,
return -ENOENT;
}
- exfat_update_parent_info(ei, old_parent_inode);
-
exfat_chain_dup(&olddir, &ei->dir);
dentry = ei->entry;
@@ -1241,8 +1218,6 @@ static int __exfat_rename(struct inode *old_parent_inode,
goto out;
}
- exfat_update_parent_info(new_ei, new_parent_inode);
-
p_dir = &(new_ei->dir);
new_entry = new_ei->entry;
ep = exfat_get_dentry(sb, p_dir, new_entry, &new_bh);