diff options
author | Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> | 2021-07-21 15:30:40 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> | 2021-07-22 09:31:14 -0700 |
commit | 49f756342b818fccb576c7b6ff00af7b32778e7d (patch) | |
tree | e7ea21dba1bd8fb64899d11e43a61c3442611bcb /drivers/thermal | |
parent | 263862652f169c3ba2b5cdc39d7037e5ab0bb6a6 (diff) | |
download | linux-49f756342b818fccb576c7b6ff00af7b32778e7d.tar.bz2 |
drm/i915/dg2: Add dbuf programming
DG2 extends our DDB to four DBuf slices; pipes A+B only have access to
the first two slices, whereas pipes C+D only have access to the second
two.
Confusingly, our bspec decided to switch from 1-based numbering
of dbuf slices (S1, S2) to 0-based numbering (S0, S1, S2, S3) in
Display13. At the moment we're using the 0-based number scheme for the
DBUF_CTL_S() register addressing, but the 1-based number scheme in the
actual slice assignment tables. We may want to consider switching the
assignment over to 0-based numbering too at some point...
Bspec: 49255
Bspec: 50057
Cc: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210721223043.834562-16-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/thermal')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions