summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/rtc
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>2020-02-12 17:59:11 -0600
committerLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>2020-03-30 07:34:57 +0100
commit7235d9e48fda6902018e04669eda6f5d1878599f (patch)
tree4751fde5c4061d1fba816f0b35a5db88c2b8063f /drivers/rtc
parenta0c8498c076d0338860df7e45e5e6f48158a02d8 (diff)
downloadlinux-7235d9e48fda6902018e04669eda6f5d1878599f.tar.bz2
mfd: pm8xxx: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2], introduced in C99: struct foo { int stuff; struct boo array[]; }; By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on. Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this change: "Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1] This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21 [3] commit 76497732932f ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour") Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com> Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/rtc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions