diff options
| author | Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca> | 2022-03-27 18:01:54 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> | 2022-04-04 08:38:56 +0100 |
| commit | 92d96b603738ec4f35cde7198c303ae264dd47cb (patch) | |
| tree | 9e172e212942b8b96420e6c98060a9dc339e712b /drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c | |
| parent | 3123109284176b1532874591f7c81f3837bbdc17 (diff) | |
| download | linux-92d96b603738ec4f35cde7198c303ae264dd47cb.tar.bz2 | |
regulator: wm8994: Add an off-on delay for WM8994 variant
As per Table 130 of the wm8994 datasheet at [1], there is an off-on
delay for LDO1 and LDO2. In the wm8958 datasheet [2], I could not
find any reference to it. I could not find a wm1811 datasheet to
double-check there, but as no one has complained presumably it works
without it.
This solves the issue on Samsung Aries boards with a wm8994 where
register writes fail when the device is powered off and back-on
quickly.
[1] https://statics.cirrus.com/pubs/proDatasheet/WM8994_Rev4.6.pdf
[2] https://statics.cirrus.com/pubs/proDatasheet/WM8958_v3.5.pdf
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Bakker <xc-racer2@live.ca>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CY4PR04MB056771CFB80DC447C30D5A31CB1D9@CY4PR04MB0567.namprd04.prod.outlook.com
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c | 42 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c index cadea0344486..40befdd9dfa9 100644 --- a/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c +++ b/drivers/regulator/wm8994-regulator.c @@ -82,6 +82,35 @@ static const struct regulator_desc wm8994_ldo_desc[] = { .min_uV = 2400000, .uV_step = 100000, .enable_time = 3000, + .off_on_delay = 36000, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + }, + { + .name = "LDO2", + .id = 2, + .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, + .n_voltages = WM8994_LDO2_MAX_SELECTOR + 1, + .vsel_reg = WM8994_LDO_2, + .vsel_mask = WM8994_LDO2_VSEL_MASK, + .ops = &wm8994_ldo2_ops, + .enable_time = 3000, + .off_on_delay = 36000, + .owner = THIS_MODULE, + }, +}; + +static const struct regulator_desc wm8958_ldo_desc[] = { + { + .name = "LDO1", + .id = 1, + .type = REGULATOR_VOLTAGE, + .n_voltages = WM8994_LDO1_MAX_SELECTOR + 1, + .vsel_reg = WM8994_LDO_1, + .vsel_mask = WM8994_LDO1_VSEL_MASK, + .ops = &wm8994_ldo1_ops, + .min_uV = 2400000, + .uV_step = 100000, + .enable_time = 3000, .owner = THIS_MODULE, }, { @@ -172,9 +201,16 @@ static int wm8994_ldo_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) * regulator core and we need not worry about it on the * error path. */ - ldo->regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, - &wm8994_ldo_desc[id], - &config); + if (ldo->wm8994->type == WM8994) { + ldo->regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, + &wm8994_ldo_desc[id], + &config); + } else { + ldo->regulator = devm_regulator_register(&pdev->dev, + &wm8958_ldo_desc[id], + &config); + } + if (IS_ERR(ldo->regulator)) { ret = PTR_ERR(ldo->regulator); dev_err(wm8994->dev, "Failed to register LDO%d: %d\n", |