summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2022-12-04 17:01:50 +0000
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2022-12-04 17:01:50 +0000
commitf19a2caaab073873f673a41ce366ac898f34f543 (patch)
tree5e40ef8b2e30864406f01f0a09cbbeb153efcb42 /drivers/platform/surface/aggregator
parent969357ec94e670571d6593f2a93aba25e4577d4f (diff)
parenta04f1c81316d27e140c3df5561e5ef87794cd4bc (diff)
downloadlinux-f19a2caaab073873f673a41ce366ac898f34f543.tar.bz2
ASoC/tda998x: Fix reporting of nonexistent capture streams
Merge series from Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>: The recently added pcm-test selftest has pointed out that systems with the tda998x driver end up advertising that they support capture when in reality as far as I can see the tda998x devices are transmit only. The DAIs registered through hdmi-codec are bidirectional, meaning that for I2S systems when combined with a typical bidrectional CPU DAI the overall capability of the PCM is bidirectional. In most cases the I2S links will clock OK but no useful audio will be returned which isn't so bad but we should still not advertise the useless capability, and some systems may notice problems for example due to pinmux management. This is happening due to the hdmi-codec helpers not providing any mechanism for indicating unidirectional audio so add one and use it in the tda998x driver. It is likely other hdmi-codec users are also affected but I don't have those systems to hand. Mark Brown (2): ASoC: hdmi-codec: Allow playback and capture to be disabled drm: tda99x: Don't advertise non-existent capture support drivers/gpu/drm/i2c/tda998x_drv.c | 2 ++ include/sound/hdmi-codec.h | 4 ++++ sound/soc/codecs/hdmi-codec.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) base-commit: f0c4d9fc9cc9462659728d168387191387e903cc -- 2.30.2
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/platform/surface/aggregator')
-rw-r--r--drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c24
1 files changed, 20 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c
index 6748fe4ac5d5..def8d7ac541f 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/surface/aggregator/ssh_packet_layer.c
@@ -1596,16 +1596,32 @@ static void ssh_ptl_timeout_reap(struct work_struct *work)
ssh_ptl_tx_wakeup_packet(ptl);
}
-static bool ssh_ptl_rx_retransmit_check(struct ssh_ptl *ptl, u8 seq)
+static bool ssh_ptl_rx_retransmit_check(struct ssh_ptl *ptl, const struct ssh_frame *frame)
{
int i;
/*
+ * Ignore unsequenced packets. On some devices (notably Surface Pro 9),
+ * unsequenced events will always be sent with SEQ=0x00. Attempting to
+ * detect retransmission would thus just block all events.
+ *
+ * While sequence numbers would also allow detection of retransmitted
+ * packets in unsequenced communication, they have only ever been used
+ * to cover edge-cases in sequenced transmission. In particular, the
+ * only instance of packets being retransmitted (that we are aware of)
+ * is due to an ACK timeout. As this does not happen in unsequenced
+ * communication, skip the retransmission check for those packets
+ * entirely.
+ */
+ if (frame->type == SSH_FRAME_TYPE_DATA_NSQ)
+ return false;
+
+ /*
* Check if SEQ has been seen recently (i.e. packet was
* re-transmitted and we should ignore it).
*/
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(ptl->rx.blocked.seqs); i++) {
- if (likely(ptl->rx.blocked.seqs[i] != seq))
+ if (likely(ptl->rx.blocked.seqs[i] != frame->seq))
continue;
ptl_dbg(ptl, "ptl: ignoring repeated data packet\n");
@@ -1613,7 +1629,7 @@ static bool ssh_ptl_rx_retransmit_check(struct ssh_ptl *ptl, u8 seq)
}
/* Update list of blocked sequence IDs. */
- ptl->rx.blocked.seqs[ptl->rx.blocked.offset] = seq;
+ ptl->rx.blocked.seqs[ptl->rx.blocked.offset] = frame->seq;
ptl->rx.blocked.offset = (ptl->rx.blocked.offset + 1)
% ARRAY_SIZE(ptl->rx.blocked.seqs);
@@ -1624,7 +1640,7 @@ static void ssh_ptl_rx_dataframe(struct ssh_ptl *ptl,
const struct ssh_frame *frame,
const struct ssam_span *payload)
{
- if (ssh_ptl_rx_retransmit_check(ptl, frame->seq))
+ if (ssh_ptl_rx_retransmit_check(ptl, frame))
return;
ptl->ops.data_received(ptl, payload);