summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLight Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com>2020-01-22 14:53:09 +0800
committerLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>2020-02-14 11:26:29 +0100
commit3de7deefce693bb9783bca4cb42a81653ebec4e9 (patch)
tree21f7a9637068f9ecc5ede55f971b3e342c2f58a1 /drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
parentef1ea54eab0ecb072700f59701387f839c8c760d (diff)
downloadlinux-3de7deefce693bb9783bca4cb42a81653ebec4e9.tar.bz2
pinctrl: mediatek: Check gpio pin number and use binary search in mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup()
1. Check if gpio pin number is in valid range to prevent from get invalid pointer 'desc' in the following code: desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio]; 2. Improve mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup() 2.1 Modify mtk_hw_pin_field_lookup() to use binary search for accelerating search. 2.2 Correct message after the following check fail: if (hw->soc->reg_cal && hw->soc->reg_cal[field].range) { rc = &hw->soc->reg_cal[field]; The original message is: "Not support field %d for pin %d (%s)\n" However, the check is on soc chip level, not on pin level yet. So the message is corrected as: "Not support field %d for this soc\n" Signed-off-by: Light Hsieh <light.hsieh@mediatek.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1579675994-7001-1-git-send-email-light.hsieh@mediatek.com Acked-by: Sean Wang <sean.wang@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c')
-rw-r--r--drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c25
1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
index 923264d0e9ef..3e13ae712c5c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/mediatek/pinctrl-paris.c
@@ -81,6 +81,8 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
int val, val2, err, reg, ret = 1;
const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
+ if (pin >= hw->soc->npins)
+ return -EINVAL;
desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
switch (param) {
@@ -206,6 +208,10 @@ static int mtk_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned int pin,
int err = 0;
u32 reg;
+ if (pin >= hw->soc->npins) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto err;
+ }
desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[pin];
switch ((u32)param) {
@@ -693,6 +699,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
int value, err;
+ if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DIR, &value);
@@ -708,6 +717,9 @@ static int mtk_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
int value, err;
+ if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
err = mtk_hw_get_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DI, &value);
@@ -722,6 +734,9 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value)
struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
const struct mtk_pin_desc *desc;
+ if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+ return;
+
desc = (const struct mtk_pin_desc *)&hw->soc->pins[gpio];
mtk_hw_set_value(hw, desc, PINCTRL_PIN_REG_DO, !!value);
@@ -729,12 +744,22 @@ static void mtk_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio, int value)
static int mtk_gpio_direction_input(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio)
{
+ struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+ if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
return pinctrl_gpio_direction_input(chip->base + gpio);
}
static int mtk_gpio_direction_output(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned int gpio,
int value)
{
+ struct mtk_pinctrl *hw = gpiochip_get_data(chip);
+
+ if (gpio > hw->soc->npins)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mtk_gpio_set(chip, gpio, value);
return pinctrl_gpio_direction_output(chip->base + gpio);