diff options
author | Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> | 2012-11-29 11:36:54 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> | 2012-12-10 20:21:03 +1000 |
commit | 85b144f860176ec18db927d6d9ecdfb24d9c6483 (patch) | |
tree | 22c7d066d82286c7638bd974089ef0a682d0c4dd /drivers/gpu/drm/ttm | |
parent | 6ed9ccb41209b93409c92eb8c130eada4e0832ef (diff) | |
download | linux-85b144f860176ec18db927d6d9ecdfb24d9c6483.tar.bz2 |
drm/ttm: call ttm_bo_cleanup_refs with reservation and lru lock held, v3
By removing the unlocking of lru and retaking it immediately, a race is
removed where the bo is taken off the swap list or the lru list between
the unlock and relock. As such the cleanup_refs code can be simplified,
it will attempt to call ttm_bo_wait non-blockingly, and if it fails
it will drop the locks and perform a blocking wait, or return an error
if no_wait_gpu was set.
The need for looping is also eliminated, since swapout and evict_mem_first
will always follow the destruction path, no new fence is allowed
to be attached. As far as I can see this may already have been the case,
but the unlocking / relocking required a complicated loop to deal with
re-reservation.
Changes since v1:
- Simplify no_wait_gpu case by folding it in with empty ddestroy.
- Hold a reservation while calling ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use again.
Changes since v2:
- Do not remove bo from lru list while waiting
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/ttm')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 123 |
1 files changed, 76 insertions, 47 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c index b7781453bfd1..ef223d581a70 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c @@ -488,12 +488,16 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) ttm_bo_mem_put(bo, &bo->mem); atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0); + wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue); /* - * Make processes trying to reserve really pick it up. + * Since the final reference to this bo may not be dropped by + * the current task we have to put a memory barrier here to make + * sure the changes done in this function are always visible. + * + * This function only needs protection against the final kref_put. */ - smp_mb__after_atomic_dec(); - wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue); + smp_mb__before_atomic_dec(); } static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) @@ -543,68 +547,84 @@ static void ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_or_queue(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo) } /** - * function ttm_bo_cleanup_refs + * function ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock * If bo idle, remove from delayed- and lru lists, and unref. * If not idle, do nothing. * + * Must be called with lru_lock and reservation held, this function + * will drop both before returning. + * * @interruptible Any sleeps should occur interruptibly. - * @no_wait_reserve Never wait for reserve. Return -EBUSY instead. * @no_wait_gpu Never wait for gpu. Return -EBUSY instead. */ -static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, - bool interruptible, - bool no_wait_reserve, - bool no_wait_gpu) +static int ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo, + bool interruptible, + bool no_wait_gpu) { struct ttm_bo_device *bdev = bo->bdev; + struct ttm_bo_driver *driver = bdev->driver; struct ttm_bo_global *glob = bo->glob; int put_count; - int ret = 0; + int ret; -retry: spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock); - ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, interruptible, no_wait_gpu); - spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock); + ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false, true); - if (unlikely(ret != 0)) - return ret; + if (ret && !no_wait_gpu) { + void *sync_obj; -retry_reserve: - spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock); + /* + * Take a reference to the fence and unreserve, + * at this point the buffer should be dead, so + * no new sync objects can be attached. + */ + sync_obj = driver->sync_obj_ref(&bo->sync_obj); + spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock); - if (unlikely(list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))) { + atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0); + wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue); spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); - return 0; - } - ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0); - - if (unlikely(ret == -EBUSY)) { - spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); - if (likely(!no_wait_reserve)) - ret = ttm_bo_wait_unreserved(bo, interruptible); - if (unlikely(ret != 0)) + ret = driver->sync_obj_wait(sync_obj, false, interruptible); + driver->sync_obj_unref(&sync_obj); + if (ret) return ret; - goto retry_reserve; - } + /* + * remove sync_obj with ttm_bo_wait, the wait should be + * finished, and no new wait object should have been added. + */ + spin_lock(&bdev->fence_lock); + ret = ttm_bo_wait(bo, false, false, true); + WARN_ON(ret); + spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock); + if (ret) + return ret; - BUG_ON(ret != 0); + spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock); + ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, true, false, 0); - /** - * We can re-check for sync object without taking - * the bo::lock since setting the sync object requires - * also bo::reserved. A busy object at this point may - * be caused by another thread recently starting an accelerated - * eviction. - */ + /* + * We raced, and lost, someone else holds the reservation now, + * and is probably busy in ttm_bo_cleanup_memtype_use. + * + * Even if it's not the case, because we finished waiting any + * delayed destruction would succeed, so just return success + * here. + */ + if (ret) { + spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); + return 0; + } + } else + spin_unlock(&bdev->fence_lock); - if (unlikely(bo->sync_obj)) { + if (ret || unlikely(list_empty(&bo->ddestroy))) { atomic_set(&bo->reserved, 0); wake_up_all(&bo->event_queue); spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); - goto retry; + return ret; } put_count = ttm_bo_del_from_lru(bo); @@ -647,9 +667,13 @@ static int ttm_bo_delayed_delete(struct ttm_bo_device *bdev, bool remove_all) kref_get(&nentry->list_kref); } - spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); - ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(entry, false, !remove_all, - !remove_all); + ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(entry, false, !remove_all, false, 0); + if (!ret) + ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(entry, false, + !remove_all); + else + spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); + kref_put(&entry->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list); entry = nentry; @@ -800,9 +824,13 @@ retry: kref_get(&bo->list_kref); if (!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy)) { - spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); - ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, interruptible, - no_wait_reserve, no_wait_gpu); + ret = ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, interruptible, no_wait_reserve, false, 0); + if (!ret) + ret = ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(bo, interruptible, + no_wait_gpu); + else + spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); + kref_put(&bo->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list); return ret; @@ -1796,8 +1824,9 @@ static int ttm_bo_swapout(struct ttm_mem_shrink *shrink) kref_get(&bo->list_kref); if (!list_empty(&bo->ddestroy)) { - spin_unlock(&glob->lru_lock); - (void) ttm_bo_cleanup_refs(bo, false, false, false); + ttm_bo_reserve_locked(bo, false, false, false, 0); + ttm_bo_cleanup_refs_and_unlock(bo, false, false); + kref_put(&bo->list_kref, ttm_bo_release_list); spin_lock(&glob->lru_lock); continue; |