summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com>2013-07-27 10:17:12 +0200
committerBen Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>2013-07-30 13:04:52 +1000
commit35095f7529bb6abdfc956e7a41ca6957520b70a7 (patch)
tree8bbcde7796a2743c6b7d56323afbebec89920f25 /drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau
parent9a7046d55f319b2dde5d2536cc2adb01ebdbe09e (diff)
downloadlinux-35095f7529bb6abdfc956e7a41ca6957520b70a7.tar.bz2
drm/nouveau: fix size check for cards without vm
Op 24-07-13 17:55, Dan Carpenter schreef: > Hello Maarten Lankhorst, > > This is a semi-automatic email about new static checker warnings. > > The patch 0108bc808107: "drm/nouveau: do not allow negative sizes for > now" from Jul 7, 2013, leads to the following Smatch complaint: > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c:222 nouveau_bo_new() > warn: variable dereferenced before check 'drm->client.base.vm' (see line 201) > > drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c > 200 int type = ttm_bo_type_device; > 201 int max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift) - 1); > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > New dereference. > > 202 > 203 if (size <= 0 || size > max_size) { > 204 nv_warn(drm, "skipped size %x\n", (u32)size); > 205 return -EINVAL; > 206 } > 207 > 208 if (sg) > 209 type = ttm_bo_type_sg; > 210 > 211 nvbo = kzalloc(sizeof(struct nouveau_bo), GFP_KERNEL); > 212 if (!nvbo) > 213 return -ENOMEM; > 214 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->head); > 215 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->entry); > 216 INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nvbo->vma_list); > 217 nvbo->tile_mode = tile_mode; > 218 nvbo->tile_flags = tile_flags; > 219 nvbo->bo.bdev = &drm->ttm.bdev; > 220 > 221 nvbo->page_shift = 12; > 222 if (drm->client.base.vm) { > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > Old check. > > 223 if (!(flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_TT) && size > 256 * 1024) > 224 nvbo->page_shift = drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift; > > regards, > dan carpenter 8<----- Commit 0108bc808107: "drm/nouveau: do not allow negative sizes for now" broke older nvidia gpu's that lack a vm. Add an explicit check to handle this. Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reported-by: konrad wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau')
-rw-r--r--drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c7
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
index 4e7ee5f4155c..af20fba3a1a4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_bo.c
@@ -198,7 +198,12 @@ nouveau_bo_new(struct drm_device *dev, int size, int align,
size_t acc_size;
int ret;
int type = ttm_bo_type_device;
- int max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift) - 1);
+ int lpg_shift = 12;
+ int max_size;
+
+ if (drm->client.base.vm)
+ lpg_shift = drm->client.base.vm->vmm->lpg_shift;
+ max_size = INT_MAX & ~((1 << lpg_shift) - 1);
if (size <= 0 || size > max_size) {
nv_warn(drm, "skipped size %x\n", (u32)size);