diff options
author | Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com> | 2021-01-10 23:43:05 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com> | 2021-02-22 16:42:14 +0800 |
commit | 67f1120381df022a7016f4acc8d4880da9a66c03 (patch) | |
tree | 0af085d8074f30baed5944150d8c99b19311982d /drivers/gpu/drm/i915 | |
parent | d18ac1a7eef9ec266142b637253353a8d9f95cc1 (diff) | |
download | linux-67f1120381df022a7016f4acc8d4880da9a66c03.tar.bz2 |
drm/i915/gvt: Introduce per object locking in GVT scheduler.
To support ww locking and per-object implemented in i915, GVT scheduler needs
to be refined. Most of the changes are located in shadow batch buffer, shadow
wa context in GVT-g, where use quite a lot of i915 gem object APIs.
v2:
- Adjust the usage of ww lock on context pin/unpin. (maarten)
- Rebase the patch on the newest staging branch.
Fixes: 6b05030496f7 ("drm/i915: Convert i915_gem_object/client_blt.c to use ww locking as well, v2.")
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Wang <zhi.a.wang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1610314985-26065-1-git-send-email-zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@linux.intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/gpu/drm/i915')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 40 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c index a55ae50dbbe1..fc735692f21f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gvt/scheduler.c @@ -412,7 +412,9 @@ static void release_shadow_wa_ctx(struct intel_shadow_wa_ctx *wa_ctx) if (!wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj) return; + i915_gem_object_lock(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj, NULL); i915_gem_object_unpin_map(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj); + i915_gem_object_unlock(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj); i915_gem_object_put(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj); wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj = NULL; @@ -520,6 +522,7 @@ static int prepare_shadow_batch_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload) struct intel_gvt *gvt = workload->vgpu->gvt; const int gmadr_bytes = gvt->device_info.gmadr_bytes_in_cmd; struct intel_vgpu_shadow_bb *bb; + struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww; int ret; list_for_each_entry(bb, &workload->shadow_bb, list) { @@ -544,10 +547,19 @@ static int prepare_shadow_batch_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload) * directly */ if (!bb->ppgtt) { - bb->vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(bb->obj, - NULL, 0, 0, 0); + i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, false); +retry: + i915_gem_object_lock(bb->obj, &ww); + + bb->vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(bb->obj, &ww, + NULL, 0, 0, 0); if (IS_ERR(bb->vma)) { ret = PTR_ERR(bb->vma); + if (ret == -EDEADLK) { + ret = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww); + if (!ret) + goto retry; + } goto err; } @@ -561,13 +573,15 @@ static int prepare_shadow_batch_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload) 0); if (ret) goto err; - } - /* No one is going to touch shadow bb from now on. */ - i915_gem_object_flush_map(bb->obj); + /* No one is going to touch shadow bb from now on. */ + i915_gem_object_flush_map(bb->obj); + i915_gem_object_unlock(bb->obj); + } } return 0; err: + i915_gem_ww_ctx_fini(&ww); release_shadow_batch_buffer(workload); return ret; } @@ -594,14 +608,29 @@ static int prepare_shadow_wa_ctx(struct intel_shadow_wa_ctx *wa_ctx) unsigned char *per_ctx_va = (unsigned char *)wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.shadow_va + wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.size; + struct i915_gem_ww_ctx ww; + int ret; if (wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.size == 0) return 0; - vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj, NULL, - 0, CACHELINE_BYTES, 0); - if (IS_ERR(vma)) - return PTR_ERR(vma); + i915_gem_ww_ctx_init(&ww, false); +retry: + i915_gem_object_lock(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj, &ww); + + vma = i915_gem_object_ggtt_pin_ww(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj, &ww, NULL, + 0, CACHELINE_BYTES, 0); + if (IS_ERR(vma)) { + ret = PTR_ERR(vma); + if (ret == -EDEADLK) { + ret = i915_gem_ww_ctx_backoff(&ww); + if (!ret) + goto retry; + } + return ret; + } + + i915_gem_object_unlock(wa_ctx->indirect_ctx.obj); /* FIXME: we are not tracking our pinned VMA leaving it * up to the core to fix up the stray pin_count upon @@ -635,12 +664,14 @@ static void release_shadow_batch_buffer(struct intel_vgpu_workload *workload) list_for_each_entry_safe(bb, pos, &workload->shadow_bb, list) { if (bb->obj) { + i915_gem_object_lock(bb->obj, NULL); if (bb->va && !IS_ERR(bb->va)) i915_gem_object_unpin_map(bb->obj); if (bb->vma && !IS_ERR(bb->vma)) i915_vma_unpin(bb->vma); + i915_gem_object_unlock(bb->obj); i915_gem_object_put(bb->obj); } list_del(&bb->list); |