diff options
author | Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> | 2017-01-23 10:11:49 +0530 |
---|---|---|
committer | Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> | 2017-01-30 09:22:22 +0100 |
commit | 052c6f19141dd13f266cc465fde6f38ddc93d5fb (patch) | |
tree | d81203a2e96ae93897d488a6aea6ba92048f64e1 /drivers/base/power/opp/of.c | |
parent | 5b650b388844f26c61c70564865598836d05dcb3 (diff) | |
download | linux-052c6f19141dd13f266cc465fde6f38ddc93d5fb.tar.bz2 |
PM / OPP: Move away from RCU locking
The RCU locking isn't well suited for the OPP core. The RCU locking fits
better for reader heavy stuff, while the OPP core have at max one or two
readers only at a time.
Over that, it was getting very confusing the way RCU locking was used
with the OPP core. The individual OPPs are mostly well handled, i.e. for
an update a new structure was created and then that replaced the older
one. But the OPP tables were updated directly all the time from various
parts of the core. Though they were mostly used from within RCU locked
region, they didn't had much to do with RCU and were governed by the
mutex instead.
And that mixed with the 'opp_table_lock' has made the core even more
confusing.
Now that we are already managing the OPPs and the OPP tables with kernel
reference infrastructure, we can get rid of RCU locking completely and
simplify the code a lot.
Remove all RCU references from code and comments.
Acquire opp_table->lock while parsing the list of OPPs though.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'drivers/base/power/opp/of.c')
-rw-r--r-- | drivers/base/power/opp/of.c | 40 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c index 6a6e6e7846b3..083b79fa0c62 100644 --- a/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp/of.c @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static struct opp_table *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np) mutex_lock(&opp_table_lock); - list_for_each_entry_rcu(opp_table, &opp_tables, node) { + list_for_each_entry(opp_table, &opp_tables, node) { if (opp_table->np == np) { /* * Multiple devices can point to the same OPP table and @@ -235,12 +235,6 @@ free_microvolt: * @dev: device pointer used to lookup OPP table. * * Free OPPs created using static entries present in DT. - * - * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. */ void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev) { @@ -269,12 +263,6 @@ static struct device_node *_of_get_opp_desc_node(struct device *dev) * opp can be controlled using dev_pm_opp_enable/disable functions and may be * removed by dev_pm_opp_remove. * - * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. - * * Return: * 0 On success OR * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and opp->available @@ -358,7 +346,7 @@ static int _opp_add_static_v2(struct opp_table *opp_table, struct device *dev, * Notify the changes in the availability of the operable * frequency/voltage list. */ - srcu_notifier_call_chain(&opp_table->srcu_head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp); + blocking_notifier_call_chain(&opp_table->head, OPP_EVENT_ADD, new_opp); return 0; free_opp: @@ -470,12 +458,6 @@ static int _of_add_opp_table_v1(struct device *dev) * * Register the initial OPP table with the OPP library for given device. * - * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. - * * Return: * 0 On success OR * Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and opp->available @@ -520,12 +502,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_add_table); * * This removes the OPP tables for CPUs present in the @cpumask. * This should be used only to remove static entries created from DT. - * - * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. */ void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask) { @@ -538,12 +514,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table); * @cpumask: cpumask for which OPP table needs to be added. * * This adds the OPP tables for CPUs present in the @cpumask. - * - * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. */ int dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask) { @@ -591,12 +561,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table); * This updates the @cpumask with CPUs that are sharing OPPs with @cpu_dev. * * Returns -ENOENT if operating-points-v2 isn't present for @cpu_dev. - * - * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected. - * Hence this function internally uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks - * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure - * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where - * mutex cannot be locked. */ int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, struct cpumask *cpumask) |