diff options
| author | Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> | 2020-12-23 00:01:52 +0800 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com> | 2021-01-12 20:25:32 -0800 |
| commit | 80709af7325d179b433817f421c85449f2454046 (patch) | |
| tree | 69bddb8d4eab09de98102a39d574915981dccf85 /arch | |
| parent | 7cd1af107a92eb63b93a96dc07406dcbc5269436 (diff) | |
| download | linux-80709af7325d179b433817f421c85449f2454046.tar.bz2 | |
riscv: cacheinfo: Fix using smp_processor_id() in preemptible
Use raw_smp_processor_id instead of smp_processor_id() to fix warning,
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: init/1
caller is debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x26
CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 5.10.0-rc4 #211
Call Trace:
walk_stackframe+0x0/0xaa
show_stack+0x32/0x3e
dump_stack+0x76/0x90
check_preemption_disabled+0xaa/0xac
debug_smp_processor_id+0x1c/0x26
get_cache_size+0x18/0x68
load_elf_binary+0x868/0xece
bprm_execve+0x224/0x498
kernel_execve+0xdc/0x142
run_init_process+0x90/0x9e
try_to_run_init_process+0x12/0x3c
kernel_init+0xb4/0xf8
ret_from_exception+0x0/0xc
The issue is found when CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT enabled.
Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
[Palmer: Added a comment.]
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@google.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c | 11 |
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c index de59dd457b41..d86781357044 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cacheinfo.c @@ -26,7 +26,16 @@ cache_get_priv_group(struct cacheinfo *this_leaf) static struct cacheinfo *get_cacheinfo(u32 level, enum cache_type type) { - struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(smp_processor_id()); + /* + * Using raw_smp_processor_id() elides a preemptability check, but this + * is really indicative of a larger problem: the cacheinfo UABI assumes + * that cores have a homonogenous view of the cache hierarchy. That + * happens to be the case for the current set of RISC-V systems, but + * likely won't be true in general. Since there's no way to provide + * correct information for these systems via the current UABI we're + * just eliding the check for now. + */ + struct cpu_cacheinfo *this_cpu_ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo(raw_smp_processor_id()); struct cacheinfo *this_leaf; int index; |