KVM: x86/mmu: Track the number of TDP MMU pages, but not the actual pages

Track the number of TDP MMU "shadow" pages instead of tracking the pages
themselves. With the NX huge page list manipulation moved out of the common
linking flow, elminating the list-based tracking means the happy path of
adding a shadow page doesn't need to acquire a spinlock and can instead
inc/dec an atomic.

Keep the tracking as the WARN during TDP MMU teardown on leaked shadow
pages is very, very useful for detecting KVM bugs.

Tracking the number of pages will also make it trivial to expose the
counter to userspace as a stat in the future, which may or may not be
desirable.

Note, the TDP MMU needs to use a separate counter (and stat if that ever
comes to be) from the existing n_used_mmu_pages. The TDP MMU doesn't bother
supporting the shrinker nor does it honor KVM_SET_NR_MMU_PAGES (because the
TDP MMU consumes so few pages relative to shadow paging), and including TDP
MMU pages in that counter would break both the shrinker and shadow MMUs,
e.g. if a VM is using nested TDP.

Cc: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20221019165618.927057-6-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 9 insertions, 11 deletions

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 059231c82345..4e5b3ae824c1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -29,7 +29,6 @@ int kvm_mmu_init_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
 	kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_enabled = true;
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots);
 	spin_lock_init(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
 	kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq = wq;
 	return 1;
 }
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_uninit_tdp_mmu(struct kvm *kvm)
 	/* Also waits for any queued work items.  */
 	destroy_workqueue(kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_zap_wq);
 
-	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages));
+	WARN_ON(atomic64_read(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages));
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_roots));
 
 	/*
@@ -377,11 +376,13 @@ static void handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
 static void tdp_account_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, +1);
+	atomic64_inc(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
 }
 
 static void tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
 {
 	kvm_account_pgtable_pages((void *)sp->spt, -1);
+	atomic64_dec(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
 }
 
 /**
@@ -397,17 +398,17 @@ static void tdp_mmu_unlink_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 			      bool shared)
 {
 	tdp_unaccount_mmu_page(kvm, sp);
+
+	if (!sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed)
+		return;
+
 	if (shared)
 		spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
 	else
 		lockdep_assert_held_write(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
-	list_del(&sp->link);
-
-	if (sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed) {
-		sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed = false;
-		untrack_possible_nx_huge_page(kvm, sp);
-	}
+	sp->nx_huge_page_disallowed = false;
+	untrack_possible_nx_huge_page(kvm, sp);
 
 	if (shared)
 		spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
@@ -1140,9 +1141,6 @@ static int tdp_mmu_link_sp(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 		tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, iter, spte);
 	}
 
-	spin_lock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
-	list_add(&sp->link, &kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages);
-	spin_unlock(&kvm->arch.tdp_mmu_pages_lock);
 	tdp_account_mmu_page(kvm, sp);
 
 	return 0;