diff options
| author | Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> | 2017-08-04 14:20:54 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> | 2017-08-04 11:18:01 -0700 |
| commit | b0a0c2566f28e71e5e32121992ac8060cec75510 (patch) | |
| tree | 9f293b81ee5a47c73d86de4eb8151c525db8de3f /arch/s390/net | |
| parent | 1aff0c3402fbda8c629b12f5490977717cc0e2ab (diff) | |
| download | linux-b0a0c2566f28e71e5e32121992ac8060cec75510.tar.bz2 | |
bpf, s390: fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64
While testing some other work that required JIT modifications, I
run into test_bpf causing a hang when JIT enabled on s390. The
problematic test case was the one from ddc665a4bb4b (bpf, arm64:
fix jit branch offset related to ldimm64), and turns out that we
do have a similar issue on s390 as well. In bpf_jit_prog() we
update next instruction address after returning from bpf_jit_insn()
with an insn_count. bpf_jit_insn() returns either -1 in case of
error (e.g. unsupported insn), 1 or 2. The latter is only the
case for ldimm64 due to spanning 2 insns, however, next address
is only set to i + 1 not taking actual insn_count into account,
thus fix is to use insn_count instead of 1. bpf_jit_enable in
mode 2 provides also disasm on s390:
Before fix:
000003ff800349b6: a7f40003 brc 15,3ff800349bc ; target
000003ff800349ba: 0000 unknown
000003ff800349bc: e3b0f0700024 stg %r11,112(%r15)
000003ff800349c2: e3e0f0880024 stg %r14,136(%r15)
000003ff800349c8: 0db0 basr %r11,%r0
000003ff800349ca: c0ef00000000 llilf %r14,0
000003ff800349d0: e320b0360004 lg %r2,54(%r11)
000003ff800349d6: e330b03e0004 lg %r3,62(%r11)
000003ff800349dc: ec23ffeda065 clgrj %r2,%r3,10,3ff800349b6 ; jmp
000003ff800349e2: e3e0b0460004 lg %r14,70(%r11)
000003ff800349e8: e3e0b04e0004 lg %r14,78(%r11)
000003ff800349ee: b904002e lgr %r2,%r14
000003ff800349f2: e3b0f0700004 lg %r11,112(%r15)
000003ff800349f8: e3e0f0880004 lg %r14,136(%r15)
000003ff800349fe: 07fe bcr 15,%r14
After fix:
000003ff80ef3db4: a7f40003 brc 15,3ff80ef3dba
000003ff80ef3db8: 0000 unknown
000003ff80ef3dba: e3b0f0700024 stg %r11,112(%r15)
000003ff80ef3dc0: e3e0f0880024 stg %r14,136(%r15)
000003ff80ef3dc6: 0db0 basr %r11,%r0
000003ff80ef3dc8: c0ef00000000 llilf %r14,0
000003ff80ef3dce: e320b0360004 lg %r2,54(%r11)
000003ff80ef3dd4: e330b03e0004 lg %r3,62(%r11)
000003ff80ef3dda: ec230006a065 clgrj %r2,%r3,10,3ff80ef3de6 ; jmp
000003ff80ef3de0: e3e0b0460004 lg %r14,70(%r11)
000003ff80ef3de6: e3e0b04e0004 lg %r14,78(%r11) ; target
000003ff80ef3dec: b904002e lgr %r2,%r14
000003ff80ef3df0: e3b0f0700004 lg %r11,112(%r15)
000003ff80ef3df6: e3e0f0880004 lg %r14,136(%r15)
000003ff80ef3dfc: 07fe bcr 15,%r14
test_bpf.ko suite runs fine after the fix.
Fixes: 054623105728 ("s390/bpf: Add s390x eBPF JIT compiler backend")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Tested-by: Michael Holzheu <holzheu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/s390/net')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c index 01c6fbc3e85b..1803797fc885 100644 --- a/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/s390/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -1253,7 +1253,8 @@ static int bpf_jit_prog(struct bpf_jit *jit, struct bpf_prog *fp) insn_count = bpf_jit_insn(jit, fp, i); if (insn_count < 0) return -1; - jit->addrs[i + 1] = jit->prg; /* Next instruction address */ + /* Next instruction address */ + jit->addrs[i + insn_count] = jit->prg; } bpf_jit_epilogue(jit); |