summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/powerpc/sysdev
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorNathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>2022-09-07 17:01:11 -0500
committerMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>2022-09-14 22:43:13 +1000
commitf88aabad33ea22be2ce1c60d8901942e4e2a9edb (patch)
treeba41bd056270ef519fa0db5ce0cd55fcd7d9b1c0 /arch/powerpc/sysdev
parent71a92e99c47900cc164620948b3863382cec4f1a (diff)
downloadlinux-f88aabad33ea22be2ce1c60d8901942e4e2a9edb.tar.bz2
Revert "powerpc/rtas: Implement reentrant rtas call"
At the time this was submitted by Leonardo, I confirmed -- or thought I had confirmed -- with PowerVM partition firmware development that the following RTAS functions: - ibm,get-xive - ibm,int-off - ibm,int-on - ibm,set-xive were safe to call on multiple CPUs simultaneously, not only with respect to themselves as indicated by PAPR, but with arbitrary other RTAS calls: https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/875zcy2v8o.fsf@linux.ibm.com/ Recent discussion with firmware development makes it clear that this is not true, and that the code in commit b664db8e3f97 ("powerpc/rtas: Implement reentrant rtas call") is unsafe, likely explaining several strange bugs we've seen in internal testing involving DLPAR and LPM. These scenarios use ibm,configure-connector, whose internal state can be corrupted by the concurrent use of the "reentrant" functions, leading to symptoms like endless busy statuses from RTAS. Fixes: b664db8e3f97 ("powerpc/rtas: Implement reentrant rtas call") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.8+ Signed-off-by: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Laurent Dufour <laurent.dufour@fr.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907220111.223267-1-nathanl@linux.ibm.com
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/sysdev')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/ics-rtas.c22
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 11 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/ics-rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/ics-rtas.c
index 9e7007f9aca5..f8320f8e5bc7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/ics-rtas.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xics/ics-rtas.c
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ static void ics_rtas_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
server = xics_get_irq_server(d->irq, irq_data_get_affinity_mask(d), 0);
- call_status = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_set_xive, 3, 1, NULL, hw_irq,
- server, DEFAULT_PRIORITY);
+ call_status = rtas_call(ibm_set_xive, 3, 1, NULL, hw_irq, server,
+ DEFAULT_PRIORITY);
if (call_status != 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR
"%s: ibm_set_xive irq %u server %x returned %d\n",
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ static void ics_rtas_unmask_irq(struct irq_data *d)
}
/* Now unmask the interrupt (often a no-op) */
- call_status = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_int_on, 1, 1, NULL, hw_irq);
+ call_status = rtas_call(ibm_int_on, 1, 1, NULL, hw_irq);
if (call_status != 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: ibm_int_on irq=%u returned %d\n",
__func__, hw_irq, call_status);
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static void ics_rtas_mask_real_irq(unsigned int hw_irq)
if (hw_irq == XICS_IPI)
return;
- call_status = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_int_off, 1, 1, NULL, hw_irq);
+ call_status = rtas_call(ibm_int_off, 1, 1, NULL, hw_irq);
if (call_status != 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: ibm_int_off irq=%u returned %d\n",
__func__, hw_irq, call_status);
@@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ static void ics_rtas_mask_real_irq(unsigned int hw_irq)
}
/* Have to set XIVE to 0xff to be able to remove a slot */
- call_status = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_set_xive, 3, 1, NULL, hw_irq,
- xics_default_server, 0xff);
+ call_status = rtas_call(ibm_set_xive, 3, 1, NULL, hw_irq,
+ xics_default_server, 0xff);
if (call_status != 0) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: ibm_set_xive(0xff) irq=%u returned %d\n",
__func__, hw_irq, call_status);
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static int ics_rtas_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
if (hw_irq == XICS_IPI || hw_irq == XICS_IRQ_SPURIOUS)
return -1;
- status = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_get_xive, 1, 3, xics_status, hw_irq);
+ status = rtas_call(ibm_get_xive, 1, 3, xics_status, hw_irq);
if (status) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: ibm,get-xive irq=%u returns %d\n",
@@ -126,8 +126,8 @@ static int ics_rtas_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
pr_debug("%s: irq %d [hw 0x%x] server: 0x%x\n", __func__, d->irq,
hw_irq, irq_server);
- status = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_set_xive, 3, 1, NULL,
- hw_irq, irq_server, xics_status[1]);
+ status = rtas_call(ibm_set_xive, 3, 1, NULL,
+ hw_irq, irq_server, xics_status[1]);
if (status) {
printk(KERN_ERR "%s: ibm,set-xive irq=%u returns %d\n",
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ static int ics_rtas_check(struct ics *ics, unsigned int hw_irq)
return -EINVAL;
/* Check if RTAS knows about this interrupt */
- rc = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_get_xive, 1, 3, status, hw_irq);
+ rc = rtas_call(ibm_get_xive, 1, 3, status, hw_irq);
if (rc)
return -ENXIO;
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static long ics_rtas_get_server(struct ics *ics, unsigned long vec)
{
int rc, status[2];
- rc = rtas_call_reentrant(ibm_get_xive, 1, 3, status, vec);
+ rc = rtas_call(ibm_get_xive, 1, 3, status, vec);
if (rc)
return -1;
return status[0];