diff options
author | Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> | 2019-08-09 12:03:12 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> | 2019-08-09 17:51:39 +0100 |
commit | 9ffeb6d08c3a4bbd7b1e33711b241f511e2ded79 (patch) | |
tree | cd3d6211180de96c446af4cc90b62226f18bb576 /arch/arm64/kernel | |
parent | 788961462f3471617749edf10d0fcafad410d2bb (diff) | |
download | linux-9ffeb6d08c3a4bbd7b1e33711b241f511e2ded79.tar.bz2 |
PSCI: cpuidle: Refactor CPU suspend power_state parameter handling
Current PSCI code handles idle state entry through the
psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API, that takes an idle state index as a
parameter and convert the index into a previously initialized
power_state parameter before calling the PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() with it.
This is unwieldly, since it forces the PSCI firmware layer to keep track
of power_state parameter for every idle state so that the
index->power_state conversion can be made in the PSCI firmware layer
instead of the CPUidle driver implementations.
Move the power_state handling out of drivers/firmware/psci
into the respective ACPI/DT PSCI CPUidle backends and convert
the psci_cpu_suspend_enter() API to get the power_state
parameter as input, which makes it closer to its firmware
interface PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() API.
A notable side effect is that the PSCI ACPI/DT CPUidle backends
now can directly handle (and if needed update) power_state
parameters before handing them over to the PSCI firmware
interface to trigger PSCI.CPU_SUSPEND() calls.
Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/kernel')
-rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c | 49 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c index 619e0ebb8399..e4d6af2fdec7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpuidle.c @@ -47,17 +47,58 @@ int arm_cpuidle_suspend(int index) #define ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(arch_flags) (!(arch_flags)) +static int psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) +{ + int i, count; + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi; + struct acpi_processor *pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); + + /* + * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized + * idle states must not be enabled, so bail out + */ + if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi)) + return -EINVAL; + + count = pr->power.count - 1; + if (count <= 0) + return -ENODEV; + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + u32 state; + + lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i + 1]; + /* + * Only bits[31:0] represent a PSCI power_state while + * bits[63:32] must be 0x0 as per ARM ACPI FFH Specification + */ + state = lpi->address; + if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(state)) { + pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", state); + return -EINVAL; + } + } + + return 0; +} + int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu) { - return psci_cpu_init_idle(cpu); + return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu); } int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi) { + u32 state = lpi->address; + if (ARM64_LPI_IS_RETENTION_STATE(lpi->arch_flags)) - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, - lpi->index); + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_RETENTION_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, + lpi->index, state); else - return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, lpi->index); + return CPU_PM_CPU_IDLE_ENTER_PARAM(psci_cpu_suspend_enter, + lpi->index, state); } #endif |