diff options
| author | Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com> | 2019-03-12 22:12:46 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> | 2019-03-22 20:57:27 +0800 |
| commit | 580e295178402d14bbf598a5702f8e01fc59dbaa (patch) | |
| tree | 1c577fecbb63b68d096bb384ab4f81a8c367ec1e /arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c | |
| parent | 7aceaaef04eaaf6019ca159bc354d800559bba1d (diff) | |
| download | linux-580e295178402d14bbf598a5702f8e01fc59dbaa.tar.bz2 | |
crypto: arm64/gcm-aes-ce - fix no-NEON fallback code
The arm64 gcm-aes-ce algorithm is failing the extra crypto self-tests
following my patches to test the !may_use_simd() code paths, which
previously were untested. The problem is that in the !may_use_simd()
case, an odd number of AES blocks can be processed within each step of
the skcipher_walk. However, the skcipher_walk is being done with a
"stride" of 2 blocks and is advanced by an even number of blocks after
each step. This causes the encryption to produce the wrong ciphertext
and authentication tag, and causes the decryption to incorrectly fail.
Fix it by only processing an even number of blocks per step.
Fixes: c2b24c36e0a3 ("crypto: arm64/aes-gcm-ce - fix scatterwalk API violation")
Fixes: 71e52c278c54 ("crypto: arm64/aes-ce-gcm - operate on two input blocks at a time")
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.19+
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c | 10 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c index 791ad422c427..089b09286da7 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-glue.c @@ -473,9 +473,11 @@ static int gcm_encrypt(struct aead_request *req) put_unaligned_be32(2, iv + GCM_IV_SIZE); while (walk.nbytes >= (2 * AES_BLOCK_SIZE)) { - int blocks = walk.nbytes / AES_BLOCK_SIZE; + const int blocks = + walk.nbytes / (2 * AES_BLOCK_SIZE) * 2; u8 *dst = walk.dst.virt.addr; u8 *src = walk.src.virt.addr; + int remaining = blocks; do { __aes_arm64_encrypt(ctx->aes_key.key_enc, @@ -485,9 +487,9 @@ static int gcm_encrypt(struct aead_request *req) dst += AES_BLOCK_SIZE; src += AES_BLOCK_SIZE; - } while (--blocks > 0); + } while (--remaining > 0); - ghash_do_update(walk.nbytes / AES_BLOCK_SIZE, dg, + ghash_do_update(blocks, dg, walk.dst.virt.addr, &ctx->ghash_key, NULL, pmull_ghash_update_p64); @@ -609,7 +611,7 @@ static int gcm_decrypt(struct aead_request *req) put_unaligned_be32(2, iv + GCM_IV_SIZE); while (walk.nbytes >= (2 * AES_BLOCK_SIZE)) { - int blocks = walk.nbytes / AES_BLOCK_SIZE; + int blocks = walk.nbytes / (2 * AES_BLOCK_SIZE) * 2; u8 *dst = walk.dst.virt.addr; u8 *src = walk.src.virt.addr; |