summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/dev-tools
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2022-12-12 16:42:57 -0800
committerLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>2022-12-12 16:42:57 -0800
commite2ed78d5d9ca07a2b9d158ebac366170a2d3083d (patch)
tree1c5e722706ca862849c149c39431f63c1a0f6cf5 /Documentation/dev-tools
parent23a68d14def8247735b66a14b370b42d8fcedb47 (diff)
parent054be257f28ca8eeb8e3620766501b81ceb4b293 (diff)
downloadlinux-e2ed78d5d9ca07a2b9d158ebac366170a2d3083d.tar.bz2
Merge tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-next-6.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest
Pull KUnit updates from Shuah Khan: "Several enhancements, fixes, clean-ups, documentation updates, improvements to logging and KTAP compliance of KUnit test output: - log numbers in decimal and hex - parse KTAP compliant test output - allow conditionally exposing static symbols to tests when KUNIT is enabled - make static symbols visible during kunit testing - clean-ups to remove unused structure definition" * tag 'linux-kselftest-kunit-next-6.2-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/shuah/linux-kselftest: (29 commits) Documentation: dev-tools: Clarify requirements for result description apparmor: test: make static symbols visible during kunit testing kunit: add macro to allow conditionally exposing static symbols to tests kunit: tool: make parser preserve whitespace when printing test log Documentation: kunit: Fix "How Do I Use This" / "Next Steps" sections kunit: tool: don't include KTAP headers and the like in the test log kunit: improve KTAP compliance of KUnit test output kunit: tool: parse KTAP compliant test output mm: slub: test: Use the kunit_get_current_test() function kunit: Use the static key when retrieving the current test kunit: Provide a static key to check if KUnit is actively running tests kunit: tool: make --json do nothing if --raw_ouput is set kunit: tool: tweak error message when no KTAP found kunit: remove KUNIT_INIT_MEM_ASSERTION macro Documentation: kunit: Remove redundant 'tips.rst' page Documentation: KUnit: reword description of assertions Documentation: KUnit: make usage.rst a superset of tips.rst, remove duplication kunit: eliminate KUNIT_INIT_*_ASSERT_STRUCT macros kunit: tool: remove redundant file.close() call in unit test kunit: tool: unit tests all check parser errors, standardize formatting a bit ...
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/dev-tools')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst4
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst115
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst20
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst18
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst190
-rw-r--r--Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst92
6 files changed, 136 insertions, 303 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
index d0a9565b0f44..414c105b10a9 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst
@@ -80,8 +80,8 @@ have the number 1 and the number then must increase by 1 for each additional
subtest within the same test at the same nesting level.
The description is a description of the test, generally the name of
-the test, and can be any string of words (can't include #). The
-description is optional, but recommended.
+the test, and can be any string of characters other than # or a
+newline. The description is optional, but recommended.
The directive and any diagnostic data is optional. If either are present, they
must follow a hash sign, "#".
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst
index 8efe792bdcb9..e95ab05342bb 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst
@@ -4,16 +4,17 @@
KUnit Architecture
==================
-The KUnit architecture can be divided into two parts:
+The KUnit architecture is divided into two parts:
- `In-Kernel Testing Framework`_
-- `kunit_tool (Command Line Test Harness)`_
+- `kunit_tool (Command-line Test Harness)`_
In-Kernel Testing Framework
===========================
The kernel testing library supports KUnit tests written in C using
-KUnit. KUnit tests are kernel code. KUnit does several things:
+KUnit. These KUnit tests are kernel code. KUnit performs the following
+tasks:
- Organizes tests
- Reports test results
@@ -22,19 +23,17 @@ KUnit. KUnit tests are kernel code. KUnit does several things:
Test Cases
----------
-The fundamental unit in KUnit is the test case. The KUnit test cases are
-grouped into KUnit suites. A KUnit test case is a function with type
-signature ``void (*)(struct kunit *test)``.
-These test case functions are wrapped in a struct called
-struct kunit_case.
+The test case is the fundamental unit in KUnit. KUnit test cases are organised
+into suites. A KUnit test case is a function with type signature
+``void (*)(struct kunit *test)``. These test case functions are wrapped in a
+struct called struct kunit_case.
.. note:
``generate_params`` is optional for non-parameterized tests.
-Each KUnit test case gets a ``struct kunit`` context
-object passed to it that tracks a running test. The KUnit assertion
-macros and other KUnit utilities use the ``struct kunit`` context
-object. As an exception, there are two fields:
+Each KUnit test case receives a ``struct kunit`` context object that tracks a
+running test. The KUnit assertion macros and other KUnit utilities use the
+``struct kunit`` context object. As an exception, there are two fields:
- ``->priv``: The setup functions can use it to store arbitrary test
user data.
@@ -77,12 +76,13 @@ Executor
The KUnit executor can list and run built-in KUnit tests on boot.
The Test suites are stored in a linker section
-called ``.kunit_test_suites``. For code, see:
-https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h?h=v5.15#n945.
+called ``.kunit_test_suites``. For the code, see ``KUNIT_TABLE()`` macro
+definition in
+`include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h?h=v6.0#n950>`_.
The linker section consists of an array of pointers to
``struct kunit_suite``, and is populated by the ``kunit_test_suites()``
-macro. To run all tests compiled into the kernel, the KUnit executor
-iterates over the linker section array.
+macro. The KUnit executor iterates over the linker section array in order to
+run all the tests that are compiled into the kernel.
.. kernel-figure:: kunit_suitememorydiagram.svg
:alt: KUnit Suite Memory
@@ -90,17 +90,17 @@ iterates over the linker section array.
KUnit Suite Memory Diagram
On the kernel boot, the KUnit executor uses the start and end addresses
-of this section to iterate over and run all tests. For code, see:
-https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/executor.c
-
+of this section to iterate over and run all tests. For the implementation of the
+executor, see
+`lib/kunit/executor.c <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/executor.c>`_.
When built as a module, the ``kunit_test_suites()`` macro defines a
``module_init()`` function, which runs all the tests in the compilation
unit instead of utilizing the executor.
In KUnit tests, some error classes do not affect other tests
or parts of the kernel, each KUnit case executes in a separate thread
-context. For code, see:
-https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/try-catch.c?h=v5.15#n58
+context. See the ``kunit_try_catch_run()`` function in
+`lib/kunit/try-catch.c <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/lib/kunit/try-catch.c?h=v5.15#n58>`_.
Assertion Macros
----------------
@@ -111,37 +111,36 @@ All expectations/assertions are formatted as:
- ``{EXPECT|ASSERT}`` determines whether the check is an assertion or an
expectation.
+ In the event of a failure, the testing flow differs as follows:
- - For an expectation, if the check fails, marks the test as failed
- and logs the failure.
+ - For expectations, the test is marked as failed and the failure is logged.
- - An assertion, on failure, causes the test case to terminate
- immediately.
+ - Failing assertions, on the other hand, result in the test case being
+ terminated immediately.
- - Assertions call function:
+ - Assertions call the function:
``void __noreturn kunit_abort(struct kunit *)``.
- - ``kunit_abort`` calls function:
+ - ``kunit_abort`` calls the function:
``void __noreturn kunit_try_catch_throw(struct kunit_try_catch *try_catch)``.
- - ``kunit_try_catch_throw`` calls function:
+ - ``kunit_try_catch_throw`` calls the function:
``void kthread_complete_and_exit(struct completion *, long) __noreturn;``
and terminates the special thread context.
- ``<op>`` denotes a check with options: ``TRUE`` (supplied property
- has the boolean value “true”), ``EQ`` (two supplied properties are
+ has the boolean value "true"), ``EQ`` (two supplied properties are
equal), ``NOT_ERR_OR_NULL`` (supplied pointer is not null and does not
- contain an “err” value).
+ contain an "err" value).
- ``[_MSG]`` prints a custom message on failure.
Test Result Reporting
---------------------
-KUnit prints test results in KTAP format. KTAP is based on TAP14, see:
-https://github.com/isaacs/testanything.github.io/blob/tap14/tap-version-14-specification.md.
-KTAP (yet to be standardized format) works with KUnit and Kselftest.
-The KUnit executor prints KTAP results to dmesg, and debugfs
-(if configured).
+KUnit prints the test results in KTAP format. KTAP is based on TAP14, see
+Documentation/dev-tools/ktap.rst.
+KTAP works with KUnit and Kselftest. The KUnit executor prints KTAP results to
+dmesg, and debugfs (if configured).
Parameterized Tests
-------------------
@@ -150,33 +149,35 @@ Each KUnit parameterized test is associated with a collection of
parameters. The test is invoked multiple times, once for each parameter
value and the parameter is stored in the ``param_value`` field.
The test case includes a KUNIT_CASE_PARAM() macro that accepts a
-generator function.
-The generator function is passed the previous parameter and returns the next
-parameter. It also provides a macro to generate common-case generators based on
-arrays.
+generator function. The generator function is passed the previous parameter
+and returns the next parameter. It also includes a macro for generating
+array-based common-case generators.
-kunit_tool (Command Line Test Harness)
+kunit_tool (Command-line Test Harness)
======================================
-kunit_tool is a Python script ``(tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py)``
-that can be used to configure, build, exec, parse and run (runs other
-commands in order) test results. You can either run KUnit tests using
-kunit_tool or can include KUnit in kernel and parse manually.
+``kunit_tool`` is a Python script, found in ``tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py``. It
+is used to configure, build, execute, parse test results and run all of the
+previous commands in correct order (i.e., configure, build, execute and parse).
+You have two options for running KUnit tests: either build the kernel with KUnit
+enabled and manually parse the results (see
+Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst) or use ``kunit_tool``
+(see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst).
- ``configure`` command generates the kernel ``.config`` from a
``.kunitconfig`` file (and any architecture-specific options).
- For some architectures, additional config options are specified in the
- ``qemu_config`` Python script
- (For example: ``tools/testing/kunit/qemu_configs/powerpc.py``).
+ The Python scripts available in ``qemu_configs`` folder
+ (for example, ``tools/testing/kunit/qemu configs/powerpc.py``) contains
+ additional configuration options for specific architectures.
It parses both the existing ``.config`` and the ``.kunitconfig`` files
- and ensures that ``.config`` is a superset of ``.kunitconfig``.
- If this is not the case, it will combine the two and run
- ``make olddefconfig`` to regenerate the ``.config`` file. It then
- verifies that ``.config`` is now a superset. This checks if all
- Kconfig dependencies are correctly specified in ``.kunitconfig``.
- ``kunit_config.py`` includes the parsing Kconfigs code. The code which
- runs ``make olddefconfig`` is a part of ``kunit_kernel.py``. You can
- invoke this command via: ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config`` and
+ to ensure that ``.config`` is a superset of ``.kunitconfig``.
+ If not, it will combine the two and run ``make olddefconfig`` to regenerate
+ the ``.config`` file. It then checks to see if ``.config`` has become a superset.
+ This verifies that all the Kconfig dependencies are correctly specified in the
+ file ``.kunitconfig``. The ``kunit_config.py`` script contains the code for parsing
+ Kconfigs. The code which runs ``make olddefconfig`` is part of the
+ ``kunit_kernel.py`` script. You can invoke this command through:
+ ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py config`` and
generate a ``.config`` file.
- ``build`` runs ``make`` on the kernel tree with required options
(depends on the architecture and some options, for example: build_dir)
@@ -184,8 +185,8 @@ kunit_tool or can include KUnit in kernel and parse manually.
To build a KUnit kernel from the current ``.config``, you can use the
``build`` argument: ``./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py build``.
- ``exec`` command executes kernel results either directly (using
- User-mode Linux configuration), or via an emulator such
- as QEMU. It reads results from the log via standard
+ User-mode Linux configuration), or through an emulator such
+ as QEMU. It reads results from the log using standard
output (stdout), and passes them to ``parse`` to be parsed.
If you already have built a kernel with built-in KUnit tests,
you can run the kernel and display the test results with the ``exec``
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
index f5d13f1d37be..b3593ae29ace 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/index.rst
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@ KUnit - Linux Kernel Unit Testing
api/index
style
faq
- tips
running_tips
This section details the kernel unit testing framework.
@@ -100,14 +99,11 @@ Read also :ref:`kinds-of-tests`.
How do I use it?
================
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst - for KUnit new users.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst - KUnit architecture.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst - run kunit_tool.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst - run tests without kunit_tool.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst - write tests.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst - best practices with
- examples.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst - KUnit APIs
- used for testing.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst - KUnit common questions and
- answers.
+You can find a step-by-step guide to writing and running KUnit tests in
+Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
+
+Alternatively, feel free to look through the rest of the KUnit documentation,
+or to experiment with tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py and the example test under
+lib/kunit/kunit-example-test.c
+
+Happy testing!
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
index f4f504f1fb15..c736613c9b19 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/start.rst
@@ -294,13 +294,11 @@ Congrats! You just wrote your first KUnit test.
Next Steps
==========
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/architecture.rst - KUnit architecture.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst - run kunit_tool.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst - run tests without kunit_tool.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst - write tests.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst - best practices with
- examples.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/index.rst - KUnit APIs
- used for testing.
-* Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/faq.rst - KUnit common questions and
- answers.
+If you're interested in using some of the more advanced features of kunit.py,
+take a look at Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_wrapper.rst
+
+If you'd like to run tests without using kunit.py, check out
+Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/run_manual.rst
+
+For more information on writing KUnit tests (including some common techniques
+for testing different things), see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst
deleted file mode 100644
index 492d2ded2f5a..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/tips.rst
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,190 +0,0 @@
-.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
-
-============================
-Tips For Writing KUnit Tests
-============================
-
-Exiting early on failed expectations
-------------------------------------
-
-``KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ`` and friends will mark the test as failed and continue
-execution. In some cases, it's unsafe to continue and you can use the
-``KUNIT_ASSERT`` variant to exit on failure.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- void example_test_user_alloc_function(struct kunit *test)
- {
- void *object = alloc_some_object_for_me();
-
- /* Make sure we got a valid pointer back. */
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, object);
- do_something_with_object(object);
- }
-
-Allocating memory
------------------
-
-Where you would use ``kzalloc``, you should prefer ``kunit_kzalloc`` instead.
-KUnit will ensure the memory is freed once the test completes.
-
-This is particularly useful since it lets you use the ``KUNIT_ASSERT_EQ``
-macros to exit early from a test without having to worry about remembering to
-call ``kfree``.
-
-Example:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- void example_test_allocation(struct kunit *test)
- {
- char *buffer = kunit_kzalloc(test, 16, GFP_KERNEL);
- /* Ensure allocation succeeded. */
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, buffer);
-
- KUNIT_ASSERT_STREQ(test, buffer, "");
- }
-
-
-Testing static functions
-------------------------
-
-If you don't want to expose functions or variables just for testing, one option
-is to conditionally ``#include`` the test file at the end of your .c file, e.g.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- /* In my_file.c */
-
- static int do_interesting_thing();
-
- #ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
- #include "my_kunit_test.c"
- #endif
-
-Injecting test-only code
-------------------------
-
-Similarly to the above, it can be useful to add test-specific logic.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- /* In my_file.h */
-
- #ifdef CONFIG_MY_KUNIT_TEST
- /* Defined in my_kunit_test.c */
- void test_only_hook(void);
- #else
- void test_only_hook(void) { }
- #endif
-
-This test-only code can be made more useful by accessing the current kunit
-test, see below.
-
-Accessing the current test
---------------------------
-
-In some cases, you need to call test-only code from outside the test file, e.g.
-like in the example above or if you're providing a fake implementation of an
-ops struct.
-There is a ``kunit_test`` field in ``task_struct``, so you can access it via
-``current->kunit_test``.
-
-Here's a slightly in-depth example of how one could implement "mocking":
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- #include <linux/sched.h> /* for current */
-
- struct test_data {
- int foo_result;
- int want_foo_called_with;
- };
-
- static int fake_foo(int arg)
- {
- struct kunit *test = current->kunit_test;
- struct test_data *test_data = test->priv;
-
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_data->want_foo_called_with, arg);
- return test_data->foo_result;
- }
-
- static void example_simple_test(struct kunit *test)
- {
- /* Assume priv is allocated in the suite's .init */
- struct test_data *test_data = test->priv;
-
- test_data->foo_result = 42;
- test_data->want_foo_called_with = 1;
-
- /* In a real test, we'd probably pass a pointer to fake_foo somewhere
- * like an ops struct, etc. instead of calling it directly. */
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, fake_foo(1), 42);
- }
-
-
-Note: here we're able to get away with using ``test->priv``, but if you wanted
-something more flexible you could use a named ``kunit_resource``, see
-Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst.
-
-Failing the current test
-------------------------
-
-But sometimes, you might just want to fail the current test. In that case, we
-have ``kunit_fail_current_test(fmt, args...)`` which is defined in ``<kunit/test-bug.h>`` and
-doesn't require pulling in ``<kunit/test.h>``.
-
-E.g. say we had an option to enable some extra debug checks on some data structure:
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- #include <kunit/test-bug.h>
-
- #ifdef CONFIG_EXTRA_DEBUG_CHECKS
- static void validate_my_data(struct data *data)
- {
- if (is_valid(data))
- return;
-
- kunit_fail_current_test("data %p is invalid", data);
-
- /* Normal, non-KUnit, error reporting code here. */
- }
- #else
- static void my_debug_function(void) { }
- #endif
-
-
-Customizing error messages
---------------------------
-
-Each of the ``KUNIT_EXPECT`` and ``KUNIT_ASSERT`` macros have a ``_MSG`` variant.
-These take a format string and arguments to provide additional context to the automatically generated error messages.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- char some_str[41];
- generate_sha1_hex_string(some_str);
-
- /* Before. Not easy to tell why the test failed. */
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, strlen(some_str), 40);
-
- /* After. Now we see the offending string. */
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, strlen(some_str), 40, "some_str='%s'", some_str);
-
-Alternatively, one can take full control over the error message by using ``KUNIT_FAIL()``, e.g.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- /* Before */
- KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, some_setup_function(), 0);
-
- /* After: full control over the failure message. */
- if (some_setup_function())
- KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to setup thing for testing");
-
-Next Steps
-==========
-* Optional: see the Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst page for a more
- in-depth explanation of KUnit.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
index 2737863ef365..48f8196d5aad 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/usage.rst
@@ -112,11 +112,45 @@ terminates the test case if the condition is not satisfied. For example:
KUNIT_EXPECT_LE(test, a[i], a[i + 1]);
}
-In this example, the method under test should return pointer to a value. If the
-pointer returns null or an errno, we want to stop the test since the following
-expectation could crash the test case. `ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(...)` allows us
-to bail out of the test case if the appropriate conditions are not satisfied to
-complete the test.
+In this example, we need to be able to allocate an array to test the ``sort()``
+function. So we use ``KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL()`` to abort the test if
+there's an allocation error.
+
+.. note::
+ In other test frameworks, ``ASSERT`` macros are often implemented by calling
+ ``return`` so they only work from the test function. In KUnit, we stop the
+ current kthread on failure, so you can call them from anywhere.
+
+Customizing error messages
+--------------------------
+
+Each of the ``KUNIT_EXPECT`` and ``KUNIT_ASSERT`` macros have a ``_MSG``
+variant. These take a format string and arguments to provide additional
+context to the automatically generated error messages.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ char some_str[41];
+ generate_sha1_hex_string(some_str);
+
+ /* Before. Not easy to tell why the test failed. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, strlen(some_str), 40);
+
+ /* After. Now we see the offending string. */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ_MSG(test, strlen(some_str), 40, "some_str='%s'", some_str);
+
+Alternatively, one can take full control over the error message by using
+``KUNIT_FAIL()``, e.g.
+
+.. code-block:: c
+
+ /* Before */
+ KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, some_setup_function(), 0);
+
+ /* After: full control over the failure message. */
+ if (some_setup_function())
+ KUNIT_FAIL(test, "Failed to setup thing for testing");
+
Test Suites
~~~~~~~~~~~
@@ -546,24 +580,6 @@ By reusing the same ``cases`` array from above, we can write the test as a
{}
};
-Exiting Early on Failed Expectations
-------------------------------------
-
-We can use ``KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ`` to mark the test as failed and continue
-execution. In some cases, it is unsafe to continue. We can use the
-``KUNIT_ASSERT`` variant to exit on failure.
-
-.. code-block:: c
-
- void example_test_user_alloc_function(struct kunit *test)
- {
- void *object = alloc_some_object_for_me();
-
- /* Make sure we got a valid pointer back. */
- KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, object);
- do_something_with_object(object);
- }
-
Allocating Memory
-----------------
@@ -625,17 +641,23 @@ as shown in next section: *Accessing The Current Test*.
Accessing The Current Test
--------------------------
-In some cases, we need to call test-only code from outside the test file.
-For example, see example in section *Injecting Test-Only Code* or if
-we are providing a fake implementation of an ops struct. Using
-``kunit_test`` field in ``task_struct``, we can access it via
-``current->kunit_test``.
+In some cases, we need to call test-only code from outside the test file. This
+is helpful, for example, when providing a fake implementation of a function, or
+to fail any current test from within an error handler.
+We can do this via the ``kunit_test`` field in ``task_struct``, which we can
+access using the ``kunit_get_current_test()`` function in ``kunit/test-bug.h``.
+
+``kunit_get_current_test()`` is safe to call even if KUnit is not enabled. If
+KUnit is not enabled, was built as a module (``CONFIG_KUNIT=m``), or no test is
+running in the current task, it will return ``NULL``. This compiles down to
+either a no-op or a static key check, so will have a negligible performance
+impact when no test is running.
-The example below includes how to implement "mocking":
+The example below uses this to implement a "mock" implementation of a function, ``foo``:
.. code-block:: c
- #include <linux/sched.h> /* for current */
+ #include <kunit/test-bug.h> /* for kunit_get_current_test */
struct test_data {
int foo_result;
@@ -644,7 +666,7 @@ The example below includes how to implement "mocking":
static int fake_foo(int arg)
{
- struct kunit *test = current->kunit_test;
+ struct kunit *test = kunit_get_current_test();
struct test_data *test_data = test->priv;
KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, test_data->want_foo_called_with, arg);
@@ -675,7 +697,7 @@ Each test can have multiple resources which have string names providing the same
flexibility as a ``priv`` member, but also, for example, allowing helper
functions to create resources without conflicting with each other. It is also
possible to define a clean up function for each resource, making it easy to
-avoid resource leaks. For more information, see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/test.rst.
+avoid resource leaks. For more information, see Documentation/dev-tools/kunit/api/resource.rst.
Failing The Current Test
------------------------
@@ -703,3 +725,9 @@ structures as shown below:
static void my_debug_function(void) { }
#endif
+``kunit_fail_current_test()`` is safe to call even if KUnit is not enabled. If
+KUnit is not enabled, was built as a module (``CONFIG_KUNIT=m``), or no test is
+running in the current task, it will do nothing. This compiles down to either a
+no-op or a static key check, so will have a negligible performance impact when
+no test is running.
+