summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/Documentation/DocBook
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>2009-03-25 22:48:06 +0300
committerAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>2009-03-31 01:14:44 +0400
commit99b76233803beab302123d243eea9e41149804f3 (patch)
tree398178210fe66845ccd6fa4258ba762a87e023ad /Documentation/DocBook
parent3dec7f59c370c7b58184d63293c3dc984d475840 (diff)
downloadlinux-99b76233803beab302123d243eea9e41149804f3.tar.bz2
proc 2/2: remove struct proc_dir_entry::owner
Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting in module refcount underflow. We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops and ->data. But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment) and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give some thoughts. ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for protection. rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm. And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular. We definitely don't want such modular code. Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller. So, let's nuke it. Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/DocBook')
-rw-r--r--Documentation/DocBook/procfs_example.c9
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/procfs_example.c b/Documentation/DocBook/procfs_example.c
index 8c6396e4bf31..a5b11793b1e0 100644
--- a/Documentation/DocBook/procfs_example.c
+++ b/Documentation/DocBook/procfs_example.c
@@ -117,9 +117,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
rv = -ENOMEM;
goto out;
}
-
- example_dir->owner = THIS_MODULE;
-
/* create jiffies using convenience function */
jiffies_file = create_proc_read_entry("jiffies",
0444, example_dir,
@@ -130,8 +127,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
goto no_jiffies;
}
- jiffies_file->owner = THIS_MODULE;
-
/* create foo and bar files using same callback
* functions
*/
@@ -146,7 +141,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
foo_file->data = &foo_data;
foo_file->read_proc = proc_read_foobar;
foo_file->write_proc = proc_write_foobar;
- foo_file->owner = THIS_MODULE;
bar_file = create_proc_entry("bar", 0644, example_dir);
if(bar_file == NULL) {
@@ -159,7 +153,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
bar_file->data = &bar_data;
bar_file->read_proc = proc_read_foobar;
bar_file->write_proc = proc_write_foobar;
- bar_file->owner = THIS_MODULE;
/* create symlink */
symlink = proc_symlink("jiffies_too", example_dir,
@@ -169,8 +162,6 @@ static int __init init_procfs_example(void)
goto no_symlink;
}
- symlink->owner = THIS_MODULE;
-
/* everything OK */
printk(KERN_INFO "%s %s initialised\n",
MODULE_NAME, MODULE_VERS);