summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2016-05-20 19:53:09 -0400
committerDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>2016-05-20 19:53:09 -0400
commitcb543e80f43b2db9d3adcc80d522b27829e60d82 (patch)
tree1f5773cda4c0b535c4432f12a633ff304d11a004
parent238a9584e9e2c7b3ea23924e9183fee05d584789 (diff)
parent1b9b69ecb3a5236d4d3da0f0fa11af916371841e (diff)
downloadlinux-cb543e80f43b2db9d3adcc80d522b27829e60d82.tar.bz2
Merge branch 'bpf-verifier-fixes'
Alexei Starovoitov says: ==================== bpf: verifier fixes Further testing of 'direct packet access' uncovered several usability issues. Fix them. ==================== Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-rw-r--r--kernel/bpf/verifier.c30
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index a08d66215245..668e07903c8f 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -683,15 +683,11 @@ static int check_packet_access(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
{
struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
struct reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
- int linear_size = (int) reg->range - (int) reg->off;
- if (linear_size < 0 || linear_size >= MAX_PACKET_OFF) {
- verbose("verifier bug\n");
- return -EFAULT;
- }
- if (off < 0 || off + size > linear_size) {
- verbose("invalid access to packet, off=%d size=%d, allowed=%d\n",
- off, size, linear_size);
+ off += reg->off;
+ if (off < 0 || off + size > reg->range) {
+ verbose("invalid access to packet, off=%d size=%d, R%d(id=%d,off=%d,r=%d)\n",
+ off, size, regno, reg->id, reg->off, reg->range);
return -EACCES;
}
return 0;
@@ -1249,6 +1245,7 @@ static int check_packet_ptr_add(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
struct reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
struct reg_state *dst_reg = &regs[insn->dst_reg];
struct reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
+ struct reg_state tmp_reg;
s32 imm;
if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K) {
@@ -1271,6 +1268,19 @@ add_imm:
*/
dst_reg->off += imm;
} else {
+ if (src_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ /* R6=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=62) R7=imm22; r7 += r6 */
+ tmp_reg = *dst_reg; /* save r7 state */
+ *dst_reg = *src_reg; /* copy pkt_ptr state r6 into r7 */
+ src_reg = &tmp_reg; /* pretend it's src_reg state */
+ /* if the checks below reject it, the copy won't matter,
+ * since we're rejecting the whole program. If all ok,
+ * then imm22 state will be added to r7
+ * and r7 will be pkt(id=0,off=22,r=62) while
+ * r6 will stay as pkt(id=0,off=0,r=62)
+ */
+ }
+
if (src_reg->type == CONST_IMM) {
/* pkt_ptr += reg where reg is known constant */
imm = src_reg->imm;
@@ -1569,7 +1579,9 @@ static int check_alu_op(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
return 0;
} else if (opcode == BPF_ADD &&
BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&
- dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET) {
+ (dst_reg->type == PTR_TO_PACKET ||
+ (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
+ regs[insn->src_reg].type == PTR_TO_PACKET))) {
/* ptr_to_packet += K|X */
return check_packet_ptr_add(env, insn);
} else if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_ALU64 &&