diff options
| author | Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> | 2021-04-25 13:28:10 +0300 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com> | 2021-05-18 23:01:51 -0700 |
| commit | 75e8564e919f369cafb3d2b8fd11ec5af7b37416 (patch) | |
| tree | 8f56b568dc4539be74cff6f7f2e7c93fb770a98e | |
| parent | 7c9f131f366ab414691907fa0407124ea2b2f3bc (diff) | |
| download | linux-75e8564e919f369cafb3d2b8fd11ec5af7b37416.tar.bz2 | |
net/mlx5: Don't overwrite HCA capabilities when setting MSI-X count
During driver probe of device that has dynamic MSI-X feature enabled,
the following error is printed in some FW flavour (not released yet).
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: firmware version: 4.7.4387
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: 126.016 Gb/s available PCIe bandwidth (8.0 GT/s PCIe x16 link)
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: mlx5_cmd_check:777:(pid 70599): SET_HCA_CAP(0x109) op_mod(0x0) failed, status bad parameter(0x3), syndrome (0x0)
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: set_hca_cap:622:(pid 70599): handle_hca_cap failed
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: mlx5_function_setup:1045:(pid 70599): set_hca_cap failed
mlx5_core 0000:06:00.0: probe_one:1465:(pid 70599): mlx5_init_one failed with error code -22
mlx5_core: probe of 0000:06:00.0 failed with error -22
In order to make the setting capability of MSI-X future proof, let's
query the current capabilities first.
Fixes: 604774add516 ("net/mlx5: Dynamically assign MSI-X vectors count")
Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@nvidia.com>
| -rw-r--r-- | drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c | 22 |
1 files changed, 17 insertions, 5 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c index 1f907df5b3a2..c3373fb1cd7f 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/pci_irq.c @@ -95,9 +95,10 @@ int mlx5_get_default_msix_vec_count(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int num_vfs) int mlx5_set_msix_vec_count(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int function_id, int msix_vec_count) { - int sz = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(set_hca_cap_in); + int query_sz = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(query_hca_cap_out); + int set_sz = MLX5_ST_SZ_BYTES(set_hca_cap_in); + void *hca_cap = NULL, *query_cap = NULL, *cap; int num_vf_msix, min_msix, max_msix; - void *hca_cap, *cap; int ret; num_vf_msix = MLX5_CAP_GEN_MAX(dev, num_total_dynamic_vf_msix); @@ -116,11 +117,20 @@ int mlx5_set_msix_vec_count(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int function_id, if (msix_vec_count > max_msix) return -EOVERFLOW; - hca_cap = kzalloc(sz, GFP_KERNEL); - if (!hca_cap) - return -ENOMEM; + query_cap = kzalloc(query_sz, GFP_KERNEL); + hca_cap = kzalloc(set_sz, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!hca_cap || !query_cap) { + ret = -ENOMEM; + goto out; + } + + ret = mlx5_vport_get_other_func_cap(dev, function_id, query_cap); + if (ret) + goto out; cap = MLX5_ADDR_OF(set_hca_cap_in, hca_cap, capability); + memcpy(cap, MLX5_ADDR_OF(query_hca_cap_out, query_cap, capability), + MLX5_UN_SZ_BYTES(hca_cap_union)); MLX5_SET(cmd_hca_cap, cap, dynamic_msix_table_size, msix_vec_count); MLX5_SET(set_hca_cap_in, hca_cap, opcode, MLX5_CMD_OP_SET_HCA_CAP); @@ -130,7 +140,9 @@ int mlx5_set_msix_vec_count(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev, int function_id, MLX5_SET(set_hca_cap_in, hca_cap, op_mod, MLX5_SET_HCA_CAP_OP_MOD_GENERAL_DEVICE << 1); ret = mlx5_cmd_exec_in(dev, set_hca_cap, hca_cap); +out: kfree(hca_cap); + kfree(query_cap); return ret; } |