summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>2021-02-08 17:33:33 -0600
committerMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>2021-02-10 17:22:51 +0000
commit6f5d506d7ff1d9b1ffac0130f2958b9da41175f4 (patch)
treef23f0d88e83a85d7ec57adb74c4153587854ebe3
parent717a8fdd150c495cc202880cf6955294c7acae4f (diff)
downloadlinux-6f5d506d7ff1d9b1ffac0130f2958b9da41175f4.tar.bz2
ASoC: SOF: Intel: SoundWire: refine ACPI match
We have existing platforms where the wrong machine is selected. We need to make sure the number of devices reported on a link matches what we expect for a link descriptor. This helps avoid using the TGL-RVP configuration for an HP platform or vice-versa, depending on the order in which they are inserted in the table. Co-developed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <bard.liao@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Guennadi Liakhovetski <guennadi.liakhovetski@intel.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210208233336.59449-9-pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
-rw-r--r--sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c59
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 14 deletions
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
index 447163494b05..db868376039a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/intel/hda.c
@@ -1071,32 +1071,63 @@ static bool link_slaves_found(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
struct sdw_intel_slave_id *ids = sdw->ids;
int num_slaves = sdw->num_slaves;
unsigned int part_id, link_id, unique_id, mfg_id;
- int i, j;
+ int i, j, k;
for (i = 0; i < link->num_adr; i++) {
u64 adr = link->adr_d[i].adr;
+ int reported_part_count = 0;
mfg_id = SDW_MFG_ID(adr);
part_id = SDW_PART_ID(adr);
link_id = SDW_DISCO_LINK_ID(adr);
+
+ for (j = 0; j < num_slaves; j++) {
+ /* find out how many identical parts were reported on that link */
+ if (ids[j].link_id == link_id &&
+ ids[j].id.part_id == part_id &&
+ ids[j].id.mfg_id == mfg_id)
+ reported_part_count++;
+ }
+
for (j = 0; j < num_slaves; j++) {
+ int expected_part_count = 0;
+
if (ids[j].link_id != link_id ||
ids[j].id.part_id != part_id ||
ids[j].id.mfg_id != mfg_id)
continue;
- /*
- * we have to check unique id
- * if there is more than one
- * Slave on the link
- */
- unique_id = SDW_UNIQUE_ID(adr);
- if (link->num_adr == 1 ||
- ids[j].id.unique_id == SDW_IGNORED_UNIQUE_ID ||
- ids[j].id.unique_id == unique_id) {
- dev_dbg(bus->dev,
- "found %x at link %d\n",
- part_id, link_id);
- break;
+
+ /* find out how many identical parts are expected */
+ for (k = 0; k < link->num_adr; k++) {
+ u64 adr2 = link->adr_d[i].adr;
+ unsigned int part_id2, link_id2, mfg_id2;
+
+ mfg_id2 = SDW_MFG_ID(adr2);
+ part_id2 = SDW_PART_ID(adr2);
+ link_id2 = SDW_DISCO_LINK_ID(adr2);
+
+ if (link_id2 == link_id &&
+ part_id2 == part_id &&
+ mfg_id2 == mfg_id)
+ expected_part_count++;
+ }
+
+ if (reported_part_count == expected_part_count) {
+ /*
+ * we have to check unique id
+ * if there is more than one
+ * Slave on the link
+ */
+ unique_id = SDW_UNIQUE_ID(adr);
+ if (reported_part_count == 1 ||
+ ids[j].id.unique_id == unique_id) {
+ dev_dbg(bus->dev, "found %x at link %d\n",
+ part_id, link_id);
+ break;
+ }
+ } else {
+ dev_dbg(bus->dev, "part %x reported %d expected %d on link %d, skipping\n",
+ part_id, reported_part_count, expected_part_count, link_id);
}
}
if (j == num_slaves) {