summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>2015-12-16 17:23:11 -0500
committerAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>2015-12-18 15:34:33 -0500
commit68791649a725ac58c88b472ea6187853e67b3415 (patch)
treeebf7737b18657445c9874829cf9458855cd96e34
parent73eee9b2de1fa08f2a82bb32ac4ec5e605716a91 (diff)
downloadlinux-68791649a725ac58c88b472ea6187853e67b3415.tar.bz2
xprtrdma: Invalidate in the RPC reply handler
There is a window between the time the RPC reply handler wakes the waiting RPC task and when xprt_release() invokes ops->buf_free. During this time, memory regions containing the data payload may still be accessed by a broken or malicious server, but the RPC application has already been allowed access to the memory containing the RPC request's data payloads. The server should be fenced from client memory containing RPC data payloads _before_ the RPC application is allowed to continue. This change also more strongly enforces send queue accounting. There is a maximum number of RPC calls allowed to be outstanding. When an RPC/RDMA transport is set up, just enough send queue resources are allocated to handle registration, Send, and invalidation WRs for each those RPCs at the same time. Before, additional RPC calls could be dispatched while invalidation WRs were still consuming send WQEs. When invalidation WRs backed up, dispatching additional RPCs resulted in a send queue overrun. Now, the reply handler prevents RPC dispatch until invalidation is complete. This prevents RPC call dispatch until there are enough send queue resources to proceed. Still to do: If an RPC exits early (say, ^C), the reply handler has no opportunity to perform invalidation. Currently, xprt_rdma_free() still frees remaining RDMA resources, which could deadlock. Additional changes are needed to handle invalidation properly in this case. Reported-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Tested-by: Devesh Sharma <devesh.sharma@avagotech.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-rw-r--r--net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c16
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
index c10d9699441c..0f28f2d743ed 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
@@ -804,6 +804,11 @@ rpcrdma_reply_handler(struct rpcrdma_rep *rep)
if (req->rl_reply)
goto out_duplicate;
+ /* Sanity checking has passed. We are now committed
+ * to complete this transaction.
+ */
+ list_del_init(&rqst->rq_list);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
dprintk("RPC: %s: reply 0x%p completes request 0x%p\n"
" RPC request 0x%p xid 0x%08x\n",
__func__, rep, req, rqst,
@@ -888,12 +893,23 @@ badheader:
break;
}
+ /* Invalidate and flush the data payloads before waking the
+ * waiting application. This guarantees the memory region is
+ * properly fenced from the server before the application
+ * accesses the data. It also ensures proper send flow
+ * control: waking the next RPC waits until this RPC has
+ * relinquished all its Send Queue entries.
+ */
+ if (req->rl_nchunks)
+ r_xprt->rx_ia.ri_ops->ro_unmap_sync(r_xprt, req);
+
credits = be32_to_cpu(headerp->rm_credit);
if (credits == 0)
credits = 1; /* don't deadlock */
else if (credits > r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests)
credits = r_xprt->rx_buf.rb_max_requests;
+ spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
cwnd = xprt->cwnd;
xprt->cwnd = credits << RPC_CWNDSHIFT;
if (xprt->cwnd > cwnd)