summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>2021-04-07 10:01:53 +0200
committerThierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>2021-04-09 15:21:18 +0200
commit64d7d074acd52e1bdff621f2cb86c0aae9bcef80 (patch)
treecfa2994803adc62ea28541475e0d8f04039d0df4
parent0e719e8ca3946bac0034152309fe7565616bde50 (diff)
downloadlinux-64d7d074acd52e1bdff621f2cb86c0aae9bcef80.tar.bz2
pwm: lpss: Don't modify HW state in .remove callback
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do, this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level driver. So drop the hardware modification from the .remove() callback. Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
-rw-r--r--drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c6
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
index 9ea6a176cbe5..58b4031524af 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-lpss.c
@@ -254,12 +254,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_lpss_probe);
int pwm_lpss_remove(struct pwm_lpss_chip *lpwm)
{
- int i;
-
- for (i = 0; i < lpwm->info->npwm; i++) {
- if (pwm_is_enabled(&lpwm->chip.pwms[i]))
- pm_runtime_put(lpwm->chip.dev);
- }
return pwmchip_remove(&lpwm->chip);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pwm_lpss_remove);