summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/nokia-tips
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/nokia-tips')
-rw-r--r--doc/nokia-tips105
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/nokia-tips b/doc/nokia-tips
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..468c1a1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/nokia-tips
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+<b>Nokia tips</b>
+
+When developing this tool I've found some bugs and misfeatures that
+should be fixed to make flashing safer and cleaner.
+
+Before reading the list of the following items I would like to say that
+Nokia has done a wonderful work on this device on the flashing/nolo parts,
+it's really hard to break the device and it works pretty nice. BTW I
+think that there are some things that should be fixed.
+
+
+<b>*) Flashing at low battery level</b>
+
+ When the device is under a certain limit of battery it will not start,
+ this is done by initfs, without any warning message or so, this really
+ scares end users, because the battery level check is done in the initfs
+ boot stage, not inside NOLO, so it's possible to flash the device on
+ low level batteries.
+
+ This is *really* dangerous and not very user friendly.
+
+
+<b>*) Internal nolo state not reset'd</b>
+
+ It's possible to get nolo on a strange state that always returns error
+ when flashing pieces, it's mandatory to reboot the device to recover
+ the original nolo state and be able to flash again.
+
+ This is an strange and not very clear to me.
+
+
+<b>*) Buffer overflows</b>
+
+ The original nokia flasher has some buffer overflow bugs that should
+ be fixed. They're safe for 99.9% of cases, but bofs on critical programs
+ like this one should not be there.
+
+ If nokia releases the source of the flasher it would be easier to make it
+ better and safer. BTW the original flasher is much more secure and reliable
+ than this one.
+
+
+<b>*) Missing stuff</b>
+
+ There are some flashing options that are not working like passing arguments
+ to the kernel, set the hw revision or do a cold flash (the most critical
+ part is undocumented).
+
+
+<b>*) Weird firmware format</b>
+
+ The (new and old) FIASCO firmware format is not a very clean format, it
+ doesn't provide any checksumming facility to ensure that the contents of
+ the firmware have been modified or incorrect, so i'll rather encourage
+ to design and create a standard firmware format for embedded devices with
+ checksumming, signatures, handling libraries, documentation and so.
+
+ I'll happilly collaborate on the design of this open firmware format, and
+ it would be used on all the open source-based devices to aim interoperability
+ between devices and flashers, providing a more standard and reliable way of
+ flashing devices.
+
+ This will ease the development on new devices, so the information and the
+ code could be revised and enhaced by zillions of eyes.
+
+
+<b>*) Poor checksumming</b>
+
+ The only checksum is a 16 bit xor of the whole firmware piece and it's only
+ checked after sending the piece to the device.
+
+ This is not very safe, because 16 bit checksum is a very low-quality
+ algorithm. It currently performs a unique check at the end, it could be
+ better to check each data block to avoid errors or invalid flashing, isn't it ?
+
+<b>*) No validation of pieces before flashing</b>
+
+ I've implemented a minimal check of the pieces to avoid flashing invalid
+ pieces on the wrong place. This is done in fpid.c (firmware piece identifier).
+
+ This should avoid end users to flash initfs on the kernel or weird things
+ that can (pseudo)brick the device.
+
+
+<b>*) Reverse flashing</b>
+
+ If you want to test a new firmware, but you don't want to loose all the
+ contents of your device. The only way to do that (afaik) is from the
+ device. That's done with `0xFFFF -e [path]`.
+
+ IMHO the reverse flashing (dump) should be implemented inside the bootloader
+ (NOLO in this case), and allow to retrieve (at least) the most critical
+ pieces of the firmware before flashing a new ones, and restore them in
+ case of a wrong checksumming (for example)
+
+
+<b>*) Documentation</b>
+
+ The nokia flasher comes as is, without documentation. This is not good
+ to anybody, because the lack of information is always the root of problems,
+ fear and ignorance.
+
+ So giving a minimal documentation about how to use the flasher (not only
+ the basic usage stuff (like the maemo community has done in the wiki)
+ would be good for everybody.