| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select
unnecessary Platform")
Current ALSA SoC avoid to add duplicate component to rtd,
and this driver was selecting CPU component as Platform component.
Thus, above patch removed Platform settings from this driver,
because it assumed these are same component.
But, some CPU driver is using generic DMAEngine, in such case, both
CPU component and Platform component will have same of_node/name.
In other words, there are some components which are different but
have same of_node/name.
In such case, Card driver definitely need to select Platform even
though it is same as CPU.
It is depends on CPU driver, but is difficult to know it from Card driver.
This patch reverts above patch.
Fixes: commit 655368dfc75e8 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850-pcm5142: don't select unnecessary Platform")
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
ALSA SoC is now supporting "no Platform". Sound card doesn't need to
select "CPU component" as "Platform" anymore if it doesn't need
special Platform.
This patch removes such settings.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
ASoC is now supporting modern style dai_link
(= snd_soc_dai_link_component) for CPU/Codec/Platform.
This patch switches to use it.
Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
Fix sparse warnings:
sound/soc/atmel/tse850-pcm5142.c:120:5: warning: symbol 'tse850_get_mix' was not declared. Should it be static?
sound/soc/atmel/tse850-pcm5142.c:132:5: warning: symbol 'tse850_put_mix' was not declared. Should it be static?
sound/soc/atmel/tse850-pcm5142.c:154:5: warning: symbol 'tse850_get_ana' was not declared. Should it be static?
sound/soc/atmel/tse850-pcm5142.c:187:5: warning: symbol 'tse850_put_ana' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
Convert to // comments in the leading comment, drop the boilerplate
license text and use the correct MODULE_LICENSE.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
At some point I added the "Low" entry at the beginning of the array
without bumping the enumeration count from 9 to 10. Fix this. While at
it, fix the anti-pattern for the other enumeration (used by MUX{1,2}).
Fixes: aa43112445f0 ("ASoC: atmel: tse850: add ASoC driver for the Axentia TSE-850")
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
|
|
This breaks devicetree compatibility, but in this case that is ok. All
affected units are either on my desk, or running an even older version
of the driver that is not compatible with the upstreamed version anyway
(and when these other units are eventually updated, they will get a
fresh dtb as well, so that is not a significant problem either).
All of that is of course assuming that noone else has managed to build
something that can use this driver, but that seems extremely improbable.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
|
The TSE-850 is an FM Transmitter Station Equipment, designed to generate
baseband signals for FM, mainly the DARC subcarrier, but other signals
are also possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
|
