summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/memblock.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2012-10-24x86, mm: Trim memory in memblock to be page alignedYinghai Lu1-0/+24
We will not map partial pages, so need to make sure memblock allocation will not allocate those bytes out. Also we will use for_each_mem_pfn_range() to loop to map memory range to keep them consistent. Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAE9FiQVZirvaBMFYRfXMmWEcHbKSicQEHz4VAwUv0xFCk51ZNw@mail.gmail.com Acked-by: Jacob Shin <jacob.shin@amd.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
2012-10-09mm: avoid section mismatch warning for memblock_type_nameRaghavendra D Prabhu1-1/+2
Following section mismatch warning is thrown during build; WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x32408f): Section mismatch in reference from the function memblock_type_name() to the variable .meminit.data:memblock The function memblock_type_name() references the variable __meminitdata memblock. This is often because memblock_type_name lacks a __meminitdata annotation or the annotation of memblock is wrong. This is because memblock_type_name makes reference to memblock variable with attribute __meminitdata. Hence, the warning (even if the function is inline). [akpm@linux-foundation.org: remove inline] Signed-off-by: Raghavendra D Prabhu <rprabhu@wnohang.net> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-10-09mm/memblock: use existing interface to set nidWanpeng Li1-1/+1
Use the existing interface function to set the NUMA node ID (NID) for the regions, either memory or reserved region. Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> Cc: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-09-05mm/memblock: Use NULL instead of 0 for pointersSachin Kamat1-1/+1
This type cleanup also fixes the following sparse warning: mm/memblock.c:249:49: warning: Using plain integer as NULL pointer Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: patches@linaro.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-07-31mm/memblock.c:memblock_double_array(): cosmetic cleanupsAndrew Morton1-17/+18
This function is an 80-column eyesore, quite unnecessarily. Clean that up, and use standard comment layout style. Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Greg Pearson <greg.pearson@hp.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-07-11memblock: free allocated memblock_reserved_regions laterYinghai Lu1-28/+23
memblock_free_reserved_regions() calls memblock_free(), but memblock_free() would double reserved.regions too, so we could free the old range for reserved.regions. Also tj said there is another bug which could be related to this. | I don't think we're saving any noticeable | amount by doing this "free - give it to page allocator - reserve | again" dancing. We should just allocate regions aligned to page | boundaries and free them later when memblock is no longer in use. in that case, when DEBUG_PAGEALLOC, will get panic: memblock_free: [0x0000102febc080-0x0000102febf080] memblock_free_reserved_regions+0x37/0x39 BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffff88102febd948 IP: [<ffffffff836a5774>] __next_free_mem_range+0x9b/0x155 PGD 4826063 PUD cf67a067 PMD cf7fa067 PTE 800000102febd160 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC CPU 0 Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 3.5.0-rc2-next-20120614-sasha #447 RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff836a5774>] [<ffffffff836a5774>] __next_free_mem_range+0x9b/0x155 See the discussion at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/6/13/469 So try to allocate with PAGE_SIZE alignment and free it later. Reported-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@gmail.com> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-06-20mm/memblock: fix overlapping allocation when doubling reserved arrayGreg Pearson1-4/+32
__alloc_memory_core_early() asks memblock for a range of memory then try to reserve it. If the reserved region array lacks space for the new range, memblock_double_array() is called to allocate more space for the array. If memblock is used to allocate memory for the new array it can end up using a range that overlaps with the range originally allocated in __alloc_memory_core_early(), leading to possible data corruption. With this patch memblock_double_array() now calls memblock_find_in_range() with a narrowed candidate range (in cases where the reserved.regions array is being doubled) so any memory allocated will not overlap with the original range that was being reserved. The range is narrowed by passing in the starting address and size of the previously allocated range. Then the range above the ending address is searched and if a candidate is not found, the range below the starting address is searched. Signed-off-by: Greg Pearson <greg.pearson@hp.com> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-06-20mm: fix kernel-doc warningsWanpeng Li1-6/+6
Fix kernel-doc warnings such as Warning(../mm/page_cgroup.c:432): No description found for parameter 'id' Warning(../mm/page_cgroup.c:432): Excess function parameter 'mem' description in 'swap_cgroup_record' Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-06-08memblock: Document memblock_is_region_{memory,reserved}()Stephen Boyd1-0/+20
At first glance one would think that memblock_is_region_memory() and memblock_is_region_reserved() would be implemented in the same way. Unfortunately they aren't and the former returns whether the region specified is a subset of a memory bank while the latter returns whether the region specified intersects with reserved memory. Document the two functions so that users aren't tempted to make the implementation the same between them and to clarify the purpose of the functions. Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1337845521-32755-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2012-05-29mm/memblock: fix memory leak on extending regionsGavin Shan1-13/+24
The overall memblock has been organized into the memory regions and reserved regions. Initially, the memory regions and reserved regions are stored in the predetermined arrays of "struct memblock _region". It's possible for the arrays to be enlarged when we have newly added regions, but no free space left there. The policy here is to create double-sized array either by slab allocator or memblock allocator. Unfortunately, we didn't free the old array, which might be allocated through slab allocator before. That would cause memory leak. The patch introduces 2 variables to trace where (slab or memblock) the memory and reserved regions come from. The memory for the memory or reserved regions will be deallocated by kfree() if that was allocated by slab allocator. Thus to fix the memory leak issue. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-05-29mm/memblock: cleanup on duplicate VA/PA conversionGavin Shan1-2/+3
The overall memblock has been organized into the memory regions and reserved regions. Initially, the memory regions and reserved regions are stored in the predetermined arrays of "struct memblock _region". It's possible for the arrays to be enlarged when we have newly added regions for them, but no enough space there. Under the situation, We will created double-sized array to meet the requirement. However, the original implementation converted the VA (Virtual Address) of the newly allocated array of regions to PA (Physical Address), then translate back when we allocates the new array from slab. That's actually unnecessary. The patch removes the duplicate VA/PA conversion. Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-04-20memblock: memblock should be able to handle zero length operationsTejun Heo1-1/+6
Commit 24aa07882b ("memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/ free_range() with generic ones") replaced x86 specific memblock operations with the generic ones; unfortunately, it lost zero length operation handling in the process making the kernel panic if somebody tries to reserve zero length area. There isn't much to be gained by being cranky to zero length operations and panicking is almost the worst response. Drop the BUG_ON() in memblock_reserve() and update memblock_add_region/isolate_range() so that all zero length operations are handled as noops. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: Valere Monseur <valere.monseur@ymail.com> Bisected-by: Joseph Freeman <jfree143dev@gmail.com> Tested-by: Joseph Freeman <jfree143dev@gmail.com> Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43098 Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2012-03-01memblock: Fix size aligning of memblock_alloc_base_nid()Tejun Heo1-3/+3
memblock allocator aligns @size to @align to reduce the amount of fragmentation. Commit: 7bd0b0f0da ("memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator") Broke it by incorrectly relocating @size aligning to memblock_find_in_range_node(). As the aligned size is not propagated back to memblock_alloc_base_nid(), the actually reserved size isn't aligned. While this increases memory use for memblock reserved array, this shouldn't cause any critical failure; however, it seems that the size aligning was hiding a use-beyond-allocation bug in sparc64 and losing the aligning causes boot failure. The underlying problem is currently being debugged but this is a proper fix in itself, it's already pretty late in -rc cycle for boot failures and reverting the change for debugging isn't difficult. Restore the size aligning moving it to memblock_alloc_base_nid(). Reported-by: Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120228205621.GC3252@dhcp-172-17-108-109.mtv.corp.google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> LKML-Reference: <alpine.SOC.1.00.1202130942030.1488@math.ut.ee>
2012-01-16memblock: Fix alloc failure due to dumb underflow protection in ↵Tejun Heo1-2/+5
memblock_find_in_range_node() 7bd0b0f0da ("memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iterator") implemented a simple top-down allocator using a reverse memblock iterator. To avoid underflow in the allocator loop, it simply raised the lower boundary to the requested size under the assumption that requested size would be far smaller than available memblocks. This causes early page table allocation failure under certain configurations in Xen. Fix it by checking for underflow directly instead of bumping up lower bound. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reported-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> Cc: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: xen-devel@lists.xensource.com Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20120113181412.GA11112@google.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
2011-12-08memblock: Reimplement memblock allocation using reverse free area iteratorTejun Heo1-146/+127
Now that all early memory information is in memblock when enabled, we can implement reverse free area iterator and use it to implement NUMA aware allocator which is then wrapped for simpler variants instead of the confusing and inefficient mending of information in separate NUMA aware allocator. Implement for_each_free_mem_range_reverse(), use it to reimplement memblock_find_in_range_node() which in turn is used by all allocators. The visible allocator interface is inconsistent and can probably use some cleanup too. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Kill early_node_map[]Tejun Heo1-1/+1
Now all ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP archs select HAVE_MEBLOCK_NODE_MAP - there's no user of early_node_map[] left. Kill early_node_map[] and replace ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP with HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. Also, relocate for_each_mem_pfn_range() and helper from mm.h to memblock.h as page_alloc.c would no longer host an alternative implementation. This change is ultimately one to one mapping and shouldn't cause any observable difference; however, after the recent changes, there are some functions which now would fit memblock.c better than page_alloc.c and dependency on HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP instead of HAVE_MEMBLOCK doesn't make much sense on some of them. Further cleanups for functions inside HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP in mm.h would be nice. -v2: Fix compile bug introduced by mis-spelling CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_HAVE_NODE_MAP in mmzone.h. Reported by Stephen Rothwell. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
2011-12-08memblock: Implement memblock_add_node()Tejun Heo1-7/+13
Implement memblock_add_node() which can add a new memblock memory region with specific node ID. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: s/memblock_analyze()/memblock_allow_resize()/ and update usersTejun Heo1-3/+2
The only function of memblock_analyze() is now allowing resize of memblock region arrays. Rename it to memblock_allow_resize() and update its users. * The following users remain the same other than renaming. arm/mm/init.c::arm_memblock_init() microblaze/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree() powerpc/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree() openrisc/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree() sh/mm/init.c::paging_init() sparc/mm/init_64.c::paging_init() unicore32/mm/init.c::uc32_memblock_init() * In the following users, analyze was used to update total size which is no longer necessary. powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec.c::reserve_crashkernel() powerpc/kernel/prom.c::early_init_devtree() powerpc/mm/init_32.c::MMU_init() powerpc/mm/tlb_nohash.c::__early_init_mmu() powerpc/platforms/ps3/mm.c::ps3_mm_add_memory() powerpc/platforms/embedded6xx/wii.c::wii_memory_fixups() sh/kernel/machine_kexec.c::reserve_crashkernel() * x86/kernel/e820.c::memblock_x86_fill() was directly setting memblock_can_resize before populating memblock and calling analyze afterwards. Call memblock_allow_resize() before start populating. memblock_can_resize is now static inside memblock.c. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
2011-12-08memblock: Track total size of regions automaticallyTejun Heo1-14/+13
Total size of memory regions was calculated by memblock_analyze() requiring explicitly calling the function between operations which can change memory regions and possible users of total size, which is cumbersome and fragile. This patch makes each memblock_type track total size automatically with minor modifications to memblock manipulation functions and remove requirements on calling memblock_analyze(). [__]memblock_dump_all() now also dumps the total size of reserved regions. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Reimplement memblock_enforce_memory_limit() using __memblock_remove()Tejun Heo1-29/+13
With recent updates, the basic memblock operations are robust enough that there's no reason for memblock_enfore_memory_limit() to directly manipulate memblock region arrays. Reimplement it using __memblock_remove(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Make memblock functions handle overflowing range @sizeTejun Heo1-3/+12
Allow memblock users to specify range where @base + @size overflows and automatically cap it at maximum. This makes the interface more robust and specifying till-the-end-of-memory easier. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Reimplement __memblock_remove() using memblock_isolate_range()Tejun Heo1-47/+9
__memblock_remove()'s open coded region manipulation can be trivially replaced with memblock_islate_range(). This increases code sharing and eases improving region tracking. This pulls memblock_isolate_range() out of HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. Make it use memblock_get_region_node() instead of assuming rgn->nid is available. -v2: Fixed build failure on !HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP caused by direct rgn->nid access. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Separate out memblock_isolate_range() from memblock_set_node()Tejun Heo1-39/+78
memblock_set_node() operates in three steps - break regions crossing boundaries, set nid and merge back regions. This patch separates the first part into a separate function - memblock_isolate_range(), which breaks regions crossing range boundaries and returns range index range for regions properly contained in the specified memory range. This doesn't introduce any behavior change and will be used to further unify region handling. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Kill memblock_init()Tejun Heo1-34/+14
memblock_init() initializes arrays for regions and memblock itself; however, all these can be done with struct initializers and memblock_init() can be removed. This patch kills memblock_init() and initializes memblock with struct initializer. The only difference is that the first dummy entries don't have .nid set to MAX_NUMNODES initially. This doesn't cause any behavior difference. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
2011-12-08memblock: Kill sentinel entries at the end of static region arraysTejun Heo1-12/+2
memblock no longer depends on having one more entry at the end during addition making the sentinel entries at the end of region arrays not too useful. Remove the sentinels. This eases further updates. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Add __memblock_dump_all()Tejun Heo1-4/+1
Add __memblock_dump_all() which dumps memblock configuration whether memblock_debug is enabled or not. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Use memblock_reserve() in memblock internal functionsTejun Heo1-6/+3
Make memblock_double_array(), __memblock_alloc_base() and memblock_alloc_nid() use memblock_reserve() instead of calling memblock_add_region() with reserved array directly. This eases debugging and updates to memblock_add_region(). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-12-08memblock: Make memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return int and update ↵Tejun Heo1-9/+9
prototypes memblock_{add|remove|free|reserve}() return either 0 or -errno but had long as return type. Chage it to int. Also, drop 'extern' from all prototypes in memblock.h - they are unnecessary and used inconsistently (especially if mm.h is included in the picture). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
2011-11-28Merge branch 'master' into x86/memblockTejun Heo1-5/+12
Conflicts & resolutions: * arch/x86/xen/setup.c dc91c728fd "xen: allow extra memory to be in multiple regions" 24aa07882b "memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free..." conflicted on xen_add_extra_mem() updates. The resolution is trivial as the latter just want to replace memblock_x86_reserve_range() with memblock_reserve(). * drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c 166e9278a3f "x86/ia64: intel-iommu: move to drivers/iommu/" 5dfe8660a3d "bootmem: Replace work_with_active_regions() with..." conflicted as the former moved the file under drivers/iommu/. Resolved by applying the chnages from the latter on the moved file. * mm/Kconfig 6661672053a "memblock: add NO_BOOTMEM config symbol" c378ddd53f9 "memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option" conflicted trivially. Both added config options. Just letting both add their own options resolves the conflict. * mm/memblock.c d1f0ece6cdc "mm/memblock.c: small function definition fixes" ed7b56a799c "memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce()" confliected. The former updates function removed by the latter. Resolution is trivial. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
2011-10-31mm/memblock.c: quiet sparse noiseH Hartley Sweeten1-1/+2
Quiet the following sparse noise in this file: warning: symbol 'memblock_overlaps_region' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@visionengravers,com> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-10-31mm/memblock.c: small function definition fixesJonghwan Choi1-1/+1
warning: function 'memblock_memory_can_coalesce' with external linkage has definition. Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-10-31memblock: add memblock_start_of_DRAM()Sam Ravnborg1-0/+6
SPARC32 require access to the start address. Add a new helper memblock_start_of_DRAM() to give access to the address of the first memblock - which contains the lowest address. The awkward name was chosen to match the already present memblock_end_of_DRAM(). Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-07-25mm/memblock.c: avoid abuse of RED_INACTIVEAndrew Morton1-4/+4
RED_INACTIVE is a slab thing, and reusing it for memblock was inappropriate, because memblock is dealing with phys_addr_t's which have a Kconfigurable sizeof(). Create a new poison type for this application. Fixes the sparse warning warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (9f911029d74e35b becomes 9d74e35b) Reported-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com> Tested-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@visionengravers.com> Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-07-14memblock: Cast phys_addr_t to unsigned long long for printf useH. Peter Anvin1-2/+6
phys_addr_t is not necessarily the same thing as unsigned long long. It is, however, easier to cast it to unsigned long long for printf purposes than it is to deal with differnent printf formats. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/4E1F4D2C.3000507@zytor.com
2011-07-14memblock, x86: Replace memblock_x86_reserve/free_range() with generic onesTejun Heo1-0/+5
Other than sanity check and debug message, the x86 specific version of memblock reserve/free functions are simple wrappers around the generic versions - memblock_reserve/free(). This patch adds debug messages with caller identification to the generic versions and replaces x86 specific ones and kills them. arch/x86/include/asm/memblock.h and arch/x86/mm/memblock.c are empty after this change and removed. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock, x86: Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config optionTejun Heo1-1/+1
From 6839454ae63f1eb21e515c10229ca95c22955fec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:17 +0200 Make ARCH_DISCARD_MEMBLOCK a config option so that it can be handled together with other MEMBLOCK options. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110714094603.GH3455@htj.dyndns.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Implement for_each_free_mem_range()Tejun Heo1-0/+76
Implement for_each_free_mem_range() which iterates over free memory areas according to memblock (memory && !reserved). This will be used to simplify memblock users. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Add optional region->nidTejun Heo1-18/+124
From 83103b92f3234ec830852bbc5c45911bd6cbdb20 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:22:16 +0200 Add optional region->nid which can be enabled by arch using CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP. When enabled, memblock also carries NUMA node information and replaces early_node_map[]. Newly added memblocks have MAX_NUMNODES as nid. Arch can then call memblock_set_node() to set node information. memblock takes care of merging and node affine allocations w.r.t. node information. When MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is enabled, early_node_map[], related data structures and functions to manipulate and iterate it are disabled. memblock version of __next_mem_pfn_range() is provided such that for_each_mem_pfn_range() behaves the same and its users don't have to be updated. -v2: Yinghai spotted section mismatch caused by missing __init_memblock in memblock_set_node(). Fixed. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20110714094342.GF3455@htj.dyndns.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Reimplement memblock_add_region()Tejun Heo1-85/+110
memblock_add_region() carefully checked for merge and overlap conditions while adding a new region, which is complicated and makes it difficult to allow arbitrary overlaps or add more merge conditions (e.g. node ID). This re-implements memblock_add_region() such that insertion is done in two steps - all non-overlapping portions of new area are inserted as separate regions first and then memblock_merge_regions() scan and merge all neighbouring compatible regions. This makes addition logic simpler and more versatile and enables adding node information to memblock. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-3-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Remove memblock_memory_can_coalesce()Tejun Heo1-29/+0
Arch could implement memblock_memor_can_coalesce() to veto merging of adjacent or overlapping memblock regions; however, no arch did and any vetoing would trigger WARN_ON(). Memblock regions are supposed to deal with proper memory anyway. Remove the unused hook. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310462166-31469-2-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Separate out memblock_find_in_range_node()Tejun Heo1-25/+32
Node affine memblock allocation logic is currently implemented across memblock_alloc_nid() and memblock_alloc_nid_region(). This reorganizes it such that it resembles that of non-NUMA allocation API. Area finding is collected and moved into new exported function memblock_find_in_range_node() which is symmetrical to non-NUMA counterpart - it handles @start/@end and understands ANYWHERE and ACCESSIBLE. memblock_alloc_nid() now simply calls memblock_find_in_range_node() and reserves the returned area. This makes memblock_alloc[_try]_nid() observe ACCESSIBLE limit on node affine allocations too (again, this doesn't make any difference for the current sole user - sparc64). Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-8-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Make memblock_alloc_[try_]nid() top-downTejun Heo1-18/+11
NUMA aware memblock alloc functions - memblock_alloc_[try_]nid() - weren't properly top-down because memblock_nid_range() scanned forward. This patch reverses memblock_nid_range(), renames it to memblock_nid_range_rev() and updates related functions to implement proper top-down allocation. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Don't allow archs to override memblock_nid_range()Tejun Heo1-1/+1
memblock_nid_range() is used to implement memblock_[try_]alloc_nid(). The generic version determines the range by walking early_node_map with for_each_mem_pfn_range(). The generic version is defined __weak to allow arch override. Currently, only sparc overrides it; however, with the previous update to the generic implementation, there isn't much to be gained with arch override. Sparc would behave exactly the same with the generic implementation. This patch disallows arch override for memblock_nid_range() and make both generic and sparc versions static. sparc is only compile tested. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-14memblock: Improve generic memblock_nid_range() using for_each_mem_pfn_range()Tejun Heo1-17/+3
Given an address range, memblock_nid_range() determines the node the start of the range belongs to and upto where the range stays in the same node. It's implemented by calling get_pfn_range_for_nid(), which determines min and max pfns for a given node, for each node and testing whether start address falls in there. This is not only inefficient but also incorrect when nodes interleave as min-max ranges for nodes overlap. This patch reimplements memblock_nid_range() using for_each_mem_pfn_range(). It's simpler, walks the mem ranges once and can find the exact range the start address falls in. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310460395-30913-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-13memblock: Replace memblock_find_base() with memblock_find_in_range()Tejun Heo1-12/+7
memblock_find_base() is a static function with two callers in memblock.c and memblock_find_in_range() is a wrapper around it which just changes the types and order of parameters. Make memblock_find_in_range() take phys_addr_t instead of u64 for consistency and replace memblock_find_base() with it. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-7-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-13memblock: Kill MEMBLOCK_ERRORTejun Heo1-11/+10
25818f0f28 (memblock: Make MEMBLOCK_ERROR be 0) thankfully made MEMBLOCK_ERROR 0 and there already are codes which expect error return to be 0. There's no point in keeping MEMBLOCK_ERROR around. End its misery. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-6-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-13memblock: Use round_up/down() instead of memblock_align_up/down()Tejun Heo1-16/+5
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-5-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-07-13memblock: Use MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE instead of ANYWHERE in ↵Tejun Heo1-1/+1
memblock_alloc_try_nid() After node affine allocation fails, memblock_alloc_try_nid() calls memblock_alloc_base() with @max_addr set to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE. This is inconsistent with memblock_alloc() and what the function's sole user - sparc/mm/init_64 - expects, although it doesn't make any difference as sparc64 doesn't have highmem and ACCESSIBLE equals ANYWHERE. This patch makes memblock_alloc_try_nid() use ACCESSIBLE instead of ANYWHERE. This isn't complete as node affine allocation doesn't consider memblock.current_limit. It will be handled with future changes. This patch doesn't introduce any behavior difference. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1310457490-3356-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
2011-03-22mm/memblock: properly handle overlaps and fix error pathBenjamin Herrenschmidt1-109/+132
Currently memblock_reserve() or memblock_free() don't handle overlaps of any kind. There is some special casing for coalescing exactly adjacent regions but that's about it. This is annoying because typically memblock_reserve() is used to mark regions passed by the firmware as reserved and we all know how much we can trust our firmwares... Also, with the current code, if we do something it doesn't handle right such as trying to memblock_reserve() a large range spanning multiple existing smaller reserved regions for example, or doing overlapping reservations, it can silently corrupt the internal region array, causing odd errors much later on, such as allocations returning reserved regions etc... This patch rewrites the underlying functions that add or remove a region to the arrays. The new code is a lot more robust as it fully handles overlapping regions. It's also, imho, simpler than the previous implementation. In addition, while doing so, I found a bug where if we fail to double the array while adding a region, we would remove the last region of the array rather than the region we just allocated. This fixes it too. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-02-11memblock: don't adjust size in memblock_find_base()Yinghai Lu1-2/+0
While applying patch to use memblock to find aperture for 64bit x86. Ingo found system with 1g + force_iommu > No AGP bridge found > Node 0: aperture @ 38000000 size 32 MB > Aperture pointing to e820 RAM. Ignoring. > Your BIOS doesn't leave a aperture memory hole > Please enable the IOMMU option in the BIOS setup > This costs you 64 MB of RAM > Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (0,65536K) the corresponding code: addr = memblock_find_in_range(0, 1ULL<<32, aper_size, 512ULL<<20); if (addr == MEMBLOCK_ERROR || addr + aper_size > 0xffffffff) { printk(KERN_ERR "Cannot allocate aperture memory hole (%lx,%uK)\n", addr, aper_size>>10); return 0; } memblock_x86_reserve_range(addr, addr + aper_size, "aperture64") fails because memblock core code align the size with 512M. That could make size way too big. So don't align the size in that case. actually __memblock_alloc_base, the another caller already align that before calling that function. BTW. x86 does not use __memblock_alloc_base... Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-11-01 13:31:39 +0000