summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/mm/hugetlb.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-05-27Merge tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2022-05-27' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-1/+8
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm Pull hotfixes from Andrew Morton: "Six hotfixes. The page_table_check one from Miaohe Lin is considered a minor thing so it isn't marked for -stable. The remainder address pre-5.19 issues and are cc:stable" * tag 'mm-hotfixes-stable-2022-05-27' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm: mm/page_table_check: fix accessing unmapped ptep kexec_file: drop weak attribute from arch_kexec_apply_relocations[_add] mm/page_alloc: always attempt to allocate at least one page during bulk allocation hugetlb: fix huge_pmd_unshare address update zsmalloc: fix races between asynchronous zspage free and page migration Revert "mm/cma.c: remove redundant cma_mutex lock"
2022-05-27hugetlb: fix huge_pmd_unshare address updateMike Kravetz1-1/+8
The routine huge_pmd_unshare() is passed a pointer to an address associated with an area which may be unshared. If unshare is successful this address is updated to 'optimize' callers iterating over huge page addresses. For the optimization to work correctly, address should be updated to the last huge page in the unmapped/unshared area. However, in the common case where the passed address is PUD_SIZE aligned, the address is incorrectly updated to the address of the preceding huge page. That wastes CPU cycles as the unmapped/unshared range is scanned twice. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220524205003.126184-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: 39dde65c9940 ("shared page table for hugetlb page") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm/hugetlb: handle uffd-wp during fork()Peter Xu1-14/+28
Firstly, we'll need to pass in dst_vma into copy_hugetlb_page_range() because for uffd-wp it's the dst vma that matters on deciding how we should treat uffd-wp protected ptes. We should recognize pte markers during fork and do the pte copy if needed. [lkp@intel.com: vma_needs_copy can be static] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Ylb0CGeFJlc4EzLk@7ec4ff11d4ae Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014918.14932-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm/hugetlb: only drop uffd-wp special pte if requiredPeter Xu1-8/+25
As with shmem uffd-wp special ptes, only drop the uffd-wp special swap pte if unmapping an entire vma or synchronized such that faults can not race with the unmap operation. This requires passing zap_flags all the way to the lowest level hugetlb unmap routine: __unmap_hugepage_range. In general, unmap calls originated in hugetlbfs code will pass the ZAP_FLAG_DROP_MARKER flag as synchronization is in place to prevent faults. The exception is hole punch which will first unmap without any synchronization. Later when hole punch actually removes the page from the file, it will check to see if there was a subsequent fault and if so take the hugetlb fault mutex while unmapping again. This second unmap will pass in ZAP_FLAG_DROP_MARKER. The justification of "whether to apply ZAP_FLAG_DROP_MARKER flag when unmap a hugetlb range" is (IMHO): we should never reach a state when a page fault could errornously fault in a page-cache page that was wr-protected to be writable, even in an extremely short period. That could happen if e.g. we pass ZAP_FLAG_DROP_MARKER when hugetlbfs_punch_hole() calls hugetlb_vmdelete_list(), because if a page faults after that call and before remove_inode_hugepages() is executed, the page cache can be mapped writable again in the small racy window, that can cause unexpected data overwritten. [peterx@redhat.com: fix sparse warning] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/Ylcdw8I1L5iAoWhb@xz-m1.local [akpm@linux-foundation.org: move zap_flags_t from mm.h to mm_types.h to fix build issues] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014915.14873-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm/hugetlb: allow uffd wr-protect none ptesPeter Xu1-4/+24
Teach hugetlbfs code to wr-protect none ptes just in case the page cache existed for that pte. Meanwhile we also need to be able to recognize a uffd-wp marker pte and remove it for uffd_wp_resolve. Since at it, introduce a variable "psize" to replace all references to the huge page size fetcher. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014912.14815-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm/hugetlb: handle pte markers in page faultsPeter Xu1-4/+14
Allow hugetlb code to handle pte markers just like none ptes. It's mostly there, we just need to make sure we don't assume hugetlb_no_page() only handles none pte, so when detecting pte change we should use pte_same() rather than pte_none(). We need to pass in the old_pte to do the comparison. Check the original pte to see whether it's a pte marker, if it is, we should recover uffd-wp bit on the new pte to be installed, so that the next write will be trapped by uffd. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014909.14761-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm/hugetlb: handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECTPeter Xu1-1/+12
This starts from passing cp_flags into hugetlb_change_protection() so hugetlb will be able to handle MM_CP_UFFD_WP[_RESOLVE] requests. huge_pte_clear_uffd_wp() is introduced to handle the case where the UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT is requested upon migrating huge page entries. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014906.14708-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm/hugetlb: take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WPPeter Xu1-6/+23
Pass the wp_copy variable into hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte() thoughout the stack. Apply the UFFD_WP bit if UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP is with UFFDIO_COPY. Hugetlb pages are only managed by hugetlbfs, so we're safe even without setting dirty bit in the huge pte if the page is installed as read-only. However we'd better still keep the dirty bit set for a read-only UFFDIO_COPY pte (when UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP bit is set), not only to match what we do with shmem, but also because the page does contain dirty data that the kernel just copied from the userspace. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014904.14643-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm/hugetlb: hook page faults for uffd write protectionPeter Xu1-0/+20
Hook up hugetlbfs_fault() with the capability to handle userfaultfd-wp faults. We do this slightly earlier than hugetlb_cow() so that we can avoid taking some extra locks that we definitely don't need. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220405014901.14590-1-peterx@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Alistair Popple <apopple@nvidia.com> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-13mm: hugetlb: considering PMD sharing when flushing cache/TLBsBaolin Wang1-2/+15
This patchset fixes some cache flushing issues if PMD sharing is possible for hugetlb pages, which were found by code inspection. Meanwhile Mike found the flush_cache_page() can not cover the whole size of a hugetlb page on some architectures [1], so I added a new patch 3 to fix this issue, since I found only try_to_unmap_one() and try_to_migrate_one() need to fix after some investigation. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/064da3bb-5b4b-7332-a722-c5a541128705@oracle.com/ This patch (of 3): When moving hugetlb page tables, the cache flushing is called in move_page_tables() without considering the shared PMDs, which may be cause cache issues on some architectures. Thus we should move the hugetlb cache flushing into move_hugetlb_page_tables() with considering the shared PMDs ranges, calculated by adjust_range_if_pmd_sharing_possible(). Meanwhile also expanding the TLBs flushing range in case of shared PMDs. Note this is discovered via code inspection, and did not meet a real problem in practice so far. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cover.1651056365.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0443c8cf20db554d3ff4b439b30e0ff26c0181dd.1651056365.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Fixes: 550a7d60bd5e ("mm, hugepages: add mremap() support for hugepage backed vma") Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm/gup: sanity-check with CONFIG_DEBUG_VM that anonymous pages are exclusive ↵David Hildenbrand1-0/+3
when (un)pinning Let's verify when (un)pinning anonymous pages that we always deal with exclusive anonymous pages, which guarantees that we'll have a reliable PIN, meaning that we cannot end up with the GUP pin being inconsistent with he pages mapped into the page tables due to a COW triggered by a write fault. When pinning pages, after conditionally triggering GUP unsharing of possibly shared anonymous pages, we should always only see exclusive anonymous pages. Note that anonymous pages that are mapped writable must be marked exclusive, otherwise we'd have a BUG. When pinning during ordinary GUP, simply add a check after our conditional GUP-triggered unsharing checks. As we know exactly how the page is mapped, we know exactly in which page we have to check for PageAnonExclusive(). When pinning via GUP-fast we have to be careful, because we can race with fork(): verify only after we made sure via the seqcount that we didn't race with concurrent fork() that we didn't end up pinning a possibly shared anonymous page. Similarly, when unpinning, verify that the pages are still marked as exclusive: otherwise something turned the pages possibly shared, which can result in random memory corruptions, which we really want to catch. With only the pinned pages at hand and not the actual page table entries we have to be a bit careful: hugetlb pages are always mapped via a single logical page table entry referencing the head page and PG_anon_exclusive of the head page applies. Anon THP are a bit more complicated, because we might have obtained the page reference either via a PMD or a PTE -- depending on the mapping type we either have to check PageAnonExclusive of the head page (PMD-mapped THP) or the tail page (PTE-mapped THP) applies: as we don't know and to make our life easier, check that either is set. Take care to not verify in case we're unpinning during GUP-fast because we detected concurrent fork(): we might stumble over an anonymous page that is now shared. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-18-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm/gup: trigger FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE when R/O-pinning a possibly shared ↵David Hildenbrand1-3/+24
anonymous page Whenever GUP currently ends up taking a R/O pin on an anonymous page that might be shared -- mapped R/O and !PageAnonExclusive() -- any write fault on the page table entry will end up replacing the mapped anonymous page due to COW, resulting in the GUP pin no longer being consistent with the page actually mapped into the page table. The possible ways to deal with this situation are: (1) Ignore and pin -- what we do right now. (2) Fail to pin -- which would be rather surprising to callers and could break user space. (3) Trigger unsharing and pin the now exclusive page -- reliable R/O pins. Let's implement 3) because it provides the clearest semantics and allows for checking in unpin_user_pages() and friends for possible BUGs: when trying to unpin a page that's no longer exclusive, clearly something went very wrong and might result in memory corruptions that might be hard to debug. So we better have a nice way to spot such issues. This change implies that whenever user space *wrote* to a private mapping (IOW, we have an anonymous page mapped), that GUP pins will always remain consistent: reliable R/O GUP pins of anonymous pages. As a side note, this commit fixes the COW security issue for hugetlb with FOLL_PIN as documented in: https://lore.kernel.org/r/3ae33b08-d9ef-f846-56fb-645e3b9b4c66@redhat.com The vmsplice reproducer still applies, because vmsplice uses FOLL_GET instead of FOLL_PIN. Note that follow_huge_pmd() doesn't apply because we cannot end up in there with FOLL_PIN. This commit is heavily based on prototype patches by Andrea. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-17-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Co-developed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm: support GUP-triggered unsharing of anonymous pagesDavid Hildenbrand1-21/+35
Whenever GUP currently ends up taking a R/O pin on an anonymous page that might be shared -- mapped R/O and !PageAnonExclusive() -- any write fault on the page table entry will end up replacing the mapped anonymous page due to COW, resulting in the GUP pin no longer being consistent with the page actually mapped into the page table. The possible ways to deal with this situation are: (1) Ignore and pin -- what we do right now. (2) Fail to pin -- which would be rather surprising to callers and could break user space. (3) Trigger unsharing and pin the now exclusive page -- reliable R/O pins. We want to implement 3) because it provides the clearest semantics and allows for checking in unpin_user_pages() and friends for possible BUGs: when trying to unpin a page that's no longer exclusive, clearly something went very wrong and might result in memory corruptions that might be hard to debug. So we better have a nice way to spot such issues. To implement 3), we need a way for GUP to trigger unsharing: FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE. FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE is only applicable to R/O mapped anonymous pages and resembles COW logic during a write fault. However, in contrast to a write fault, GUP-triggered unsharing will, for example, still maintain the write protection. Let's implement FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE by hooking into the existing write fault handlers for all applicable anonymous page types: ordinary pages, THP and hugetlb. * If FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE finds a R/O-mapped anonymous page that has been marked exclusive in the meantime by someone else, there is nothing to do. * If FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE finds a R/O-mapped anonymous page that's not marked exclusive, it will try detecting if the process is the exclusive owner. If exclusive, it can be set exclusive similar to reuse logic during write faults via page_move_anon_rmap() and there is nothing else to do; otherwise, we either have to copy and map a fresh, anonymous exclusive page R/O (ordinary pages, hugetlb), or split the THP. This commit is heavily based on patches by Andrea. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-16-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Co-developed-by: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm/gup: disallow follow_page(FOLL_PIN)David Hildenbrand1-3/+5
We want to change the way we handle R/O pins on anonymous pages that might be shared: if we detect a possibly shared anonymous page -- mapped R/O and not !PageAnonExclusive() -- we want to trigger unsharing via a page fault, resulting in an exclusive anonymous page that can be pinned reliably without getting replaced via COW on the next write fault. However, the required page fault will be problematic for follow_page(): in contrast to ordinary GUP, follow_page() doesn't trigger faults internally. So we would have to end up failing a R/O pin via follow_page(), although there is something mapped R/O into the page table, which might be rather surprising. We don't seem to have follow_page(FOLL_PIN) users, and it's a purely internal MM function. Let's just make our life easier and the semantics of follow_page() clearer by just disallowing FOLL_PIN for follow_page() completely. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-15-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm: remember exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusiveDavid Hildenbrand1-4/+11
Let's mark exclusively mapped anonymous pages with PG_anon_exclusive as exclusive, and use that information to make GUP pins reliable and stay consistent with the page mapped into the page table even if the page table entry gets write-protected. With that information at hand, we can extend our COW logic to always reuse anonymous pages that are exclusive. For anonymous pages that might be shared, the existing logic applies. As already documented, PG_anon_exclusive is usually only expressive in combination with a page table entry. Especially PTE vs. PMD-mapped anonymous pages require more thought, some examples: due to mremap() we can easily have a single compound page PTE-mapped into multiple page tables exclusively in a single process -- multiple page table locks apply. Further, due to MADV_WIPEONFORK we might not necessarily write-protect all PTEs, and only some subpages might be pinned. Long story short: once PTE-mapped, we have to track information about exclusivity per sub-page, but until then, we can just track it for the compound page in the head page and not having to update a whole bunch of subpages all of the time for a simple PMD mapping of a THP. For simplicity, this commit mostly talks about "anonymous pages", while it's for THP actually "the part of an anonymous folio referenced via a page table entry". To not spill PG_anon_exclusive code all over the mm code-base, we let the anon rmap code to handle all PG_anon_exclusive logic it can easily handle. If a writable, present page table entry points at an anonymous (sub)page, that (sub)page must be PG_anon_exclusive. If GUP wants to take a reliably pin (FOLL_PIN) on an anonymous page references via a present page table entry, it must only pin if PG_anon_exclusive is set for the mapped (sub)page. This commit doesn't adjust GUP, so this is only implicitly handled for FOLL_WRITE, follow-up commits will teach GUP to also respect it for FOLL_PIN without FOLL_WRITE, to make all GUP pins of anonymous pages fully reliable. Whenever an anonymous page is to be shared (fork(), KSM), or when temporarily unmapping an anonymous page (swap, migration), the relevant PG_anon_exclusive bit has to be cleared to mark the anonymous page possibly shared. Clearing will fail if there are GUP pins on the page: * For fork(), this means having to copy the page and not being able to share it. fork() protects against concurrent GUP using the PT lock and the src_mm->write_protect_seq. * For KSM, this means sharing will fail. For swap this means, unmapping will fail, For migration this means, migration will fail early. All three cases protect against concurrent GUP using the PT lock and a proper clear/invalidate+flush of the relevant page table entry. This fixes memory corruptions reported for FOLL_PIN | FOLL_WRITE, when a pinned page gets mapped R/O and the successive write fault ends up replacing the page instead of reusing it. It improves the situation for O_DIRECT/vmsplice/... that still use FOLL_GET instead of FOLL_PIN, if fork() is *not* involved, however swapout and fork() are still problematic. Properly using FOLL_PIN instead of FOLL_GET for these GUP users will fix the issue for them. I. Details about basic handling I.1. Fresh anonymous pages page_add_new_anon_rmap() and hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap() will mark the given page exclusive via __page_set_anon_rmap(exclusive=1). As that is the mechanism fresh anonymous pages come into life (besides migration code where we copy the page->mapping), all fresh anonymous pages will start out as exclusive. I.2. COW reuse handling of anonymous pages When a COW handler stumbles over a (sub)page that's marked exclusive, it simply reuses it. Otherwise, the handler tries harder under page lock to detect if the (sub)page is exclusive and can be reused. If exclusive, page_move_anon_rmap() will mark the given (sub)page exclusive. Note that hugetlb code does not yet check for PageAnonExclusive(), as it still uses the old COW logic that is prone to the COW security issue because hugetlb code cannot really tolerate unnecessary/wrong COW as huge pages are a scarce resource. I.3. Migration handling try_to_migrate() has to try marking an exclusive anonymous page shared via page_try_share_anon_rmap(). If it fails because there are GUP pins on the page, unmap fails. migrate_vma_collect_pmd() and __split_huge_pmd_locked() are handled similarly. Writable migration entries implicitly point at shared anonymous pages. For readable migration entries that information is stored via a new "readable-exclusive" migration entry, specific to anonymous pages. When restoring a migration entry in remove_migration_pte(), information about exlusivity is detected via the migration entry type, and RMAP_EXCLUSIVE is set accordingly for page_add_anon_rmap()/hugepage_add_anon_rmap() to restore that information. I.4. Swapout handling try_to_unmap() has to try marking the mapped page possibly shared via page_try_share_anon_rmap(). If it fails because there are GUP pins on the page, unmap fails. For now, information about exclusivity is lost. In the future, we might want to remember that information in the swap entry in some cases, however, it requires more thought, care, and a way to store that information in swap entries. I.5. Swapin handling do_swap_page() will never stumble over exclusive anonymous pages in the swap cache, as try_to_migrate() prohibits that. do_swap_page() always has to detect manually if an anonymous page is exclusive and has to set RMAP_EXCLUSIVE for page_add_anon_rmap() accordingly. I.6. THP handling __split_huge_pmd_locked() has to move the information about exclusivity from the PMD to the PTEs. a) In case we have a readable-exclusive PMD migration entry, simply insert readable-exclusive PTE migration entries. b) In case we have a present PMD entry and we don't want to freeze ("convert to migration entries"), simply forward PG_anon_exclusive to all sub-pages, no need to temporarily clear the bit. c) In case we have a present PMD entry and want to freeze, handle it similar to try_to_migrate(): try marking the page shared first. In case we fail, we ignore the "freeze" instruction and simply split ordinarily. try_to_migrate() will properly fail because the THP is still mapped via PTEs. When splitting a compound anonymous folio (THP), the information about exclusivity is implicitly handled via the migration entries: no need to replicate PG_anon_exclusive manually. I.7. fork() handling fork() handling is relatively easy, because PG_anon_exclusive is only expressive for some page table entry types. a) Present anonymous pages page_try_dup_anon_rmap() will mark the given subpage shared -- which will fail if the page is pinned. If it failed, we have to copy (or PTE-map a PMD to handle it on the PTE level). Note that device exclusive entries are just a pointer at a PageAnon() page. fork() will first convert a device exclusive entry to a present page table and handle it just like present anonymous pages. b) Device private entry Device private entries point at PageAnon() pages that cannot be mapped directly and, therefore, cannot get pinned. page_try_dup_anon_rmap() will mark the given subpage shared, which cannot fail because they cannot get pinned. c) HW poison entries PG_anon_exclusive will remain untouched and is stale -- the page table entry is just a placeholder after all. d) Migration entries Writable and readable-exclusive entries are converted to readable entries: possibly shared. I.8. mprotect() handling mprotect() only has to properly handle the new readable-exclusive migration entry: When write-protecting a migration entry that points at an anonymous page, remember the information about exclusivity via the "readable-exclusive" migration entry type. II. Migration and GUP-fast Whenever replacing a present page table entry that maps an exclusive anonymous page by a migration entry, we have to mark the page possibly shared and synchronize against GUP-fast by a proper clear/invalidate+flush to make the following scenario impossible: 1. try_to_migrate() places a migration entry after checking for GUP pins and marks the page possibly shared. 2. GUP-fast pins the page due to lack of synchronization 3. fork() converts the "writable/readable-exclusive" migration entry into a readable migration entry 4. Migration fails due to the GUP pin (failing to freeze the refcount) 5. Migration entries are restored. PG_anon_exclusive is lost -> We have a pinned page that is not marked exclusive anymore. Note that we move information about exclusivity from the page to the migration entry as it otherwise highly overcomplicates fork() and PTE-mapping a THP. III. Swapout and GUP-fast Whenever replacing a present page table entry that maps an exclusive anonymous page by a swap entry, we have to mark the page possibly shared and synchronize against GUP-fast by a proper clear/invalidate+flush to make the following scenario impossible: 1. try_to_unmap() places a swap entry after checking for GUP pins and clears exclusivity information on the page. 2. GUP-fast pins the page due to lack of synchronization. -> We have a pinned page that is not marked exclusive anymore. If we'd ever store information about exclusivity in the swap entry, similar to migration handling, the same considerations as in II would apply. This is future work. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-13-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm/page-flags: reuse PG_mappedtodisk as PG_anon_exclusive for PageAnon() pagesDavid Hildenbrand1-0/+2
The basic question we would like to have a reliable and efficient answer to is: is this anonymous page exclusive to a single process or might it be shared? We need that information for ordinary/single pages, hugetlb pages, and possibly each subpage of a THP. Introduce a way to mark an anonymous page as exclusive, with the ultimate goal of teaching our COW logic to not do "wrong COWs", whereby GUP pins lose consistency with the pages mapped into the page table, resulting in reported memory corruptions. Most pageflags already have semantics for anonymous pages, however, PG_mappedtodisk should never apply to pages in the swapcache, so let's reuse that flag. As PG_has_hwpoisoned also uses that flag on the second tail page of a compound page, convert it to PG_error instead, which is marked as PF_NO_TAIL, so never used for tail pages. Use custom page flag modification functions such that we can do additional sanity checks. The semantics we'll put into some kernel doc in the future are: " PG_anon_exclusive is *usually* only expressive in combination with a page table entry. Depending on the page table entry type it might store the following information: Is what's mapped via this page table entry exclusive to the single process and can be mapped writable without further checks? If not, it might be shared and we might have to COW. For now, we only expect PTE-mapped THPs to make use of PG_anon_exclusive in subpages. For other anonymous compound folios (i.e., hugetlb), only the head page is logically mapped and holds this information. For example, an exclusive, PMD-mapped THP only has PG_anon_exclusive set on the head page. When replacing the PMD by a page table full of PTEs, PG_anon_exclusive, if set on the head page, will be set on all tail pages accordingly. Note that converting from a PTE-mapping to a PMD mapping using the same compound page is currently not possible and consequently doesn't require care. If GUP wants to take a reliable pin (FOLL_PIN) on an anonymous page, it should only pin if the relevant PG_anon_exclusive is set. In that case, the pin will be fully reliable and stay consistent with the pages mapped into the page table, as the bit cannot get cleared (e.g., by fork(), KSM) while the page is pinned. For anonymous pages that are mapped R/W, PG_anon_exclusive can be assumed to always be set because such pages cannot possibly be shared. The page table lock protecting the page table entry is the primary synchronization mechanism for PG_anon_exclusive; GUP-fast that does not take the PT lock needs special care when trying to clear the flag. Page table entry types and PG_anon_exclusive: * Present: PG_anon_exclusive applies. * Swap: the information is lost. PG_anon_exclusive was cleared. * Migration: the entry holds this information instead. PG_anon_exclusive was cleared. * Device private: PG_anon_exclusive applies. * Device exclusive: PG_anon_exclusive applies. * HW Poison: PG_anon_exclusive is stale and not changed. If the page may be pinned (FOLL_PIN), clearing PG_anon_exclusive is not allowed and the flag will stick around until the page is freed and folio->mapping is cleared. " We won't be clearing PG_anon_exclusive on destructive unmapping (i.e., zapping) of page table entries, page freeing code will handle that when also invalidate page->mapping to not indicate PageAnon() anymore. Letting information about exclusivity stick around will be an important property when adding sanity checks to unpinning code. Note that we properly clear the flag in free_pages_prepare() via PAGE_FLAGS_CHECK_AT_PREP for each individual subpage of a compound page, so there is no need to manually clear the flag. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-12-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm/rmap: split page_dup_rmap() into page_dup_file_rmap() and ↵David Hildenbrand1-7/+9
page_try_dup_anon_rmap() ... and move the special check for pinned pages into page_try_dup_anon_rmap() to prepare for tracking exclusive anonymous pages via a new pageflag, clearing it only after making sure that there are no GUP pins on the anonymous page. We really only care about pins on anonymous pages, because they are prone to getting replaced in the COW handler once mapped R/O. For !anon pages in cow-mappings (!VM_SHARED && VM_MAYWRITE) we shouldn't really care about that, at least not that I could come up with an example. Let's drop the is_cow_mapping() check from page_needs_cow_for_dma(), as we know we're dealing with anonymous pages. Also, drop the handling of pinned pages from copy_huge_pud() and add a comment if ever supporting anonymous pages on the PUD level. This is a preparation for tracking exclusivity of anonymous pages in the rmap code, and disallowing marking a page shared (-> failing to duplicate) if there are GUP pins on a page. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-5-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-05-09mm/hugetlb: take src_mm->write_protect_seq in copy_hugetlb_page_range()David Hildenbrand1-2/+6
Let's do it just like copy_page_range(), taking the seqlock and making sure the mmap_lock is held in write mode. This allows for add a VM_BUG_ON to page_needs_cow_for_dma() and properly synchronizes concurrent fork() with GUP-fast of hugetlb pages, which will be relevant for further changes. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220428083441.37290-3-david@redhat.com Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Liang Zhang <zhangliang5@huawei.com> Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Cc: Oded Gabbay <oded.gabbay@gmail.com> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Pedro Demarchi Gomes <pedrodemargomes@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-29mm: hugetlb: add missing cache flushing in hugetlb_unshare_all_pmds()Baolin Wang1-0/+1
Missed calling flush_cache_range() before removing the sharing PMD entrires, otherwise data consistence issue may be occurred on some architectures whose caches are strict and require a virtual>physical translation to exist for a virtual address. Thus add it. Now no architectures enabling PMD sharing will be affected, since they do not have a VIVT cache. That means this issue can not be happened in practice so far. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/47441086affcabb6ecbe403173e9283b0d904b38.1650956489.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/419b0e777c9e6d1454dcd906e0f5b752a736d335.1650781755.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Fixes: 6dfeaff93be1 ("hugetlb/userfaultfd: unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wp") Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-29mm: use for_each_online_node and node_online instead of open codingPeng Liu1-2/+2
Use more generic functions to deal with issues related to online nodes. The changes will make the code simplified. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220429030218.644635-1-liupeng256@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Suggested-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Suggested-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-29hugetlb: fix return value of __setup handlersPeng Liu1-8/+8
When __setup() return '0', using invalid option values causes the entire kernel boot option string to be reported as Unknown. Hugetlb calls __setup() and will return '0' when set invalid parameter string. The following phenomenon is observed: cmdline: hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1 dmesg: HugeTLB: unsupported hugepagesz=1Y HugeTLB: hugepages=1 does not follow a valid hugepagesz, ignoring Unknown kernel command line parameters "hugepagesz=1Y hugepages=1" Since hugetlb will print warning/error information before return for invalid parameter string, just use return '1' to avoid print again. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-4-liupeng256@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com> Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-29hugetlb: fix hugepages_setup when deal with pernodePeng Liu1-0/+15
Hugepages can be specified to pernode since "hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation", but the following problem is observed. Confusing behavior is observed when both 1G and 2M hugepage is set after "numa=off". cmdline hugepage settings: hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:3,1:3 hugepagesz=2M hugepages=0:1024,1:1024 results: HugeTLB registered 1.00 GiB page size, pre-allocated 0 pages HugeTLB registered 2.00 MiB page size, pre-allocated 1024 pages Furthermore, confusing behavior can be also observed when an invalid node behind a valid node. To fix this, never allocate any typical hugepage when an invalid parameter is received. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-3-liupeng256@huawei.com Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation") Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Cc: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-29hugetlb: fix wrong use of nr_online_nodesPeng Liu1-7/+5
Patch series "hugetlb: Fix some incorrect behavior", v3. This series fix three bugs of hugetlb: 1) Invalid use of nr_online_nodes; 2) Inconsistency between 1G hugepage and 2M hugepage; 3) Useless information in dmesg. This patch (of 4): Certain systems are designed to have sparse/discontiguous nodes. In this case, nr_online_nodes can not be used to walk through numa node. Also, a valid node may be greater than nr_online_nodes. However, in hugetlb, it is assumed that nodes are contiguous. For sparse/discontiguous nodes, the current code may treat a valid node as invalid, and will fail to allocate all hugepages on a valid node that "nid >= nr_online_nodes". As David suggested: if (tmp >= nr_online_nodes) goto invalid; Just imagine node 0 and node 2 are online, and node 1 is offline. Assuming that "node < 2" is valid is wrong. Recheck all the places that use nr_online_nodes, and repair them one by one. [liupeng256@huawei.com: v4] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220416103526.3287348-1-liupeng256@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-1-liupeng256@huawei.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220413032915.251254-2-liupeng256@huawei.com Fixes: 4178158ef8ca ("hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't work") Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation") Fixes: e79ce9832316 ("hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameter") Fixes: f9317f77a6e0 ("hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warnings") Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng256@huawei.com> Suggested-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-28mm: hugetlb_vmemmap: cleanup hugetlb_vmemmap related functionsMuchun Song1-5/+5
Patch series "cleanup hugetlb_vmemmap". The word of "free" is not expressive enough to express the feature of optimizing vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB, rename this keywork to "optimize" is more clear. In this series, cheanup related codes to make it more clear and expressive. This is suggested by David. This patch (of 3): The word of "free" is not expressive enough to express the feature of optimizing vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB, rename this keywork to "optimize". And some function names are prefixed with "huge_page" instead of "hugetlb", it is easily to be confused with THP. In this patch, cheanup related functions to make code more clear and expressive. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220404074652.68024-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220404074652.68024-2-songmuchun@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-28hugetlb: remove use of list iterator variable after loopJakob Koschel1-14/+19
In preparation to limit the scope of the list iterator to the list traversal loop, use a dedicated pointer to iterate through the list [1]. Before hugetlb_resv_map_add() was expecting a file_region struct, but in case the list iterator in add_reservation_in_range() did not exit early, the variable passed in, is not actually a valid structure. In such a case 'rg' is computed on the head element of the list and represents an out-of-bounds pointer. This still remains safe *iff* you only use the link member (as it is done in hugetlb_resv_map_add()). To avoid the type-confusion altogether and limit the list iterator to the loop, only a list_head pointer is kept to pass to hugetlb_resv_map_add(). Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/ [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220331224323.903842-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: "Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com> Cc: Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl> Cc: "Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl> Cc: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-28mm, hugetlb, hwpoison: separate branch for free and in-use hugepageNaoya Horiguchi1-1/+3
We know that HPageFreed pages should have page refcount 0, so get_page_unless_zero() always fails and returns 0. So explicitly separate the branch based on page state for minor optimization and better readability. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220415041848.GA3034499@ik1-406-35019.vs.sakura.ne.jp Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Suggested-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Suggested-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-21mm/hwpoison: fix race between hugetlb free/demotion and memory_failure_hugetlb()Naoya Horiguchi1-0/+10
There is a race condition between memory_failure_hugetlb() and hugetlb free/demotion, which causes setting PageHWPoison flag on the wrong page. The one simple result is that wrong processes can be killed, but another (more serious) one is that the actual error is left unhandled, so no one prevents later access to it, and that might lead to more serious results like consuming corrupted data. Think about the below race window: CPU 1 CPU 2 memory_failure_hugetlb struct page *head = compound_head(p); hugetlb page might be freed to buddy, or even changed to another compound page. get_hwpoison_page -- page is not what we want now... The current code first does prechecks roughly and then reconfirms after taking refcount, but it's found that it makes code overly complicated, so move the prechecks in a single hugetlb_lock range. A newly introduced function, try_memory_failure_hugetlb(), always takes hugetlb_lock (even for non-hugetlb pages). That can be improved, but memory_failure() is rare in principle, so should not be a big problem. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220408135323.1559401-2-naoya.horiguchi@linux.dev Fixes: 761ad8d7c7b5 ("mm: hwpoison: introduce memory_failure_hugetlb()") Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Reported-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-04-15hugetlb: do not demote poisoned hugetlb pagesMike Kravetz1-7/+10
It is possible for poisoned hugetlb pages to reside on the free lists. The huge page allocation routines which dequeue entries from the free lists make a point of avoiding poisoned pages. There is no such check and avoidance in the demote code path. If a hugetlb page on the is on a free list, poison will only be set in the head page rather then the page with the actual error. If such a page is demoted, then the poison flag may follow the wrong page. A page without error could have poison set, and a page with poison could not have the flag set. Check for poison before attempting to demote a hugetlb page. Also, return -EBUSY to the caller if only poisoned pages are on the free list. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220307215707.50916-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: 8531fc6f52f5 ("hugetlb: add hugetlb demote page support") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22Merge tag 'folio-5.18c' of git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecacheLinus Torvalds1-6/+9
Pull folio updates from Matthew Wilcox: - Rewrite how munlock works to massively reduce the contention on i_mmap_rwsem (Hugh Dickins): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/8e4356d-9622-a7f0-b2c-f116b5f2efea@google.com/ - Sort out the page refcount mess for ZONE_DEVICE pages (Christoph Hellwig): https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220210072828.2930359-1-hch@lst.de/ - Convert GUP to use folios and make pincount available for order-1 pages. (Matthew Wilcox) - Convert a few more truncation functions to use folios (Matthew Wilcox) - Convert page_vma_mapped_walk to use PFNs instead of pages (Matthew Wilcox) - Convert rmap_walk to use folios (Matthew Wilcox) - Convert most of shrink_page_list() to use a folio (Matthew Wilcox) - Add support for creating large folios in readahead (Matthew Wilcox) * tag 'folio-5.18c' of git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache: (114 commits) mm/damon: minor cleanup for damon_pa_young selftests/vm/transhuge-stress: Support file-backed PMD folios mm/filemap: Support VM_HUGEPAGE for file mappings mm/readahead: Switch to page_cache_ra_order mm/readahead: Align file mappings for non-DAX mm/readahead: Add large folio readahead mm: Support arbitrary THP sizes mm: Make large folios depend on THP mm: Fix READ_ONLY_THP warning mm/filemap: Allow large folios to be added to the page cache mm: Turn can_split_huge_page() into can_split_folio() mm/vmscan: Convert pageout() to take a folio mm/vmscan: Turn page_check_references() into folio_check_references() mm/vmscan: Account large folios correctly mm/vmscan: Optimise shrink_page_list for non-PMD-sized folios mm/vmscan: Free non-shmem folios without splitting them mm/rmap: Constify the rmap_walk_control argument mm/rmap: Convert rmap_walk() to take a folio mm: Turn page_anon_vma() into folio_anon_vma() mm/rmap: Turn page_lock_anon_vma_read() into folio_lock_anon_vma_read() ...
2022-03-22userfaultfd: provide unmasked address on page-faultNadav Amit1-2/+4
Userfaultfd is supposed to provide the full address (i.e., unmasked) of the faulting access back to userspace. However, that is not the case for quite some time. Even running "userfaultfd_demo" from the userfaultfd man page provides the wrong output (and contradicts the man page). Notice that "UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT event" shows the masked address (7fc5e30b3000) and not the first read address (0x7fc5e30b300f). Address returned by mmap() = 0x7fc5e30b3000 fault_handler_thread(): poll() returns: nready = 1; POLLIN = 1; POLLERR = 0 UFFD_EVENT_PAGEFAULT event: flags = 0; address = 7fc5e30b3000 (uffdio_copy.copy returned 4096) Read address 0x7fc5e30b300f in main(): A Read address 0x7fc5e30b340f in main(): A Read address 0x7fc5e30b380f in main(): A Read address 0x7fc5e30b3c0f in main(): A The exact address is useful for various reasons and specifically for prefetching decisions. If it is known that the memory is populated by certain objects whose size is not page-aligned, then based on the faulting address, the uffd-monitor can decide whether to prefetch and prefault the adjacent page. This bug has been for quite some time in the kernel: since commit 1a29d85eb0f1 ("mm: use vmf->address instead of of vmf->virtual_address") vmf->virtual_address"), which dates back to 2016. A concern has been raised that existing userspace application might rely on the old/wrong behavior in which the address is masked. Therefore, it was suggested to provide the masked address unless the user explicitly asks for the exact address. Add a new userfaultfd feature UFFD_FEATURE_EXACT_ADDRESS to direct userfaultfd to provide the exact address. Add a new "real_address" field to vmf to hold the unmasked address. Provide the address to userspace accordingly. Initialize real_address in various code-paths to be consistent with address, even when it is not used, to be on the safe side. [namit@vmware.com: initialize real_address on all code paths, per Jan] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220226022655.350562-1-namit@vmware.com [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo in comment, per Jan] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218041003.3508-1-namit@vmware.com Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Acked-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22mm/hugetlb.c: export PageHeadHuge()David Howells1-0/+1
Export PageHeadHuge() - it's used by folio_test_hugetlb() and thence by such as folio_file_page() and folio_contains(). Matthew suggested I use the first of those instead of doing the same calculation manually - but I can't call it from a module. Kirill suggested rearranging things to put it in a header, but that introduces header dependencies because of where constants are defined. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/EXPORT_SYMBOL/EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL/, per Christoph] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2494562.1646054576@warthog.procyon.org.uk Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163707085314.3221130.14783857863702203440.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22mm/hugetlb: use helper macro __ATTR_RWMiaohe Lin1-2/+1
Use helper macro __ATTR_RW to define HSTATE_ATTR to make code more clear. Minor readability improvement. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220222112731.33479-1-linmiaohe@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22hugetlb: clean up potential spectre issue warningsMike Kravetz1-3/+4
Recently introduced code allows numa nodes to be specified on the kernel command line for hugetlb allocations or CMA reservations. The node values are user specified and used as indicies into arrays. This generated the following smatch warnings: mm/hugetlb.c:4170 hugepages_setup() warn: potential spectre issue 'default_hugepages_in_node' [w] mm/hugetlb.c:4172 hugepages_setup() warn: potential spectre issue 'parsed_hstate->max_huge_pages_node' [w] mm/hugetlb.c:6898 cmdline_parse_hugetlb_cma() warn: potential spectre issue 'hugetlb_cma_size_in_node' [w] (local cap) Clean up by using array_index_nospec to sanitize array indicies. The routine cmdline_parse_hugetlb_cma has the same overflow/truncation issue addressed in [1]. That is also fixed with this change. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220209134018.8242-1-liuyuntao10@huawei.com/ As Michal pointed out, this is unlikely to be exploitable because it is __init code. But the patch suppresses the warnings. [mike.kravetz@oracle.com: v2] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220218212946.35441-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220217234218.192885-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Cc: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22mm: hugetlb: fix missing cache flush in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte()Muchun Song1-1/+2
folio_copy() will copy the data from one page to the target page, then the target page will be mapped to the user space address, which might have an alias issue with the kernel address used to copy the data from the page to. There are 2 ways to fix this issue. 1) insert flush_dcache_page() after folio_copy(). 2) replace folio_copy() with copy_user_huge_page() which already considers the cache maintenance. We chose 2) way to fix the issue since architectures can optimize this situation. It is also make backports easier. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220210123058.79206-5-songmuchun@bytedance.com Fixes: 8cc5fcbb5be8 ("mm, hugetlb: fix racy resv_huge_pages underflow on UFFDIO_COPY") Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Lars Persson <lars.persson@axis.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Xiongchun Duan <duanxiongchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-22mm: merge pte_mkhuge() call into arch_make_huge_pte()Anshuman Khandual1-2/+1
Each call into pte_mkhuge() is invariably followed by arch_make_huge_pte(). Instead arch_make_huge_pte() can accommodate pte_mkhuge() at the beginning. This updates generic fallback stub for arch_make_huge_pte() and available platforms definitions. This makes huge pte creation much cleaner and easier to follow. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1643860669-26307-1-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com> Reviewed-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu> Acked-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-03-21mm/hugetlb: Use try_grab_folio() instead of try_grab_compound_head()Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-4/+3
follow_hugetlb_page() only cares about success or failure, so it doesn't need to know the type of the returned pointer, only whether it's NULL or not. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
2022-03-21mm: Make compound_pincount always availableMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-0/+4
Move compound_pincount from the third page to the second page, which means it's available for all compound pages. That lets us delete hpage_pincount_available(). On 32-bit systems, there isn't enough space for both compound_pincount and compound_nr in the second page (it would collide with page->private, which is in use for pages in the swap cache), so revert the optimisation of storing both compound_order and compound_nr on 32-bit systems. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: William Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
2022-02-26hugetlbfs: fix a truncation issue in hugepages parameterLiu Yuntao1-2/+2
When we specify a large number for node in hugepages parameter, it may be parsed to another number due to truncation in this statement: node = tmp; For example, add following parameter in command line: hugepagesz=1G hugepages=4294967297:5 and kernel will allocate 5 hugepages for node 1 instead of ignoring it. I move the validation check earlier to fix this issue, and slightly simplifies the condition here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220209134018.8242-1-liuyuntao10@huawei.com Fixes: b5389086ad7be0 ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation") Signed-off-by: Liu Yuntao <liuyuntao10@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-02-26mm/hugetlb: fix kernel crash with hugetlb mremapAneesh Kumar K.V1-4/+3
This fixes the below crash: kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:2373! cpu 0x5d: Vector: 700 (Program Check) at [c00000003c6e76e0] pc: c000000000581a54: pmd_to_page+0x54/0x80 lr: c00000000058d184: move_hugetlb_page_tables+0x4e4/0x5b0 sp: c00000003c6e7980 msr: 9000000000029033 current = 0xc00000003bd8d980 paca = 0xc000200fff610100 irqmask: 0x03 irq_happened: 0x01 pid = 9349, comm = hugepage-mremap kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:2373! move_hugetlb_page_tables+0x4e4/0x5b0 (link register) move_hugetlb_page_tables+0x22c/0x5b0 (unreliable) move_page_tables+0xdbc/0x1010 move_vma+0x254/0x5f0 sys_mremap+0x7c0/0x900 system_call_exception+0x160/0x2c0 the kernel can't use huge_pte_offset before it set the pte entry because a page table lookup check for huge PTE bit in the page table to differentiate between a huge pte entry and a pointer to pte page. A huge_pte_alloc won't mark the page table entry huge and hence kernel should not use huge_pte_offset after a huge_pte_alloc. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220211063221.99293-1-aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com Fixes: 550a7d60bd5e ("mm, hugepages: add mremap() support for hugepage backed vma") Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2022-02-17mm/munlock: rmap call mlock_vma_page() munlock_vma_page()Hugh Dickins1-2/+2
Add vma argument to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(), make them inline functions which check (vma->vm_flags & VM_LOCKED) before calling mlock_page() and munlock_page() in mm/mlock.c. Add bool compound to mlock_vma_page() and munlock_vma_page(): this is because we have understandable difficulty in accounting pte maps of THPs, and if passed a PageHead page, mlock_page() and munlock_page() cannot tell whether it's a pmd map to be counted or a pte map to be ignored. Add vma arg to page_add_file_rmap() and page_remove_rmap(), like the others, and use that to call mlock_vma_page() at the end of the page adds, and munlock_vma_page() at the end of page_remove_rmap() (end or beginning? unimportant, but end was easier for assertions in testing). No page lock is required (although almost all adds happen to hold it): delete the "Serialize with page migration" BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page))s. Certainly page lock did serialize with page migration, but I'm having difficulty explaining why that was ever important. Mlock accounting on THPs has been hard to define, differed between anon and file, involved PageDoubleMap in some places and not others, required clear_page_mlock() at some points. Keep it simple now: just count the pmds and ignore the ptes, there is no reason for ptes to undo pmd mlocks. page_add_new_anon_rmap() callers unchanged: they have long been calling lru_cache_add_inactive_or_unevictable(), which does its own VM_LOCKED handling (it also checks for not VM_SPECIAL: I think that's overcautious, and inconsistent with other checks, that mmap_region() already prevents VM_LOCKED on VM_SPECIAL; but haven't quite convinced myself to change it). Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
2022-01-15mm: change page type prior to adding page table entryPasha Tatashin1-3/+3
Patch series "page table check", v3. Ensure that some memory corruptions are prevented by checking at the time of insertion of entries into user page tables that there is no illegal sharing. We have recently found a problem [1] that existed in kernel since 4.14. The problem was caused by broken page ref count and led to memory leaking from one process into another. The problem was accidentally detected by studying a dump of one process and noticing that one page contains memory that should not belong to this process. There are some other page->_refcount related problems that were recently fixed: [2], [3] which potentially could also lead to illegal sharing. In addition to hardening refcount [4] itself, this work is an attempt to prevent this class of memory corruption issues. It uses a simple state machine that is independent from regular MM logic to check for illegal sharing at time pages are inserted and removed from page tables. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/xr9335nxwc5y.fsf@gthelen2.svl.corp.google.com [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/1582661774-30925-2-git-send-email-akaher@vmware.com [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20210622021423.154662-3-mike.kravetz@oracle.com [4] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211221150140.988298-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com This patch (of 4): There are a few places where we first update the entry in the user page table, and later change the struct page to indicate that this is anonymous or file page. In most places, however, we first configure the page metadata and then insert entries into the page table. Page table check, will use the information from struct page to verify the type of entry is inserted. Change the order in all places to first update struct page, and later to update page table. This means that we first do calls that may change the type of page (anon or file): page_move_anon_rmap page_add_anon_rmap do_page_add_anon_rmap page_add_new_anon_rmap page_add_file_rmap hugepage_add_anon_rmap hugepage_add_new_anon_rmap And after that do calls that add entries to the page table: set_huge_pte_at set_pte_at Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211221154650.1047963-1-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211221154650.1047963-2-pasha.tatashin@soleen.com Signed-off-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com> Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-12-10hugetlbfs: fix issue of preallocation of gigantic pages can't workZhenguo Yao1-1/+1
Preallocation of gigantic pages can't work bacause of commit b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation"). When nid is NUMA_NO_NODE(-1), alloc_bootmem_huge_page will always return without doing allocation. Fix this by adding more check. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211129133803.15653-1-yaozhenguo1@gmail.com Fixes: b5389086ad7b ("hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node allocation") Signed-off-by: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Tested-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-22hugetlbfs: flush before unlock on move_hugetlb_page_tables()Nadav Amit1-1/+1
We must flush the TLB before releasing i_mmap_rwsem to avoid the potential reuse of an unshared PMDs page. This is not true in the case of move_hugetlb_page_tables(). The last reference on the page table can therefore be dropped before the TLB flush took place. Prevent it by reordering the operations and flushing the TLB before releasing i_mmap_rwsem. Fixes: 550a7d60bd5e ("mm, hugepages: add mremap() support for hugepage backed vma") Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-22hugetlbfs: flush TLBs correctly after huge_pmd_unshareNadav Amit1-4/+19
When __unmap_hugepage_range() calls to huge_pmd_unshare() succeed, a TLB flush is missing. This TLB flush must be performed before releasing the i_mmap_rwsem, in order to prevent an unshared PMDs page from being released and reused before the TLB flush took place. Arguably, a comprehensive solution would use mmu_gather interface to batch the TLB flushes and the PMDs page release, however it is not an easy solution: (1) try_to_unmap_one() and try_to_migrate_one() also call huge_pmd_unshare() and they cannot use the mmu_gather interface; and (2) deferring the release of the page reference for the PMDs page until after i_mmap_rwsem is dropeed can confuse huge_pmd_unshare() into thinking PMDs are shared when they are not. Fix __unmap_hugepage_range() by adding the missing TLB flush, and forcing a flush when unshare is successful. Fixes: 24669e58477e ("hugetlb: use mmu_gather instead of a temporary linked list for accumulating pages)" # 3.6 Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-20hugetlb, userfaultfd: fix reservation restore on userfaultfd errorMina Almasry1-3/+4
Currently in the is_continue case in hugetlb_mcopy_atomic_pte(), if we bail out using "goto out_release_unlock;" in the cases where idx >= size, or !huge_pte_none(), the code will detect that new_pagecache_page == false, and so call restore_reserve_on_error(). In this case I see restore_reserve_on_error() delete the reservation, and the following call to remove_inode_hugepages() will increment h->resv_hugepages causing a 100% reproducible leak. We should treat the is_continue case similar to adding a page into the pagecache and set new_pagecache_page to true, to indicate that there is no reservation to restore on the error path, and we need not call restore_reserve_on_error(). Rename new_pagecache_page to page_in_pagecache to make that clear. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211117193825.378528-1-almasrymina@google.com Fixes: c7b1850dfb41 ("hugetlb: don't pass page cache pages to restore_reserve_on_error") Signed-off-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Reported-by: James Houghton <jthoughton@google.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Wei Xu <weixugc@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-20hugetlb: fix hugetlb cgroup refcounting during mremapBui Quang Minh1-1/+3
When hugetlb_vm_op_open() is called during copy_vma(), we may take the reference to resv_map->css. Later, when clearing the reservation pointer of old_vma after transferring it to new_vma, we forget to drop the reference to resv_map->css. This leads to a reference leak of css. Fixes this by adding a check to drop reservation css reference in clear_vma_resv_huge_pages() Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211113154412.91134-1-minhquangbui99@gmail.com Fixes: 550a7d60bd5e35 ("mm, hugepages: add mremap() support for hugepage backed vma") Signed-off-by: Bui Quang Minh <minhquangbui99@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com> Cc: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@huawei.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-06Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew)Linus Torvalds1-63/+636
Merge misc updates from Andrew Morton: "257 patches. Subsystems affected by this patch series: scripts, ocfs2, vfs, and mm (slab-generic, slab, slub, kconfig, dax, kasan, debug, pagecache, gup, swap, memcg, pagemap, mprotect, mremap, iomap, tracing, vmalloc, pagealloc, memory-failure, hugetlb, userfaultfd, vmscan, tools, memblock, oom-kill, hugetlbfs, migration, thp, readahead, nommu, ksm, vmstat, madvise, memory-hotplug, rmap, zsmalloc, highmem, zram, cleanups, kfence, and damon)" * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>: (257 commits) mm/damon: remove return value from before_terminate callback mm/damon: fix a few spelling mistakes in comments and a pr_debug message mm/damon: simplify stop mechanism Docs/admin-guide/mm/pagemap: wordsmith page flags descriptions Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/start: simplify the content Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/start: fix a wrong link Docs/admin-guide/mm/damon/start: fix wrong example commands mm/damon/dbgfs: add adaptive_targets list check before enable monitor_on mm/damon: remove unnecessary variable initialization Documentation/admin-guide/mm/damon: add a document for DAMON_RECLAIM mm/damon: introduce DAMON-based Reclamation (DAMON_RECLAIM) selftests/damon: support watermarks mm/damon/dbgfs: support watermarks mm/damon/schemes: activate schemes based on a watermarks mechanism tools/selftests/damon: update for regions prioritization of schemes mm/damon/dbgfs: support prioritization weights mm/damon/vaddr,paddr: support pageout prioritization mm/damon/schemes: prioritize regions within the quotas mm/damon/selftests: support schemes quotas mm/damon/dbgfs: support quotas of schemes ...
2021-11-06hugetlbfs: extend the definition of hugepages parameter to support node ↵Zhenguo Yao1-25/+128
allocation We can specify the number of hugepages to allocate at boot. But the hugepages is balanced in all nodes at present. In some scenarios, we only need hugepages in one node. For example: DPDK needs hugepages which are in the same node as NIC. If DPDK needs four hugepages of 1G size in node1 and system has 16 numa nodes we must reserve 64 hugepages on the kernel cmdline. But only four hugepages are used. The others should be free after boot. If the system memory is low(for example: 64G), it will be an impossible task. So extend the hugepages parameter to support specifying hugepages on a specific node. For example add following parameter: hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:1,1:3 It will allocate 1 hugepage in node0 and 3 hugepages in node1. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211005054729.86457-1-yaozhenguo1@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Zhenguo Yao <yaozhenguo1@gmail.com> Cc: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Cc: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-06hugetlb: remove unnecessary set_page_count in prep_compound_gigantic_pageMike Kravetz1-1/+0
In commit 7118fc2906e2 ("hugetlb: address ref count racing in prep_compound_gigantic_page"), page_ref_freeze is used to atomically zero the ref count of tail pages iff they are 1. The unconditional call to set_page_count(0) was left in the code. This call is after page_ref_freeze so it is really a noop. Remove redundant and unnecessary set_page_count call. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211026220635.35187-1-mike.kravetz@oracle.com Fixes: 7118fc2906e29 ("hugetlb: address ref count racing in prep_compound_gigantic_page") Signed-off-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Suggested-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Reviewed-by: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com> Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2021-11-06hugetlb: remove redundant VM_BUG_ON() in add_reservation_in_range()Baolin Wang1-1/+0
When calling hugetlb_resv_map_add(), we've guaranteed that the parameter 'to' is always larger than 'from', so it never returns a negative value from hugetlb_resv_map_add(). Thus remove the redundant VM_BUG_ON(). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/2b565552f3d06753da1e8dda439c0d96d6d9a5a3.1634797639.git.baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com Signed-off-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com> Reviewed-by: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>