summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/test_bpf.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-04-01bpf, tests: Add load store test case for tail callXu Kuohai1-0/+30
Add test case to enusre that the caller and callee's fp offsets are correct during tail call (mainly asserting for arm64 JIT). Tested on both big-endian and little-endian arm64 qemu, result: test_bpf: Summary: 1026 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [1014/1014 JIT'ed] test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 10 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [10/10 JIT'ed] test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321152852.2334294-6-xukuohai@huawei.com
2022-04-01bpf, tests: Add tests for BPF_LDX/BPF_STX with different offsetsXu Kuohai1-4/+281
This patch adds tests to verify the behavior of BPF_LDX/BPF_STX + BPF_B/BPF_H/BPF_W/BPF_DW with negative offset, small positive offset, large positive offset, and misaligned offset. Tested on both big-endian and little-endian arm64 qemu, result: test_bpf: Summary: 1026 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [1014/1014 JIT'ed]'] test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed] test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321152852.2334294-5-xukuohai@huawei.com
2021-11-16bpf: Change value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33Tiezhu Yang1-2/+2
In the current code, the actual max tail call count is 33 which is greater than MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT (defined as 32). The actual limit is not consistent with the meaning of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT and thus confusing at first glance. We can see the historical evolution from commit 04fd61ab36ec ("bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs") and commit f9dabe016b63 ("bpf: Undo off-by-one in interpreter tail call count limit"). In order to avoid changing existing behavior, the actual limit is 33 now, this is reasonable. After commit 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite"), we can see there exists failed testcase. On all archs when CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON is not set: # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf # dmesg | grep -w FAIL Tail call error path, max count reached jited:0 ret 34 != 33 FAIL On some archs: # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf # dmesg | grep -w FAIL Tail call error path, max count reached jited:1 ret 34 != 33 FAIL Although the above failed testcase has been fixed in commit 18935a72eb25 ("bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit tests"), it would still be good to change the value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT from 32 to 33 to make the code more readable. The 32-bit x86 JIT was using a limit of 32, just fix the wrong comments and limit to 33 tail calls as the constant MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT updated. For the mips64 JIT, use "ori" instead of "addiu" as suggested by Johan Almbladh. For the riscv JIT, use RV_REG_TCC directly to save one register move as suggested by Björn Töpel. For the other implementations, no function changes, it does not change the current limit 33, the new value of MAX_TAIL_CALL_CNT can reflect the actual max tail call count, the related tail call testcases in test_bpf module and selftests can work well for the interpreter and the JIT. Here are the test results on x86_64: # uname -m x86_64 # echo 0 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls # dmesg | tail -1 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/core/bpf_jit_enable # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls # dmesg | tail -1 test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [8/8 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # ./test_progs -t tailcalls #142 tailcalls:OK Summary: 1/11 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Tested-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: Björn Töpel <bjorn@kernel.org> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Acked-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1636075800-3264-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
2021-10-28bpf, tests: Add module parameter test_suite to test_bpf moduleTiezhu Yang1-77/+135
After commit 9298e63eafea ("bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU operand magnitudes"), when modprobe test_bpf.ko with JIT on mips64, there exists segment fault due to the following reason: [...] ALU64_MOV_X: all register value magnitudes jited:1 Break instruction in kernel code[#1] [...] It seems that the related JIT implementations of some test cases in test_bpf() have problems. At this moment, I do not care about the segment fault while I just want to verify the test cases of tail calls. Based on the above background and motivation, add the following module parameter test_suite to the test_bpf.ko: test_suite=<string>: only the specified test suite will be run, the string can be "test_bpf", "test_tail_calls" or "test_skb_segment". If test_suite is not specified, but test_id, test_name or test_range is specified, set 'test_bpf' as the default test suite. This is useful to only test the corresponding test suite when specifying the valid test_suite string. Any invalid test suite will result in -EINVAL being returned and no tests being run. If the test_suite is not specified or specified as empty string, it does not change the current logic, all of the test cases will be run. Here are some test results: # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf # dmesg | grep Summary test_bpf: Summary: 1009 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/997 JIT'ed] test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed] test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED # rmmod test_bpf # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_bpf # dmesg | tail -1 test_bpf: Summary: 1009 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/997 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls # dmesg test_bpf: #0 Tail call leaf jited:0 21 PASS [...] test_bpf: #7 Tail call error path, index out of range jited:0 32 PASS test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 8 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/8 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_skb_segment # dmesg test_bpf: #0 gso_with_rx_frags PASS test_bpf: #1 gso_linear_no_head_frag PASS test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED # rmmod test_bpf # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf test_id=1 # dmesg test_bpf: test_bpf: set 'test_bpf' as the default test_suite. test_bpf: #1 TXA jited:0 54 51 50 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/1 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_bpf test_name=TXA # dmesg test_bpf: #1 TXA jited:0 54 50 51 PASS test_bpf: Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/1 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_tail_calls test_range=6,7 # dmesg test_bpf: #6 Tail call error path, NULL target jited:0 41 PASS test_bpf: #7 Tail call error path, index out of range jited:0 32 PASS test_bpf: test_tail_calls: Summary: 2 PASSED, 0 FAILED, [0/2 JIT'ed] # rmmod test_bpf # dmesg -c # modprobe test_bpf test_suite=test_skb_segment test_id=1 # dmesg test_bpf: #1 gso_linear_no_head_frag PASS test_bpf: test_skb_segment: Summary: 1 PASSED, 0 FAILED By the way, the above segment fault has been fixed in the latest bpf-next tree which contains the mips64 JIT rework. Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Acked-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/1635384321-28128-1-git-send-email-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
2021-10-07bpf, tests: Add more LD_IMM64 testsJohan Almbladh1-3/+117
This patch adds new tests for the two-instruction LD_IMM64. The new tests verify the operation with immediate values of different byte patterns. Mainly intended to cover JITs that want to be clever when loading 64-bit constants. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211007143006.634308-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add test of LDX_MEM with operand aliasingJohan Almbladh1-0/+58
This patch adds a set of tests of BPF_LDX_MEM where both operand registers are the same register. Mainly testing 32-bit JITs that may load a 64-bit value in two 32-bit loads, and must not overwrite the address register. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-11-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add test of ALU shifts with operand register aliasingJohan Almbladh1-13/+149
This patch adds a tests of ALU32 and ALU64 LSH/RSH/ARSH operations for the case when the two operands are the same register. Mainly intended to test JITs that implement ALU64 shifts with 32-bit CPU instructions. Also renamed related helper functions for consistency with the new tests. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-10-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of BPF_ATOMIC register combinationsJohan Almbladh1-0/+422
This patch adds tests of all register combinations for BPF_ATOMIC operations on both BPF_W and BPF_DW sizes. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-9-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU register combinationsJohan Almbladh1-71/+763
This patch replaces the current register combination test with new exhaustive tests. Before, only a subset of register combinations was tested for ALU64 DIV. Now, all combinatons of operand registers are tested, including the case when they are the same, and for all ALU32 and ALU64 operations. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-8-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Minor restructuring of ALU testsJohan Almbladh1-72/+65
This patch moves the ALU LSH/RSH/ARSH reference computations into the common reference value function. Also fix typo in constants so they now have the intended values. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-7-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add more tests for ALU and ATOMIC register clobberingJohan Almbladh1-70/+197
This patch expands the register-clobbering-during-function-call tests to cover more all ALU32/64 MUL, DIV and MOD operations and all ATOMIC operations. In short, if a JIT implements a complex operation with a call to an external function, it must make sure to save and restore all its caller-saved registers that may be clobbered by the call. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-6-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add tests to check source register zero-extensionJohan Almbladh1-0/+143
This patch adds tests to check that the source register is preserved when zero-extending a 32-bit value. In particular, it checks that the source operand is not zero-extended in-place. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-5-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of BPF_ATOMIC magnitudesJohan Almbladh1-1/+503
This patch adds a series of test to verify the operation of BPF_ATOMIC with BPF_DW and BPF_W sizes, for all power-of-two magnitudes of the register value operand. Also fixes a confusing typo in the comment for a related test. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-4-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add zero-extension checks in BPF_ATOMIC testsJohan Almbladh1-5/+17
This patch updates the existing tests of BPF_ATOMIC operations to verify that a 32-bit register operand is properly zero-extended. In particular, it checks the operation on archs that require 32-bit operands to be properly zero-/sign-extended or the result is undefined, e.g. MIPS64. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-3-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-10-01bpf/tests: Add tests of BPF_LDX and BPF_STX with small sizesJohan Almbladh1-0/+254
This patch adds a series of tests to verify the behavior of BPF_LDX and BPF_STX with BPF_B//W sizes in isolation. In particular, it checks that BPF_LDX zero-extendeds the result, and that BPF_STX does not overwrite adjacent bytes in memory. BPF_ST and operations on BPF_DW size are deemed to be sufficiently tested by existing tests. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20211001130348.3670534-2-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf: Replace "want address" users of BPF_CAST_CALL with BPF_CALL_IMMKees Cook1-1/+1
In order to keep ahead of cases in the kernel where Control Flow Integrity (CFI) may trip over function call casts, enabling -Wcast-function-type is helpful. To that end, BPF_CAST_CALL causes various warnings and is one of the last places in the kernel triggering this warning. Most places using BPF_CAST_CALL actually just want a void * to perform math on. It's not actually performing a call, so just use a different helper to get the void *, by way of the new BPF_CALL_IMM() helper, which can clean up a common copy/paste idiom as well. This change results in no object code difference. Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/20 Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CAEf4Bzb46=-J5Fxc3mMZ8JQPtK1uoE0q6+g6WPz53Cvx=CBEhw@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210928230946.4062144-2-keescook@chromium.org
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add tail call limit test with external function callJohan Almbladh1-3/+83
This patch adds a tail call limit test where the program also emits a BPF_CALL to an external function prior to the tail call. Mainly testing that JITed programs preserve its internal register state, for example tail call count, across such external calls. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-15-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Fix error in tail call limit testsJohan Almbladh1-10/+27
This patch fixes an error in the tail call limit test that caused the test to fail on for x86-64 JIT. Previously, the register R0 was used to report the total number of tail calls made. However, after a tail call fall-through, the value of the R0 register is undefined. Now, all tail call error path tests instead use context state to store the count. Fixes: 874be05f525e ("bpf, tests: Add tail call test suite") Reported-by: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io> Reported-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-14-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add more BPF_END byte order conversion testsJohan Almbladh1-0/+122
This patch adds tests of the high 32 bits of 64-bit BPF_END conversions. It also adds a mirrored set of tests where the source bytes are reversed. The MSB of each byte is now set on the high word instead, possibly affecting sign-extension during conversion in a different way. Mainly for JIT testing. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-13-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Expand branch conversion JIT testJohan Almbladh1-34/+91
This patch expands the branch conversion test introduced by 66e5eb84 ("bpf, tests: Add branch conversion JIT test"). The test now includes a JMP with maximum eBPF offset. This triggers branch conversion for the 64-bit MIPS JIT. Additional variants are also added for cases when the branch is taken or not taken. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-12-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add JMP tests with degenerate conditionalJohan Almbladh1-0/+229
This patch adds a set of tests for JMP and JMP32 operations where the branch decision is know at JIT time. Mainly testing JIT behaviour. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-11-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add JMP tests with small offsetsJohan Almbladh1-0/+71
This patch adds a set of tests for JMP to verify that the JITed jump offset is calculated correctly. We pretend that the verifier has inserted any zero extensions to make the jump-over operations JIT to one instruction each, in order to control the exact JITed jump offset. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-10-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add test case flag for verifier zero-extensionJohan Almbladh1-0/+3
This patch adds a new flag to indicate that the verified did insert zero-extensions, even though the verifier is not being run for any of the tests. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-9-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add exhaustive test of LD_IMM64 immediate magnitudesJohan Almbladh1-0/+63
This patch adds a test for the 64-bit immediate load, a two-instruction operation, to verify correctness for all possible magnitudes of the immediate operand. Mainly intended for JIT testing. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-8-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add staggered JMP and JMP32 testsJohan Almbladh1-0/+829
This patch adds a new type of jump test where the program jumps forwards and backwards with increasing offset. It mainly tests JITs where a relative jump may generate different JITed code depending on the offset size, read MIPS. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-7-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of JMP operand magnitudesJohan Almbladh1-0/+779
This patch adds a set of tests for conditional JMP and JMP32 operations to verify correctness for all possible magnitudes of the immediate and register operands. Mainly intended for JIT testing. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-6-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU operand magnitudesJohan Almbladh1-0/+772
This patch adds a set of tests for ALU64 and ALU32 arithmetic and bitwise logical operations to verify correctness for all possible magnitudes of the register and immediate operands. Mainly intended for JIT testing. The patch introduces a pattern generator that can be used to drive extensive tests of different kinds of operations. It is parameterized to allow tuning of the operand combinations to test. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-5-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Add exhaustive tests of ALU shift valuesJohan Almbladh1-0/+260
This patch adds a set of tests for ALU64 and ALU32 shift operations to verify correctness for all possible values of the shift value. Mainly intended for JIT testing. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-4-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Reduce memory footprint of test suiteJohan Almbladh1-14/+12
The test suite used to call any fill_helper callbacks to generate eBPF program data for all test cases at once. This caused ballooning memory requirements as more extensive test cases were added. Now the each fill_helper is called before the test is run and the allocated memory released afterwards, before the next test case is processed. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-3-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-28bpf/tests: Allow different number of runs per test caseJohan Almbladh1-0/+4
This patch allows a test cast to specify the number of runs to use. For compatibility with existing test case definitions, the default value 0 is interpreted as MAX_TESTRUNS. A reduced number of runs is useful for complex test programs where 1000 runs may take a very long time. Instead of reducing what is tested, one can instead reduce the number of times the test is run. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210914091842.4186267-2-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-09-10selftests/bpf: Test new __sk_buff field hwtstampVadim Fedorenko1-0/+1
Analogous to the gso_segs selftests introduced in commit d9ff286a0f59 ("bpf: allow BPF programs access skb_shared_info->gso_segs field"). Signed-off-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210909220409.8804-3-vfedorenko@novek.ru
2021-08-17bpf: Refactor BPF_PROG_RUN into a functionAndrii Nakryiko1-1/+1
Turn BPF_PROG_RUN into a proper always inlined function. No functional and performance changes are intended, but it makes it much easier to understand what's going on with how BPF programs are actually get executed. It's more obvious what types and callbacks are expected. Also extra () around input parameters can be dropped, as well as `__` variable prefixes intended to avoid naming collisions, which makes the code simpler to read and write. This refactoring also highlighted one extra issue. BPF_PROG_RUN is both a macro and an enum value (BPF_PROG_RUN == BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN). Turning BPF_PROG_RUN into a function causes naming conflict compilation error. So rename BPF_PROG_RUN into lower-case bpf_prog_run(), similar to bpf_prog_run_xdp(), bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu(), etc. All existing callers of BPF_PROG_RUN, the macro, are switched to bpf_prog_run() explicitly. Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815070609.987780-2-andrii@kernel.org
2021-08-16bpf, tests: Fix spelling mistake "shoft" -> "shift"Colin Ian King1-1/+1
There is a spelling mistake in a literal string. Fix it. Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210815213950.47751-1-colin.king@canonical.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add tail call test suiteJohan Almbladh1-0/+248
While BPF_CALL instructions were tested implicitly by the cBPF-to-eBPF translation, there has not been any tests for BPF_TAIL_CALL instructions. The new test suite includes tests for tail call chaining, tail call count tracking and error paths. It is mainly intended for JIT development and testing. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-15-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add tests for BPF_CMPXCHGJohan Almbladh1-0/+166
Tests for BPF_CMPXCHG with both word and double word operands. As with the tests for other atomic operations, these tests only check the result of the arithmetic operation. The atomicity of the operations is not tested. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-14-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add tests for atomic operationsJohan Almbladh1-86/+166
Tests for each atomic arithmetic operation and BPF_XCHG, derived from old BPF_XADD tests. The tests include BPF_W/DW and BPF_FETCH variants. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-13-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add test for 32-bit context pointer argument passingJohan Almbladh1-0/+16
On a 32-bit architecture, the context pointer will occupy the low half of R1, and the other half will be zero. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-12-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add branch conversion JIT testJohan Almbladh1-0/+43
Some JITs may need to convert a conditional jump instruction to to short PC-relative branch and a long unconditional jump, if the PC-relative offset exceeds offset field width in the CPU instruction. This test triggers such branch conversion on the 32-bit MIPS JIT. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-11-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add word-order tests for load/store of double wordsJohan Almbladh1-0/+36
A double word (64-bit) load/store may be implemented as two successive 32-bit operations, one for each word. Check that the order of those operations is consistent with the machine endianness. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-10-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add tests for ALU operations implemented with function callsJohan Almbladh1-0/+141
32-bit JITs may implement complex ALU64 instructions using function calls. The new tests check aspects related to this, such as register clobbering and register argument re-ordering. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-9-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add more ALU64 BPF_MUL testsJohan Almbladh1-0/+48
This patch adds BPF_MUL tests for 64x32 and 64x64 multiply. Mainly testing 32-bit JITs that implement ALU64 operations with two 32-bit CPU registers per operand. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-8-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add more BPF_LSH/RSH/ARSH tests for ALU64Johan Almbladh1-2/+542
This patch adds a number of tests for BPF_LSH, BPF_RSH amd BPF_ARSH ALU64 operations with values that may trigger different JIT code paths. Mainly testing 32-bit JITs that implement ALU64 operations with two 32-bit CPU registers per operand. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-7-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add more ALU32 tests for BPF_LSH/RSH/ARSHJohan Almbladh1-0/+102
This patch adds more tests of ALU32 shift operations BPF_LSH and BPF_RSH, including the special case of a zero immediate. Also add corresponding BPF_ARSH tests which were missing for ALU32. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-6-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add more tests of ALU32 and ALU64 bitwise operationsJohan Almbladh1-0/+210
This patch adds tests of BPF_AND, BPF_OR and BPF_XOR with different magnitude of the immediate value. Mainly checking 32-bit JIT sub-word handling and zero/sign extension. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-5-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Fix typos in test case descriptionsJohan Almbladh1-4/+4
This patch corrects the test description in a number of cases where the description differed from what was actually tested and expected. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-4-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add BPF_MOV tests for zero and sign extensionJohan Almbladh1-0/+84
Tests for ALU32 and ALU64 MOV with different sizes of the immediate value. Depending on the immediate field width of the native CPU instructions, a JIT may generate code differently depending on the immediate value. Test that zero or sign extension is performed as expected. Mainly for JIT testing. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-3-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-08-10bpf, tests: Add BPF_JMP32 test casesJohan Almbladh1-0/+511
An eBPF JIT may implement JMP32 operations in a different way than JMP, especially on 32-bit architectures. This patch adds a series of tests for JMP32 operations, mainly for testing JITs. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210809091829.810076-2-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-07-23bpf/tests: Do not PASS tests without actually testing the resultJohan Almbladh1-1/+8
Each test case can have a set of sub-tests, where each sub-test can run the cBPF/eBPF test snippet with its own data_size and expected result. Before, the end of the sub-test array was indicated by both data_size and result being zero. However, most or all of the internal eBPF tests has a data_size of zero already. When such a test also had an expected value of zero, the test was never run but reported as PASS anyway. Now the test runner always runs the first sub-test, regardless of the data_size and result values. The sub-test array zero-termination only applies for any additional sub-tests. There are other ways fix it of course, but this solution at least removes the surprise of eBPF tests with a zero result always succeeding. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210721103822.3755111-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-07-23bpf/tests: Fix copy-and-paste error in double word testJohan Almbladh1-2/+2
This test now operates on DW as stated instead of W, which was already covered by another test. Signed-off-by: Johan Almbladh <johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210721104058.3755254-1-johan.almbladh@anyfinetworks.com
2021-07-08lib/test: fix spelling mistakesZhen Lei1-1/+1
Fix some spelling mistakes in comments found by "codespell": thats ==> that's unitialized ==> uninitialized panicing ==> panicking sucess ==> success possitive ==> positive intepreted ==> interpreted Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210607133036.12525-2-thunder.leizhen@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> [test_bfp.c] Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-11-18 17:21:55 +0000