| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Add 'const' to some function arguments and variables to make it easier
to read the code.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>
[jstultz: Also fixup pre-existing checkpatch warnings for
prototype arguments with no variable name]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
|
|
The messages printed by tk_debug_account_sleep_time() are basically
useful for system sleep debugging, so print them only when the other
debug messages from the core suspend/hibernate code are enabled.
While at it, make it clear that the messages from
tk_debug_account_sleep_time() are about timekeeping suspend
duration, because in general timekeeping may be suspeded and
resumed for multiple times during one system suspend-resume cycle.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
We cannot do printk() from tk_debug_account_sleep_time(), because
tk_debug_account_sleep_time() is called under tk_core seq lock.
The reason why printk() is unsafe there is that console_sem may
invoke scheduler (up()->wake_up_process()->activate_task()), which,
in turn, can return back to timekeeping code, for instance, via
get_time()->ktime_get(), deadlocking the system on tk_core seq lock.
[ 48.950592] ======================================================
[ 48.950622] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[ 48.950622] 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+ #101 Not tainted
[ 48.950622] -------------------------------------------------------
[ 48.950622] kworker/0:0/3 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 48.950653] (tk_core){----..}, at: [<c01cc624>] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90
[ 48.950683]
but task is already holding lock:
[ 48.950683] (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90
[ 48.950714]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 48.950714]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[ 48.950714]
-> #5 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}:
[ 48.950744] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[ 48.950775] lock_hrtimer_base+0x28/0x58
[ 48.950775] hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x20/0x5c8
[ 48.950775] __enqueue_rt_entity+0x320/0x360
[ 48.950805] enqueue_rt_entity+0x2c/0x44
[ 48.950805] enqueue_task_rt+0x24/0x94
[ 48.950836] ttwu_do_activate+0x54/0xc0
[ 48.950836] try_to_wake_up+0x248/0x5c8
[ 48.950836] __setup_irq+0x420/0x5f0
[ 48.950836] request_threaded_irq+0xdc/0x184
[ 48.950866] devm_request_threaded_irq+0x58/0xa4
[ 48.950866] omap_i2c_probe+0x530/0x6a0
[ 48.950897] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xb0
[ 48.950897] driver_probe_device+0x1f8/0x2cc
[ 48.950897] __driver_attach+0xc0/0xc4
[ 48.950927] bus_for_each_dev+0x6c/0xa0
[ 48.950927] bus_add_driver+0x100/0x210
[ 48.950927] driver_register+0x78/0xf4
[ 48.950958] do_one_initcall+0x3c/0x16c
[ 48.950958] kernel_init_freeable+0x20c/0x2d8
[ 48.950958] kernel_init+0x8/0x110
[ 48.950988] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[ 48.950988]
-> #4 (&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock){-.-...}:
[ 48.951019] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
[ 48.951019] rq_offline_rt+0x9c/0x2bc
[ 48.951019] set_rq_offline.part.2+0x2c/0x58
[ 48.951049] rq_attach_root+0x134/0x144
[ 48.951049] cpu_attach_domain+0x18c/0x6f4
[ 48.951049] build_sched_domains+0xba4/0xd80
[ 48.951080] sched_init_smp+0x68/0x10c
[ 48.951080] kernel_init_freeable+0x160/0x2d8
[ 48.951080] kernel_init+0x8/0x110
[ 48.951080] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[ 48.951110]
-> #3 (&rq->lock){-.-.-.}:
[ 48.951110] _raw_spin_lock+0x40/0x50
[ 48.951141] task_fork_fair+0x30/0x124
[ 48.951141] sched_fork+0x194/0x2e0
[ 48.951141] copy_process.part.5+0x448/0x1a20
[ 48.951171] _do_fork+0x98/0x7e8
[ 48.951171] kernel_thread+0x2c/0x34
[ 48.951171] rest_init+0x1c/0x18c
[ 48.951202] start_kernel+0x35c/0x3d4
[ 48.951202] 0x8000807c
[ 48.951202]
-> #2 (&p->pi_lock){-.-.-.}:
[ 48.951232] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[ 48.951232] try_to_wake_up+0x30/0x5c8
[ 48.951232] up+0x4c/0x60
[ 48.951263] __up_console_sem+0x2c/0x58
[ 48.951263] console_unlock+0x3b4/0x650
[ 48.951263] vprintk_emit+0x270/0x474
[ 48.951293] vprintk_default+0x20/0x28
[ 48.951293] printk+0x20/0x30
[ 48.951324] kauditd_hold_skb+0x94/0xb8
[ 48.951324] kauditd_thread+0x1a4/0x56c
[ 48.951324] kthread+0x104/0x148
[ 48.951354] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[ 48.951354]
-> #1 ((console_sem).lock){-.....}:
[ 48.951385] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x50/0x64
[ 48.951385] down_trylock+0xc/0x2c
[ 48.951385] __down_trylock_console_sem+0x24/0x80
[ 48.951385] console_trylock+0x10/0x8c
[ 48.951416] vprintk_emit+0x264/0x474
[ 48.951416] vprintk_default+0x20/0x28
[ 48.951416] printk+0x20/0x30
[ 48.951446] tk_debug_account_sleep_time+0x5c/0x70
[ 48.951446] __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime.constprop.3+0x170/0x1a0
[ 48.951446] timekeeping_resume+0x218/0x23c
[ 48.951477] syscore_resume+0x94/0x42c
[ 48.951477] suspend_enter+0x554/0x9b4
[ 48.951477] suspend_devices_and_enter+0xd8/0x4b4
[ 48.951507] enter_state+0x934/0xbd4
[ 48.951507] pm_suspend+0x14/0x70
[ 48.951507] state_store+0x68/0xc8
[ 48.951538] kernfs_fop_write+0xf4/0x1f8
[ 48.951538] __vfs_write+0x1c/0x114
[ 48.951538] vfs_write+0xa0/0x168
[ 48.951568] SyS_write+0x3c/0x90
[ 48.951568] __sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10
[ 48.951568]
-> #0 (tk_core){----..}:
[ 48.951599] lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294
[ 48.951599] ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4
[ 48.951629] retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90
[ 48.951629] on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c
[ 48.951629] clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20
[ 48.951660] process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808
[ 48.951660] worker_thread+0x3c/0x550
[ 48.951660] kthread+0x104/0x148
[ 48.951690] ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24
[ 48.951690]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 48.951690] Chain exists of:
tk_core --> &rt_b->rt_runtime_lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock
[ 48.951721] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 48.951721] CPU0 CPU1
[ 48.951721] ---- ----
[ 48.951721] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
[ 48.951751] lock(&rt_b->rt_runtime_lock);
[ 48.951751] lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
[ 48.951751] lock(tk_core);
[ 48.951782]
*** DEADLOCK ***
[ 48.951782] 3 locks held by kworker/0:0/3:
[ 48.951782] #0: ("events"){.+.+.+}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808
[ 48.951812] #1: (hrtimer_work){+.+...}, at: [<c0156590>] process_one_work+0x1f8/0x808
[ 48.951843] #2: (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-...}, at: [<c01cc610>] retrigger_next_event+0x38/0x90
[ 48.951843] stack backtrace:
[ 48.951873] CPU: 0 PID: 3 Comm: kworker/0:0 Not tainted 4.10.0-rc7-next-20170213+
[ 48.951904] Workqueue: events clock_was_set_work
[ 48.951904] [<c0110208>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<c010c224>] (show_stack+0x10/0x14)
[ 48.951934] [<c010c224>] (show_stack) from [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack+0xac/0xe0)
[ 48.951934] [<c04ca6c0>] (dump_stack) from [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug+0x1d0/0x308)
[ 48.951965] [<c019b5cc>] (print_circular_bug) from [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain+0xf50/0x1324)
[ 48.951965] [<c019d2a8>] (validate_chain) from [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire+0x468/0x7e8)
[ 48.951995] [<c019ec18>] (__lock_acquire) from [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire+0xe0/0x294)
[ 48.951995] [<c019f634>] (lock_acquire) from [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now+0x5c/0x1d4)
[ 48.952026] [<c01d0ea0>] (ktime_get_update_offsets_now) from [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event+0x4c/0x90)
[ 48.952026] [<c01cc624>] (retrigger_next_event) from [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu+0x40/0x7c)
[ 48.952056] [<c01e4e24>] (on_each_cpu) from [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work+0x14/0x20)
[ 48.952056] [<c01cafc4>] (clock_was_set_work) from [<c015664c>] (process_one_work+0x2b4/0x808)
[ 48.952087] [<c015664c>] (process_one_work) from [<c0157774>] (worker_thread+0x3c/0x550)
[ 48.952087] [<c0157774>] (worker_thread) from [<c015d644>] (kthread+0x104/0x148)
[ 48.952087] [<c015d644>] (kthread) from [<c0107830>] (ret_from_fork+0x14/0x24)
Replace printk() with printk_deferred(), which does not call into
the scheduler.
Fixes: 0bf43f15db85 ("timekeeping: Prints the amounts of time spent during suspend")
Reported-and-tested-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: "[4.9+]" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170215044332.30449-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
In addition to keeping a histogram of suspend times, also
print out the time spent in suspend to dmesg.
This helps to keep track of suspend time while debugging using
kernel logs.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Cc: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>
[jstultz: Tweaked commit message]
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
|
|
It was reported that hibernation could fail on the 2nd attempt, where the
system hangs at hibernate() -> syscore_resume() -> i8237A_resume() ->
claim_dma_lock(), because the lock has already been taken.
However there is actually no other process would like to grab this lock on
that problematic platform.
Further investigation showed that the problem is triggered by setting
/sys/power/pm_trace to 1 before the 1st hibernation.
Since once pm_trace is enabled, the rtc becomes unmeaningful after suspend,
and meanwhile some BIOSes would like to adjust the 'invalid' RTC (e.g, smaller
than 1970) to the release date of that motherboard during POST stage, thus
after resumed, it may seem that the system had a significant long sleep time
which is a completely meaningless value.
Then in timekeeping_resume -> tk_debug_account_sleep_time, if the bit31 of the
sleep time happened to be set to 1, fls() returns 32 and we add 1 to
sleep_time_bin[32], which causes an out of bounds array access and therefor
memory being overwritten.
As depicted by System.map:
0xffffffff81c9d080 b sleep_time_bin
0xffffffff81c9d100 B dma_spin_lock
the dma_spin_lock.val is set to 1, which caused this problem.
This patch adds a sanity check in tk_debug_account_sleep_time()
to ensure we don't index past the sleep_time_bin array.
[jstultz: Problem diagnosed and original patch by Chen Yu, I've solved the
issue slightly differently, but borrowed his excelent explanation of the
issue here.]
Fixes: 5c83545f24ab "power: Add option to log time spent in suspend"
Reported-by: Janek Kozicki <cosurgi@gmail.com>
Reported-by: Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Xunlei Pang <xpang@redhat.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1471993702-29148-3-git-send-email-john.stultz@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
|
|
Convert the core timekeeping logic to use timespec64s. This moves the
2038 issues out of the core logic and into all of the accessor
functions.
Future changes will need to push the timespec64s out to all
timekeeping users, but that can be done interface by interface.
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
|
|
Include appropriate header file kernel/time/timekeeping_internal.h in
kernel/time/timekeeping_debug.c because it has prototype declaration of
function defined in kernel/time/timekeeping_debug.c.
This eliminates the following warning in
kernel/time/timekeeping_debug.c:
kernel/time/timekeeping_debug.c:68:6: warning: no previous prototype for ‘tk_debug_account_sleep_time’ [-Wmissing-prototypes]
Signed-off-by: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
|
|
Below is a patch from android kernel that maintains a histogram of
suspend times. Please review and provide feedback.
Statistices on the time spent in suspend are kept in
/sys/kernel/debug/sleep_time.
Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Cc: San Mehat <san@google.com>
Cc: Benoit Goby <benoit@android.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
[zoran.markovic@linaro.org: Re-formatted suspend time table to better
fit expected values. Moved accounting of suspend time into timekeeping
core. Removed CONFIG_SUSPEND_TIME flag and made the feature conditional
on CONFIG_DEBUG_FS. Changed the file name to sleep_time to better fit
terminology in timekeeping core. Changed seq_printf to seq_puts. Tweaked
commit message]
Signed-off-by: Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
|
