summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/locking
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2018-03-31locking/rwsem: Add DEBUG_RWSEMS to look for lock/unlock mismatchesWaiman Long2-1/+11
For a rwsem, locking can either be exclusive or shared. The corresponding exclusive or shared unlock must be used. Otherwise, the protected data structures may get corrupted or the lock may be in an inconsistent state. In order to detect such anomaly, a new configuration option DEBUG_RWSEMS is added which can be enabled to look for such mismatches and print warnings that that happens. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1522445280-7767-2-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-03-31Merge branch 'linus' into locking/core, to pick up fixesIngo Molnar1-7/+30
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-03-29lockdep: Make the lock debug output more usefulTetsuo Handa1-2/+2
The lock debug output in print_lock() has a few shortcomings: - It prints the hlock->acquire_ip field in %px and %pS format. That's redundant information. - It lacks information about the lock object itself. The lock class is not helpful to identify a particular instance of a lock. Change the output so it prints: - hlock->instance to allow identification of a particular lock instance. - only the %pS format of hlock->ip_acquire which is sufficient to decode the actual code line with faddr2line. The resulting output is: 3 locks held by a.out/31106: #0: 00000000b0f753ba (&mm->mmap_sem){++++}, at: copy_process.part.41+0x10d5/0x1fe0 #1: 00000000ef64d539 (&mm->mmap_sem/1){+.+.}, at: copy_process.part.41+0x10fe/0x1fe0 #2: 00000000b41a282e (&mapping->i_mmap_rwsem){++++}, at: copy_process.part.41+0x12f2/0x1fe0 [ tglx: Massaged changelog ] Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/201803271941.GBE57310.tVSOJLQOFFOHFM@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
2018-03-28locking/rtmutex: Handle non enqueued waiters gracefully in remove_waiter()Peter Zijlstra2-7/+7
In -RT task_blocks_on_rt_mutex() may return with -EAGAIN due to (->pi_blocked_on == PI_WAKEUP_INPROGRESS) before it added itself as a waiter. In such a case remove_waiter() must not be called because without a waiter it will trigger the BUG_ON() statement. This was initially reported by Yimin Deng. Thomas Gleixner fixed it then with an explicit check for waiters before calling remove_waiter(). Instead of an explicit NULL check before calling rt_mutex_top_waiter() make the function return NULL if there are no waiters. With that fixed the now pointless NULL check is removed from rt_mutex_slowlock(). Reported-and-debugged-by: Yimin Deng <yimin11.deng@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAAh1qt=DCL9aUXNxanP5BKtiPp3m+qj4yB+gDohhXPVFCxWwzg@mail.gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180327121438.sss7hxg3crqy4ecd@linutronix.de
2018-03-20locking/mutex: Improve documentationMatthew Wilcox1-7/+30
On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 01:56:31PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > My memory is weak and our documentation is awful. What does > mutex_lock_killable() actually do and how does it differ from > mutex_lock_interruptible()? Add kernel-doc for mutex_lock_killable() and mutex_lock_io(). Reword the kernel-doc for mutex_lock_interruptible(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Cc: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: cl@linux.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180315115812.GA9949@bombadil.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-03-12Merge tag 'v4.16-rc5' into locking/core, to pick up fixesIngo Molnar1-2/+3
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-03-09rtmutex: Make rt_mutex_futex_unlock() safe for irq-off callsitesBoqun Feng1-2/+3
When running rcutorture with TREE03 config, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y, and kernel cmdline argument "rcutorture.gp_exp=1", lockdep reports a HARDIRQ-safe->HARDIRQ-unsafe deadlock: ================================ WARNING: inconsistent lock state 4.16.0-rc4+ #1 Not tainted -------------------------------- inconsistent {IN-HARDIRQ-W} -> {HARDIRQ-ON-W} usage. takes: __schedule+0xbe/0xaf0 {IN-HARDIRQ-W} state was registered at: _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 scheduler_tick+0x47/0xf0 ... other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&rq->lock); <Interrupt> lock(&rq->lock); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by rcu_torture_rea/724: rcu_torture_read_lock+0x0/0x70 stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 724 Comm: rcu_torture_rea Not tainted 4.16.0-rc4+ #1 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.11.0-20171110_100015-anatol 04/01/2014 Call Trace: lock_acquire+0x90/0x200 ? __schedule+0xbe/0xaf0 _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 ? __schedule+0xbe/0xaf0 __schedule+0xbe/0xaf0 preempt_schedule_irq+0x2f/0x60 retint_kernel+0x1b/0x2d RIP: 0010:rcu_read_unlock_special+0x0/0x680 ? rcu_torture_read_unlock+0x60/0x60 __rcu_read_unlock+0x64/0x70 rcu_torture_read_unlock+0x17/0x60 rcu_torture_reader+0x275/0x450 ? rcutorture_booster_init+0x110/0x110 ? rcu_torture_stall+0x230/0x230 ? kthread+0x10e/0x130 kthread+0x10e/0x130 ? kthread_create_worker_on_cpu+0x70/0x70 ? call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0x11a/0x150 ret_from_fork+0x3a/0x50 This happens with the following even sequence: preempt_schedule_irq(); local_irq_enable(); __schedule(): local_irq_disable(); // irq off ... rcu_note_context_switch(): rcu_note_preempt_context_switch(): rcu_read_unlock_special(): local_irq_save(flags); ... raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(...,flags); // irq remains off rt_mutex_futex_unlock(): raw_spin_lock_irq(); ... raw_spin_unlock_irq(); // accidentally set irq on <return to __schedule()> rq_lock(): raw_spin_lock(); // acquiring rq->lock with irq on which means rq->lock becomes a HARDIRQ-unsafe lock, which can cause deadlocks in scheduler code. This problem was introduced by commit 02a7c234e540 ("rcu: Suppress lockdep false-positive ->boost_mtx complaints"). That brought the user of rt_mutex_futex_unlock() with irq off. To fix this, replace the *lock_irq() in rt_mutex_futex_unlock() with *lock_irq{save,restore}() to make it safe to call rt_mutex_futex_unlock() with irq off. Fixes: 02a7c234e540 ("rcu: Suppress lockdep false-positive ->boost_mtx complaints") Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Cc: "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180309065630.8283-1-boqun.feng@gmail.com
2018-02-28locking/lockdep: Show unadorned pointersBorislav Petkov1-12/+12
Show unadorned pointers in lockdep reports - lockdep is a debugging facility and hashing pointers there doesn't make a whole lotta sense. Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180226134926.23069-1-bp@alien8.de
2018-02-13locking/qspinlock: Ensure node->count is updated before initialising nodeWill Deacon1-0/+8
When queuing on the qspinlock, the count field for the current CPU's head node is incremented. This needn't be atomic because locking in e.g. IRQ context is balanced and so an IRQ will return with node->count as it found it. However, the compiler could in theory reorder the initialisation of node[idx] before the increment of the head node->count, causing an IRQ to overwrite the initialised node and potentially corrupt the lock state. Avoid the potential for this harmful compiler reordering by placing a barrier() between the increment of the head node->count and the subsequent node initialisation. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1518528177-19169-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-02-13locking/qspinlock: Ensure node is initialised before updating prev->nextWill Deacon1-6/+7
When a locker ends up queuing on the qspinlock locking slowpath, we initialise the relevant mcs node and publish it indirectly by updating the tail portion of the lock word using xchg_tail. If we find that there was a pre-existing locker in the queue, we subsequently update their ->next field to point at our node so that we are notified when it's our turn to take the lock. This can be roughly illustrated as follows: /* Initialise the fields in node and encode a pointer to node in tail */ tail = initialise_node(node); /* * Exchange tail into the lockword using an atomic read-modify-write * operation with release semantics */ old = xchg_tail(lock, tail); /* If there was a pre-existing waiter ... */ if (old & _Q_TAIL_MASK) { prev = decode_tail(old); smp_read_barrier_depends(); /* ... then update their ->next field to point to node. WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, node); } The conditional update of prev->next therefore relies on the address dependency from the result of xchg_tail ensuring order against the prior initialisation of node. However, since the release semantics of the xchg_tail operation apply only to the write portion of the RmW, then this ordering is not guaranteed and it is possible for the CPU to return old before the writes to node have been published, consequently allowing us to point prev->next to an uninitialised node. This patch fixes the problem by making the update of prev->next a RELEASE operation, which also removes the reliance on dependency ordering. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1518528177-19169-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-01-30Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-42/+47
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes relate to making lock_is_held() et al (and external wrappers of them) work on const data types - this requires const propagation through the depths of lockdep. This removes a number of ugly type hacks the external helpers used" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: lockdep: Convert some users to const lockdep: Make lockdep checking constant lockdep: Assign lock keys on registration
2018-01-30Merge branch 'core-rcu-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds2-63/+57
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull RCU updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main RCU changes in this cycle were: - Updates to use cond_resched() instead of cond_resched_rcu_qs() where feasible (currently everywhere except in kernel/rcu and in kernel/torture.c). Also a couple of fixes to avoid sending IPIs to offline CPUs. - Updates to simplify RCU's dyntick-idle handling. - Updates to remove almost all uses of smp_read_barrier_depends() and read_barrier_depends(). - Torture-test updates. - Miscellaneous fixes" * 'core-rcu-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (72 commits) torture: Save a line in stutter_wait(): while -> for torture: Eliminate torture_runnable and perf_runnable torture: Make stutter less vulnerable to compilers and races locking/locktorture: Fix num reader/writer corner cases locking/locktorture: Fix rwsem reader_delay torture: Place all torture-test modules in one MAINTAINERS group rcutorture/kvm-build.sh: Skip build directory check rcutorture: Simplify functions.sh include path rcutorture: Simplify logging rcutorture/kvm-recheck-*: Improve result directory readability check rcutorture/kvm.sh: Support execution from any directory rcutorture/kvm.sh: Use consistent help text for --qemu-args rcutorture/kvm.sh: Remove unused variable, `alldone` rcutorture: Remove unused script, config2frag.sh rcutorture/configinit: Fix build directory error message rcutorture: Preempt RCU-preempt readers more vigorously torture: Reduce #ifdefs for preempt_schedule() rcu: Remove have_rcu_nocb_mask from tree_plugin.h rcu: Add comment giving debug strategy for double call_rcu() tracing, rcu: Hide trace event rcu_nocb_wake when not used ...
2018-01-24locking/lockdep: Avoid triggering hardlockup from debug_show_all_locks()Tejun Heo1-0/+2
debug_show_all_locks() iterates all tasks and print held locks whole holding tasklist_lock. This can take a while on a slow console device and may end up triggering NMI hardlockup detector if someone else ends up waiting for tasklist_lock. Touch the NMI watchdog while printing the held locks to avoid spuriously triggering the hardlockup detector. Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: kernel-team@fb.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180122220055.GB1771050@devbig577.frc2.facebook.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2018-01-18lockdep: Make lockdep checking constantMatthew Wilcox1-6/+7
There are several places in the kernel which would like to pass a const pointer to lockdep_is_held(). Constify the entire path so nobody has to trick the compiler. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180117151414.23686-3-willy@infradead.org
2018-01-18lockdep: Assign lock keys on registrationMatthew Wilcox1-36/+40
Lockdep is assigning lock keys when a lock was looked up. This is unnecessary; if the lock has never been registered then it is known that it is not locked. It also complicates the calling convention. Switch to assigning the lock key in register_lock_class(). Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180117151414.23686-2-willy@infradead.org
2018-01-14futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futexPeter Zijlstra2-7/+20
Julia reported futex state corruption in the following scenario: waiter waker stealer (prio > waiter) futex(WAIT_REQUEUE_PI, uaddr, uaddr2, timeout=[N ms]) futex_wait_requeue_pi() futex_wait_queue_me() freezable_schedule() <scheduled out> futex(LOCK_PI, uaddr2) futex(CMP_REQUEUE_PI, uaddr, uaddr2, 1, 0) /* requeues waiter to uaddr2 */ futex(UNLOCK_PI, uaddr2) wake_futex_pi() cmp_futex_value_locked(uaddr2, waiter) wake_up_q() <woken by waker> <hrtimer_wakeup() fires, clears sleeper->task> futex(LOCK_PI, uaddr2) __rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock() try_to_take_rt_mutex() /* steals lock */ rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, stealer) <preempted> <scheduled in> rt_mutex_wait_proxy_lock() __rt_mutex_slowlock() try_to_take_rt_mutex() /* fails, lock held by stealer */ if (timeout && !timeout->task) return -ETIMEDOUT; fixup_owner() /* lock wasn't acquired, so, fixup_pi_state_owner skipped */ return -ETIMEDOUT; /* At this point, we've returned -ETIMEDOUT to userspace, but the * futex word shows waiter to be the owner, and the pi_mutex has * stealer as the owner */ futex_lock(LOCK_PI, uaddr2) -> bails with EDEADLK, futex word says we're owner. And suggested that what commit: 73d786bd043e ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state") removes from fixup_owner() looks to be just what is needed. And indeed it is -- I completely missed that requeue_pi could also result in this case. So we need to restore that, except that subsequent patches, like commit: 16ffa12d7425 ("futex: Pull rt_mutex_futex_unlock() out from under hb->lock") changed all the locking rules. Even without that, the sequence: - if (rt_mutex_futex_trylock(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex)) { - locked = 1; - goto out; - } - raw_spin_lock_irq(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); - owner = rt_mutex_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex); - if (!owner) - owner = rt_mutex_next_owner(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex); - raw_spin_unlock_irq(&q->pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock); - ret = fixup_pi_state_owner(uaddr, q, owner); already suggests there were races; otherwise we'd never have to look at next_owner. So instead of doing 3 consecutive wait_lock sections with who knows what races, we do it all in a single section. Additionally, the usage of pi_state->owner in fixup_owner() was only safe because only the rt_mutex owner would modify it, which this additional case wrecks. Luckily the values can only change away and not to the value we're testing, this means we can do a speculative test and double check once we have the wait_lock. Fixes: 73d786bd043e ("futex: Rework inconsistent rt_mutex/futex_q state") Reported-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> Reported-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Julia Cartwright <julia@ni.com> Tested-by: Gratian Crisan <gratian.crisan@ni.com> Cc: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171208124939.7livp7no2ov65rrc@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2018-01-03Merge branch 'for-mingo' of ↵Ingo Molnar2-63/+57
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu into core/rcu Pull RCU updates from Paul E. McKenney: - Updates to use cond_resched() instead of cond_resched_rcu_qs() where feasible (currently everywhere except in kernel/rcu and in kernel/torture.c). Also a couple of fixes to avoid sending IPIs to offline CPUs. - Updates to simplify RCU's dyntick-idle handling. - Updates to remove almost all uses of smp_read_barrier_depends() and read_barrier_depends(). - Miscellaneous fixes. - Torture-test updates. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-12locking/lockdep: Remove the cross-release locking checksIngo Molnar1-617/+35
This code (CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE=y and CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS=y), while it found a number of old bugs initially, was also causing too many false positives that caused people to disable lockdep - which is arguably a worse overall outcome. If we disable cross-release by default but keep the code upstream then in practice the most likely outcome is that we'll allow the situation to degrade gradually, by allowing entropy to introduce more and more false positives, until it overwhelms maintenance capacity. Another bad side effect was that people were trying to work around the false positives by uglifying/complicating unrelated code. There's a marked difference between annotating locking operations and uglifying good code just due to bad lock debugging code ... This gradual decrease in quality happened to a number of debugging facilities in the kernel, and lockdep is pretty complex already, so we cannot risk this outcome. Either cross-release checking can be done right with no false positives, or it should not be included in the upstream kernel. ( Note that it might make sense to maintain it out of tree and go through the false positives every now and then and see whether new bugs were introduced. ) Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-12locking/core: Remove break_lock field when CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK=yWill Deacon1-8/+1
When CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBEAK=y, locking structures grow an extra int ->break_lock field which is used to implement raw_spin_is_contended() by setting the field to 1 when waiting on a lock and clearing it to zero when holding a lock. However, there are a few problems with this approach: - There is a write-write race between a CPU successfully taking the lock (and subsequently writing break_lock = 0) and a waiter waiting on the lock (and subsequently writing break_lock = 1). This could result in a contended lock being reported as uncontended and vice-versa. - On machines with store buffers, nothing guarantees that the writes to break_lock are visible to other CPUs at any particular time. - READ_ONCE/WRITE_ONCE are not used, so the field is potentially susceptible to harmful compiler optimisations, Consequently, the usefulness of this field is unclear and we'd be better off removing it and allowing architectures to implement raw_spin_is_contended() by providing a definition of arch_spin_is_contended(), as they can when CONFIG_GENERIC_LOCKBREAK=n. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511894539-7988-3-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-12locking/core: Fix deadlock during boot on systems with GENERIC_LOCKBREAKWill Deacon1-4/+4
Commit: a8a217c22116 ("locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock()") removed the definition of raw_spin_can_lock(), causing the GENERIC_LOCKBREAK spin_lock() routines to poll the ->break_lock field when waiting on a lock. This has been reported to cause a deadlock during boot on s390, because the ->break_lock field is also set by the waiters, and can potentially remain set indefinitely if no other CPUs come in to take the lock after it has been released. This patch removes the explicit spinning on ->break_lock from the waiters, instead relying on the outer trylock() operation to determine when the lock is available. Reported-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Sebastian Ott <sebott@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: a8a217c22116 ("locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock()") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1511894539-7988-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-11Merge branches 'cond_resched.2017.12.04a', 'dyntick.2017.11.28a', ↵Paul E. McKenney2-63/+57
'fixes.2017.12.11a', 'srbd.2017.12.05a' and 'torture.2017.12.11a' into HEAD cond_resched.2017.12.04a: Convert cond_resched_rcu_qs() to cond_resched() dyntick.2017.11.28a: Make RCU dynticks handle interrupts from NMI fixes.2017.12.11a: Miscellaneous fixes srbd.2017.12.05a: Remove now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends() torture.2017.12.11a: Torture-testing update
2017-12-11torture: Eliminate torture_runnable and perf_runnablePaul E. McKenney1-5/+1
The purpose of torture_runnable is to allow rcutorture and locktorture to be started and stopped via sysfs when they are built into the kernel (as in not compiled as loadable modules). However, the 0444 permissions for both instances of torture_runnable prevent this use case from ever being put into practice. Given that there have been no complaints about this deficiency, it is reasonable to conclude that no one actually makes use of this sysfs capability. The perf_runnable module parameter for rcuperf is in the same situation. This commit therefore removes both torture_runnable instances as well as perf_runnable. Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-12-11locking/locktorture: Fix num reader/writer corner casesDavidlohr Bueso1-32/+44
Things can explode for locktorture if the user does combinations of nwriters_stress=0 nreaders_stress=0. Fix this by not assuming we always want to torture writer threads. Reported-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
2017-12-11locking/locktorture: Fix rwsem reader_delayDavidlohr Bueso1-1/+1
We should account for nreader threads, not writers in this callback. Could even trigger a div by 0 if the user explicitly disables writers. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-12-11torture: Reduce #ifdefs for preempt_schedule()Paul E. McKenney1-18/+6
This commit adds a torture_preempt_schedule() that is nothingness in !PREEMPT builds and is preempt_schedule() otherwise. Then torture_preempt_schedule() is used to eliminate several ugly #ifdefs, both in rcutorture and in locktorture. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2017-12-06locking/lockdep: Fix possible NULL derefPeter Zijlstra1-1/+2
We can't invalidate xhlocks when we've not yet allocated any. Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Fixes: f52be5708076 ("locking/lockdep: Untangle xhlock history save/restore from task independence") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-12-04locking: Remove smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath()Paul E. McKenney1-7/+5
Queued spinlocks are not used by DEC Alpha, and furthermore operations such as READ_ONCE() and release/relaxed RMW atomics are being changed to imply smp_read_barrier_depends(). This commit therefore removes the now-redundant smp_read_barrier_depends() from queued_spin_lock_slowpath(), and adjusts the comments accordingly. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
2017-11-15kmemcheck: remove annotationsLevin, Alexander (Sasha Levin)1-3/+0
Patch series "kmemcheck: kill kmemcheck", v2. As discussed at LSF/MM, kill kmemcheck. KASan is a replacement that is able to work without the limitation of kmemcheck (single CPU, slow). KASan is already upstream. We are also not aware of any users of kmemcheck (or users who don't consider KASan as a suitable replacement). The only objection was that since KASAN wasn't supported by all GCC versions provided by distros at that time we should hold off for 2 years, and try again. Now that 2 years have passed, and all distros provide gcc that supports KASAN, kill kmemcheck again for the very same reasons. This patch (of 4): Remove kmemcheck annotations, and calls to kmemcheck from the kernel. [alexander.levin@verizon.com: correctly remove kmemcheck call from dma_map_sg_attrs] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171012192151.26531-1-alexander.levin@verizon.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171007030159.22241-2-alexander.levin@verizon.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com> Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Tim Hansen <devtimhansen@gmail.com> Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegardno@ifi.uio.no> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-11-08locking/pvqspinlock: Implement hybrid PV queued/unfair locksWaiman Long1-9/+38
Currently, all the lock waiters entering the slowpath will do one lock stealing attempt to acquire the lock. That helps performance, especially in VMs with over-committed vCPUs. However, the current pvqspinlocks still don't perform as good as unfair locks in many cases. On the other hands, unfair locks do have the problem of lock starvation that pvqspinlocks don't have. This patch combines the best attributes of an unfair lock and a pvqspinlock into a hybrid lock with 2 modes - queued mode & unfair mode. A lock waiter goes into the unfair mode when there are waiters in the wait queue but the pending bit isn't set. Otherwise, it will go into the queued mode waiting in the queue for its turn. On a 2-socket 36-core E5-2699 v3 system (HT off), a kernel build (make -j<n>) was done in a VM with unpinned vCPUs 3 times with the best time selected and <n> is the number of vCPUs available. The build times of the original pvqspinlock, hybrid pvqspinlock and unfair lock with various number of vCPUs are as follows: vCPUs pvqlock hybrid pvqlock unfair lock ----- ------- -------------- ----------- 30 342.1s 329.1s 329.1s 36 314.1s 305.3s 307.3s 45 345.0s 302.1s 306.6s 54 365.4s 308.6s 307.8s 72 358.9s 293.6s 303.9s 108 343.0s 285.9s 304.2s The hybrid pvqspinlock performs better or comparable to the unfair lock. By turning on QUEUED_LOCK_STAT, the table below showed the number of lock acquisitions in unfair mode and queue mode after a kernel build with various number of vCPUs. vCPUs queued mode unfair mode ----- ----------- ----------- 30 9,130,518 294,954 36 10,856,614 386,809 45 8,467,264 11,475,373 54 6,409,987 19,670,855 72 4,782,063 25,712,180 It can be seen that as the VM became more and more over-committed, the ratio of locks acquired in unfair mode increases. This is all done automatically to get the best overall performance as possible. Using a kernel locking microbenchmark with number of locking threads equals to the number of vCPUs available on the same machine, the minimum, average and maximum (min/avg/max) numbers of locking operations done per thread in a 5-second testing interval are shown below: vCPUs hybrid pvqlock unfair lock ----- -------------- ----------- 36 822,135/881,063/950,363 75,570/313,496/ 690,465 54 542,435/581,664/625,937 35,460/204,280/ 457,172 72 397,500/428,177/499,299 17,933/150,679/ 708,001 108 257,898/288,150/340,871 3,085/181,176/1,257,109 It can be seen that the hybrid pvqspinlocks are more fair and performant than the unfair locks in this test. The table below shows the kernel build times on a smaller 2-socket 16-core 32-thread E5-2620 v4 system. vCPUs pvqlock hybrid pvqlock unfair lock ----- ------- -------------- ----------- 16 436.8s 433.4s 435.6s 36 366.2s 364.8s 364.5s 48 423.6s 376.3s 370.2s 64 433.1s 376.6s 376.8s Again, the performance of the hybrid pvqspinlock was comparable to that of the unfair lock. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Eduardo Valentin <eduval@amazon.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1510089486-3466-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-07locking/rwlocks: Fix commentsCheng Jian1-1/+2
- fix the list of locking API headers in kernel/locking/spinlock.c - fix an #endif comment Signed-off-by: Cheng Jian <cj.chengjian@huawei.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: huawei.libin@huawei.com Cc: xiexiuqi@huawei.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1509706788-152547-1-git-send-email-cj.chengjian@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-07Merge branch 'linus' into locking/core, to resolve conflictsIngo Molnar17-0/+17
Conflicts: include/linux/compiler-clang.h include/linux/compiler-gcc.h include/linux/compiler-intel.h include/uapi/linux/stddef.h Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-11-02License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no licenseGreg Kroah-Hartman17-0/+17
Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license. By default all files without license information are under the default license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2. Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0' SPDX license identifier. The SPDX identifier is a legally binding shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text. This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and Philippe Ombredanne. How this work was done: Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of the use cases: - file had no licensing information it it. - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it, - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information, Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords. The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne. Philippe prepared the base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files. The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files assessed. Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s) to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was: - Files considered eligible had to be source code files. - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5 lines of source - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5 lines). All documentation files were explicitly excluded. The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license identifiers to apply. - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was considered to have no license information in it, and the top level COPYING file license applied. For non */uapi/* files that summary was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 11139 and resulted in the first patch in this series. If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0". Results of that was: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------- GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 930 and resulted in the second patch in this series. - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in it (per prior point). Results summary: SPDX license identifier # files ---------------------------------------------------|------ GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note 270 GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 169 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause) 21 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 17 LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 15 GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 14 ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause) 5 LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note 4 LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT) 3 ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT) 1 and that resulted in the third patch in this series. - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became the concluded license(s). - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a license but the other didn't, or they both detected different licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred. - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics). - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier, the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later in time. In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation. Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights. The Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so they are related. Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks in about 15000 files. In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the correct identifier. Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch version early this week with: - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected license ids and scores - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+ files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction. This worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the different types of files to be modified. These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg. Thomas wrote a script to parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the format that the file expected. This script was further refined by Greg based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different comment types.) Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to generate the patches. Reviewed-by: Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org> Reviewed-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-10-25locking/lockdep: Introduce CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE_FULLSTACK=yByungchul Park1-0/+4
Add a Kconfig knob that enables the lockdep "crossrelease_fullstack" boot parameter. Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: amir73il@gmail.com Cc: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: darrick.wong@oracle.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: hch@infradead.org Cc: idryomov@gmail.com Cc: johan@kernel.org Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508921765-15396-7-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-25locking/lockdep: Add a boot parameter allowing unwind in cross-release and ↵Byungchul Park1-2/+17
disable it by default Johan Hovold reported a heavy performance regression caused by lockdep cross-release: > Boot time (from "Linux version" to login prompt) had in fact doubled > since 4.13 where it took 17 seconds (with my current config) compared to > the 35 seconds I now see with 4.14-rc4. > > I quick bisect pointed to lockdep and specifically the following commit: > > 28a903f63ec0 ("locking/lockdep: Handle non(or multi)-acquisition > of a crosslock") > > which I've verified is the commit which doubled the boot time (compared > to 28a903f63ec0^) (added by lockdep crossrelease series [1]). Currently cross-release performs unwind on every acquisition, but that is very expensive. This patch makes unwind optional and disables it by default and only records acquire_ip. Full stack traces are sometimes required for full analysis, in which case a boot paramter, crossrelease_fullstack, can be specified. On my qemu Ubuntu machine (x86_64, 4 cores, 512M), the regression was fixed. We measure boot times with 'perf stat --null --repeat 10 $QEMU', where $QEMU launches a kernel with init=/bin/true: 1. No lockdep enabled: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 2.756558155 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.09% ) 2. Lockdep enabled: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 2.968710420 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.12% ) 3. Lockdep enabled + cross-release enabled: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 3.153839636 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.31% ) 4. Lockdep enabled + cross-release enabled + this patch applied: Performance counter stats for 'qemu_booting_time.sh bzImage' (10 runs): 2.963669551 seconds time elapsed ( +- 0.11% ) I.e. lockdep cross-release performance is now indistinguishable from vanilla lockdep. Bisected-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Analyzed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reported-by: Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: amir73il@gmail.com Cc: axboe@kernel.dk Cc: darrick.wong@oracle.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: hch@infradead.org Cc: idryomov@gmail.com Cc: johannes.berg@intel.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1508921765-15396-5-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-25locking/qrwlock: Prevent slowpath writers getting held up by fastpathWill Deacon1-15/+5
When a prospective writer takes the qrwlock locking slowpath due to the lock being held, it attempts to cmpxchg the wmode field from 0 to _QW_WAITING so that concurrent lockers also take the slowpath and queue on the spinlock accordingly, allowing the lockers to drain. Unfortunately, this isn't fair, because a fastpath writer that comes in after the lock is made available but before the _QW_WAITING flag is set can effectively jump the queue. If there is a steady stream of prospective writers, then the waiter will be held off indefinitely. This patch restores fairness by separating _QW_WAITING and _QW_LOCKED into two distinct fields: _QW_LOCKED continues to occupy the bottom byte of the lockword so that it can be cleared unconditionally when unlocking, but _QW_WAITING now occupies what used to be the bottom bit of the reader count. This then forces the slow-path for concurrent lockers. Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Adam Wallis <awallis@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy.Linton@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507810851-306-6-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-25locking/qrwlock: Use atomic_cond_read_acquire() when spinning in qrwlockWill Deacon1-38/+12
The qrwlock slowpaths involve spinning when either a prospective reader is waiting for a concurrent writer to drain, or a prospective writer is waiting for concurrent readers to drain. In both of these situations, atomic_cond_read_acquire() can be used to avoid busy-waiting and make use of any backoff functionality provided by the architecture. This patch replaces the open-code loops and rspin_until_writer_unlock() implementation with atomic_cond_read_acquire(). The write mode transition zero to _QW_WAITING is left alone, since (a) this doesn't need acquire semantics and (b) should be fast. Tested-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Tested-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com> Tested-by: Adam Wallis <awallis@codeaurora.org> Tested-by: Jan Glauber <jglauber@cavium.com> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy.Linton@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507810851-306-4-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-25locking/qrwlock: Use 'struct qrwlock' instead of 'struct __qrwlock'Will Deacon1-24/+2
There's no good reason to keep the internal structure of struct qrwlock hidden from qrwlock.h, particularly as it's actually needed for unlock and ends up being abstracted independently behind the __qrwlock_write_byte() function. Stop pretending we can hide this stuff, and move the __qrwlock definition into qrwlock, removing the __qrwlock_write_byte() nastiness and using the same struct definition everywhere instead. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Jeremy.Linton@arm.com Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507810851-306-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10locking/core: Remove {read,spin,write}_can_lock()Will Deacon1-4/+2
Outside of the locking code itself, {read,spin,write}_can_lock() have no users in tree. Apparmor (the last remaining user of write_can_lock()) got moved over to lockdep by the previous patch. This patch removes the use of {read,spin,write}_can_lock() from the BUILD_LOCK_OPS macro, deferring to the trylock operation for testing the lock status, and subsequently removes the unused macros altogether. They aren't guaranteed to work in a concurrent environment and can give incorrect results in the case of qrwlock. Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1507055129-12300-2-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10locking/rwsem: Add down_read_killable()Kirill Tkhai1-0/+16
Similar to down_read() and down_write_killable(), add killable version of down_read(), based on __down_read_killable() function, added in previous patches. Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: avagin@virtuozzo.com Cc: davem@davemloft.net Cc: fenghua.yu@intel.com Cc: gorcunov@virtuozzo.com Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Cc: hpa@zytor.com Cc: ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru Cc: mattst88@gmail.com Cc: rientjes@google.com Cc: rth@twiddle.net Cc: schwidefsky@de.ibm.com Cc: tony.luck@intel.com Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/150670119884.23930.2585570605960763239.stgit@localhost.localdomain Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-10-10locking/lockdep: Fix stacktrace messPeter Zijlstra1-28/+20
There is some complication between check_prevs_add() and check_prev_add() wrt. saving stack traces. The problem is that we want to be frugal with saving stack traces, since it consumes static resources. We'll only know in check_prev_add() if we need the trace, but we can call into it multiple times. So we want to do on-demand and re-use. A further complication is that check_prev_add() can drop graph_lock and mess with our static resources. In any case, the current state; after commit: ce07a9415f26 ("locking/lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace") is that we'll assume the trace contains valid data once check_prev_add() returns '2'. However, as noted by Josh, this is false, check_prev_add() can return '2' before having saved a trace, this then result in the possibility of using uninitialized data. Testing, as reported by Wu, shows a NULL deref. So simplify. Since the graph_lock() thing is a debug path that hasn't really been used in a long while, take it out back and avoid the head-ache. Further initialize the stack_trace to a known 'empty' state; as long as nr_entries == 0, nothing should deref entries. We can then use the 'entries == NULL' test for a valid trace / on-demand saving. Analyzed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: ce07a9415f26 ("locking/lockdep: Make check_prev_add() able to handle external stack_trace") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-09-29locking/rwsem-xadd: Fix missed wakeup due to reordering of loadPrateek Sood1-0/+27
If a spinner is present, there is a chance that the load of rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can be reordered with respect to decrement of rwsem count in __up_write() leading to wakeup being missed: spinning writer up_write caller --------------- ----------------------- [S] osq_unlock() [L] osq spin_lock(wait_lock) sem->count=0xFFFFFFFF00000001 +0xFFFFFFFF00000000 count=sem->count MB sem->count=0xFFFFFFFE00000001 -0xFFFFFFFF00000001 spin_trylock(wait_lock) return rwsem_try_write_lock(count) spin_unlock(wait_lock) schedule() Reordering of atomic_long_sub_return_release() in __up_write() and rwsem_has_spinner() in rwsem_wake() can cause missing of wakeup in up_write() context. In spinning writer, sem->count and local variable count is 0XFFFFFFFE00000001. It would result in rwsem_try_write_lock() failing to acquire rwsem and spinning writer going to sleep in rwsem_down_write_failed(). The smp_rmb() will make sure that the spinner state is consulted after sem->count is updated in up_write context. Signed-off-by: Prateek Sood <prsood@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dave@stgolabs.net Cc: longman@redhat.com Cc: parri.andrea@gmail.com Cc: sramana@codeaurora.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1504794658-15397-1-git-send-email-prsood@codeaurora.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-09-13mm: treewide: remove GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flagMichal Hocko1-1/+1
GFP_TEMPORARY was introduced by commit e12ba74d8ff3 ("Group short-lived and reclaimable kernel allocations") along with __GFP_RECLAIMABLE. It's primary motivation was to allow users to tell that an allocation is short lived and so the allocator can try to place such allocations close together and prevent long term fragmentation. As much as this sounds like a reasonable semantic it becomes much less clear when to use the highlevel GFP_TEMPORARY allocation flag. How long is temporary? Can the context holding that memory sleep? Can it take locks? It seems there is no good answer for those questions. The current implementation of GFP_TEMPORARY is basically GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RECLAIMABLE which in itself is tricky because basically none of the existing caller provide a way to reclaim the allocated memory. So this is rather misleading and hard to evaluate for any benefits. I have checked some random users and none of them has added the flag with a specific justification. I suspect most of them just copied from other existing users and others just thought it might be a good idea to use without any measuring. This suggests that GFP_TEMPORARY just motivates for cargo cult usage without any reasoning. I believe that our gfp flags are quite complex already and especially those with highlevel semantic should be clearly defined to prevent from confusion and abuse. Therefore I propose dropping GFP_TEMPORARY and replace all existing users to simply use GFP_KERNEL. Please note that SLAB users with shrinkers will still get __GFP_RECLAIMABLE heuristic and so they will be placed properly for memory fragmentation prevention. I can see reasons we might want some gfp flag to reflect shorterm allocations but I propose starting from a clear semantic definition and only then add users with proper justification. This was been brought up before LSF this year by Matthew [1] and it turned out that GFP_TEMPORARY really doesn't have a clear semantic. It seems to be a heuristic without any measured advantage for most (if not all) its current users. The follow up discussion has revealed that opinions on what might be temporary allocation differ a lot between developers. So rather than trying to tweak existing users into a semantic which they haven't expected I propose to simply remove the flag and start from scratch if we really need a semantic for short term allocations. [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170118054945.GD18349@bombadil.infradead.org [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix typo] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes] [sfr@canb.auug.org.au: drm/i915: fix up] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170816144703.378d4f4d@canb.auug.org.au Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170728091904.14627-1-mhocko@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-09-08locking/rtmutex: replace top-waiter and pi_waiters leftmost cachingDavidlohr Bueso3-31/+18
... with the generic rbtree flavor instead. No changes in semantics whatsoever. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170719014603.19029-10-dave@stgolabs.net Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-09-04Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds9-211/+940
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: - Add 'cross-release' support to lockdep, which allows APIs like completions, where it's not the 'owner' who releases the lock, to be tracked. It's all activated automatically under CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y. - Clean up (restructure) the x86 atomics op implementation to be more readable, in preparation of KASAN annotations. (Dmitry Vyukov) - Fix static keys (Paolo Bonzini) - Add killable versions of down_read() et al (Kirill Tkhai) - Rework and fix jump_label locking (Marc Zyngier, Paolo Bonzini) - Rework (and fix) tlb_flush_pending() barriers (Peter Zijlstra) - Remove smp_mb__before_spinlock() and convert its usages, introduce smp_mb__after_spinlock() (Peter Zijlstra) * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (56 commits) locking/lockdep/selftests: Fix mixed read-write ABBA tests sched/completion: Avoid unnecessary stack allocation for COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK() acpi/nfit: Fix COMPLETION_INITIALIZER_ONSTACK() abuse locking/pvqspinlock: Relax cmpxchg's to improve performance on some architectures smp: Avoid using two cache lines for struct call_single_data locking/lockdep: Untangle xhlock history save/restore from task independence locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Disable CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_REFCOUNT for the time being futex: Remove duplicated code and fix undefined behaviour Documentation/locking/atomic: Finish the document... locking/lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotation workqueue/lockdep: 'Fix' flush_work() annotation locking/lockdep/selftests: Add mixed read-write ABBA tests mm, locking/barriers: Clarify tlb_flush_pending() barriers locking/lockdep: Make CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE and CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS truly non-interactive locking/lockdep: Explicitly initialize wq_barrier::done::map locking/lockdep: Rename CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETE to CONFIG_LOCKDEP_COMPLETIONS locking/lockdep: Reword title of LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE config locking/lockdep: Make CONFIG_LOCKDEP_CROSSRELEASE part of CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING locking/refcounts, x86/asm: Implement fast refcount overflow protection locking/lockdep: Fix the rollback and overwrite detection logic in crossrelease ...
2017-08-29locking/pvqspinlock: Relax cmpxchg's to improve performance on some ↵Waiman Long1-7/+17
architectures All the locking related cmpxchg's in the following functions are replaced with the _acquire variants: - pv_queued_spin_steal_lock() - trylock_clear_pending() This change should help performance on architectures that use LL/SC. The cmpxchg in pv_kick_node() is replaced with a relaxed version with explicit memory barrier to make sure that it is fully ordered in the writing of next->lock and the reading of pn->state whether the cmpxchg is a success or failure without affecting performance in non-LL/SC architectures. On a 2-socket 12-core 96-thread Power8 system with pvqspinlock explicitly enabled, the performance of a locking microbenchmark with and without this patch on a 4.13-rc4 kernel with Xinhui's PPC qspinlock patch were as follows: # of thread w/o patch with patch % Change ----------- --------- ---------- -------- 8 5054.8 Mop/s 5209.4 Mop/s +3.1% 16 3985.0 Mop/s 4015.0 Mop/s +0.8% 32 2378.2 Mop/s 2396.0 Mop/s +0.7% Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Pan Xinhui <xinhui@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502741222-24360-1-git-send-email-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-29locking/lockdep: Untangle xhlock history save/restore from task independencePeter Zijlstra1-41/+38
Where XHLOCK_{SOFT,HARD} are save/restore points in the xhlocks[] to ensure the temporal IRQ events don't interact with task state, the XHLOCK_PROC is a fundament different beast that just happens to share the interface. The purpose of XHLOCK_PROC is to annotate independent execution inside one task. For example workqueues, each work should appear to run in its own 'pristine' 'task'. Remove XHLOCK_PROC in favour of its own interface to avoid confusion. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: oleg@redhat.com Cc: tj@kernel.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170829085939.ggmb6xiohw67micb@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-25locking/lockdep: Fix workqueue crossrelease annotationPeter Zijlstra1-20/+36
The new completion/crossrelease annotations interact unfavourable with the extant flush_work()/flush_workqueue() annotations. The problem is that when a single work class does: wait_for_completion(&C) and complete(&C) in different executions, we'll build dependencies like: lock_map_acquire(W) complete_acquire(C) and lock_map_acquire(W) complete_release(C) which results in the dependency chain: W->C->W, which lockdep thinks spells deadlock, even though there is no deadlock potential since works are ran concurrently. One possibility would be to change the work 'lock' to recursive-read, but that would mean hitting a lockdep limitation on recursive locks. Also, unconditinoally switching to recursive-read here would fail to detect the actual deadlock on single-threaded workqueues, which do have a problem with this. For now, forcefully disregard these locks for crossrelease. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: byungchul.park@lge.com Cc: david@fromorbit.com Cc: johannes@sipsolutions.net Cc: oleg@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-17locking: Remove spin_unlock_wait() generic definitionsPaul E. McKenney1-117/+0
There is no agreed-upon definition of spin_unlock_wait()'s semantics, and it appears that all callers could do just as well with a lock/unlock pair. This commit therefore removes spin_unlock_wait() and related definitions from core code. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Cc: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2017-08-14locking/lockdep: Fix the rollback and overwrite detection logic in crossreleaseByungchul Park1-6/+6
As Boqun Feng pointed out, current->hist_id should be aligned with the latest valid xhlock->hist_id so that hist_id_save[] storing current->hist_id can be comparable with xhlock->hist_id. Fix it. Additionally, the condition for overwrite-detection should be the opposite. Fix the code and the comments as well. <- direction to visit hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh (h: history) ^^ ^ || start from here |previous entry current entry Reported-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Cc: willy@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502694052-16085-3-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com [ Improve the comments some more. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2017-08-14locking/lockdep: Add a comment about crossrelease_hist_end() in ↵Byungchul Park1-0/+4
lockdep_sys_exit() In lockdep_sys_exit(), crossrelease_hist_end() is called unconditionally even when getting here without having started e.g. just after forking. But it's no problem since it would roll back to an invalid entry anyway. Add a comment to explain this. Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: boqun.feng@gmail.com Cc: kernel-team@lge.com Cc: kirill@shutemov.name Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: npiggin@gmail.com Cc: walken@google.com Cc: willy@infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502694052-16085-2-git-send-email-byungchul.park@lge.com [ Improved the description and the comments. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-02 09:53:22 +0000