summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/locking
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2019-09-25Revert "locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted"Wanpeng Li1-1/+1
This patch reverts commit 75437bb304b20 (locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted). A large performance regression was caused by this commit. on over-subscription scenarios. The test was run on a Xeon Skylake box, 2 sockets, 40 cores, 80 threads, with three VMs of 80 vCPUs each. The score of ebizzy -M is reduced from 13000-14000 records/s to 1700-1800 records/s: Host Guest score vanilla w/o kvm optimizations upstream 1700-1800 records/s vanilla w/o kvm optimizations revert 13000-14000 records/s vanilla w/ kvm optimizations upstream 4500-5000 records/s vanilla w/ kvm optimizations revert 14000-15500 records/s Exit from aggressive wait-early mechanism can result in premature yield and extra scheduling latency. Actually, only 6% of wait_early events are caused by vcpu_is_preempted() being true. However, when one vCPU voluntarily releases its vCPU, all the subsequently waiters in the queue will do the same and the cascading effect leads to bad performance. kvm optimizations: [1] commit d73eb57b80b (KVM: Boost vCPUs that are delivering interrupts) [2] commit 266e85a5ec9 (KVM: X86: Boost queue head vCPU to mitigate lock waiter preemption) Tested-by: loobinliu@tencent.com Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> Cc: loobinliu@tencent.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 75437bb304b20 (locking/pvqspinlock: Don't wait if vCPU is preempted) Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
2019-09-16Merge branch 'sched-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-4/+2
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull scheduler updates from Ingo Molnar: - MAINTAINERS: Add Mark Rutland as perf submaintainer, Juri Lelli and Vincent Guittot as scheduler submaintainers. Add Dietmar Eggemann, Steven Rostedt, Ben Segall and Mel Gorman as scheduler reviewers. As perf and the scheduler is getting bigger and more complex, document the status quo of current responsibilities and interests, and spread the review pain^H^H^H^H fun via an increase in the Cc: linecount generated by scripts/get_maintainer.pl. :-) - Add another series of patches that brings the -rt (PREEMPT_RT) tree closer to mainline: split the monolithic CONFIG_PREEMPT dependencies into a new CONFIG_PREEMPTION category that will allow the eventual introduction of CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT. Still a few more hundred patches to go though. - Extend the CPU cgroup controller with uclamp.min and uclamp.max to allow the finer shaping of CPU bandwidth usage. - Micro-optimize energy-aware wake-ups from O(CPUS^2) to O(CPUS). - Improve the behavior of high CPU count, high thread count applications running under cpu.cfs_quota_us constraints. - Improve balancing with SCHED_IDLE (SCHED_BATCH) tasks present. - Improve CPU isolation housekeeping CPU allocation NUMA locality. - Fix deadline scheduler bandwidth calculations and logic when cpusets rebuilds the topology, or when it gets deadline-throttled while it's being offlined. - Convert the cpuset_mutex to percpu_rwsem, to allow it to be used from setscheduler() system calls without creating global serialization. Add new synchronization between cpuset topology-changing events and the deadline acceptance tests in setscheduler(), which were broken before. - Rework the active_mm state machine to be less confusing and more optimal. - Rework (simplify) the pick_next_task() slowpath. - Improve load-balancing on AMD EPYC systems. - ... and misc cleanups, smaller fixes and improvements - please see the Git log for more details. * 'sched-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (53 commits) sched/psi: Correct overly pessimistic size calculation sched/fair: Speed-up energy-aware wake-ups sched/uclamp: Always use 'enum uclamp_id' for clamp_id values sched/uclamp: Update CPU's refcount on TG's clamp changes sched/uclamp: Use TG's clamps to restrict TASK's clamps sched/uclamp: Propagate system defaults to the root group sched/uclamp: Propagate parent clamps sched/uclamp: Extend CPU's cgroup controller sched/topology: Improve load balancing on AMD EPYC systems arch, ia64: Make NUMA select SMP sched, perf: MAINTAINERS update, add submaintainers and reviewers sched/fair: Use rq_lock/unlock in online_fair_sched_group cpufreq: schedutil: fix equation in comment sched: Rework pick_next_task() slow-path sched: Allow put_prev_task() to drop rq->lock sched/fair: Expose newidle_balance() sched: Add task_struct pointer to sched_class::set_curr_task sched: Rework CPU hotplug task selection sched/{rt,deadline}: Fix set_next_task vs pick_next_task sched: Fix kerneldoc comment for ia64_set_curr_task ...
2019-09-16Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds5-51/+205
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: - improve rwsem scalability - add uninitialized rwsem debugging check - reduce lockdep's stacktrace memory usage and add diagnostics - misc cleanups, code consolidation and constification * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: mutex: Fix up mutex_waiter usage locking/mutex: Use mutex flags macro instead of hard code locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c locking/qspinlock,x86: Clarify virt_spin_lock_key locking/rwsem: Check for operations on an uninitialized rwsem locking/rwsem: Make handoff writer optimistically spin on owner locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statistics locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack traces stacktrace: Constify 'entries' arguments locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not modified
2019-09-16Merge branch 'sched/rt' into sched/core, to pick up -rt changesIngo Molnar4-15/+40
Pick up the first couple of patches working towards PREEMPT_RT. Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-08-08mutex: Fix up mutex_waiter usagePeter Zijlstra2-15/+0
The patch moving bits into mutex.c was a little too much; by also moving struct mutex_waiter a few less common CONFIGs would no longer build. Fixes: 5f35d5a66b3e ("locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.c") Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2019-08-06locking/mutex: Use mutex flags macro instead of hard codeMukesh Ojha1-1/+1
Use the mutex flag macro instead of hard code value inside __mutex_owner(). Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: mingo@redhat.com Cc: will@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1564585504-3543-2-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org
2019-08-06locking/mutex: Make __mutex_owner static to mutex.cMukesh Ojha2-0/+41
__mutex_owner() should only be used by the mutex api's. So, to put this restiction let's move the __mutex_owner() function definition from linux/mutex.h to mutex.c file. There exist functions that uses __mutex_owner() like mutex_is_locked() and mutex_trylock_recursive(), So to keep legacy thing intact move them as well and export them. Move mutex_waiter structure also to keep it private to the file. Signed-off-by: Mukesh Ojha <mojha@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: mingo@redhat.com Cc: will@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1564585504-3543-1-git-send-email-mojha@codeaurora.org
2019-08-06locking/rwsem: Check for operations on an uninitialized rwsemDavidlohr Bueso1-4/+18
Currently rwsems is the only locking primitive that lacks this debug feature. Add it under CONFIG_DEBUG_RWSEMS and do the magic checking in the locking fastpath (trylock) operation such that we cover all cases. The unlocking part is pretty straightforward. Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: mingo@kernel.org Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190729044735.9632-1-dave@stgolabs.net
2019-08-06locking/rwsem: Make handoff writer optimistically spin on ownerWaiman Long1-6/+26
When the handoff bit is set by a writer, no other tasks other than the setting writer itself is allowed to acquire the lock. If the to-be-handoff'ed writer goes to sleep, there will be a wakeup latency period where the lock is free, but no one can acquire it. That is less than ideal. To reduce that latency, the handoff writer will now optimistically spin on the owner if it happens to be a on-cpu writer. It will spin until it releases the lock and the to-be-handoff'ed writer can then acquire the lock immediately without any delay. Of course, if the owner is not a on-cpu writer, the to-be-handoff'ed writer will have to sleep anyway. The optimistic spinning code is also modified to not stop spinning when the handoff bit is set. This will prevent an occasional setting of handoff bit from causing a bunch of optimistic spinners from entering into the wait queue causing significant reduction in throughput. On a 1-socket 22-core 44-thread Skylake system, the AIM7 shared_memory workload was run with 7000 users. The throughput (jobs/min) of the following kernels were as follows: 1) 5.2-rc6 - 8,092,486 2) 5.2-rc6 + tip's rwsem patches - 7,567,568 3) 5.2-rc6 + tip's rwsem patches + this patch - 7,954,545 Using perf-record(1), the %cpu time used by rwsem_down_write_slowpath(), rwsem_down_write_failed() and their callees for the 3 kernels were 1.70%, 5.46% and 2.08% respectively. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: x86@kernel.org Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190625143913.24154-1-longman@redhat.com
2019-08-01lockdep: Make print_lock() address visiblePaul E. McKenney1-1/+1
Security is a wonderful thing, but so is the ability to debug based on lockdep warnings. This commit therefore makes lockdep lock addresses visible in the clear. Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
2019-07-25sched/core: Convert get_task_struct() to return the taskMatthew Wilcox (Oracle)1-4/+2
Returning the pointer that was passed in allows us to write slightly more idiomatic code. Convert a few users. Signed-off-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190704221323.24290-1-willy@infradead.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Report more stack trace statisticsBart Van Assche3-0/+39
Report the number of stack traces and the number of stack trace hash chains. These two numbers are useful because these allow to estimate the number of stack trace hash collisions. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-5-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Reduce space occupied by stack tracesBart Van Assche2-38/+92
Although commit 669de8bda87b ("kernel/workqueue: Use dynamic lockdep keys for workqueues") unregisters dynamic lockdep keys when a workqueue is destroyed, a side effect of that commit is that all stack traces associated with the lockdep key are leaked when a workqueue is destroyed. Fix this by storing each unique stack trace once. Other changes in this patch are: - Use NULL instead of { .nr_entries = 0 } to represent 'no trace'. - Store a pointer to a stack trace in struct lock_class and struct lock_list instead of storing 'nr_entries' and 'offset'. This patch avoids that the following program triggers the "BUG: MAX_STACK_TRACE_ENTRIES too low!" complaint: #include <fcntl.h> #include <unistd.h> int main() { for (;;) { int fd = open("/dev/infiniband/rdma_cm", O_RDWR); close(fd); } } Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Reported-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-4-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Make it clear that what lock_class::key points at is not ↵Bart Van Assche3-3/+4
modified This patch does not change the behavior of the lockdep code. Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190722182443.216015-2-bvanassche@acm.org Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/mutex: Test for initialized mutexSebastian Andrzej Siewior1-1/+10
An uninitialized/ zeroed mutex will go unnoticed because there is no check for it. There is a magic check in the unlock's slowpath path which might go unnoticed if the unlock happens in the fastpath. Add a ->magic check early in the mutex_lock() and mutex_trylock() path. Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190703092125.lsdf4gpsh2plhavb@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Clean up #ifdef checksArnd Bergmann1-7/+6
As Will Deacon points out, CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING implies TRACE_IRQFLAGS, so the conditions I added in the previous patch, and some others in the same file can be simplified by only checking for the former. No functional change. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Fixes: 886532aee3cd ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190628102919.2345242-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/lockdep: Hide unused 'class' variableArnd Bergmann1-1/+2
The usage is now hidden in an #ifdef, so we need to move the variable itself in there as well to avoid this warning: kernel/locking/lockdep_proc.c:203:21: error: unused variable 'class' [-Werror,-Wunused-variable] Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Cc: frederic@kernel.org Fixes: 68d41d8c94a3 ("locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats error") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190715092809.736834-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/rwsem: Add ACQUIRE commentsPeter Zijlstra1-5/+13
Since we just reviewed read_slowpath for ACQUIRE correctness, add a few coments to retain our findings. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25lcoking/rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE to read_slowpath sleep loopPeter Zijlstra1-1/+3
While reviewing another read_slowpath patch, both Will and I noticed another missing ACQUIRE, namely: X = 0; CPU0 CPU1 rwsem_down_read() for (;;) { set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE); X = 1; rwsem_up_write(); rwsem_mark_wake() atomic_long_add(adjustment, &sem->count); smp_store_release(&waiter->task, NULL); if (!waiter.task) break; ... } r = X; Allows 'r == 0'. Reported-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/rwsem: Add missing ACQUIRE to read_slowpath exit when queue is emptyJan Stancek1-0/+2
LTP mtest06 has been observed to occasionally hit "still mapped when deleted" and following BUG_ON on arm64. The extra mapcount originated from pagefault handler, which handled pagefault for vma that has already been detached. vma is detached under mmap_sem write lock by detach_vmas_to_be_unmapped(), which also invalidates vmacache. When the pagefault handler (under mmap_sem read lock) calls find_vma(), vmacache_valid() wrongly reports vmacache as valid. After rwsem down_read() returns via 'queue empty' path (as of v5.2), it does so without an ACQUIRE on sem->count: down_read() __down_read() rwsem_down_read_failed() __rwsem_down_read_failed_common() raw_spin_lock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list)) { if (atomic_long_read(&sem->count) >= 0) { raw_spin_unlock_irq(&sem->wait_lock); return sem; The problem can be reproduced by running LTP mtest06 in a loop and building the kernel (-j $NCPUS) in parallel. It does reproduces since v4.20 on arm64 HPE Apollo 70 (224 CPUs, 256GB RAM, 2 nodes). It triggers reliably in about an hour. The patched kernel ran fine for 10+ hours. Signed-off-by: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org> Acked-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: dbueso@suse.de Fixes: 4b486b535c33 ("locking/rwsem: Exit read lock slowpath if queue empty & no writer") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/50b8914e20d1d62bb2dee42d342836c2c16ebee7.1563438048.git.jstancek@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-25locking/rwsem: Don't call owner_on_cpu() on read-ownerWaiman Long1-1/+5
For writer, the owner value is cleared on unlock. For reader, it is left intact on unlock for providing better debugging aid on crash dump and the unlock of one reader may not mean the lock is free. As a result, the owner_on_cpu() shouldn't be used on read-owner as the task pointer value may not be valid and it might have been freed. That is the case in rwsem_spin_on_owner(), but not in rwsem_can_spin_on_owner(). This can lead to use-after-free error from KASAN. For example, BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in rwsem_down_write_slowpath (/home/miguel/kernel/linux/kernel/locking/rwsem.c:669 /home/miguel/kernel/linux/kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1125) Fix this by checking for RWSEM_READER_OWNED flag before calling owner_on_cpu(). Reported-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> Tested-by: Luis Henriques <lhenriques@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Fixes: 94a9717b3c40e ("locking/rwsem: Make rwsem->owner an atomic_long_t") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/81e82d5b-5074-77e8-7204-28479bbe0df0@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-15docs: locking: convert docs to ReST and rename to *.rstMauro Carvalho Chehab2-2/+2
Convert the locking documents to ReST and add them to the kernel development book where it belongs. Most of the stuff here is just to make Sphinx to properly parse the text file, as they're already in good shape, not requiring massive changes in order to be parsed. The conversion is actually: - add blank lines and identation in order to identify paragraphs; - fix tables markups; - add some lists markups; - mark literal blocks; - adjust title markups. At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings. Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org> Acked-by: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
2019-07-13locking/lockdep: Fix lock used or unused stats errorYuyang Du1-2/+3
The stats variable nr_unused_locks is incremented every time a new lock class is register and decremented when the lock is first used in __lock_acquire(). And after all, it is shown and checked in lockdep_stats. However, under configurations that either CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS or CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING is not defined: The commit: 091806515124b20 ("locking/lockdep: Consolidate lock usage bit initialization") missed marking the LOCK_USED flag at IRQ usage initialization because as mark_usage() is not called. And the commit: 886532aee3cd42d ("locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") further made mark_lock() not defined such that the LOCK_USED cannot be marked at all when the lock is first acquired. As a result, we fix this by not showing and checking the stats under such configurations for lockdep_stats. Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw> Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: arnd@arndb.de Cc: frederic@kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190709101522.9117-1-duyuyang@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-07-08Merge branch 'locking-core-for-linus' of ↵Linus Torvalds8-1455/+1886
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip Pull locking updates from Ingo Molnar: "The main changes in this cycle are: - rwsem scalability improvements, phase #2, by Waiman Long, which are rather impressive: "On a 2-socket 40-core 80-thread Skylake system with 40 reader and writer locking threads, the min/mean/max locking operations done in a 5-second testing window before the patchset were: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,807/1,808/1,810 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,807/50,344/151,255 After the patchset, they became: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 30,057/31,359/32,741 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 94,466/95,845/97,098" There's a lot of changes to the locking implementation that makes it similar to qrwlock, including owner handoff for more fair locking. Another microbenchmark shows how across the spectrum the improvements are: "With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 2-socket Skylake system with equal numbers of readers and writers (mixed) before and after this patchset were: # of Threads Before Patch After Patch ------------ ------------ ----------- 2 2,618 4,193 4 1,202 3,726 8 802 3,622 16 729 3,359 32 319 2,826 64 102 2,744" The changes are extensive and the patch-set has been through several iterations addressing various locking workloads. There might be more regressions, but unless they are pathological I believe we want to use this new implementation as the baseline going forward. - jump-label optimizations by Daniel Bristot de Oliveira: the primary motivation was to remove IPI disturbance of isolated RT-workload CPUs, which resulted in the implementation of batched jump-label updates. Beyond the improvement of the real-time characteristics kernel, in one test this patchset improved static key update overhead from 57 msecs to just 1.4 msecs - which is a nice speedup as well. - atomic64_t cross-arch type cleanups by Mark Rutland: over the last ~10 years of atomic64_t existence the various types used by the APIs only had to be self-consistent within each architecture - which means they became wildly inconsistent across architectures. Mark puts and end to this by reworking all the atomic64 implementations to use 's64' as the base type for atomic64_t, and to ensure that this type is consistently used for parameters and return values in the API, avoiding further problems in this area. - A large set of small improvements to lockdep by Yuyang Du: type cleanups, output cleanups, function return type and othr cleanups all around the place. - A set of percpu ops cleanups and fixes by Peter Zijlstra. - Misc other changes - please see the Git log for more details" * 'locking-core-for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip: (82 commits) locking/lockdep: increase size of counters for lockdep statistics locking/atomics: Use sed(1) instead of non-standard head(1) option locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING x86/jump_label: Make tp_vec_nr static x86/percpu: Optimize raw_cpu_xchg() x86/percpu, sched/fair: Avoid local_clock() x86/percpu, x86/irq: Relax {set,get}_irq_regs() x86/percpu: Relax smp_processor_id() x86/percpu: Differentiate this_cpu_{}() and __this_cpu_{}() locking/rwsem: Guard against making count negative locking/rwsem: Adaptive disabling of reader optimistic spinning locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsem locking/rwsem: Make rwsem->owner an atomic_long_t locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writer locking/rwsem: Clarify usage of owner's nonspinaable bit locking/rwsem: Wake up almost all readers in wait queue locking/rwsem: More optimal RT task handling of null owner locking/rwsem: Always release wait_lock before waking up tasks locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvation locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return owner state ...
2019-06-28Merge branch 'for-mingo' of ↵Ingo Molnar2-2/+2
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu into core/rcu Pull rcu/next + tools/memory-model changes from Paul E. McKenney: - RCU flavor consolidation cleanups and optmizations - Documentation updates - Miscellaneous fixes - SRCU updates - RCU-sync flavor consolidation - Torture-test updates - Linux-kernel memory-consistency-model updates, most notably the addition of plain C-language accesses Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-25locking/lockdep: increase size of counters for lockdep statisticsKobe Wu1-20/+16
When system has been running for a long time, signed integer counters are not enough for some lockdep statistics. Using unsigned long counters can satisfy the requirement. Besides, most of lockdep statistics are unsigned. It is better to use unsigned int instead of int. Remove unused variables. - max_recursion_depth - nr_cyclic_check_recursions - nr_find_usage_forwards_recursions - nr_find_usage_backwards_recursions Signed-off-by: Kobe Wu <kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org> Cc: <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com> Cc: Eason Lin <eason-yh.lin@mediatek.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1561365348-16050-1-git-send-email-kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-25locking/lockdep: Move mark_lock() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && ↵Arnd Bergmann1-39/+34
CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING The last cleanup patch triggered another issue, as now another function should be moved into the same section: kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3580:12: error: 'mark_lock' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function] static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this, Move mark_lock() into the same #ifdef section as its only caller, and remove the now-unused mark_lock_irq() stub helper. Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Yuyang Du <duyuyang@gmail.com> Fixes: 0d2cc3b34532 ("locking/lockdep: Move valid_state() inside CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS && CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING") Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190617124718.1232976-1-arnd@arndb.de Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-19Merge branches 'consolidate.2019.05.28a', 'doc.2019.05.28a', ↵Paul E. McKenney2-2/+2
'fixes.2019.06.13a', 'srcu.2019.05.28a', 'sync.2019.05.28a' and 'torture.2019.05.28a' into HEAD consolidate.2019.05.28a: RCU flavor consolidation cleanups and optmizations. doc.2019.05.28a: Documentation updates. fixes.2019.06.13a: Miscellaneous fixes. srcu.2019.05.28a: SRCU updates. sync.2019.05.28a: RCU-sync flavor consolidation. torture.2019.05.28a: Torture-test updates.
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Guard against making count negativeWaiman Long1-12/+41
The upper bits of the count field is used as reader count. When sufficient number of active readers are present, the most significant bit will be set and the count becomes negative. If the number of active readers keep on piling up, we may eventually overflow the reader counts. This is not likely to happen unless the number of bits reserved for reader count is reduced because those bits are need for other purpose. To prevent this count overflow from happening, the most significant bit is now treated as a guard bit (RWSEM_FLAG_READFAIL). Read-lock attempts will now fail for both the fast and slow paths whenever this bit is set. So all those extra readers will be put to sleep in the wait list. Wakeup will not happen until the reader count reaches 0. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-17-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Adaptive disabling of reader optimistic spinningWaiman Long2-8/+135
Reader optimistic spinning is helpful when the reader critical section is short and there aren't that many readers around. It makes readers relatively more preferred than writers. When a writer times out spinning on a reader-owned lock and set the nospinnable bits, there are two main reasons for that. 1) The reader critical section is long, perhaps the task sleeps after acquiring the read lock. 2) There are just too many readers contending the lock causing it to take a while to service all of them. In the former case, long reader critical section will impede the progress of writers which is usually more important for system performance. In the later case, reader optimistic spinning tends to make the reader groups that contain readers that acquire the lock together smaller leading to more of them. That may hurt performance in some cases. In other words, the setting of nonspinnable bits indicates that reader optimistic spinning may not be helpful for those workloads that cause it. Therefore, any writers that have observed the setting of the writer nonspinnable bit for a given rwsem after they fail to acquire the lock via optimistic spinning will set the reader nonspinnable bit once they acquire the write lock. Similarly, readers that observe the setting of reader nonspinnable bit at slowpath entry will also set the reader nonspinnable bit when they acquire the read lock via the wakeup path. Once the reader nonspinnable bit is on, it will only be reset when a writer is able to acquire the rwsem in the fast path or somehow a reader or writer in the slowpath doesn't observe the nonspinable bit. This is to discourage reader optmistic spinning on that particular rwsem and make writers more preferred. This adaptive disabling of reader optimistic spinning will alleviate some of the negative side effect of this feature. In addition, this patch tries to make readers in the spinning queue follow the phase-fair principle after quitting optimistic spinning by checking if another reader has somehow acquired a read lock after this reader enters the optimistic spinning queue. If so and the rwsem is still reader-owned, this reader is in the right read-phase and can attempt to acquire the lock. On a 2-socket 40-core 80-thread Skylake system, the page_fault1 test of the will-it-scale benchmark was run with various number of threads. The number of operations done before reader optimistic spinning patches, this patch and after this patch were: Threads Before rspin Before patch After patch %change ------- ------------ ------------ ----------- ------- 20 5541068 5345484 5455667 -3.5%/ +2.1% 40 10185150 7292313 9219276 -28.5%/+26.4% 60 8196733 6460517 7181209 -21.2%/+11.2% 80 9508864 6739559 8107025 -29.1%/+20.3% This patch doesn't recover all the lost performance, but it is more than half. Given the fact that reader optimistic spinning does benefit some workloads, this is a good compromise. Using the rwsem locking microbenchmark with very short critical section, this patch doesn't have too much impact on locking performance as shown by the locking rates (kops/s) below with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after this patch: # of Threads Pre-patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 2 4,730 4,969 4 4,814 4,786 8 4,866 4,815 16 4,715 4,511 32 3,338 3,500 64 3,212 3,389 80 3,110 3,044 When running the locking microbenchmark with 40 dedicated reader and writer threads, however, the reader performance is curtailed to favor the writer. Before patch: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 204,026/234,309/254,816 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 88,515/95,884/115,644 After patch: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 33,813/35,260/36,791 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 95,368/96,565/97,798 Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-16-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Enable time-based spinning on reader-owned rwsemWaiman Long2-30/+144
When the rwsem is owned by reader, writers stop optimistic spinning simply because there is no easy way to figure out if all the readers are actively running or not. However, there are scenarios where the readers are unlikely to sleep and optimistic spinning can help performance. This patch provides a simple mechanism for spinning on a reader-owned rwsem by a writer. It is a time threshold based spinning where the allowable spinning time can vary from 10us to 25us depending on the condition of the rwsem. When the time threshold is exceeded, the nonspinnable bits will be set in the owner field to indicate that no more optimistic spinning will be allowed on this rwsem until it becomes writer owned again. Not even readers is allowed to acquire the reader-locked rwsem by optimistic spinning for fairness. We also want a writer to acquire the lock after the readers hold the lock for a relatively long time. In order to give preference to writers under such a circumstance, the single RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE bit is now split into two - one for reader and one for writer. When optimistic spinning is disabled, both bits will be set. When the reader count drop down to 0, the writer nonspinnable bit will be cleared to allow writers to spin on the lock, but not the readers. When a writer acquires the lock, it will write its own task structure pointer into sem->owner and clear the reader nonspinnable bit in the process. The time taken for each iteration of the reader-owned rwsem spinning loop varies. Below are sample minimum elapsed times for 16 iterations of the loop. System Time for 16 Iterations ------ ---------------------- 1-socket Skylake ~800ns 4-socket Broadwell ~300ns 2-socket ThunderX2 (arm64) ~250ns When the lock cacheline is contended, we can see up to almost 10X increase in elapsed time. So 25us will be at most 500, 1300 and 1600 iterations for each of the above systems. With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 8-socket IvyBridge-EX system with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after this patch were as follows: # of Threads Pre-patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 2 1,759 6,684 4 1,684 6,738 8 1,074 7,222 16 900 7,163 32 458 7,316 64 208 520 128 168 425 240 143 474 This patch gives a big boost in performance for mixed reader/writer workloads. With 32 locking threads, the rwsem lock event data were: rwsem_opt_fail=79850 rwsem_opt_nospin=5069 rwsem_opt_rlock=597484 rwsem_opt_wlock=957339 rwsem_sleep_reader=57782 rwsem_sleep_writer=55663 With 64 locking threads, the data looked like: rwsem_opt_fail=346723 rwsem_opt_nospin=6293 rwsem_opt_rlock=1127119 rwsem_opt_wlock=1400628 rwsem_sleep_reader=308201 rwsem_sleep_writer=72281 So a lot more threads acquired the lock in the slowpath and more threads went to sleep. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-15-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Make rwsem->owner an atomic_long_tWaiman Long1-45/+80
The rwsem->owner contains not just the task structure pointer, it also holds some flags for storing the current state of the rwsem. Some of the flags may have to be atomically updated. To reflect the new reality, the owner is now changed to an atomic_long_t type. New helper functions are added to properly separate out the task structure pointer and the embedded flags. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-14-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Enable readers spinning on writerWaiman Long2-12/+75
This patch enables readers to optimistically spin on a rwsem when it is owned by a writer instead of going to sleep directly. The rwsem_can_spin_on_owner() function is extracted out of rwsem_optimistic_spin() and is called directly by rwsem_down_read_slowpath() and rwsem_down_write_slowpath(). With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 8-socket IvyBrige-EX system with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after the patch were as follows: # of Threads Pre-patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 4 1,674 1,684 8 1,062 1,074 16 924 900 32 300 458 64 195 208 128 164 168 240 149 143 The performance change wasn't significant in this case, but this change is required by a follow-on patch. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-13-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Clarify usage of owner's nonspinaable bitWaiman Long1-22/+21
Bit 1 of sem->owner (RWSEM_ANONYMOUSLY_OWNED) is used to designate an anonymous owner - readers or an anonymous writer. The setting of this anonymous bit is used as an indicator that optimistic spinning cannot be done on this rwsem. With the upcoming reader optimistic spinning patches, a reader-owned rwsem can be spinned on for a limit period of time. We still need this bit to indicate a rwsem is nonspinnable, but not setting this bit loses its meaning that the owner is known. So rename the bit to RWSEM_NONSPINNABLE to clarify its meaning. This patch also fixes a DEBUG_RWSEMS_WARN_ON() bug in __up_write(). Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-12-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Wake up almost all readers in wait queueWaiman Long1-5/+26
When the front of the wait queue is a reader, other readers immediately following the first reader will also be woken up at the same time. However, if there is a writer in between. Those readers behind the writer will not be woken up. Because of optimistic spinning, the lock acquisition order is not FIFO anyway. The lock handoff mechanism will ensure that lock starvation will not happen. Assuming that the lock hold times of the other readers still in the queue will be about the same as the readers that are being woken up, there is really not much additional cost other than the additional latency due to the wakeup of additional tasks by the waker. Therefore all the readers up to a maximum of 256 in the queue are woken up when the first waiter is a reader to improve reader throughput. This is somewhat similar in concept to a phase-fair R/W lock. With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) on a 8-socket IvyBridge-EX system with equal numbers of readers and writers before and after this patch were as follows: # of Threads Pre-Patch Post-patch ------------ --------- ---------- 4 1,641 1,674 8 731 1,062 16 564 924 32 78 300 64 38 195 240 50 149 There is no performance gain at low contention level. At high contention level, however, this patch gives a pretty decent performance boost. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-11-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: More optimal RT task handling of null ownerWaiman Long1-7/+44
An RT task can do optimistic spinning only if the lock holder is actually running. If the state of the lock holder isn't known, there is a possibility that high priority of the RT task may block forward progress of the lock holder if it happens to reside on the same CPU. This will lead to deadlock. So we have to make sure that an RT task will not spin on a reader-owned rwsem. When the owner is temporarily set to NULL, there are two cases where we may want to continue spinning: 1) The lock owner is in the process of releasing the lock, sem->owner is cleared but the lock has not been released yet. 2) The lock was free and owner cleared, but another task just comes in and acquire the lock before we try to get it. The new owner may be a spinnable writer. So an RT task is now made to retry one more time to see if it can acquire the lock or continue spinning on the new owning writer. When testing on a 8-socket IvyBridge-EX system, the one additional retry seems to improve locking performance of RT write locking threads under heavy contentions. The table below shows the locking rates (in kops/s) with various write locking threads before and after the patch. Locking threads Pre-patch Post-patch --------------- --------- ----------- 4 2,753 2,608 8 2,529 2,520 16 1,727 1,918 32 1,263 1,956 64 889 1,343 Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-10-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Always release wait_lock before waking up tasksWaiman Long1-16/+15
With the use of wake_q, we can do task wakeups without holding the wait_lock. There is one exception in the rwsem code, though. It is when the writer in the slowpath detects that there are waiters ahead but the rwsem is not held by a writer. This can lead to a long wait_lock hold time especially when a large number of readers are to be woken up. Remediate this situation by releasing the wait_lock before waking up tasks and re-acquiring it afterward. The rwsem_try_write_lock() function is also modified to read the rwsem count directly to avoid stale count value. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-9-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Implement lock handoff to prevent lock starvationWaiman Long2-54/+173
Because of writer lock stealing, it is possible that a constant stream of incoming writers will cause a waiting writer or reader to wait indefinitely leading to lock starvation. This patch implements a lock handoff mechanism to disable lock stealing and force lock handoff to the first waiter or waiters (for readers) in the queue after at least a 4ms waiting period unless it is a RT writer task which doesn't need to wait. The waiting period is used to avoid discouraging lock stealing too much to affect performance. The setting and clearing of the handoff bit is serialized by the wait_lock. So racing is not possible. A rwsem microbenchmark was run for 5 seconds on a 2-socket 40-core 80-thread Skylake system with a v5.1 based kernel and 240 write_lock threads with 5us sleep critical section. Before the patch, the min/mean/max numbers of locking operations for the locking threads were 1/7,792/173,696. After the patch, the figures became 5,842/6,542/7,458. It can be seen that the rwsem became much more fair, though there was a drop of about 16% in the mean locking operations done which was a tradeoff of having better fairness. Making the waiter set the handoff bit right after the first wakeup can impact performance especially with a mixed reader/writer workload. With the same microbenchmark with short critical section and equal number of reader and writer threads (40/40), the reader/writer locking operation counts with the current patch were: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/1,794/1,796 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 1,793/34,956/86,081 By making waiter set handoff bit immediately after wakeup: 40 readers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/44/46 40 writers, Iterations Min/Mean/Max = 43/1,263/3,191 Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-8-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Make rwsem_spin_on_owner() return owner stateWaiman Long1-18/+47
This patch modifies rwsem_spin_on_owner() to return four possible values to better reflect the state of lock holder which enables us to make a better decision of what to do next. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-7-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Code cleanup after files mergingWaiman Long2-95/+42
After merging all the relevant rwsem code into one single file, there are a number of optimizations and cleanups that can be done: 1) Remove all the EXPORT_SYMBOL() calls for functions that are not accessed elsewhere. 2) Remove all the __visible tags as none of the functions will be called from assembly code anymore. 3) Make all the internal functions static. 4) Remove some unneeded blank lines. 5) Remove the intermediate rwsem_down_{read|write}_failed*() functions and rename __rwsem_down_{read|write}_failed_common() to rwsem_down_{read|write}_slowpath(). 6) Remove "__" prefix of __rwsem_mark_wake(). 7) Use atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire() as much as possible. 8) Remove the rwsem_rtrylock and rwsem_wtrylock lock events as they are not that useful. That enables the compiler to do better optimization and reduce code size. The text+data size of rwsem.o on an x86-64 machine with gcc8 was reduced from 10237 bytes to 5030 bytes with this change. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-6-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Merge rwsem.h and rwsem-xadd.c into rwsem.cWaiman Long4-900/+891
Now we only have one implementation of rwsem. Even though we still use xadd to handle reader locking, we use cmpxchg for writer instead. So the filename rwsem-xadd.c is not strictly correct. Also no one outside of the rwsem code need to know the internal implementation other than function prototypes for two internal functions that are called directly from percpu-rwsem.c. So the rwsem-xadd.c and rwsem.h files are now merged into rwsem.c in the following order: <upper part of rwsem.h> <rwsem-xadd.c> <lower part of rwsem.h> <rwsem.c> The rwsem.h file now contains only 2 function declarations for __up_read() and __down_read(). This is a code relocation patch with no code change at all except making __up_read() and __down_read() non-static functions so they can be used by percpu-rwsem.c. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-5-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Implement a new locking schemeWaiman Long2-136/+85
The current way of using various reader, writer and waiting biases in the rwsem code are confusing and hard to understand. I have to reread the rwsem count guide in the rwsem-xadd.c file from time to time to remind myself how this whole thing works. It also makes the rwsem code harder to be optimized. To make rwsem more sane, a new locking scheme similar to the one in qrwlock is now being used. The atomic long count has the following bit definitions: Bit 0 - writer locked bit Bit 1 - waiters present bit Bits 2-7 - reserved for future extension Bits 8-X - reader count (24/56 bits) The cmpxchg instruction is now used to acquire the write lock. The read lock is still acquired with xadd instruction, so there is no change here. This scheme will allow up to 16M/64P active readers which should be more than enough. We can always use some more reserved bits if necessary. With that change, we can deterministically know if a rwsem has been write-locked. Looking at the count alone, however, one cannot determine for certain if a rwsem is owned by readers or not as the readers that set the reader count bits may be in the process of backing out. So we still need the reader-owned bit in the owner field to be sure. With a locking microbenchmark running on 5.1 based kernel, the total locking rates (in kops/s) of the benchmark on a 8-socket 120-core IvyBridge-EX system before and after the patch were as follows: Before Patch After Patch # of Threads wlock rlock wlock rlock ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 30,659 31,341 31,055 31,283 2 8,909 16,457 9,884 17,659 4 9,028 15,823 8,933 20,233 8 8,410 14,212 7,230 17,140 16 8,217 25,240 7,479 24,607 The locking rates of the benchmark on a Power8 system were as follows: Before Patch After Patch # of Threads wlock rlock wlock rlock ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 12,963 13,647 13,275 13,601 2 7,570 11,569 7,902 10,829 4 5,232 5,516 5,466 5,435 8 5,233 3,386 5,467 3,168 The locking rates of the benchmark on a 2-socket ARM64 system were as follows: Before Patch After Patch # of Threads wlock rlock wlock rlock ------------ ----- ----- ----- ----- 1 21,495 21,046 21,524 21,074 2 5,293 10,502 5,333 10,504 4 5,325 11,463 5,358 11,631 8 5,391 11,712 5,470 11,680 The performance are roughly the same before and after the patch. There are run-to-run variations in performance. Runs with higher variances usually have higher throughput. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-4-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Remove rwsem_wake() wakeup optimizationWaiman Long1-72/+0
After the following commit: 59aabfc7e959 ("locking/rwsem: Reduce spinlock contention in wakeup after up_read()/up_write()") the rwsem_wake() forgoes doing a wakeup if the wait_lock cannot be directly acquired and an optimistic spinning locker is present. This can help performance by avoiding spinning on the wait_lock when it is contended. With the later commit: 133e89ef5ef3 ("locking/rwsem: Enable lockless waiter wakeup(s)") the performance advantage of the above optimization diminishes as the average wait_lock hold time become much shorter. With a later patch that supports rwsem lock handoff, we can no longer relies on the fact that the presence of an optimistic spinning locker will ensure that the lock will be acquired by a task soon and rwsem_wake() will be called later on to wake up waiters. This can lead to missed wakeup and application hang. So the original 59aabfc7e959 commit has to be reverted. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-3-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/rwsem: Make owner available even if !CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNERWaiman Long2-24/+1
The owner field in the rw_semaphore structure is used primarily for optimistic spinning. However, identifying the rwsem owner can also be helpful in debugging as well as tracing locking related issues when analyzing crash dump. The owner field may also store state information that can be important to the operation of the rwsem. So the owner field is now made a permanent member of the rw_semaphore structure irrespective of CONFIG_RWSEM_SPIN_ON_OWNER. Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190520205918.22251-2-longman@redhat.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17locking/lockdep: Remove unnecessary DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON()Kobe Wu1-1/+1
DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON() will turn off debug_locks and makes print_unlock_imbalance_bug() return directly. Remove a redundant whitespace. Signed-off-by: Kobe Wu <kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: <linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org> Cc: <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com> Cc: Eason Lin <eason-yh.lin@mediatek.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/1559217575-30298-1-git-send-email-kobe-cp.wu@mediatek.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-17Merge tag 'v5.2-rc5' into locking/core, to pick up fixesIngo Molnar1-2/+1
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-05treewide: Replace GPLv2 boilerplate/reference with SPDX - rule 436Thomas Gleixner1-2/+1
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): distributed under the terms of the gnu gpl version 2 extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-only has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 2 file(s). Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Armijn Hemel <armijn@tjaldur.nl> Reviewed-by: Allison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531190115.032570679@linutronix.de Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-06-03locking/lock_events: Use raw_cpu_{add,inc}() for statsPeter Zijlstra1-41/+4
Instead of playing silly games with CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT toggling between this_cpu_*() and __this_cpu_*() use raw_cpu_*(), which is exactly what we want here. Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527082326.GP2623@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Fix merging of hlocks with non-zero referencesImre Deak1-9/+9
The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_c; struct mutex lock_c; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_c, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_c, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_c); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); (**) will trigger the following error in __lock_release() when calling mutex_release() at **: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(depth <= 0) The problem is that the hlock merging happening at * updates the references for test_ww_class incorrectly to 3 whereas it should've updated it to 4 (representing all the instances for ww_ctx and ww_lock_[abc]). Fix this by updating the references during merging correctly taking into account that we can have non-zero references (both for the hlock that we merge into another hlock or for the hlock we are merging into). Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Ville=20Syrj=C3=A4l=C3=A4?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-2-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
2019-06-03locking/lockdep: Fix OOO unlock when hlocks need mergingImre Deak1-12/+29
The sequence static DEFINE_WW_CLASS(test_ww_class); struct ww_acquire_ctx ww_ctx; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_a; struct ww_mutex ww_lock_b; struct mutex lock_c; struct mutex lock_d; ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); (*) ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); triggers the following WARN in __lock_release() when doing the unlock at *: DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(curr->lockdep_depth != depth - 1); The problem is that the WARN check doesn't take into account the merging of ww_lock_a and ww_lock_b which results in decreasing curr->lockdep_depth by 2 not only 1. Note that the following sequence doesn't trigger the WARN, since there won't be any hlock merging. ww_acquire_init(&ww_ctx, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_a, &test_ww_class); ww_mutex_init(&ww_lock_b, &test_ww_class); mutex_init(&lock_c); mutex_init(&lock_d); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_a, &ww_ctx); mutex_lock(&lock_c); mutex_lock(&lock_d); ww_mutex_lock(&ww_lock_b, &ww_ctx); mutex_unlock(&lock_d); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_b); ww_mutex_unlock(&ww_lock_a); mutex_unlock(&lock_c); ww_acquire_fini(&ww_ctx); In general both of the above two sequences are valid and shouldn't trigger any lockdep warning. Fix this by taking the decrement due to the hlock merging into account during lock release and hlock class re-setting. Merging can't happen during lock downgrading since there won't be a new possibility to merge hlocks in that case, so add a WARN if merging still happens then. Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190524201509.9199-1-imre.deak@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-11-17 03:01:52 +0000