summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2022-07-21bpf: Switch to new kfunc flags infrastructureKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-8/+6
Instead of populating multiple sets to indicate some attribute and then researching the same BTF ID in them, prepare a single unified BTF set which indicates whether a kfunc is allowed to be called, and also its attributes if any at the same time. Now, only one call is needed to perform the lookup for both kfunc availability and its attributes. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220721134245.2450-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-07-21bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_helper_callStanislav Fomichev1-1/+3
Syzkaller found a problem similar to d1a6edecc1fd ("bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_code") where attach_func_proto might be NULL: RIP: 0010:check_helper_call+0x3dcb/0x8d50 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:7330 do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:12302 [inline] do_check_common+0x6e1e/0xb980 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:14610 do_check_main kernel/bpf/verifier.c:14673 [inline] bpf_check+0x661e/0xc520 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:15243 bpf_prog_load+0x11ae/0x1f80 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2620 With the following reproducer: bpf$BPF_PROG_RAW_TRACEPOINT_LOAD(0x5, &(0x7f0000000780)={0xf, 0x4, &(0x7f0000000040)=@framed={{}, [@call={0x85, 0x0, 0x0, 0xbb}]}, &(0x7f0000000000)='GPL\x00', 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, 0x2b, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0}, 0x80) Let's do the same here, only check attach_func_proto for the prog types where we are certain that attach_func_proto is defined. Fixes: 69fd337a975c ("bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor") Reported-by: syzbot+0f8d989b1fba1addc5e0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220720164729.147544-1-sdf@google.com
2022-07-14bpf: Fix subprog names in stack traces.Alexei Starovoitov1-3/+1
The commit 7337224fc150 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior") accidently made bpf_prog_ksym_set_name() conservative for bpf subprograms. Fixed it so instead of "bpf_prog_tag_F" the stack traces print "bpf_prog_tag_full_subprog_name". Fixes: 7337224fc150 ("bpf: Improve the info.func_info and info.func_info_rec_size behavior") Reported-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220714211637.17150-1-alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
2022-07-14bpf: Warn on non-preallocated case for BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLEYafang Shao1-0/+1
BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE is also tracing type, which may cause unexpected memory allocation if we set BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC. Let's also warn on it similar as we do in case of BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT. Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220713160936.57488-1-laoar.shao@gmail.com
2022-07-13bpf: Tidy up verifier check_func_arg()Joanne Koong1-28/+38
This patch does two things: 1. For matching against the arg type, the match should be against the base type of the arg type, since the arg type can have different bpf_type_flags set on it. 2. Uses switch casing to improve readability + efficiency. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Acked-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220712210603.123791-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-07-09Merge https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-nextJakub Kicinski1-12/+226
Daniel Borkmann says: ==================== pull-request: bpf-next 2022-07-09 We've added 94 non-merge commits during the last 19 day(s) which contain a total of 125 files changed, 5141 insertions(+), 6701 deletions(-). The main changes are: 1) Add new way for performing BTF type queries to BPF, from Daniel Müller. 2) Add inlining of calls to bpf_loop() helper when its function callback is statically known, from Eduard Zingerman. 3) Implement BPF TCP CC framework usability improvements, from Jörn-Thorben Hinz. 4) Add LSM flavor for attaching per-cgroup BPF programs to existing LSM hooks, from Stanislav Fomichev. 5) Remove all deprecated libbpf APIs in prep for 1.0 release, from Andrii Nakryiko. 6) Add benchmarks around local_storage to BPF selftests, from Dave Marchevsky. 7) AF_XDP sample removal (given move to libxdp) and various improvements around AF_XDP selftests, from Magnus Karlsson & Maciej Fijalkowski. 8) Add bpftool improvements for memcg probing and bash completion, from Quentin Monnet. 9) Add arm64 JIT support for BPF-2-BPF coupled with tail calls, from Jakub Sitnicki. 10) Sockmap optimizations around throughput of UDP transmissions which have been improved by 61%, from Cong Wang. 11) Rework perf's BPF prologue code to remove deprecated functions, from Jiri Olsa. 12) Fix sockmap teardown path to avoid sleepable sk_psock_stop, from John Fastabend. 13) Fix libbpf's cleanup around legacy kprobe/uprobe on error case, from Chuang Wang. 14) Fix libbpf's bpf_helpers.h to work with gcc for the case of its sec/pragma macro, from James Hilliard. 15) Fix libbpf's pt_regs macros for riscv to use a0 for RC register, from Yixun Lan. 16) Fix bpftool to show the name of type BPF_OBJ_LINK, from Yafang Shao. * https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next: (94 commits) selftests/bpf: Fix xdp_synproxy build failure if CONFIG_NF_CONNTRACK=m/n bpf: Correctly propagate errors up from bpf_core_composites_match libbpf: Disable SEC pragma macro on GCC bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_code selftests/bpf: Add test involving restrict type qualifier bpftool: Add support for KIND_RESTRICT to gen min_core_btf command MAINTAINERS: Add entry for AF_XDP selftests files selftests, xsk: Rename AF_XDP testing app bpf, docs: Remove deprecated xsk libbpf APIs description selftests/bpf: Add benchmark for local_storage RCU Tasks Trace usage libbpf, riscv: Use a0 for RC register libbpf: Remove unnecessary usdt_rel_ip assignments selftests/bpf: Fix few more compiler warnings selftests/bpf: Fix bogus uninitialized variable warning bpftool: Remove zlib feature test from Makefile libbpf: Cleanup the legacy uprobe_event on failed add/attach_event() libbpf: Fix wrong variable used in perf_event_uprobe_open_legacy() libbpf: Cleanup the legacy kprobe_event on failed add/attach_event() selftests/bpf: Add type match test against kernel's task_struct selftests/bpf: Add nested type to type based tests ... ==================== Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220708233145.32365-1-daniel@iogearbox.net Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-07-08bpf: Check attach_func_proto more carefully in check_return_codeStanislav Fomichev1-5/+16
Syzkaller reports the following crash: RIP: 0010:check_return_code kernel/bpf/verifier.c:10575 [inline] RIP: 0010:do_check kernel/bpf/verifier.c:12346 [inline] RIP: 0010:do_check_common+0xb3d2/0xd250 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:14610 With the following reproducer: bpf$PROG_LOAD_XDP(0x5, &(0x7f00000004c0)={0xd, 0x3, &(0x7f0000000000)=ANY=[@ANYBLOB="1800000000000019000000000000000095"], &(0x7f0000000300)='GPL\x00', 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, '\x00', 0x0, 0x2b, 0xffffffffffffffff, 0x8, 0x0, 0x0, 0x10, 0x0}, 0x80) Because we don't enforce expected_attach_type for XDP programs, we end up in hitting 'if (prog->expected_attach_type == BPF_LSM_CGROUP' part in check_return_code and follow up with testing `prog->aux->attach_func_proto->type`, but `prog->aux->attach_func_proto` is NULL. Add explicit prog_type check for the "Note, BPF_LSM_CGROUP that attach ..." condition. Also, don't skip return code check for LSM/STRUCT_OPS. The above actually brings an issue with existing selftest which tries to return EPERM from void inet_csk_clone. Fix the test (and move called_socket_clone to make sure it's not incremented in case of an error) and add a new one to explicitly verify this condition. Fixes: 69fd337a975c ("bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavor") Reported-by: syzbot+5cc0730bd4b4d2c5f152@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220708175000.2603078-1-sdf@google.com
2022-07-07Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/netJakub Kicinski1-66/+47
No conflicts. Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
2022-07-01bpf: Fix insufficient bounds propagation from adjust_scalar_min_max_valsDaniel Borkmann1-49/+23
Kuee reported a corner case where the tnum becomes constant after the call to __reg_bound_offset(), but the register's bounds are not, that is, its min bounds are still not equal to the register's max bounds. This in turn allows to leak pointers through turning a pointer register as is into an unknown scalar via adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Before: func#0 @0 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 0: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) 1: (b7) r3 = 0 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 2: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 3: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 4: (47) r3 |= 32767 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=-9223372036854743041,umin=32767,var_off=(0x7fff; 0xffffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) 5: (75) if r3 s>= 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R3_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854808575,var_off=(0x8000000000007fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 6: (95) exit from 5 to 7: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 7: (d5) if r3 s<= 0x8000 goto pc+1 ; R3=scalar(umin=32769,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 8: (95) exit from 7 to 9: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 9: (07) r3 += -32767 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) <--- [*] 10: (95) exit What can be seen here is that R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) after the operation R3 += -32767 results in a 'malformed' constant, that is, R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=1,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)). Intersecting with var_off has not been done at that point via __update_reg_bounds(), which would have improved the umax to be equal to umin. Refactor the tnum <> min/max bounds information flow into a reg_bounds_sync() helper and use it consistently everywhere. After the fix, bounds have been corrected to R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) and thus the register is regarded as a 'proper' constant scalar of 0. After: func#0 @0 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 0: (b7) r0 = 1 ; R0_w=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) 1: (b7) r3 = 0 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 2: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 3: (87) r3 = -r3 ; R3_w=scalar() 4: (47) r3 |= 32767 ; R3_w=scalar(smin=-9223372036854743041,umin=32767,var_off=(0x7fff; 0xffffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) 5: (75) if r3 s>= 0x0 goto pc+1 ; R3_w=scalar(umin=9223372036854808575,var_off=(0x8000000000007fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 6: (95) exit from 5 to 7: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 7: (d5) if r3 s<= 0x8000 goto pc+1 ; R3=scalar(umin=32769,umax=9223372036854775807,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x7fffffffffff8000),s32_min=-2147450881,u32_min=32767) 8: (95) exit from 7 to 9: R0=scalar(imm=1,umin=1,umax=1,var_off=(0x1; 0x0)) R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) R3=scalar(umin=32767,umax=32768,var_off=(0x7fff; 0x8000)) R10=fp(off=0,imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) 9: (07) r3 += -32767 ; R3_w=scalar(imm=0,umax=0,var_off=(0x0; 0x0)) <--- [*] 10: (95) exit Fixes: b03c9f9fdc37 ("bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values") Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220701124727.11153-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
2022-07-01bpf: Fix incorrect verifier simulation around jmp32's jeq/jneDaniel Borkmann1-17/+24
Kuee reported a quirk in the jmp32's jeq/jne simulation, namely that the register value does not match expectations for the fall-through path. For example: Before fix: 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 0: (b7) r2 = 0 ; R2_w=P0 1: (b7) r6 = 563 ; R6_w=P563 2: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar() 3: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar() 4: (4c) w2 |= w6 ; R2_w=Pscalar(umin=563,umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x233; 0xfffffdcc),s32_min=-2147483085) R6_w=P563 5: (56) if w2 != 0x8 goto pc+1 ; R2_w=P571 <--- [*] 6: (95) exit R0 !read_ok After fix: 0: R1=ctx(off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 0: (b7) r2 = 0 ; R2_w=P0 1: (b7) r6 = 563 ; R6_w=P563 2: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar() 3: (87) r2 = -r2 ; R2_w=Pscalar() 4: (4c) w2 |= w6 ; R2_w=Pscalar(umin=563,umax=4294967295,var_off=(0x233; 0xfffffdcc),s32_min=-2147483085) R6_w=P563 5: (56) if w2 != 0x8 goto pc+1 ; R2_w=P8 <--- [*] 6: (95) exit R0 !read_ok As can be seen on line 5 for the branch fall-through path in R2 [*] is that given condition w2 != 0x8 is false, verifier should conclude that r2 = 8 as upper 32 bit are known to be zero. However, verifier incorrectly concludes that r2 = 571 which is far off. The problem is it only marks false{true}_reg as known in the switch for JE/NE case, but at the end of the function, it uses {false,true}_{64,32}off to update {false,true}_reg->var_off and they still hold the prior value of {false,true}_reg->var_off before it got marked as known. The subsequent __reg_combine_32_into_64() then propagates this old var_off and derives new bounds. The information between min/max bounds on {false,true}_reg from setting the register to known const combined with the {false,true}_reg->var_off based on the old information then derives wrong register data. Fix it by detangling the BPF_JEQ/BPF_JNE cases and updating relevant {false,true}_{64,32}off tnums along with the register marking to known constant. Fixes: 3f50f132d840 ("bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking") Reported-by: Kuee K1r0a <liulin063@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220701124727.11153-1-daniel@iogearbox.net
2022-06-29bpf: per-cgroup lsm flavorStanislav Fomichev1-0/+32
Allow attaching to lsm hooks in the cgroup context. Attaching to per-cgroup LSM works exactly like attaching to other per-cgroup hooks. New BPF_LSM_CGROUP is added to trigger new mode; the actual lsm hook we attach to is signaled via existing attach_btf_id. For the hooks that have 'struct socket' or 'struct sock' as its first argument, we use the cgroup associated with that socket. For the rest, we use 'current' cgroup (this is all on default hierarchy == v2 only). Note that for some hooks that work on 'struct sock' we still take the cgroup from 'current' because some of them work on the socket that hasn't been properly initialized yet. Behind the scenes, we allocate a shim program that is attached to the trampoline and runs cgroup effective BPF programs array. This shim has some rudimentary ref counting and can be shared between several programs attaching to the same lsm hook from different cgroups. Note that this patch bloats cgroup size because we add 211 cgroup_bpf_attach_type(s) for simplicity sake. This will be addressed in the subsequent patch. Also note that we only add non-sleepable flavor for now. To enable sleepable use-cases, bpf_prog_run_array_cg has to grab trace rcu, shim programs have to be freed via trace rcu, cgroup_bpf.effective should be also trace-rcu-managed + maybe some other changes that I'm not aware of. Reviewed-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220628174314.1216643-4-sdf@google.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-06-24bpf: Fix for use-after-free bug in inline_bpf_loopEduard Zingerman1-1/+1
As reported by Dan Carpenter, the following statements in inline_bpf_loop() might cause a use-after-free bug: struct bpf_prog *new_prog; // ... new_prog = bpf_patch_insn_data(env, position, insn_buf, *cnt); // ... env->prog->insnsi[call_insn_offset].imm = callback_offset; The bpf_patch_insn_data() might free the memory used by env->prog. Fixes: 1ade23711971 ("bpf: Inline calls to bpf_loop when callback is known") Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220624020613.548108-2-eddyz87@gmail.com
2022-06-24bpf: Replace hard-coded 0 with BPF_K in check_alu_opSimon Wang1-1/+1
Enhance readability a bit. Signed-off-by: Simon Wang <wangchuanguo@inspur.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220622031923.65692-1-wangchuanguo@inspur.com
2022-06-21bpf, x64: Add predicate for bpf2bpf with tailcalls support in JITTony Ambardar1-1/+2
The BPF core/verifier is hard-coded to permit mixing bpf2bpf and tail calls for only x86-64. Change the logic to instead rely on a new weak function 'bool bpf_jit_supports_subprog_tailcalls(void)', which a capable JIT backend can override. Update the x86-64 eBPF JIT to reflect this. Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <Tony.Ambardar@gmail.com> [jakub: drop MIPS bits and tweak patch subject] Signed-off-by: Jakub Sitnicki <jakub@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220617105735.733938-2-jakub@cloudflare.com
2022-06-20bpf: Inline calls to bpf_loop when callback is knownEduard Zingerman1-5/+175
Calls to `bpf_loop` are replaced with direct loops to avoid indirection. E.g. the following: bpf_loop(10, foo, NULL, 0); Is replaced by equivalent of the following: for (int i = 0; i < 10; ++i) foo(i, NULL); This transformation could be applied when: - callback is known and does not change during program execution; - flags passed to `bpf_loop` are always zero. Inlining logic works as follows: - During execution simulation function `update_loop_inline_state` tracks the following information for each `bpf_loop` call instruction: - is callback known and constant? - are flags constant and zero? - Function `optimize_bpf_loop` increases stack depth for functions where `bpf_loop` calls can be inlined and invokes `inline_bpf_loop` to apply the inlining. The additional stack space is used to spill registers R6, R7 and R8. These registers are used as loop counter, loop maximal bound and callback context parameter; Measurements using `benchs/run_bench_bpf_loop.sh` inside QEMU / KVM on i7-4710HQ CPU show a drop in latency from 14 ns/op to 2 ns/op. Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com> Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220620235344.569325-4-eddyz87@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-06-16bpf: Allow helpers to accept pointers with a fixed sizeMaxim Mikityanskiy1-11/+32
Before this commit, the BPF verifier required ARG_PTR_TO_MEM arguments to be followed by ARG_CONST_SIZE holding the size of the memory region. The helpers had to check that size in runtime. There are cases where the size expected by a helper is a compile-time constant. Checking it in runtime is an unnecessary overhead and waste of BPF registers. This commit allows helpers to accept pointers to memory without the corresponding ARG_CONST_SIZE, given that they define the memory region size in struct bpf_func_proto and use ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM type. arg_size is unionized with arg_btf_id to reduce the kernel image size, and it's valid because they are used by different argument types. Signed-off-by: Maxim Mikityanskiy <maximmi@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@nvidia.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220615134847.3753567-3-maximmi@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-06-16bpf: allow sleepable uprobe programs to attachDelyan Kratunov1-2/+2
uprobe and kprobe programs have the same program type, KPROBE, which is currently not allowed to load sleepable programs. To avoid adding a new UPROBE type, instead allow sleepable KPROBE programs to load and defer the is-it-actually-a-uprobe-program check to attachment time, where there's already validation of the corresponding perf_event. A corollary of this patch is that you can now load a sleepable kprobe program but cannot attach it. Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/fcd44a7cd204f372f6bb03ef794e829adeaef299.1655248076.git.delyank@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-06-07bpf: Add btf enum64 supportYonghong Song1-1/+1
Currently, BTF only supports upto 32bit enum value with BTF_KIND_ENUM. But in kernel, some enum indeed has 64bit values, e.g., in uapi bpf.h, we have enum { BPF_F_INDEX_MASK = 0xffffffffULL, BPF_F_CURRENT_CPU = BPF_F_INDEX_MASK, BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK = (0xfffffULL << 32), }; In this case, BTF_KIND_ENUM will encode the value of BPF_F_CTXLEN_MASK as 0, which certainly is incorrect. This patch added a new btf kind, BTF_KIND_ENUM64, which permits 64bit value to cover the above use case. The BTF_KIND_ENUM64 has the following three fields followed by the common type: struct bpf_enum64 { __u32 nume_off; __u32 val_lo32; __u32 val_hi32; }; Currently, btf type section has an alignment of 4 as all element types are u32. Representing the value with __u64 will introduce a pad for bpf_enum64 and may also introduce misalignment for the 64bit value. Hence, two members of val_hi32 and val_lo32 are chosen to avoid these issues. The kflag is also introduced for BTF_KIND_ENUM and BTF_KIND_ENUM64 to indicate whether the value is signed or unsigned. The kflag intends to provide consistent output of BTF C fortmat with the original source code. For example, the original BTF_KIND_ENUM bit value is 0xffffffff. The format C has two choices, printing out 0xffffffff or -1 and current libbpf prints out as unsigned value. But if the signedness is preserved in btf, the value can be printed the same as the original source code. The kflag value 0 means unsigned values, which is consistent to the default by libbpf and should also cover most cases as well. The new BTF_KIND_ENUM64 is intended to support the enum value represented as 64bit value. But it can represent all BTF_KIND_ENUM values as well. The compiler ([1]) and pahole will generate BTF_KIND_ENUM64 only if the value has to be represented with 64 bits. In addition, a static inline function btf_kind_core_compat() is introduced which will be used later when libbpf relo_core.c changed. Here the kernel shares the same relo_core.c with libbpf. [1] https://reviews.llvm.org/D124641 Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220607062600.3716578-1-yhs@fb.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-05-23bpf: Add dynptr data slicesJoanne Koong1-0/+23
This patch adds a new helper function void *bpf_dynptr_data(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u32 offset, u32 len); which returns a pointer to the underlying data of a dynptr. *len* must be a statically known value. The bpf program may access the returned data slice as a normal buffer (eg can do direct reads and writes), since the verifier associates the length with the returned pointer, and enforces that no out of bounds accesses occur. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-6-joannelkoong@gmail.com
2022-05-23bpf: Dynptr support for ring buffersJoanne Koong1-3/+49
Currently, our only way of writing dynamically-sized data into a ring buffer is through bpf_ringbuf_output but this incurs an extra memcpy cost. bpf_ringbuf_reserve + bpf_ringbuf_commit avoids this extra memcpy, but it can only safely support reservation sizes that are statically known since the verifier cannot guarantee that the bpf program won’t access memory outside the reserved space. The bpf_dynptr abstraction allows for dynamically-sized ring buffer reservations without the extra memcpy. There are 3 new APIs: long bpf_ringbuf_reserve_dynptr(void *ringbuf, u32 size, u64 flags, struct bpf_dynptr *ptr); void bpf_ringbuf_submit_dynptr(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u64 flags); void bpf_ringbuf_discard_dynptr(struct bpf_dynptr *ptr, u64 flags); These closely follow the functionalities of the original ringbuf APIs. For example, all ringbuffer dynptrs that have been reserved must be either submitted or discarded before the program exits. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-4-joannelkoong@gmail.com
2022-05-23bpf: Add bpf_dynptr_from_mem for local dynptrsJoanne Koong1-0/+6
This patch adds a new api bpf_dynptr_from_mem: long bpf_dynptr_from_mem(void *data, u32 size, u64 flags, struct bpf_dynptr *ptr); which initializes a dynptr to point to a bpf program's local memory. For now only local memory that is of reg type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE is supported. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-3-joannelkoong@gmail.com
2022-05-23bpf: Add verifier support for dynptrsJoanne Koong1-3/+185
This patch adds the bulk of the verifier work for supporting dynamic pointers (dynptrs) in bpf. A bpf_dynptr is opaque to the bpf program. It is a 16-byte structure defined internally as: struct bpf_dynptr_kern { void *data; u32 size; u32 offset; } __aligned(8); The upper 8 bits of *size* is reserved (it contains extra metadata about read-only status and dynptr type). Consequently, a dynptr only supports memory less than 16 MB. There are different types of dynptrs (eg malloc, ringbuf, ...). In this patchset, the most basic one, dynptrs to a bpf program's local memory, is added. For now only local memory that is of reg type PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE is supported. In the verifier, dynptr state information will be tracked in stack slots. When the program passes in an uninitialized dynptr (ARG_PTR_TO_DYNPTR | MEM_UNINIT), the stack slots corresponding to the frame pointer where the dynptr resides at are marked STACK_DYNPTR. For helper functions that take in initialized dynptrs (eg bpf_dynptr_read + bpf_dynptr_write which are added later in this patchset), the verifier enforces that the dynptr has been initialized properly by checking that their corresponding stack slots have been marked as STACK_DYNPTR. The 6th patch in this patchset adds test cases that the verifier should successfully reject, such as for example attempting to use a dynptr after doing a direct write into it inside the bpf program. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220523210712.3641569-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com
2022-05-23bpf: Suppress 'passing zero to PTR_ERR' warningKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-1/+1
Kernel Test Robot complains about passing zero to PTR_ERR for the said line, suppress it by using PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO. Fixes: c0a5a21c25f3 ("bpf: Allow storing referenced kptr in map") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220521132620.1976921-1-memxor@gmail.com
2022-05-20bpf: Add bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock_protoGeliang Tang1-0/+1
This patch implements a new struct bpf_func_proto, named bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock_proto. Define a new bpf_id BTF_SOCK_TYPE_MPTCP, and a new helper bpf_skc_to_mptcp_sock(), which invokes another new helper bpf_mptcp_sock_from_subflow() in net/mptcp/bpf.c to get struct mptcp_sock from a given subflow socket. v2: Emit BTF type, add func_id checks in verifier.c and bpf_trace.c, remove build check for CONFIG_BPF_JIT v5: Drop EXPORT_SYMBOL (Martin) Co-developed-by: Nicolas Rybowski <nicolas.rybowski@tessares.net> Co-developed-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Rybowski <nicolas.rybowski@tessares.net> Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@tessares.net> Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220519233016.105670-2-mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com
2022-05-13bpf: Add MEM_UNINIT as a bpf_type_flagJoanne Koong1-20/+8
Instead of having uninitialized versions of arguments as separate bpf_arg_types (eg ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM as the uninitialized version of ARG_PTR_TO_MEM), we can instead use MEM_UNINIT as a bpf_type_flag modifier to denote that the argument is uninitialized. Doing so cleans up some of the logic in the verifier. We no longer need to do two checks against an argument type (eg "if (base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_MEM || base_type(arg_type) == ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM)"), since uninitialized and initialized versions of the same argument type will now share the same base type. In the near future, MEM_UNINIT will be used by dynptr helper functions as well. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220509224257.3222614-2-joannelkoong@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-05-11bpf: add bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem for percpu mapFeng Zhou1-2/+15
Add new ebpf helpers bpf_map_lookup_percpu_elem. The implementation method is relatively simple, refer to the implementation method of map_lookup_elem of percpu map, increase the parameters of cpu, and obtain it according to the specified cpu. Signed-off-by: Feng Zhou <zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220511093854.411-2-zhoufeng.zf@bytedance.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-05-09bpf: Remove unused parameter from find_kfunc_desc_btf()Yuntao Wang1-5/+4
The func_id parameter in find_kfunc_desc_btf() is not used, get rid of it. Fixes: 2357672c54c3 ("bpf: Introduce BPF support for kernel module function calls") Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220505070114.3522522-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
2022-04-25bpf: Make BTF type match stricter for release argumentsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-3/+15
The current of behavior of btf_struct_ids_match for release arguments is that when type match fails, it retries with first member type again (recursively). Since the offset is already 0, this is akin to just casting the pointer in normal C, since if type matches it was just embedded inside parent sturct as an object. However, we want to reject cases for release function type matching, be it kfunc or BPF helpers. An example is the following: struct foo { struct bar b; }; struct foo *v = acq_foo(); rel_bar(&v->b); // btf_struct_ids_match fails btf_types_are_same, then // retries with first member type and succeeds, while // it should fail. Hence, don't walk the struct and only rely on btf_types_are_same for strict mode. All users of strict mode must be dealing with zero offset anyway, since otherwise they would want the struct to be walked. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-10-memxor@gmail.com
2022-04-25bpf: Prevent escaping of kptr loaded from mapsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-7/+28
While we can guarantee that even for unreferenced kptr, the object pointer points to being freed etc. can be handled by the verifier's exception handling (normal load patching to PROBE_MEM loads), we still cannot allow the user to pass these pointers to BPF helpers and kfunc, because the same exception handling won't be done for accesses inside the kernel. The same is true if a referenced pointer is loaded using normal load instruction. Since the reference is not guaranteed to be held while the pointer is used, it must be marked as untrusted. Hence introduce a new type flag, PTR_UNTRUSTED, which is used to mark all registers loading unreferenced and referenced kptr from BPF maps, and ensure they can never escape the BPF program and into the kernel by way of calling stable/unstable helpers. In check_ptr_to_btf_access, the !type_may_be_null check to reject type flags is still correct, as apart from PTR_MAYBE_NULL, only MEM_USER, MEM_PERCPU, and PTR_UNTRUSTED may be set for PTR_TO_BTF_ID. The first two are checked inside the function and rejected using a proper error message, but we still want to allow dereference of untrusted case. Also, we make sure to inherit PTR_UNTRUSTED when chain of pointers are walked, so that this flag is never dropped once it has been set on a PTR_TO_BTF_ID (i.e. trusted to untrusted transition can only be in one direction). In convert_ctx_accesses, extend the switch case to consider untrusted PTR_TO_BTF_ID in addition to normal PTR_TO_BTF_ID for PROBE_MEM conversion for BPF_LDX. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-5-memxor@gmail.com
2022-04-25bpf: Allow storing referenced kptr in mapKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-12/+86
Extending the code in previous commits, introduce referenced kptr support, which needs to be tagged using 'kptr_ref' tag instead. Unlike unreferenced kptr, referenced kptr have a lot more restrictions. In addition to the type matching, only a newly introduced bpf_kptr_xchg helper is allowed to modify the map value at that offset. This transfers the referenced pointer being stored into the map, releasing the references state for the program, and returning the old value and creating new reference state for the returned pointer. Similar to unreferenced pointer case, return value for this case will also be PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL. The reference for the returned pointer must either be eventually released by calling the corresponding release function, otherwise it must be transferred into another map. It is also allowed to call bpf_kptr_xchg with a NULL pointer, to clear the value, and obtain the old value if any. BPF_LDX, BPF_STX, and BPF_ST cannot access referenced kptr. A future commit will permit using BPF_LDX for such pointers, but attempt at making it safe, since the lifetime of object won't be guaranteed. There are valid reasons to enforce the restriction of permitting only bpf_kptr_xchg to operate on referenced kptr. The pointer value must be consistent in face of concurrent modification, and any prior values contained in the map must also be released before a new one is moved into the map. To ensure proper transfer of this ownership, bpf_kptr_xchg returns the old value, which the verifier would require the user to either free or move into another map, and releases the reference held for the pointer being moved in. In the future, direct BPF_XCHG instruction may also be permitted to work like bpf_kptr_xchg helper. Note that process_kptr_func doesn't have to call check_helper_mem_access, since we already disallow rdonly/wronly flags for map, which is what check_map_access_type checks, and we already ensure the PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE refers to kptr by obtaining its off_desc, so check_map_access is also not required. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-4-memxor@gmail.com
2022-04-25bpf: Tag argument to be released in bpf_func_protoKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-33/+43
Add a new type flag for bpf_arg_type that when set tells verifier that for a release function, that argument's register will be the one for which meta.ref_obj_id will be set, and which will then be released using release_reference. To capture the regno, introduce a new field release_regno in bpf_call_arg_meta. This would be required in the next patch, where we may either pass NULL or a refcounted pointer as an argument to the release function bpf_kptr_xchg. Just releasing only when meta.ref_obj_id is set is not enough, as there is a case where the type of argument needed matches, but the ref_obj_id is set to 0. Hence, we must enforce that whenever meta.ref_obj_id is zero, the register that is to be released can only be NULL for a release function. Since we now indicate whether an argument is to be released in bpf_func_proto itself, is_release_function helper has lost its utitlity, hence refactor code to work without it, and just rely on meta.release_regno to know when to release state for a ref_obj_id. Still, the restriction of one release argument and only one ref_obj_id passed to BPF helper or kfunc remains. This may be lifted in the future. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-3-memxor@gmail.com
2022-04-25bpf: Allow storing unreferenced kptr in mapKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-10/+151
This commit introduces a new pointer type 'kptr' which can be embedded in a map value to hold a PTR_TO_BTF_ID stored by a BPF program during its invocation. When storing such a kptr, BPF program's PTR_TO_BTF_ID register must have the same type as in the map value's BTF, and loading a kptr marks the destination register as PTR_TO_BTF_ID with the correct kernel BTF and BTF ID. Such kptr are unreferenced, i.e. by the time another invocation of the BPF program loads this pointer, the object which the pointer points to may not longer exist. Since PTR_TO_BTF_ID loads (using BPF_LDX) are patched to PROBE_MEM loads by the verifier, it would safe to allow user to still access such invalid pointer, but passing such pointers into BPF helpers and kfuncs should not be permitted. A future patch in this series will close this gap. The flexibility offered by allowing programs to dereference such invalid pointers while being safe at runtime frees the verifier from doing complex lifetime tracking. As long as the user may ensure that the object remains valid, it can ensure data read by it from the kernel object is valid. The user indicates that a certain pointer must be treated as kptr capable of accepting stores of PTR_TO_BTF_ID of a certain type, by using a BTF type tag 'kptr' on the pointed to type of the pointer. Then, this information is recorded in the object BTF which will be passed into the kernel by way of map's BTF information. The name and kind from the map value BTF is used to look up the in-kernel type, and the actual BTF and BTF ID is recorded in the map struct in a new kptr_off_tab member. For now, only storing pointers to structs is permitted. An example of this specification is shown below: #define __kptr __attribute__((btf_type_tag("kptr"))) struct map_value { ... struct task_struct __kptr *task; ... }; Then, in a BPF program, user may store PTR_TO_BTF_ID with the type task_struct into the map, and then load it later. Note that the destination register is marked PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL, as the verifier cannot know whether the value is NULL or not statically, it must treat all potential loads at that map value offset as loading a possibly NULL pointer. Only BPF_LDX, BPF_STX, and BPF_ST (with insn->imm = 0 to denote NULL) are allowed instructions that can access such a pointer. On BPF_LDX, the destination register is updated to be a PTR_TO_BTF_ID, and on BPF_STX, it is checked whether the source register type is a PTR_TO_BTF_ID with same BTF type as specified in the map BTF. The access size must always be BPF_DW. For the map in map support, the kptr_off_tab for outer map is copied from the inner map's kptr_off_tab. It was chosen to do a deep copy instead of introducing a refcount to kptr_off_tab, because the copy only needs to be done when paramterizing using inner_map_fd in the map in map case, hence would be unnecessary for all other users. It is not permitted to use MAP_FREEZE command and mmap for BPF map having kptrs, similar to the bpf_timer case. A kptr also requires that BPF program has both read and write access to the map (hence both BPF_F_RDONLY_PROG and BPF_F_WRONLY_PROG are disallowed). Note that check_map_access must be called from both check_helper_mem_access and for the BPF instructions, hence the kptr check must distinguish between ACCESS_DIRECT and ACCESS_HELPER, and reject ACCESS_HELPER cases. We rename stack_access_src to bpf_access_src and reuse it for this purpose. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220424214901.2743946-2-memxor@gmail.com
2022-04-21bpf: Move check_ptr_off_reg before check_map_accessKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-38/+38
Some functions in next patch want to use this function, and those functions will be called by check_map_access, hence move it before check_map_access. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220415160354.1050687-3-memxor@gmail.com
2022-04-06bpf: Reject writes for PTR_TO_MAP_KEY in check_helper_mem_accessKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+5
It is not permitted to write to PTR_TO_MAP_KEY, but the current code in check_helper_mem_access would allow for it, reject this case as well, as helpers taking ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM also take PTR_TO_MAP_KEY. Fixes: 69c087ba6225 ("bpf: Add bpf_for_each_map_elem() helper") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-4-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-04-06bpf: Check PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY in check_helper_mem_accessKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-1/+11
The commit being fixed was aiming to disallow users from incorrectly obtaining writable pointer to memory that is only meant to be read. This is enforced now using a MEM_RDONLY flag. For instance, in case of global percpu variables, when the BTF type is not struct (e.g. bpf_prog_active), the verifier marks register type as PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY from bpf_this_cpu_ptr or bpf_per_cpu_ptr helpers. However, when passing such pointer to kfunc, global funcs, or BPF helpers, in check_helper_mem_access, there is no expectation MEM_RDONLY flag will be set, hence it is checked as pointer to writable memory. Later, verifier sets up argument type of global func as PTR_TO_MEM | PTR_MAYBE_NULL, so user can use a global func to get around the limitations imposed by this flag. This check will also cover global non-percpu variables that may be introduced in kernel BTF in future. Also, we update the log message for PTR_TO_BUF case to be similar to PTR_TO_MEM case, so that the reason for error is clear to user. Fixes: 34d3a78c681e ("bpf: Make per_cpu_ptr return rdonly PTR_TO_MEM.") Reviewed-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-3-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-04-06bpf: Do write access check for kfunc and global funcKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-15/+29
When passing pointer to some map value to kfunc or global func, in verifier we are passing meta as NULL to various functions, which uses meta->raw_mode to check whether memory is being written to. Since some kfunc or global funcs may also write to memory pointers they receive as arguments, we must check for write access to memory. E.g. in some case map may be read only and this will be missed by current checks. However meta->raw_mode allows for uninitialized memory (e.g. on stack), since there is not enough info available through BTF, we must perform one call for read access (raw_mode = false), and one for write access (raw_mode = true). Fixes: e5069b9c23b3 ("bpf: Support pointers in global func args") Fixes: d583691c47dc ("bpf: Introduce mem, size argument pair support for kfunc") Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220319080827.73251-2-memxor@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
2022-03-21bpf: Fix warning for cast from restricted gfp_t in verifierJoanne Koong1-2/+2
This fixes the sparse warning reported by the kernel test robot: kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13499:47: sparse: warning: cast from restricted gfp_t kernel/bpf/verifier.c:13501:47: sparse: warning: cast from restricted gfp_t This fix can be verified locally by running: 1) wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O make.cross 2) chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross 3) COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 ./make.cross C=1 CF='-fdiagnostic-prefix -D__CHECK_ENDIAN__' Fixes: b00fa38a9c1c ("bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storage") Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321185802.824223-1-joannekoong@fb.com
2022-03-21Revert "bpf: Add support to inline bpf_get_func_ip helper on x86"Jiri Olsa1-20/+1
This reverts commit 97ee4d20ee67eb462581a7af01442de6586e390b. Following change is adding more complexity to bpf_get_func_ip helper for kprobe_multi programs, which can't be inlined easily. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220321070113.1449167-2-jolsa@kernel.org
2022-03-20bpf: Enable non-atomic allocations in local storageJoanne Koong1-0/+20
Currently, local storage memory can only be allocated atomically (GFP_ATOMIC). This restriction is too strict for sleepable bpf programs. In this patch, the verifier detects whether the program is sleepable, and passes the corresponding GFP_KERNEL or GFP_ATOMIC flag as a 5th argument to bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_get. This flag will propagate down to the local storage functions that allocate memory. Please note that bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem functions are invoked by userspace applications through syscalls. Preemption is disabled before bpf_task/sk/inode_storage_update_elem is called, which means they will always have to allocate memory atomically. Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org> Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220318045553.3091807-2-joannekoong@fb.com
2022-03-17bpf: Add support to inline bpf_get_func_ip helper on x86Jiri Olsa1-1/+20
Adding support to inline it on x86, because it's single load instruction. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220316122419.933957-6-jolsa@kernel.org
2022-03-16bpf: Fix net.core.bpf_jit_harden raceHou Tao1-2/+3
It is the bpf_jit_harden counterpart to commit 60b58afc96c9 ("bpf: fix net.core.bpf_jit_enable race"). bpf_jit_harden will be tested twice for each subprog if there are subprogs in bpf program and constant blinding may increase the length of program, so when running "./test_progs -t subprogs" and toggling bpf_jit_harden between 0 and 2, jit_subprogs may fail because constant blinding increases the length of subprog instructions during extra passs. So cache the value of bpf_jit_blinding_enabled() during program allocation, and use the cached value during constant blinding, subprog JITing and args tracking of tail call. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220309123321.2400262-4-houtao1@huawei.com
2022-03-10bpf: Use offsetofend() to simplify macro definitionYuntao Wang1-2/+1
Use offsetofend() instead of offsetof() + sizeof() to simplify MIN_BPF_LINEINFO_SIZE macro definition. Signed-off-by: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Acked-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220310161518.534544-1-ytcoode@gmail.com
2022-03-08bpf: Determine buf_info inside check_buffer_access()Shung-Hsi Yu1-9/+3
Instead of determining buf_info string in the caller of check_buffer_access(), we can determine whether the register type is read-only through type_is_rdonly_mem() helper inside check_buffer_access() and construct buf_info, making the code slightly cleaner. Signed-off-by: Shung-Hsi Yu <shung-hsi.yu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/YiWYLnAkEZXBP/gH@syu-laptop
2022-03-05bpf: Reject programs that try to load __percpu memory.Hao Luo1-10/+14
With the introduction of the btf_type_tag "percpu", we can add a MEM_PERCPU to identify those pointers that point to percpu memory. The ability of differetiating percpu pointers from regular memory pointers have two benefits: 1. It forbids unexpected use of percpu pointers, such as direct loads. In kernel, there are special functions used for accessing percpu memory. Directly loading percpu memory is meaningless. We already have BPF helpers like bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() that wrap the kernel percpu functions. So we can now convert percpu pointers into regular pointers in a safe way. 2. Previously, bpf_per_cpu_ptr() and bpf_this_cpu_ptr() only work on PTR_TO_PERCPU_BTF_ID, a special reg_type which describes static percpu variables in kernel (we rely on pahole to encode them into vmlinux BTF). Now, since we can identify __percpu tagged pointers, we can also identify dynamically allocated percpu memory as well. It means we can use bpf_xxx_cpu_ptr() on dynamic percpu memory. This would be very convenient when accessing fields like "cgroup->rstat_cpu". Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-4-haoluo@google.com
2022-03-05bpf: Fix checking PTR_TO_BTF_ID in check_mem_accessHao Luo1-1/+2
With the introduction of MEM_USER in commit c6f1bfe89ac9 ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way") PTR_TO_BTF_ID can be combined with a MEM_USER tag. Therefore, most likely, when we compare reg_type against PTR_TO_BTF_ID, we want to use the reg's base_type. Previously the check in check_mem_access() wants to say: if the reg is BTF_ID but not NULL, the execution flow falls into the 'then' branch. But now a reg of (BTF_ID | MEM_USER), which should go into the 'then' branch, goes into the 'else'. The end results before and after this patch are the same: regs tagged with MEM_USER get rejected, but not in a way we intended. So fix the condition, the error message now is correct. Before (log from commit 696c39011538): $ ./test_progs -v -n 22/3 ... libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 136561 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 invalid mem access 'user_ptr_' Now: libbpf: prog 'test_user1': BPF program load failed: Permission denied libbpf: prog 'test_user1': -- BEGIN PROG LOAD LOG -- R1 type=ctx expected=fp 0: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0 ; int BPF_PROG(test_user1, struct bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 *arg) 0: (79) r1 = *(u64 *)(r1 +0) func 'bpf_testmod_test_btf_type_tag_user_1' arg0 has btf_id 104036 type STRUCT 'bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1' 1: R1_w=user_ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1(id=0,ref_obj_id=0,off=0,imm=0) ; g = arg->a; 1: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +0) R1 is ptr_bpf_testmod_btf_type_tag_1 access user memory: off=0 Note the error message for the reason of rejection. Fixes: c6f1bfe89ac9 ("bpf: reject program if a __user tagged memory accessed in kernel way") Signed-off-by: Hao Luo <haoluo@google.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304191657.981240-2-haoluo@google.com
2022-03-05bpf: Harden register offset checks for release helpers and kfuncsKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-3/+22
Let's ensure that the PTR_TO_BTF_ID reg being passed in to release BPF helpers and kfuncs always has its offset set to 0. While not a real problem now, there's a very real possibility this will become a problem when more and more kfuncs are exposed, and more BPF helpers are added which can release PTR_TO_BTF_ID. Previous commits already protected against non-zero var_off. One of the case we are concerned about now is when we have a type that can be returned by e.g. an acquire kfunc: struct foo { int a; int b; struct bar b; }; ... and struct bar is also a type that can be returned by another acquire kfunc. Then, doing the following sequence: struct foo *f = bpf_get_foo(); // acquire kfunc if (!f) return 0; bpf_put_bar(&f->b); // release kfunc ... would work with the current code, since the btf_struct_ids_match takes reg->off into account for matching pointer type with release kfunc argument type, but would obviously be incorrect, and most likely lead to a kernel crash. A test has been included later to prevent regressions in this area. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-5-memxor@gmail.com
2022-03-05bpf: Disallow negative offset in check_ptr_off_regKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-0/+6
check_ptr_off_reg only allows fixed offset to be set for PTR_TO_BTF_ID, where reg->off < 0 doesn't make sense. This would shift the pointer backwards, and fails later in btf_struct_ids_match or btf_struct_walk due to out of bounds access (since offset is interpreted as unsigned). Improve the verifier by rejecting this case by using a better error message for BPF helpers and kfunc, by putting a check inside the check_func_arg_reg_off function. Also, update existing verifier selftests to work with new error string. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-4-memxor@gmail.com
2022-03-05bpf: Add check_func_arg_reg_off functionKumar Kartikeya Dwivedi1-28/+41
Lift the list of register types allowed for having fixed and variable offsets when passed as helper function arguments into a common helper, so that they can be reused for kfunc checks in later commits. Keeping a common helper aids maintainability and allows us to follow the same consistent rules across helpers and kfuncs. Also, convert check_func_arg to use this function. Signed-off-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220304224645.3677453-2-memxor@gmail.com
2022-03-03bpf: Small BPF verifier log improvementsMykola Lysenko1-29/+35
In particular these include: 1) Remove output of inv for scalars in print_verifier_state 2) Replace inv with scalar in verifier error messages 3) Remove _value suffixes for umin/umax/s32_min/etc (except map_value) 4) Remove output of id=0 5) Remove output of ref_obj_id=0 Signed-off-by: Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220301222745.1667206-1-mykolal@fb.com
2022-02-15bpf: Reject kfunc calls that overflow insn->immHou Tao1-1/+10
Now kfunc call uses s32 to represent the offset between the address of kfunc and __bpf_call_base, but it doesn't check whether or not s32 will be overflowed. The overflow is possible when kfunc is in module and the offset between module and kernel is greater than 2GB. Take arm64 as an example, before commit b2eed9b58811 ("arm64/kernel: kaslr: reduce module randomization range to 2 GB"), the offset between module symbol and __bpf_call_base will in 4GB range due to KASLR and may overflow s32. So add an extra checking to reject these invalid kfunc calls. Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220215065732.3179408-1-houtao1@huawei.com