| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|---|
|
Introduce the support code for emulating a GICv2 on top of GICv3
hardware.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Move the GICv2 world switch code into its own file, and add the
necessary indirection to the arm64 switch code.
Also introduce a new type field to the vgic_params structure.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
So far, irqchip_in_kernel() was implemented by testing the value of
vctrl_base, which worked fine with GICv2.
With GICv3, this field is useless, as we're using system registers
instead of a emmory mapped interface. To solve this, add a boolean
flag indicating if the we're using a vgic or not.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Brutally hack the innocent vgic code, and move the GICv2 specific code
to its own file, using vgic_ops and vgic_params as a way to pass
information between the two blocks.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Move all the data specific to a given GIC implementation into its own
little structure.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Move the code dealing with enabling the VGIC on to vgic_ops.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Instead of directly messing with with the GICH_VMCR bits for the CPU
interface save/restore code, add accessors that encode/decode the
entire set of registers exposed by VMCR.
Not the most efficient thing, but given that this code is only used
by the save/restore code, performance is far from being critical.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Move the code dealing with LR underflow handling to its own functions,
and make them accessible through vgic_ops.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Instead of directly dealing with the GICH_MISR bits, move the code to
its own function and use a couple of public flags to represent the
actual state.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Move the GICH_EISR access to its own function.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Move the GICH_ELRSR access to its own functions, and add them to
the vgic_ops structure.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
In order to split the various register manipulation from the main vgic
code, introduce a vgic_ops structure, and start by abstracting the
LR manipulation code with a couple of accessors.
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
In order to make way for the GICv3 registers, move the v2-specific
registers to their own structure.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
|
|
Add a stub for kvm_vgic_addr when compiling without
CONFIG_KVM_ARM_VGIC. The usefulness of this configurarion is extremely
doubtful, but let's fix it anyway (until we decide that we'll always
support a VGIC).
Reported-by: Michele Paolino <m.paolino@virtualopensystems.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
|
|
Support setting the distributor and cpu interface base addresses in the
VM physical address space through the KVM_{SET,GET}_DEVICE_ATTR API
in addition to the ARM specific API.
This has the added benefit of being able to share more code in user
space and do things in a uniform manner.
Also deprecate the older API at the same time, but backwards
compatibility will be maintained.
Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
|
|
The Versatile Express TC2 board, which we use as our main emulated
platform in QEMU, defines 160+32 == 192 interrupts, so limiting the
number of interrupts to 128 is not quite going to cut it for real board
emulation.
Note that this didn't use to be a problem because QEMU was buggy and
only defined 128 interrupts until recently.
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
|
|
As KVM/arm64 is looming on the horizon, it makes sense to move some
of the common code to a single location in order to reduce duplication.
The code could live anywhere. Actually, most of KVM is already built
with a bunch of ugly ../../.. hacks in the various Makefiles, so we're
not exactly talking about style here. But maybe it is time to start
moving into a less ugly direction.
The include files must be in a "public" location, as they are accessed
from non-KVM files (arch/arm/kernel/asm-offsets.c).
For this purpose, introduce two new locations:
- virt/kvm/arm/ : x86 and ia64 already share the ioapic code in
virt/kvm, so this could be seen as a (very ugly) precedent.
- include/kvm/ : there is already an include/xen, and while the
intent is slightly different, this seems as good a location as
any
Eventually, we should probably have independant Makefiles at every
levels (just like everywhere else in the kernel), but this is just
the first step.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
|
