summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)AuthorFilesLines
2021-11-18Merge tag 'for-5.16-rc1-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-5/+13
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: "Several xes and one old ioctl deprecation. Namely there's fix for crashes/warnings with lzo compression that was suspected to be caused by first pull merge resolution, but it was a different bug. Summary: - regression fix for a crash in lzo due to missing boundary checks of the page array - fix crashes on ARM64 due to missing barriers when synchronizing status bits between work queues - silence lockdep when reading chunk tree during mount - fix false positive warning in integrity checker on devices with disabled write caching - fix signedness of bitfields in scrub - start deprecation of balance v1 ioctl" * tag 'for-5.16-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: deprecate BTRFS_IOC_BALANCE ioctl btrfs: make 1-bit bit-fields of scrub_page unsigned int btrfs: check-integrity: fix a warning on write caching disabled disk btrfs: silence lockdep when reading chunk tree during mount btrfs: fix memory ordering between normal and ordered work functions btrfs: fix a out-of-bound access in copy_compressed_data_to_page()
2021-11-16btrfs: silence lockdep when reading chunk tree during mountFilipe Manana1-5/+13
Often some test cases like btrfs/161 trigger lockdep splats that complain about possible unsafe lock scenario due to the fact that during mount, when reading the chunk tree we end up calling blkdev_get_by_path() while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree. That produces a lockdep splat like the following: [ 3653.683975] ====================================================== [ 3653.685148] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 3653.686301] 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 Not tainted [ 3653.687239] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 3653.688400] mount/447465 is trying to acquire lock: [ 3653.689320] ffff8c6b0c76e528 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.691054] but task is already holding lock: [ 3653.692155] ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.693978] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 3653.695510] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 3653.696915] -> #3 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}: [ 3653.698053] down_read_nested+0x4b/0x140 [ 3653.698893] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.699988] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x31/0x40 [btrfs] [ 3653.701205] btrfs_search_slot+0x537/0xc00 [btrfs] [ 3653.702234] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x32/0x70 [btrfs] [ 3653.703332] btrfs_init_new_device+0x563/0x15b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.704439] btrfs_ioctl+0x2110/0x3530 [btrfs] [ 3653.705405] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.706215] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.706990] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.708040] -> #2 (sb_internal#2){.+.+}-{0:0}: [ 3653.708994] lock_release+0x13d/0x4a0 [ 3653.709533] up_write+0x18/0x160 [ 3653.710017] btrfs_sync_file+0x3f3/0x5b0 [btrfs] [ 3653.710699] __loop_update_dio+0xbd/0x170 [loop] [ 3653.711360] lo_ioctl+0x3b1/0x8a0 [loop] [ 3653.711929] block_ioctl+0x48/0x50 [ 3653.712442] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 [ 3653.712991] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.713519] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.714233] -> #1 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.715026] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.715648] lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] [ 3653.716275] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0x90 [ 3653.716867] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x142/0x320 [ 3653.717537] blkdev_open+0x5e/0xa0 [ 3653.718043] do_dentry_open+0x163/0x390 [ 3653.718604] path_openat+0x3f0/0xa80 [ 3653.719128] do_filp_open+0xa9/0x150 [ 3653.719652] do_sys_openat2+0x97/0x160 [ 3653.720197] __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 [ 3653.720766] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.721285] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.721986] -> #0 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: [ 3653.722775] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.723348] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.723867] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.724394] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.725041] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.725614] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726332] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.726999] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.727739] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.728384] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.729130] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.729676] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.730192] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.730800] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.731427] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.731970] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.732486] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.732997] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.733560] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.734080] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.734782] other info that might help us debug this: [ 3653.735784] Chain exists of: &disk->open_mutex --> sb_internal#2 --> btrfs-chunk-00 [ 3653.737123] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 3653.737865] CPU0 CPU1 [ 3653.738435] ---- ---- [ 3653.739007] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.739449] lock(sb_internal#2); [ 3653.740193] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 3653.740955] lock(&disk->open_mutex); [ 3653.741431] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 3653.742176] 3 locks held by mount/447465: [ 3653.742739] #0: ffff8c6acf85c0e8 (&type->s_umount_key#44/1){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: alloc_super+0xd5/0x3b0 [ 3653.744114] #1: ffffffffc0b28f70 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x59/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.745563] #2: ffff8c6b0a9f39e0 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x24/0x110 [btrfs] [ 3653.747066] stack backtrace: [ 3653.747723] CPU: 4 PID: 447465 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.15.0-rc7-btrfs-next-103 #1 [ 3653.748873] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014 [ 3653.750592] Call Trace: [ 3653.750967] dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 [ 3653.751526] check_noncircular+0xf3/0x110 [ 3653.752136] ? stack_trace_save+0x4b/0x70 [ 3653.752748] __lock_acquire+0x130e/0x2210 [ 3653.753356] lock_acquire+0xd7/0x310 [ 3653.753898] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.754596] ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140 [ 3653.755125] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.755729] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.756338] __mutex_lock+0x92/0x900 [ 3653.756794] ? blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.757400] ? do_raw_spin_unlock+0x4b/0xa0 [ 3653.757930] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x29/0x40 [ 3653.758437] ? bd_prepare_to_claim+0x129/0x150 [ 3653.758999] ? trace_module_get+0x2b/0xd0 [ 3653.759508] ? try_module_get.part.0+0x50/0x80 [ 3653.760072] blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xe7/0x320 [ 3653.760661] ? devcgroup_check_permission+0xc1/0x1f0 [ 3653.761288] blkdev_get_by_path+0xb8/0xd0 [ 3653.761797] btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 [btrfs] [ 3653.762454] open_fs_devices+0xd7/0x2c0 [btrfs] [ 3653.763055] ? clone_fs_devices+0x8f/0x170 [btrfs] [ 3653.763689] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3ad/0x870 [btrfs] [ 3653.764370] ? kvm_sched_clock_read+0x14/0x40 [ 3653.764922] open_ctree+0xb8e/0x17bf [btrfs] [ 3653.765493] ? super_setup_bdi_name+0x79/0xd0 [ 3653.766043] btrfs_mount_root.cold+0x12/0xde [btrfs] [ 3653.766780] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.767488] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.767979] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.768548] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.769076] vfs_kern_mount.part.0+0x71/0xb0 [ 3653.769718] btrfs_mount+0x11d/0x3a0 [btrfs] [ 3653.770381] ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0x3f/0x80 [ 3653.771086] ? kfree+0x1f2/0x3c0 [ 3653.771574] legacy_get_tree+0x30/0x50 [ 3653.772136] vfs_get_tree+0x28/0xc0 [ 3653.772673] path_mount+0x2d4/0xbe0 [ 3653.773201] __x64_sys_mount+0x103/0x140 [ 3653.773793] do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0 [ 3653.774333] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [ 3653.775094] RIP: 0033:0x7f648bc45aaa This happens because through btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), which is called only during mount, ends up acquiring the mutex open_mutex of a block device while holding a read lock on a leaf of the chunk tree while other paths need to acquire other locks before locking extent buffers of the chunk tree. Since at mount time when we call btrfs_read_chunk_tree() we know that we don't have other tasks running in parallel and modifying the chunk tree, we can simply skip locking of chunk tree extent buffers. So do that and move the assertion that checks the fs is not yet mounted to the top block of btrfs_read_chunk_tree(), with a comment before doing it. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-11-01Merge tag 'for-5.16-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-256/+336
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs updates from David Sterba: "The updates this time are more under the hood and enhancing existing features (subpage with compression and zoned namespaces). Performance related: - misc small inode logging improvements (+3% throughput, -11% latency on sample dbench workload) - more efficient directory logging: bulk item insertion, less tree searches and locking - speed up bulk insertion of items into a b-tree, which is used when logging directories, when running delayed items for directories (fsync and transaction commits) and when running the slow path (full sync) of an fsync (bulk creation run time -4%, deletion -12%) Core: - continued subpage support - make defragmentation work - make compression write work - zoned mode - support ZNS (zoned namespaces), zone capacity is number of usable blocks in each zone - add dedicated block group (zoned) for relocation, to prevent out of order writes in some cases - greedy block group reclaim, pick the ones with least usable space first - preparatory work for send protocol updates - error handling improvements - cleanups and refactoring Fixes: - lockdep warnings - in show_devname callback, on seeding device - device delete on loop device due to conversions to workqueues - fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications - fix tracking of missing device count and status" * tag 'for-5.16-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: (140 commits) btrfs: remove root argument from check_item_in_log() btrfs: remove root argument from add_link() btrfs: remove root argument from btrfs_unlink_inode() btrfs: remove root argument from drop_one_dir_item() btrfs: clear MISSING device status bit in btrfs_close_one_device btrfs: call btrfs_check_rw_degradable only if there is a missing device btrfs: send: prepare for v2 protocol btrfs: fix comment about sector sizes supported in 64K systems btrfs: update device path inode time instead of bd_inode fs: export an inode_update_time helper btrfs: fix deadlock when defragging transparent huge pages btrfs: sysfs: convert scnprintf and snprintf to sysfs_emit btrfs: make btrfs_super_block size match BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE btrfs: update comments for chunk allocation -ENOSPC cases btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modifications btrfs: zoned: use greedy gc for auto reclaim btrfs: check-integrity: stop storing the block device name in btrfsic_dev_state btrfs: use btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path in dev removal ioctls btrfs: add a btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path helper btrfs: handle device lookup with btrfs_dev_lookup_args ...
2021-11-01Merge tag 'for-5.16/inode-sync-2021-10-29' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-blockLinus Torvalds1-1/+1
Pull block inode sync updates from Jens Axboe: "This contains improvements to how bdev inode syncing is handled, unifying the API" * tag 'for-5.16/inode-sync-2021-10-29' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: block: simplify the block device syncing code ntfs3: use sync_blockdev_nowait fat: use sync_blockdev_nowait btrfs: use sync_blockdev xen-blkback: use sync_blockdev block: remove __sync_blockdev fs: remove __sync_filesystem
2021-10-29btrfs: clear MISSING device status bit in btrfs_close_one_deviceLi Zhang1-1/+3
Reported bug: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/389 There's a problem with scrub reporting aborted status but returning error code 0, on a filesystem with missing and readded device. Roughly these steps: - mkfs -d raid1 dev1 dev2 - fill with data - unmount - make dev1 disappear - mount -o degraded - copy more data - make dev1 appear again Running scrub afterwards reports that the command was aborted, but the system log message says the exit code was 0. It seems that the cause of the error is decrementing fs_devices->missing_devices but not clearing device->dev_state. Every time we umount filesystem, it would call close_ctree, And it would eventually involve btrfs_close_one_device to close the device, but it only decrements fs_devices->missing_devices but does not clear the device BTRFS_DEV_STATE_MISSING bit. Worse, this bug will cause Integer Overflow, because every time umount, fs_devices->missing_devices will decrease. If fs_devices->missing_devices value hit 0, it would overflow. With added debugging: loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 1 transid 21 /dev/loop1 scanned by systemd-udevd (2311) loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 56ad51f1-5523-463b-8547-c19486c51ebb devid 2 transid 17 /dev/loop2 scanned by systemd-udevd (2313) BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 0 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): using free space tree BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000f706684d /dev/loop1 18446744073709551615 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 6635ac31-56dd-4852-873b-c60f5e2d53d2 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 18446744073709551615 If fs_devices->missing_devices is 0, next time it would be 18446744073709551615 After apply this patch, the fs_devices->missing_devices seems to be right: $ truncate -s 10g test1 $ truncate -s 10g test2 $ losetup /dev/loop1 test1 $ losetup /dev/loop2 test2 $ mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/loop1 /dev/loop2 -f $ losetup -d /dev/loop2 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ mount -o degraded /dev/loop1 /mnt/1 $ umount /mnt/1 $ dmesg loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 20971520 BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 1 transid 5 /dev/loop1 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863) BTRFS: device fsid 15aa1203-98d3-4a66-bcae-ca82f629c2cd devid 2 transid 5 /dev/loop2 scanned by mkfs.btrfs (1863) BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): checking UUID tree BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 BTRFS info (device loop1): flagging fs with big metadata feature BTRFS info (device loop1): allowing degraded mounts BTRFS info (device loop1): disk space caching is enabled BTRFS info (device loop1): has skinny extents BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.00000000975bd577 /dev/loop1 0 BTRFS warning (device loop1): devid 2 uuid 8b333791-0b3f-4f57-b449-1c1ab6b51f38 is missing BTRFS info (device loop1): before clear_missing.0000000000000000 /dev/loop2 1 CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Signed-off-by: Li Zhang <zhanglikernel@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: update device path inode time instead of bd_inodeJosef Bacik1-8/+13
Christoph pointed out that I'm updating bdev->bd_inode for the device time when we remove block devices from a btrfs file system, however this isn't actually exposed to anything. The inode we want to update is the one that's associated with the path to the device, usually on devtmpfs, so that blkid notices the difference. We still don't want to do the blkdev_open, so use kern_path() to get the path to the given device and do the update time on that inode. Fixes: 8f96a5bfa150 ("btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closing") Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: fix deadlock between chunk allocation and chunk btree modificationsFilipe Manana1-1/+14
When a task is doing some modification to the chunk btree and it is not in the context of a chunk allocation or a chunk removal, it can deadlock with another task that is currently allocating a new data or metadata chunk. These contexts are the following: * When relocating a system chunk, when we need to COW the extent buffers that belong to the chunk btree; * When adding a new device (ioctl), where we need to add a new device item to the chunk btree; * When removing a device (ioctl), where we need to remove a device item from the chunk btree; * When resizing a device (ioctl), where we need to update a device item in the chunk btree and may need to relocate a system chunk that lies beyond the new device size when shrinking a device. The problem happens due to a sequence of steps like the following: 1) Task A starts a data or metadata chunk allocation and it locks the chunk mutex; 2) Task B is relocating a system chunk, and when it needs to COW an extent buffer of the chunk btree, it has locked both that extent buffer as well as its parent extent buffer; 3) Since there is not enough available system space, either because none of the existing system block groups have enough free space or because the only one with enough free space is in RO mode due to the relocation, task B triggers a new system chunk allocation. It blocks when trying to acquire the chunk mutex, currently held by task A; 4) Task A enters btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item(), in order to insert the new chunk item into the chunk btree and update the existing device items there. But in order to do that, it has to lock the extent buffer that task B locked at step 2, or its parent extent buffer, but task B is waiting on the chunk mutex, which is currently locked by task A, therefore resulting in a deadlock. One example report when the deadlock happens with system chunk relocation: INFO: task kworker/u9:5:546 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:kworker/u9:5 state:D stack:25936 pid: 546 ppid: 2 flags:0x00004000 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 rwsem_down_read_slowpath+0x4ee/0x9d0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:993 __down_read_common kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1214 [inline] __down_read kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1223 [inline] down_read_nested+0xe6/0x440 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1590 __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x31/0x350 fs/btrfs/locking.c:47 btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:54 [inline] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x8a/0x320 fs/btrfs/locking.c:191 btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1623 [inline] btrfs_search_slot+0x13b4/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1728 btrfs_update_device+0x11f/0x500 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2794 btrfs_chunk_alloc_add_chunk_item+0x34d/0xea0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:5504 do_chunk_alloc fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3408 [inline] btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x84d/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3653 flush_space+0x54e/0xd80 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:670 btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x396/0xa90 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:953 process_one_work+0x9df/0x16d0 kernel/workqueue.c:2297 worker_thread+0x90/0xed0 kernel/workqueue.c:2444 kthread+0x3e5/0x4d0 kernel/kthread.c:319 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:295 INFO: task syz-executor:9107 blocked for more than 143 seconds. Not tainted 5.15.0-rc3+ #1 "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message. task:syz-executor state:D stack:23200 pid: 9107 ppid: 7792 flags:0x00004004 Call Trace: context_switch kernel/sched/core.c:4940 [inline] __schedule+0xcd9/0x2530 kernel/sched/core.c:6287 schedule+0xd3/0x270 kernel/sched/core.c:6366 schedule_preempt_disabled+0xf/0x20 kernel/sched/core.c:6425 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:669 [inline] __mutex_lock+0xc96/0x1680 kernel/locking/mutex.c:729 btrfs_chunk_alloc+0x31a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/block-group.c:3631 find_free_extent_update_loop fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:3986 [inline] find_free_extent+0x25cb/0x3a30 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4335 btrfs_reserve_extent+0x1f1/0x500 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4415 btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x203/0x1120 fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:4813 __btrfs_cow_block+0x412/0x1620 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:415 btrfs_cow_block+0x2f6/0x8c0 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:570 btrfs_search_slot+0x1094/0x2140 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1768 relocate_tree_block fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2694 [inline] relocate_tree_blocks+0xf73/0x1770 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:2757 relocate_block_group+0x47e/0xc70 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:3673 btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x48a/0xc60 fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4070 btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x96/0x280 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3181 __btrfs_balance fs/btrfs/volumes.c:3911 [inline] btrfs_balance+0x1f03/0x3cd0 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4301 btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x61e/0x800 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4137 btrfs_ioctl+0x39ea/0x7b70 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4949 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:874 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:860 [inline] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:860 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline] do_syscall_64+0x35/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae So fix this by making sure that whenever we try to modify the chunk btree and we are neither in a chunk allocation context nor in a chunk remove context, we reserve system space before modifying the chunk btree. Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACkBjsax51i4mu6C0C3vJqQN3NR_iVuucoeG3U1HXjrgzn5FFQ@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 79bd37120b1495 ("btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.14+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: use btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path in dev removal ioctlsJosef Bacik1-8/+7
For device removal and replace we call btrfs_find_device_by_devspec, which if we give it a device path and nothing else will call btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path, which opens the block device and reads the super block and then looks up our device based on that. However at this point we're holding the sb write "lock", so reading the block device pulls in the dependency of ->open_mutex, which produces the following lockdep splat ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #405 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11576 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9bbe8cded938 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0x98/0xa0 btrfs_get_bdev_and_sb+0x1b/0xb0 btrfs_find_device_by_devspec+0x12b/0x1c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x127/0x610 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11576: #0: ffff9bbe88e4fc68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11576 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #405 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f31b02404cb Instead what we want to do is populate our device lookup args before we grab any locks, and then pass these args into btrfs_rm_device(). From there we can find the device and do the appropriate removal. Suggested-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: add a btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path helperJosef Bacik1-32/+64
We are going to want to populate our device lookup args outside of any locks and then do the actual device lookup later, so add a helper to do this work and make btrfs_find_device_by_devspec() use this helper for now. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: handle device lookup with btrfs_dev_lookup_argsJosef Bacik1-46/+76
We have a lot of device lookup functions that all do something slightly different. Clean this up by adding a struct to hold the different lookup criteria, and then pass this around to btrfs_find_device() so it can do the proper matching based on the lookup criteria. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: do not call close_fs_devices in btrfs_rm_deviceJosef Bacik1-1/+9
There's a subtle case where if we're removing the seed device from a file system we need to free its private copy of the fs_devices. However we do not need to call close_fs_devices(), because at this point there are no devices left to close as we've closed the last one. The only thing that close_fs_devices() does is decrement ->opened, which should be 1. We want to avoid calling close_fs_devices() here because it has a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex), and we are going to stop holding the uuid_mutex in this path. So simply decrement the ->opened counter like we should, and then clean up like normal. Also add a comment explaining what we're doing here as I initially removed this code erroneously. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: use num_device to check for the last surviving seed deviceAnand Jain1-1/+1
For both sprout and seed fsids, btrfs_fs_devices::num_devices provides device count including missing btrfs_fs_devices::open_devices provides device count excluding missing We create a dummy struct btrfs_device for the missing device, so num_devices != open_devices when there is a missing device. In btrfs_rm_devices() we wrongly check for %cur_devices->open_devices before freeing the seed fs_devices. Instead we should check for %cur_devices->num_devices. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: remove btrfs_raid_bio::fs_info memberQu Wenruo1-4/+3
We can grab fs_info reliably from btrfs_raid_bio::bioc, as the bioc is always passed into alloc_rbio(), and only get released when the raid bio is released. Remove btrfs_raid_bio::fs_info member, and cleanup all the @fs_info parameters for alloc_rbio() callers. Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: make sure btrfs_io_context::fs_info is always initializedQu Wenruo1-4/+5
Currently btrfs_io_context::fs_info is only initialized in btrfs_map_bio, but there are call sites like btrfs_map_sblock() which calls __btrfs_map_block() directly, leaving bioc::fs_info uninitialized (NULL). Currently this is fine, but later cleanup will rely on bioc::fs_info to grab fs_info, and this can be a hidden problem for such usage. This patch will remove such hidden uninitialized member by always assigning bioc::fs_info at alloc_btrfs_io_context(). Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: do not take the uuid_mutex in btrfs_rm_deviceJosef Bacik1-5/+5
We got the following lockdep splat while running fstests (specifically btrfs/003 and btrfs/020 in a row) with the new rc. This was uncovered by 87579e9b7d8d ("loop: use worker per cgroup instead of kworker") which converted loop to using workqueues, which comes with lockdep annotations that don't exist with kworkers. The lockdep splat is as follows: WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/156417 is trying to acquire lock: ffff9c7645b02d38 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 but task is already holding lock: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #5 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x28/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x163/0x3a0 path_openat+0x74d/0xa40 do_filp_open+0x9c/0x140 do_sys_openat2+0xb1/0x170 __x64_sys_openat+0x54/0x90 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #4 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0xd1/0x3c0 blkdev_get_by_path+0xc0/0xd0 btrfs_scan_one_device+0x52/0x1f0 [btrfs] btrfs_control_ioctl+0xac/0x170 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0xba/0x7c0 btrfs_rm_device+0x48/0x6a0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x2d1c/0x3110 [btrfs] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#11){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0x112/0x290 [loop] loop_process_work+0x25f/0xcb0 [loop] process_one_work+0x28f/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x266/0x5d0 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x170 ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/156417: #0: ffff9c7647395468 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x650 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 8 PID: 156417 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2-custom+ #34 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0x10a/0x120 __lock_acquire+0x1130/0x1dc0 lock_acquire+0xf5/0x320 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 flush_workqueue+0xae/0x600 ? flush_workqueue+0x84/0x600 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x650 [loop] lo_ioctl+0x29d/0x780 [loop] ? __lock_acquire+0x3a0/0x1dc0 ? update_dl_rq_load_avg+0x152/0x360 ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7f645884de6b Usually the uuid_mutex exists to protect the fs_devices that map together all of the devices that match a specific uuid. In rm_device we're messing with the uuid of a device, so it makes sense to protect that here. However in doing that it pulls in a whole host of lockdep dependencies, as we call mnt_may_write() on the sb before we grab the uuid_mutex, thus we end up with the dependency chain under the uuid_mutex being added under the normal sb write dependency chain, which causes problems with loop devices. We don't need the uuid mutex here however. If we call btrfs_scan_one_device() before we scratch the super block we will find the fs_devices and not find the device itself and return EBUSY because the fs_devices is open. If we call it after the scratch happens it will not appear to be a valid btrfs file system. We do not need to worry about other fs_devices modifying operations here because we're protected by the exclusive operations locking. So drop the uuid_mutex here in order to fix the lockdep splat. A more detailed explanation from the discussion: We are worried about rm and scan racing with each other, before this change we'll zero the device out under the UUID mutex so when scan does run it'll make sure that it can go through the whole device scan thing without rm messing with us. We aren't worried if the scratch happens first, because the result is we don't think this is a btrfs device and we bail out. The only case we are concerned with is we scratch _after_ scan is able to read the superblock and gets a seemingly valid super block, so lets consider this case. Scan will call device_list_add() with the device we're removing. We'll call find_fsid_with_metadata_uuid() and get our fs_devices for this UUID. At this point we lock the fs_devices->device_list_mutex. This is what protects us in this case, but we have two cases here. 1. We aren't to the device removal part of the RM. We found our device, and device name matches our path, we go down and we set total_devices to our super number of devices, which doesn't affect anything because we haven't done the remove yet. 2. We are past the device removal part, which is protected by the device_list_mutex. Scan doesn't find the device, it goes down and does the if (fs_devices->opened) return -EBUSY; check and we bail out. Nothing about this situation is ideal, but the lockdep splat is real, and the fix is safe, tho admittedly a bit scary looking. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [ copy more from the discussion ] Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: rename struct btrfs_io_bio to btrfs_bioQu Wenruo1-4/+4
Previously we had "struct btrfs_bio", which records IO context for mirrored IO and RAID56, and "strcut btrfs_io_bio", which records extra btrfs specific info for logical bytenr bio. With "btrfs_bio" renamed to "btrfs_io_context", we are safe to rename "btrfs_io_bio" to "btrfs_bio" which is a more suitable name now. The struct btrfs_bio changes meaning by this commit. There was a suggested name like btrfs_logical_bio but it's a bit long and we'd prefer to use a shorter name. This could be a concern for backports to older kernels where the different meaning could possibly cause confusion or bugs. Comparing the new and old structures, there's no overlap among the struct members so a build would break in case of incorrect backport. We haven't had many backports to bio code anyway so this is more of a theoretical cause of bugs and a matter of precaution but we'll need to keep the semantic change in mind. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: rename btrfs_bio to btrfs_io_contextQu Wenruo1-135/+132
The structure btrfs_bio is used by two different sites: - bio->bi_private for mirror based profiles For those profiles (SINGLE/DUP/RAID1*/RAID10), this structures records how many mirrors are still pending, and save the original endio function of the bio. - RAID56 code In that case, RAID56 only utilize the stripes info, and no long uses that to trace the pending mirrors. So btrfs_bio is not always bind to a bio, and contains more info for IO context, thus renaming it will make the naming less confusing. Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: remove stale comment about the btrfs_show_devnameAnand Jain1-7/+0
There were few lockdep warnings because btrfs_show_devname() was using device_list_mutex as recorded in the commits: 0ccd05285e7f ("btrfs: fix a possible umount deadlock") 779bf3fefa83 ("btrfs: fix lock dep warning, move scratch dev out of device_list_mutex and uuid_mutex") And finally, commit 88c14590cdd6 ("btrfs: use RCU in btrfs_show_devname for device list traversal") removed the device_list_mutex from btrfs_show_devname for performance reasons. This patch removes a stale comment about the function btrfs_show_devname and device_list_mutex. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: update latest_dev when we create a sprout deviceAnand Jain1-0/+2
When we add a device to the seed filesystem (sprouting) it is a new filesystem (and fsid) on the device added. Update the latest_dev so that /proc/self/mounts shows the correct device. Example: $ btrfstune -S1 /dev/vg/seed $ mount /dev/vg/seed /btrfs mount: /btrfs: WARNING: device write-protected, mounted read-only. $ cat /proc/self/mounts | grep btrfs /dev/mapper/vg-seed /btrfs btrfs ro,relatime,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/ 0 0 $ btrfs dev add -f /dev/vg/new /btrfs Before: $ cat /proc/self/mounts | grep btrfs /dev/mapper/vg-seed /btrfs btrfs ro,relatime,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/ 0 0 After: $ cat /proc/self/mounts | grep btrfs /dev/mapper/vg-new /btrfs btrfs ro,relatime,space_cache,subvolid=5,subvol=/ 0 0 Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: convert latest_bdev type to btrfs_device and renameAnand Jain1-5/+5
In preparation to fix a bug in btrfs_show_devname(). Convert fs_devices::latest_bdev type from struct block_device to struct btrfs_device and, rename the member to fs_devices::latest_dev. So that btrfs_show_devname() can use fs_devices::latest_dev::name. Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-26btrfs: rename and switch to bool btrfs_chunk_readonlyAnand Jain1-9/+8
btrfs_chunk_readonly() checks if the given chunk is writeable. It returns 1 for readonly, and 0 for writeable. So the return argument type bool shall suffice instead of the current type int. Also, rename btrfs_chunk_readonly() to btrfs_chunk_writeable() as we check if the bg is writeable, and helps to keep the logic at the parent function simpler to understand. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-25btrfs: update comment for fs_devices::seed_list in btrfs_rm_deviceSu Yue1-1/+1
Update it since commit 944d3f9fac61 ("btrfs: switch seed device to list api") did conversion from fs_devices::seed to fs_devices::seed_list. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-25btrfs: rename btrfs_alloc_chunk to btrfs_create_chunkNikolay Borisov1-5/+5
The user facing function used to allocate new chunks is btrfs_chunk_alloc, unfortunately there is yet another similar sounding function - btrfs_alloc_chunk. This creates confusion, especially since the latter function can be considered "private" in the sense that it implements the first stage of chunk creation and as such is called by btrfs_chunk_alloc. To avoid the awkwardness that comes with having similarly named but distinctly different in their purpose function rename btrfs_alloc_chunk to btrfs_create_chunk, given that the main purpose of this function is to orchestrate the whole process of allocating a chunk - reserving space into devices, deciding on characteristics of the stripe size and creating the in-memory structures. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-10-22btrfs: use sync_blockdevChristoph Hellwig1-1/+1
Use sync_blockdev instead of opencoding it. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019062530.2174626-5-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-10-18btrfs: use bdev_nr_bytes instead of open coding itChristoph Hellwig1-4/+4
Use the proper helper to read the block device size. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211018101130.1838532-13-hch@lst.de Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2021-09-17btrfs: fix mount failure due to past and transient device flush errorFilipe Manana1-0/+13
When we get an error flushing one device, during a super block commit, we record the error in the device structure, in the field 'last_flush_error'. This is used to later check if we should error out the super block commit, depending on whether the number of flush errors is greater than or equals to the maximum tolerated device failures for a raid profile. However if we get a transient device flush error, unmount the filesystem and later try to mount it, we can fail the mount because we treat that past error as critical and consider the device is missing. Even if it's very likely that the error will happen again, as it's probably due to a hardware related problem, there may be cases where the error might not happen again. One example is during testing, and a test case like the new generic/648 from fstests always triggers this. The test cases generic/019 and generic/475 also trigger this scenario, but very sporadically. When this happens we get an error like this: $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt mount: /mnt wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdc, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. $ dmesg (...) [12918.886926] BTRFS warning (device sdc): chunk 13631488 missing 1 devices, max tolerance is 0 for writable mount [12918.888293] BTRFS warning (device sdc): writable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices [12918.890853] BTRFS error (device sdc): open_ctree failed The failure happens because when btrfs_check_rw_degradable() is called at mount time, or at remount from RO to RW time, is sees a non zero value in a device's ->last_flush_error attribute, and therefore considers that the device is 'missing'. Fix this by setting a device's ->last_flush_error to zero when we close a device, making sure the error is not seen on the next mount attempt. We only need to track flush errors during the current mount, so that we never commit a super block if such errors happened. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: fix lockdep warning while mounting sprout fsAnand Jain1-3/+4
Following test case reproduces lockdep warning. Test case: $ mkfs.btrfs -f <dev1> $ btrfstune -S 1 <dev1> $ mount <dev1> <mnt> $ btrfs device add <dev2> <mnt> -f $ umount <mnt> $ mount <dev2> <mnt> $ umount <mnt> The warning claims a possible ABBA deadlock between the threads initiated by [#1] btrfs device add and [#0] the mount. [ 540.743122] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 540.743129] 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 Not tainted [ 540.743135] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 540.743142] mount/2515 is trying to acquire lock: [ 540.743149] ffffa0c5544c2ce0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.743458] but task is already holding lock: [ 540.743461] ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743541] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 540.743543] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 540.743546] -> #1 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}: [ 540.743566] down_read_nested+0x48/0x2b0 [ 540.743585] __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743650] btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x70/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.743733] btrfs_search_slot+0x6c6/0xe00 [btrfs] [ 540.743785] btrfs_update_device+0x83/0x260 [btrfs] [ 540.743849] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x13f/0x660 [btrfs] <--- device_list_mutex [ 540.743911] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x18d/0x3f0 [btrfs] [ 540.743982] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x86/0x1260 [btrfs] [ 540.744037] btrfs_init_new_device+0x1600/0x1dd0 [btrfs] [ 540.744101] btrfs_ioctl+0x1c77/0x24c0 [btrfs] [ 540.744166] __x64_sys_ioctl+0xe4/0x140 [ 540.744170] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744174] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744180] -> #0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}: [ 540.744184] __lock_acquire+0x155f/0x2360 [ 540.744188] lock_acquire+0x10b/0x5c0 [ 540.744190] __mutex_lock+0xb1/0xf80 [ 540.744193] mutex_lock_nested+0x27/0x30 [ 540.744196] clone_fs_devices+0x6d/0x210 [btrfs] [ 540.744270] btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x3c7/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744336] open_ctree+0xf6e/0x2074 [btrfs] [ 540.744406] btrfs_mount_root.cold.72+0x16/0x127 [btrfs] [ 540.744472] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744475] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744478] fc_mount+0x16/0x60 [ 540.744482] vfs_kern_mount+0x91/0x100 [ 540.744484] btrfs_mount+0x1e6/0x670 [btrfs] [ 540.744536] legacy_get_tree+0x38/0x90 [ 540.744537] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0x140 [ 540.744539] path_mount+0x8d8/0x1070 [ 540.744541] do_mount+0x8d/0xc0 [ 540.744543] __x64_sys_mount+0x125/0x160 [ 540.744545] do_syscall_64+0x4b/0x80 [ 540.744547] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 [ 540.744551] other info that might help us debug this: [ 540.744552] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 540.744553] CPU0 CPU1 [ 540.744554] ---- ---- [ 540.744555] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744557] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744560] lock(btrfs-chunk-00); [ 540.744562] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex); [ 540.744564] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 540.744565] 3 locks held by mount/2515: [ 540.744567] #0: ffffa0c56bf7a0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#42/1){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: alloc_super.isra.16+0xdf/0x450 [ 540.744574] #1: ffffffffc05a9628 (uuid_mutex){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: btrfs_read_chunk_tree+0x63/0xbb0 [btrfs] [ 540.744640] #2: ffffa0c54a7932b8 (btrfs-chunk-00){++++}-{4:4}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x32/0x200 [btrfs] [ 540.744708] stack backtrace: [ 540.744712] CPU: 2 PID: 2515 Comm: mount Not tainted 5.11.0-rc7+ #5 But the device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices() is redundant, as explained below. Two threads [1] and [2] (below) could lead to clone_fs_device(). [1] open_ctree <== mount sprout fs btrfs_read_chunk_tree() mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex) <== global lock read_one_dev() open_seed_devices() clone_fs_devices() <== seed fs_devices mutex_lock(&orig->device_list_mutex) <== seed fs_devices [2] btrfs_init_new_device() <== sprouting mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex); <== global lock btrfs_prepare_sprout() lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) clone_fs_devices(seed_fs_device) <== seed fs_devices Both of these threads hold uuid_mutex which is sufficient to protect getting the seed device(s) freed while we are trying to clone it for sprouting [2] or mounting a sprout [1] (as above). A mounted seed device can not free/write/replace because it is read-only. An unmounted seed device can be freed by btrfs_free_stale_devices(), but it needs uuid_mutex. So this patch removes the unnecessary device_list_mutex in clone_fs_devices(). And adds a lockdep_assert_held(&uuid_mutex) in clone_fs_devices(). Reported-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Tested-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: delay blkdev_put until after the device removeJosef Bacik1-6/+17
When removing the device we call blkdev_put() on the device once we've removed it, and because we have an EXCL open we need to take the ->open_mutex on the block device to clean it up. Unfortunately during device remove we are holding the sb writers lock, which results in the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11595 is trying to acquire lock: ffff973ac35dd138 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_put+0x3a/0x220 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0x62/0xe5 btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11595: #0: ffff973ac9812c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 0 PID: 11595 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #407 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae RIP: 0033:0x7fc21255d4cb So instead save the bdev and do the put once we've dropped the sb writers lock in order to avoid the lockdep recursion. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-09-07btrfs: update the bdev time directly when closingJosef Bacik1-8/+10
We update the ctime/mtime of a block device when we remove it so that blkid knows the device changed. However we do this by re-opening the block device and calling filp_update_time. This is more correct because it'll call the inode->i_op->update_time if it exists, but the block dev inodes do not do this. Instead call generic_update_time() on the bd_inode in order to avoid the blkdev_open path and get rid of the following lockdep splat: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ losetup/11596 is trying to acquire lock: ffff939640d2f538 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 but task is already holding lock: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #4 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 lo_open+0x28/0x60 [loop] blkdev_get_whole+0x25/0xf0 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x168/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 do_sys_openat2+0x7b/0x130 __x64_sys_openat+0x46/0x70 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #3 (&disk->open_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock+0x7d/0x750 blkdev_get_by_dev.part.0+0x56/0x3c0 blkdev_open+0xd2/0xe0 do_dentry_open+0x161/0x390 path_openat+0x3cc/0xa20 do_filp_open+0x96/0x120 file_open_name+0xc7/0x170 filp_open+0x2c/0x50 btrfs_scratch_superblocks.part.0+0x10f/0x170 btrfs_rm_device.cold+0xe8/0xed btrfs_ioctl+0x2a31/0x2e70 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae -> #2 (sb_writers#12){.+.+}-{0:0}: lo_write_bvec+0xc2/0x240 [loop] loop_process_work+0x238/0xd00 [loop] process_one_work+0x26b/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #1 ((work_completion)(&lo->rootcg_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}: process_one_work+0x245/0x560 worker_thread+0x55/0x3c0 kthread+0x140/0x160 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 -> #0 ((wq_completion)loop0){+.+.}-{0:0}: __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: (wq_completion)loop0 --> &disk->open_mutex --> &lo->lo_mutex Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock(&disk->open_mutex); lock(&lo->lo_mutex); lock((wq_completion)loop0); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by losetup/11596: #0: ffff939655510c68 (&lo->lo_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __loop_clr_fd+0x41/0x660 [loop] stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 11596 Comm: losetup Not tainted 5.14.0-rc2+ #406 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014 Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x72 check_noncircular+0xcf/0xf0 ? stack_trace_save+0x3b/0x50 __lock_acquire+0x10ea/0x1d90 lock_acquire+0xb5/0x2b0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? lockdep_init_map_type+0x47/0x220 flush_workqueue+0x91/0x5e0 ? flush_workqueue+0x67/0x5e0 ? verify_cpu+0xf0/0x100 drain_workqueue+0xa0/0x110 destroy_workqueue+0x36/0x250 __loop_clr_fd+0x9a/0x660 [loop] ? blkdev_ioctl+0x8d/0x2a0 block_ioctl+0x3f/0x50 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: reset replace target device to allocation state on closeDesmond Cheong Zhi Xi1-0/+3
This crash was observed with a failed assertion on device close: BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28) WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3902 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:2150 btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic libcrc32c crc32c_intel xor zstd_decompress zstd_compress xxhash lzo_compress lzo_decompress raid6_pq loop CPU: 1 PID: 3902 Comm: kworker/u8:4 Not tainted 5.14.0-rc5-default+ #1532 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space [btrfs] RIP: 0010:btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x1d2/0x1e0 [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffb7a5452d7d80 EFLAGS: 00010282 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffffabee13c4 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff97834176a378 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff97835195d388 R13: 0000000005b08000 R14: ffff978385484000 R15: 000000000000016c FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff9783bd800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000056190d003fe8 CR3: 000000002a81e005 CR4: 0000000000170ea0 Call Trace: flush_space+0x197/0x2f0 [btrfs] btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x139/0x300 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x262/0x5e0 worker_thread+0x4c/0x320 ? process_one_work+0x5e0/0x5e0 kthread+0x144/0x170 ? set_kthread_struct+0x40/0x40 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 irq event stamp: 19334989 hardirqs last enabled at (19334997): [<ffffffffab0e0c87>] console_unlock+0x2b7/0x400 hardirqs last disabled at (19335006): [<ffffffffab0e0d0d>] console_unlock+0x33d/0x400 softirqs last enabled at (19334900): [<ffffffffaba0030d>] __do_softirq+0x30d/0x574 softirqs last disabled at (19334893): [<ffffffffab0721ec>] irq_exit_rcu+0x12c/0x140 ---[ end trace 45939e308e0dd3c7 ]--- BTRFS: error (device vdd) in btrfs_run_delayed_refs:2150: errno=-28 No space left BTRFS info (device vdd): forced readonly BTRFS warning (device vdd): failed setting block group ro: -30 BTRFS info (device vdd): suspending dev_replace for unmount assertion failed: !test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state), in fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1150 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:3431! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP CPU: 1 PID: 3982 Comm: umount Tainted: G W 5.14.0-rc5-default+ #1532 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.0-59-gc9ba527-rebuilt.opensuse.org 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:assertfail.constprop.0+0x18/0x1a [btrfs] RSP: 0018:ffffb7a5454c7db8 EFLAGS: 00010246 RAX: 0000000000000068 RBX: ffff978364b91c00 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffffabee13c4 RDI: 00000000ffffffff RBP: ffff9783523a4c00 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff9783523a4d18 R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000004 R15: 0000000000000003 FS: 00007f61c8f42800(0000) GS:ffff9783bd800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000056190cffa810 CR3: 0000000030b96002 CR4: 0000000000170ea0 Call Trace: btrfs_close_one_device.cold+0x11/0x55 [btrfs] close_fs_devices+0x44/0xb0 [btrfs] btrfs_close_devices+0x48/0x160 [btrfs] generic_shutdown_super+0x69/0x100 kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30 btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x2c/0xa0 cleanup_mnt+0x144/0x1b0 task_work_run+0x59/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0xe7/0xf0 exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0xaf/0xf0 syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x19/0x50 do_syscall_64+0x4a/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae This happens when close_ctree is called while a dev_replace hasn't completed. In close_ctree, we suspend the dev_replace, but keep the replace target around so that we can resume the dev_replace procedure when we mount the root again. This is the call trace: close_ctree(): btrfs_dev_replace_suspend_for_unmount(); btrfs_close_devices(): btrfs_close_fs_devices(): btrfs_close_one_device(): ASSERT(!test_bit(BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT, &device->dev_state)); However, since the replace target sticks around, there is a device with BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT set on close, and we fail the assertion in btrfs_close_one_device. To fix this, if we come across the replace target device when closing, we should properly reset it back to allocation state. This fix also ensures that if a non-target device has a corrupted state and has the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit set, the assertion will still catch the error. Reported-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Fixes: b2a616676839 ("btrfs: fix rw device counting in __btrfs_free_extra_devids") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: fix NULL pointer dereference when deleting device by invalid idQu Wenruo1-1/+1
[BUG] It's easy to trigger NULL pointer dereference, just by removing a non-existing device id: # mkfs.btrfs -f -m single -d single /dev/test/scratch1 \ /dev/test/scratch2 # mount /dev/test/scratch1 /mnt/btrfs # btrfs device remove 3 /mnt/btrfs Then we have the following kernel NULL pointer dereference: BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000000 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 9 PID: 649 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.14.0-rc3-custom+ #35 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:btrfs_rm_device+0x4de/0x6b0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x18bb/0x3190 [btrfs] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa5/0x120 ? find_held_lock.constprop.0+0x2b/0x80 ? do_user_addr_fault+0x201/0x6a0 ? lock_release+0xd2/0x2d0 ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x83/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae [CAUSE] Commit a27a94c2b0c7 ("btrfs: Make btrfs_find_device_by_devspec return btrfs_device directly") moves the "missing" device path check into btrfs_rm_device(). But btrfs_rm_device() itself can have case where it only receives @devid, with NULL as @device_path. In that case, calling strcmp() on NULL will trigger the NULL pointer dereference. Before that commit, we handle the "missing" case inside btrfs_find_device_by_devspec(), which will not check @device_path at all if @devid is provided, thus no way to trigger the bug. [FIX] Before calling strcmp(), also make sure @device_path is not NULL. Fixes: a27a94c2b0c7 ("btrfs: Make btrfs_find_device_by_devspec return btrfs_device directly") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: introduce btrfs_search_backwards functionMarcos Paulo de Souza1-6/+1
It's a common practice to start a search using offset (u64)-1, which is the u64 maximum value, meaning that we want the search_slot function to be set in the last item with the same objectid and type. Once we are in this position, it's a matter to start a search backwards by calling btrfs_previous_item, which will check if we'll need to go to a previous leaf and other necessary checks, only to be sure that we are in last offset of the same object and type. The new btrfs_search_backwards function does the all these steps when necessary, and can be used to avoid code duplication. Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: simplify return values in btrfs_check_raid_min_devicesAnand Jain1-6/+2
Function btrfs_check_raid_min_devices() returns error code from the enum btrfs_err_code and it starts from 1. So there is no need to check if ret is > 0. So drop this check and also drop the local variable ret. Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: allow degenerate raid0/raid10David Sterba1-2/+2
The data on raid0 and raid10 are supposed to be spread over multiple devices, so the minimum constraints are set to 2 and 4 respectively. This is an artificial limit and there's some interest to remove it. Change this to allow raid0 on one device and raid10 on two devices. This works as expected eg. when converting or removing devices. The only difference is when raid0 on two devices gets one device removed. Unpatched would silently create a single profile, while newly it would be raid0. The motivation is to allow to preserve the profile type as long as it possible for some intermediate state (device removal, conversion), or when there are disks of different size, with raid0 the otherwise unusable space of the last device will be used too. Similarly for raid10, though the two largest devices would need to be the same. Unpatched kernel will mount and use the degenerate profiles just fine but won't allow any operation that would not satisfy the stricter device number constraints, eg. not allowing to go from 3 to 2 devices for raid10 or various profile conversions. Example output: # btrfs fi us -T . Overall: Device size: 10.00GiB Device allocated: 1.01GiB Device unallocated: 8.99GiB Device missing: 0.00B Used: 200.61MiB Free (estimated): 9.79GiB (min: 9.79GiB) Free (statfs, df): 9.79GiB Data ratio: 1.00 Metadata ratio: 1.00 Global reserve: 3.25MiB (used: 0.00B) Multiple profiles: no Data Metadata System Id Path RAID0 single single Unallocated -- ---------- --------- --------- -------- ----------- 1 /dev/sda10 1.00GiB 8.00MiB 1.00MiB 8.99GiB -- ---------- --------- --------- -------- ----------- Total 1.00GiB 8.00MiB 1.00MiB 8.99GiB Used 200.25MiB 352.00KiB 16.00KiB # btrfs dev us . /dev/sda10, ID: 1 Device size: 10.00GiB Device slack: 0.00B Data,RAID0/1: 1.00GiB Metadata,single: 8.00MiB System,single: 1.00MiB Unallocated: 8.99GiB Note "Data,RAID0/1", with btrfs-progs 5.13+ the number of devices per profile is printed. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: subpage: reject raid56 filesystem and profile conversionQu Wenruo1-0/+7
RAID56 is not only unsafe due to its write-hole problem, but also has tons of hardcoded PAGE_SIZE. Disable it for subpage support for now. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: constify and cleanup variables in comparatorsDavid Sterba1-1/+1
Comparators just read the data and thus get const parameters. This should be also preserved by the local variables, update all comparators passed to sort or bsearch. Cleanups: - unnecessary casts are dropped - btrfs_cmp_device_free_bytes is cleaned up to follow the common pattern and 'inline' is dropped as the function address is taken Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: simplify data stripe calculation helpersDavid Sterba1-13/+2
There are two helpers doing the same calculations based on nparity and ncopies. calc_data_stripes can be simplified into one expression, so far we don't have profile with both copies and parity, so there's no effective change. calc_stripe_length should reuse the helper and not repeat the same calculation. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: merge alloc_device helpersDavid Sterba1-41/+25
The device allocation is split to two functions, but one just calls the other and they're very far in the file. Merge them together. Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: uninline btrfs_bg_flags_to_raid_indexDavid Sterba1-0/+26
The helper does a simple translation from block group flags to index to the btrfs_raid_array table. There's no apparent reason to inline the function, the translation happens usually once per function and is not called in a loop. Making it a proper function saves quite some binary code (x86_64, release config): text data bss dec hex filename 1164011 19253 14912 1198176 124860 pre/btrfs.ko 1161559 19253 14912 1195724 123ecc post/btrfs.ko DELTA: -2451 Also add the const attribute as there are no side effects, this could help compiler to optimize a few things without the function body. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: use btrfs_next_leaf instead of btrfs_next_item when slots > nritemsMarcos Paulo de Souza1-1/+1
After calling btrfs_search_slot is a common practice to check if the slot found isn't bigger than number of slots in the current leaf, and if so, search for the same key in the next leaf by calling btrfs_next_leaf, which calls btrfs_next_old_leaf to do the job. Calling btrfs_next_item in the same situation would end up in the same code flow, since * btrfs_next_item * btrfs_next_old_item * if slot >= nritems(curr_leaf) btrfs_next_old_leaf Change btrfs_verify_dev_extents and calculate_emulated_zone_size functions to use btrfs_next_leaf in the same situation. Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-08-23btrfs: make btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc private to block-group.cNikolay Borisov1-92/+0
One of the final things that must be done to add a new chunk is inserting its device extent items in the device tree. They describe the portion of allocated device physical space during phase 1 of chunk allocation. This is currently done in btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc whose name isn't very informative. What's more, this function is only used in block-group.c but is defined as public. There isn't anything special about it that would warrant it being defined in volumes.c. Just move btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc and alloc_chunk_dev_extent to block-group.c, make the former static and rename both functions to insert_dev_extents and insert_dev_extent respectively. Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-30Merge tag 'for-5.14-rc3-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-0/+1
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs fixes from David Sterba: - fix -Warray-bounds warning, to help external patchset to make it default treewide - fix writeable device accounting (syzbot report) - fix fsync and log replay after a rename and inode eviction - fix potentially lost error code when submitting multiple bios for compressed range * tag 'for-5.14-rc3-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: calculate number of eb pages properly in csum_tree_block btrfs: fix rw device counting in __btrfs_free_extra_devids btrfs: fix lost inode on log replay after mix of fsync, rename and inode eviction btrfs: mark compressed range uptodate only if all bio succeed
2021-07-28btrfs: fix rw device counting in __btrfs_free_extra_devidsDesmond Cheong Zhi Xi1-0/+1
When removing a writeable device in __btrfs_free_extra_devids, the rw device count should be decremented. This error was caught by Syzbot which reported a warning in close_fs_devices: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 9355 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168 close_fs_devices+0x763/0x880 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168 Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 9355 Comm: syz-executor552 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc1-syzkaller #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:close_fs_devices+0x763/0x880 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1168 RSP: 0018:ffffc9000333f2f0 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: ffffffff8365f5c3 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX: ffff888029afd4c0 RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000 RBP: ffff88802846f508 R08: ffffffff8365f525 R09: ffffed100337d128 R10: ffffed100337d128 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: dffffc0000000000 R13: ffff888019be8868 R14: 1ffff1100337d10d R15: 1ffff1100337d10a FS: 00007f6f53828700(0000) GS:ffff8880b9a00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 000000000047c410 CR3: 00000000302a6000 CR4: 00000000001506f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Call Trace: btrfs_close_devices+0xc9/0x450 fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1180 open_ctree+0x8e1/0x3968 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3693 btrfs_fill_super fs/btrfs/super.c:1382 [inline] btrfs_mount_root+0xac5/0xc60 fs/btrfs/super.c:1749 legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592 vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1498 fc_mount fs/namespace.c:993 [inline] vfs_kern_mount+0xc9/0x160 fs/namespace.c:1023 btrfs_mount+0x3d3/0xb50 fs/btrfs/super.c:1809 legacy_get_tree+0xea/0x180 fs/fs_context.c:592 vfs_get_tree+0x86/0x270 fs/super.c:1498 do_new_mount fs/namespace.c:2905 [inline] path_mount+0x196f/0x2be0 fs/namespace.c:3235 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3248 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3456 [inline] __se_sys_mount+0x2f9/0x3b0 fs/namespace.c:3433 do_syscall_64+0x3f/0xb0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:47 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Because fs_devices->rw_devices was not 0 after closing all devices. Here is the call trace that was observed: btrfs_mount_root(): btrfs_scan_one_device(): device_list_add(); <---------------- device added btrfs_open_devices(): open_fs_devices(): btrfs_open_one_device(); <-------- writable device opened, rw device count ++ btrfs_fill_super(): open_ctree(): btrfs_free_extra_devids(): __btrfs_free_extra_devids(); <--- writable device removed, rw device count not decremented fail_tree_roots: btrfs_close_devices(): close_fs_devices(); <------- rw device count off by 1 As a note, prior to commit cf89af146b7e ("btrfs: dev-replace: fail mount if we don't have replace item with target device"), rw_devices was decremented on removing a writable device in __btrfs_free_extra_devids only if the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit was not set for the device. However, this check does not need to be reinstated as it is now redundant and incorrect. In __btrfs_free_extra_devids, we skip removing the device if it is the target for replacement. This is done by checking whether device->devid == BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID. Since BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT is set only on the device with devid BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID, no devices should have the BTRFS_DEV_STATE_REPLACE_TGT bit set after the check, and so it's redundant to test for that bit. Additionally, following commit 82372bc816d7 ("Btrfs: make the logic of source device removing more clear"), rw_devices is incremented whenever a writeable device is added to the alloc list (including the target device in btrfs_dev_replace_finishing), so all removals of writable devices from the alloc list should also be accompanied by a decrement to rw_devices. Reported-by: syzbot+a70e2ad0879f160b9217@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: cf89af146b7e ("btrfs: dev-replace: fail mount if we don't have replace item with target device") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Tested-by: syzbot+a70e2ad0879f160b9217@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-07-13Merge tag 'for-5.14-rc1-tag' of ↵Linus Torvalds1-85/+270
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux Pull btrfs zoned mode fixes from David Sterba: - fix deadlock when allocating system chunk - fix wrong mutex unlock on an error path - fix extent map splitting for append operation - update and fix message reporting unusable chunk space - don't block when background zone reclaim runs with balance in parallel * tag 'for-5.14-rc1-tag' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kdave/linux: btrfs: zoned: fix wrong mutex unlock on failure to allocate log root tree btrfs: don't block if we can't acquire the reclaim lock btrfs: properly split extent_map for REQ_OP_ZONE_APPEND btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk array btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks btrfs: zoned: print unusable percentage when reclaiming block groups btrfs: zoned: fix types for u64 division in btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work
2021-07-07btrfs: rework chunk allocation to avoid exhaustion of the system chunk arrayFilipe Manana1-85/+270
Commit eafa4fd0ad0607 ("btrfs: fix exhaustion of the system chunk array due to concurrent allocations") fixed a problem that resulted in exhausting the system chunk array in the superblock when there are many tasks allocating chunks in parallel. Basically too many tasks enter the first phase of chunk allocation without previous tasks having finished their second phase of allocation, resulting in too many system chunks being allocated. That was originally observed when running the fallocate tests of stress-ng on a PowerPC machine, using a node size of 64K. However that commit also introduced a deadlock where a task in phase 1 of the chunk allocation waited for another task that had allocated a system chunk to finish its phase 2, but that other task was waiting on an extent buffer lock held by the first task, therefore resulting in both tasks not making any progress. That change was later reverted by a patch with the subject "btrfs: fix deadlock with concurrent chunk allocations involving system chunks", since there is no simple and short solution to address it and the deadlock is relatively easy to trigger on zoned filesystems, while the system chunk array exhaustion is not so common. This change reworks the chunk allocation to avoid the system chunk array exhaustion. It accomplishes that by making the first phase of chunk allocation do the updates of the device items in the chunk btree and the insertion of the new chunk item in the chunk btree. This is done while under the protection of the chunk mutex (fs_info->chunk_mutex), in the same critical section that checks for available system space, allocates a new system chunk if needed and reserves system chunk space. This way we do not have chunk space reserved until the second phase completes. The same logic is applied to chunk removal as well, since it keeps reserved system space long after it is done updating the chunk btree. For direct allocation of system chunks, the previous behaviour remains, because otherwise we would deadlock on extent buffers of the chunk btree. Changes to the chunk btree are by large done by chunk allocation and chunk removal, which first reserve chunk system space and then later do changes to the chunk btree. The other remaining cases are uncommon and correspond to adding a device, removing a device and resizing a device. All these other cases do not pre-reserve system space, they modify the chunk btree right away, so they don't hold reserved space for a long period like chunk allocation and chunk removal do. The diff of this change is huge, but more than half of it is just addition of comments describing both how things work regarding chunk allocation and removal, including both the new behavior and the parts of the old behavior that did not change. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.12+ Tested-by: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com> Tested-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-30Merge tag 'for-5.14/block-2021-06-29' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-blockLinus Torvalds1-1/+1
Pull core block updates from Jens Axboe: - disk events cleanup (Christoph) - gendisk and request queue allocation simplifications (Christoph) - bdev_disk_changed cleanups (Christoph) - IO priority improvements (Bart) - Chained bio completion trace fix (Edward) - blk-wbt fixes (Jan) - blk-wbt enable/disable fix (Zhang) - Scheduler dispatch improvements (Jan, Ming) - Shared tagset scheduler improvements (John) - BFQ updates (Paolo, Luca, Pietro) - BFQ lock inversion fix (Jan) - Documentation improvements (Kir) - CLONE_IO block cgroup fix (Tejun) - Remove of ancient and deprecated block dump feature (zhangyi) - Discard merge fix (Ming) - Misc fixes or followup fixes (Colin, Damien, Dan, Long, Max, Thomas, Yang) * tag 'for-5.14/block-2021-06-29' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block: (129 commits) block: fix discard request merge block/mq-deadline: Remove a WARN_ON_ONCE() call blk-mq: update hctx->dispatch_busy in case of real scheduler blk: Fix lock inversion between ioc lock and bfqd lock bfq: Remove merged request already in bfq_requests_merged() block: pass a gendisk to bdev_disk_changed block: move bdev_disk_changed block: add the events* attributes to disk_attrs block: move the disk events code to a separate file block: fix trace completion for chained bio block/partitions/msdos: Fix typo inidicator -> indicator block, bfq: reset waker pointer with shared queues block, bfq: check waker only for queues with no in-flight I/O block, bfq: avoid delayed merge of async queues block, bfq: boost throughput by extending queue-merging times block, bfq: consider also creation time in delayed stable merge block, bfq: fix delayed stable merge check block, bfq: let also stably merged queues enjoy weight raising blk-wbt: make sure throttle is enabled properly blk-wbt: introduce a new disable state to prevent false positive by rwb_enabled() ...
2021-06-22btrfs: ensure relocation never runs while we have send operations runningFilipe Manana1-8/+0
Relocation and send do not play well together because while send is running a block group can be relocated, a transaction committed and the respective disk extents get re-allocated and written to or discarded while send is about to do something with the extents. This was explained in commit 9e967495e0e0ae ("Btrfs: prevent send failures and crashes due to concurrent relocation"), which prevented balance and send from running in parallel but it did not address one remaining case where chunk relocation can happen: shrinking a device (and device deletion which shrinks a device's size to 0 before deleting the device). We also have now one more case where relocation is triggered: on zoned filesystems partially used block groups get relocated by a background thread, introduced in commit 18bb8bbf13c183 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones"). So make sure that instead of preventing balance from running when there are ongoing send operations, we prevent relocation from happening. This uses the infrastructure recently added by a patch that has the subject: "btrfs: add cancellable chunk relocation support". Also it adds a spinlock used exclusively for the exclusivity between send and relocation, as before fs_info->balance_mutex was used, which would make an attempt to run send to block waiting for balance to finish, which can take a lot of time on large filesystems. Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-22btrfs: fix typos in commentsDavid Sterba1-4/+4
Fix typos that have snuck in since the last round. Found by codespell. Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: remove the unused parameter @len for btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe()Qu Wenruo1-3/+3
The parameter @len is not really used in btrfs_bio_fits_in_stripe(), just remove it. It got removed in 420343131970 ("btrfs: let callers of btrfs_get_io_geometry pass the em"), before that btrfs_get_chunk_map utilized it. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
2021-06-21btrfs: remove stale comment for argument seed of btrfs_find_deviceSu Yue1-2/+0
Commit b2598edf8b36 ("btrfs: remove unused argument seed from btrfs_find_device") removed the argument seed from btrfs_find_device but forgot the comment, so remove it. Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-11-22 17:10:18 +0000